Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Monday, January 09, 2023

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)Jan 09 00:45
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 00:47
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Jan 09 01:37
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@auubhxtweg528.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 01:38
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 01:49
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 01:56
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 02:00
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 02:01
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 02:04
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 02:06
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Jan 09 02:22
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 03:17
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 03:19
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 06:15
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 06:23
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJan 09 10:26
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 10:30
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJan 09 11:24
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 11:24
schestowitz <li>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/best-raspberry-pi-projects">Best Raspberry Pi Projects: January 2023</a></h5>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Jan 09 14:26
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.tomshardware.com | Best Raspberry Pi Projects: January 2023 | Tom's HardwareJan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                        <p>We’re kickstarting 2023 with a list of our favorite Raspberry Pi projects. It’s no secret we love this pocket-sized single board computer so let’s dig into some of the most inspirational creations we’ve had the honor of featuring over the last month. There are tons of cool ideas to get you excited including some mind-blowing projects made with vintage hardware that’s old enough to vote!</p>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                        <p>These makers use the best Raspberry Pi accessories, HAT, and in some cases the best 3D printers around to pull off their clever constructions and we admire their ingenuity every step of the way. Whether you have a project in mind or just need something to springboard your next project, this list is sure to get you started off on the right foot.</p>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz                                </li>Jan 09 14:26
schestowitz  <li>Jan 09 14:34
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://www.ubuntubuzz.com/2023/01/how-to-make-calendar-with-libreoffice-calc.html">How To Make Calendar with LibreOffice Calc</a></h5>Jan 09 14:34
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.ubuntubuzz.com | How To Make Calendar with LibreOffice CalcJan 09 14:34
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Jan 09 14:34
schestowitz                                        <p>This tutorial will show you the exercise of making calendars with LibreOffice Calc. It works with multilingual translations automatically so you can easily print ones with English, Indonesian, German, Chinese, Japanese and other languages. Now let's exercise.</p>Jan 09 14:34
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Jan 09 14:34
schestowitz                                </li>Jan 09 14:34
schestowitz <li>Jan 09 14:39
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://palant.info/2023/01/09/touchen-nxkey-the-keylogging-anti-keylogger-solution/">TouchEn nxKey: The keylogging anti-keylogger solution</a></h5>Jan 09 14:39
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-palant.info | TouchEn nxKey: The keylogging anti-keylogger solution | Almost SecureJan 09 14:40
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Jan 09 14:40
schestowitz                                        <p>I wrote about South Korea’s mandatory so-called security applications a week ago. My journey here started with TouchEn nxKey by RaonSecure which got my attention because the corresponding browser extension has more than 10 million users – the highest number Chrome Web Store will display. The real number of users is likely considerably higher, the software being installed on pretty much any computer in Jan 09 14:40
schestowitzSouth Korea.</p>Jan 09 14:40
schestowitz                                        <p>That’s not because people like it so much: they outright hate it, resulting in an average rating of 1,3 out of 5 stars and lots of calls to abolish it. Yet using it is required if you want to do things like online banking in South Korea.</p><p>The banks pushing for the software to be installed claim that it improves security. People call it “malware” and a “keylogger.” I spent some time analyzing Jan 09 14:40
schestowitzthe inner workings of the product and determined the latter to be far closer to the truth. The application indeed contains key logging functionality by design, and it fails to sufficiently restrict access to it. In addition, various bugs range from simple denial of service to facilitating remote code execution. Altogether I reported seven security vulnerabilities in the product.</p>Jan 09 14:40
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Jan 09 14:40
schestowitz                                </li>Jan 09 14:40
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@auubhxtweg528.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 16:54
schestowitz>> Major Hayden explores self-hosting Mastodon, butJan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> social control media is generally misguided. But he previously saidJan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> he'd take the challenge of 100 blog posts in 100 days. It's a trend!Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> I've noticed that trend myself, FWIW.  However, I often find myselfJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> finding the interactive conversations in social media more satisfyingJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> than the one-way blog posts.  I've been writing a lot in the Fediverse.Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> Maybe you'd be interested in picking up stuff from my @lxo@gnusocial.netJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> feed, as you do from the blog?  I often find myself wondering whetherJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> you'd have enjoyed some of my posts, whether you'd have published themJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> had I posted them in the blog rather than in a microblogging medium.Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> I left my job a month ago after I had suffered enough. My wife did theJan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> same, an hour or so apart. If any of you wants to know the reason,Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> it's an explanation in progress atJan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> http://techrights.org/wiki/Sirius_Open_SourceJan 09 17:41
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Sirius Open Source - TechrightsJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> I'm so sorry and worried about you all.  I haven't been able to keep upJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> with the developing history, but it's in my plans to have a look andJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> learn what happened, but from the social media posts, it looked ugly :-(Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz>> PS - LXO, blog a bit more, Free software people love it! ;-)Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> :-DJan 09 17:41
schestowitz> Jan 09 17:41
schestowitz> My stint at the FSF has been a little traumatic WRT blogging, nowadays IJan 09 17:42
schestowitz> find myself very hesitant to post something before clearing severalJan 09 17:42
schestowitz> reviews.  Interactivity in social media, OTOH, feels a lot lessJan 09 17:42
schestowitz> bureaucratic and more transient, besides the higher interactivity that IJan 09 17:42
schestowitz> always found more convenient to discuss complex ideas.Jan 09 17:42
schestowitz> Jan 09 17:42
schestowitz> That said, I've got a number of articles for the blog in the pipeline,Jan 09 17:42
schestowitz> nearly ready to publish, that I hope you will enjoy.Jan 09 17:42
schestowitzhttps://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/23/demonstration-epo-staff-during-meeting-about-re-election-president-campinos/Jan 09 17:49
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | Demonstration EPO staff during meeting about re-election president Campinos - Kluwer Patent BlogJan 09 17:49
schestowitz"Jan 09 17:49
schestowitzWhy bother?Jan 09 17:49
schestowitzJUNE 23, 2022 AT 11:32 AMJan 09 17:49
schestowitzAfter “winner takes all” now top managers takes all, the new mission statement of the EPO. Not really a surprise without any supervision, check and balances as it exist within the EU institutions in Bruxelles.Jan 09 17:49
schestowitzMalfunctionJan 09 17:49
schestowitzJUNE 23, 2022 AT 12:57 PMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzMr Campinos was elected to restore social peace within the EPO. He seems to clearly have failed to do that.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzIn a reasonably functioning public institution, under such circumstances the deciding body would at least have to provide reasons or re-appointing the person who has not succeeded in their mission.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzBut we are talking about the European Patent Organisation. I expect Mr Campinos to be re-elected, and any demonstration, petition and questions from this blog to be given the silent treatment by the AC. The lack of accountability is one of the major issues of this institution.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzConcerned observerJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 23, 2022 AT 4:55 PMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzIf SUEPO has accurately characterised the key provisions of the “Mobility Package” (CA 32/22), then it is hard to interpret that document as anything other than an attempt by the President to provide himself with a significantly expanded range of “inducements” that he can offer to AC delegations in return for their support. In this respect, the timing of the “Mobility Package” (to be decided at the same AC meeting as the potential Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzrenewal of the current President’s contract) looks more than a little suspect.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzGot a shortage of examiners at your national office? No problem, the President can offer you as many fully funded patent examiners as you require!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzFancy a break from the routine of your day job? No problem, the President can offer you a cushy secondment to Munich with few responsibilities but very generous remuneration!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzThis is the kind of benefit (or benefit in kind) that, under normal circumstances, civil servants would be required to declare … and, if they had any role in the regulatory oversight of the benefactor, would almost certainly be obliged to decline. However, we are talking about the EPO here, and so normal rules (even rules governing blatant conflicts of interest) do not apply.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzOf course, the EPO really ought to have nothing to do with funding the operations of the national offices. Indeed, I rather suspect that those paying the official fees that fund the EPO might be rather cross to learn that the EPO is spending a chunk of its income on activities that have nothing to do with its core mission.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzOn the other hand, one could question whether funding secondments to / from national offices falls within the scope of the EPO’s official activities. If not, then this might mean that such activities would not be exempt from national jurisdiction (Art. 3 PPI) or taxes (Art. 4 PPI).Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzKayJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 10:19 AMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe Dutch Hoge Raad basically declared everything regarding the EPO to fall under immunity and impunity, even traffic rule violations, despite the PPI explicitly excluding immunity there,Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzI wonder if other constitutional guards would be willing to decide differently?Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzAttentive ObserverJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 23, 2022 AT 7:20 PMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe tail has been wagging the dog for much too long and the last two tenants of the 10th floor have been very good at this game.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWhen the EPO, like the EU, was enlarged by countries of Eastern Europe, it did not give itself the means to remain governable.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe unanimity rule ruins a proper way of working. A qualified majority should be the rule. This would drastically restrain the wagging by the tail!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe move to Haar was opposed by the big countries. The cooperation budget did marvels at the time and still does.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzNow the BA will move back to town. It shows at best that the move was absolutely unnecessary.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzNow the tenant of the 10th goes one step further and invites national offices to second staff to the EPO. What a perk!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzAnd this all to get a further appointment.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWhat a shame. CA32/22 is like usual full of lovely sounding management buzzwords which are just there to hide reality.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWith his proposal the present tenant of the 10th floor will eventually kill the EPO, but this is secondary to his private interest.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWe should also not forget that the quality is deteriorating steadily. It is possible to produce a lot. This however requires proper training. Training time for examiners has been reduced by a third in order to fit the 5 years contracts.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe young professional scheme is there to extend the probationary period for a further three years. Who will want to come to the EPO if it is not staff from national offices who will keep their ties with the national security and pension systems. Will the gratification they will get be tax free or not? As they are not staff members it will probably not be tax free. Taxation in Germany is anything but a piece of cake!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzThe silence of institutions like epi in view of the degradation of service, and the constant degradation of staff regulations, which has already occurred and which will continue, is quite deafening, exactly as for the move of the BA to Haar!Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWhen will those people realise that they are sawing the branch on which they are sitting?Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzWhat perspective is offered to the new entrants in the profession of representative?Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzlaw snifferJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 23, 2022 AT 9:43 PMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzsorry but from the outside it resembles a war between privileged people, the EPO staff against external professionals going to the EPO and usurping their privileges, this is the impression the whole debate on the secondment programs is giving. I would like to be one of you and have this kind of work issues, or to get 7% wage increase (in Germany managers will get at most 3% increase end of 2022)Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzBitter WorkerJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 8:51 AMJan 09 17:50
schestowitzAgree. They’re debating First World problems. It seems that this is the worst situation they are in, yet they still have more priviledges/rights/salary increases than any job in any of the EPC Contracting States.Jan 09 17:50
schestowitzKayJan 09 17:50
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 10:24 AMJan 09 17:51
schestowitzinteresting numbers.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzMy management gave me different ones….Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzCan I get the numbers you propose? They sound much, much, very much better than what management will give us…Jan 09 17:51
schestowitz(besides the cuts on school reimbursements being done at the same time)Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzSad to read thisJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 12:41 PMJan 09 17:51
schestowitzThe point of principle every one could perhaps agree on is not to destroy the working conditions of producing staff to attribute happy few top managers selected under unclear rules questionnable bonusses and functional allowances.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzAlso seeing deteriorating the conditions of some with the non-argument that others have less somewhere else is no argument. do not hesitate to send application if you think that the EPO is the best employer in EUJan 09 17:51
schestowitzFinally if the issue does not interest you, you remain free to shift to another post on Kluwer Blog to not inflict you to read on subject that are not of your taste.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzBitter WorkerJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 5:17 PMJan 09 17:51
schestowitz“do not hesitate to send application if you think that the EPO is the best employer in EU”.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzwell, instead of making lot of noise trying to regain elitarist priviledges, EPO employees can send applications to other firms/organizations if they do not deem their working conditions good enough.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitztruth is, they won’t do it because they won’t find anything as good as the EPO from a standpoint of salary, of privileges/rights, and of workloadJan 09 17:51
schestowitzTroll snifferJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 8:35 AMJan 09 17:51
schestowitz– EPO employees do NOT get a 7% but 0,5%.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitz– These persons are NOT “external professionals”, but “experts” arbitrarily chosen by each national state and generously paid by the EPO.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzPlease stop with this “privileges” BS. Why don’t you apply at the EPO? Not going to be easy, in view of your difficulties to understand a short written text.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzAttentive ObserverJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 12:28 PMJan 09 17:51
schestowitz@ Law sniffer and Bitter Worker,Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzYou seem to ignore or do not want to realise that the EPO is not any longer the employer it used to be. It has great difficulties in recruiting people and the general salary level and other benefits has gone down drastically in recent years. The pension is not any longer guaranteed but depends on the development of financial markets.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzA good scientist or engineer, with a good mastering of foreign languages can find an attractive job in many more places than at the EPO. The “managers” at the EPO seem to ignore those basis facts.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzIn view of the difficulties in recruiting, the language requirements when hiring at the EPO will be lowered according to CA32/22.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzAs the work will nevertheless have to be done, the brilliant idea of CA32/22 is to second staff members of national offices, who will remain employees of their national office and just receive an extra payment from the office. They bring with them their national health and pension system. I wish those people good luck for getting medical treatment in Munich or The Hague. Those people are in principle not allowed to participate in any body mentioned Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzunder Art 15, but who will check?Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzThe 5 years contracts have now permeated into all levels at the office. Originally 5 years contracts were only foreseen for the BA, for whatever reason. With the reform of 2016, members of the BA have to show a given “performance” in order to be re-appointed. Re-appointment has never been a problem in the past. For a judicial body, the minimum would be that the performance criteria are public. This is not the case. Do you think it is a Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzcoincidence that about 1/3 of the members of the BA are German?Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzThen the 5 years contracts were applied at Principal Director level under the pretext that they already exist for the members of the BA (sic). Later they were applied at Director level. Now they have reached examiner level. What a perfect tool to keep people in tow. One comment disliked by the hierarchy and you will not be reappointed for a further 5 years period. Have you thought of all this?Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzWould you both be ready to leave your country of origin, sever all the ties with your national health and pension system to come to Munich or The Hague on the basis of a 5 years contract and only having the perspective of a life contract after a second period of 5 years that is 10 years in total?Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzThe problems is often compounded when there is a wife or a partner. They have no guarantee to find a job in Munich or The Hague. With kids it is even worse. They will have to get into the German, Dutch or the European school system which are all quite different from national systems in the country of origin. And if you are not successful at the EPO you will go back to your country of origin without any health insurance to start with.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzIf you are not prepared to accept those conditions and only lurk at pretended advantages/privileges without realising that there is a high price to pay for you and your family, you better keep quite!Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzYour both comments is the kind of comments which will find full support by the “managers” of the EPO and will encourage them to persevere in their doings.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzLast but not least, what staff at the EPO is doing is not defending advantages/privileges, but defending an international convention which does not deserve to be ill-treated as it is just for the benefit of a person who thinks it can do whatever it wants.Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzConcerned observerJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 3:14 PMJan 09 17:51
schestowitzAttentive, I think that you need to realise that the comments to which you have responded likely fall under the category of “coordinated inauthentic behaviour”. Interesting to see quite how much time and effort (and money?) the EPO is prepared to dedicate to efforts to undermine the public’s perception of SUEPO (and the staff that it represents).Jan 09 17:51
schestowitzAttentive ObserverJan 09 17:51
schestowitzJUNE 26, 2022 AT 11:32 AMJan 09 17:52
schestowitzDear Concerned observer,Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzI have realised “that the comments to which [I] have responded likely fall under the category of “coordinated inauthentic behaviour””.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzI found those two comments particularly obnoxious and they could not remain without any reply.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzSuch type of comments come up very regularly, and even in older times they were not justified.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzA former influent member of SUEPO, who later changed sides and even became Principal Director after taking a management degree, once said: “there are two football clubs in Munich, Bayern and 1860. They play in a different league and the difference in wages are justified”.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzThose times have gone as the wages at the EPO are not any longer what they used to be, but the comparison remains valid.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzIt is clear the EPO’s management wants to belittle as much as possible “the public’s perception of SUEPO (and the staff that it represents)”.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzIt is however also clear that SUEPO’s positions during the Corsican area was more that of wanting to go through the wall than trying to get a minimum for the staff. With the staff regulations and the way the joint bodies work at the EPO, this was not really inducing any positive result for staff. It only comforted EPO’s management in its negative attitude towards staff. This is actually continuing today.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzIt did however not justify at all the retaliatory measures taken by the then tenant of the 10th floor against some SUEPO members. Only the ILO-AT in Geneva brought the situation back to normal after a manifest excess of power.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzIt is worth noting that a lot of people very active in SUEPO in the early days ended up at Director or even Principal Director level. With one exception, they were certainly not “bought” by management but showed that they could work in the interest of all. But at the time, EPO’s management was not drunk on power.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzAnother “union” was even created in The Hague and was well received by EPO’s management. I remember seeing a picture of the then head of the EPO, his HR (?) manager and the members of the bureau of this “union” with wide grins. This “union” never made it to the joint bodies and to Munich and I think that by now it faltered in oblivion.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzThe only body which is still active and cannot be muzzled is the staff committee and especially the central staff committee. There are no discussions in this instance as the representatives of the administration mow down any comments from the side of staff representatives. As it has only a consultative role, the administration can actually do what it wants.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzlaw snifferJan 09 17:52
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 4:18 PMJan 09 17:52
schestowitzI will for sure send an application in some time, but I will first enjoy my current (low-paid) research project on patent economics, what wonders me is rather the opposite: how does it come that so unhappy and enraged employees are still remaining at the EPO, if you are quite young complaining for other 20 years will be not so good for your health, and if you are not so far from retiring, wouldn’t it be better to anticipate by some years? I am Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzquite sure that it should be possible in such structuresJan 09 17:52
schestowitzgasteigJan 09 17:52
schestowitzJUNE 24, 2022 AT 11:58 PMJan 09 17:52
schestowitzjust wonder why then you dont leave the EPO if so bad, it must be terrible to stay in such a hell on earth, and I usually dont trust pretended idealism and holy vocation for law and convention (I guess you mean the EPC) knowing that patents represent only a very minor leverage for our society and economy, besides the positive effect of encouraging research and progress. I consider the ones in charge of scrutinizing patents when standing as Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzuntouchable judges above any kind of financial or political consideration, as just trying to protect their privileged working condition and usurped independence and disconnection from the real world (for example I read here of a campaign to invalidate patents if the description is not fully complying with certain strict criteria: but this means additional hurdles and costs for companies which are then necessarily charged on the price to the end Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzconsumer, and this only in Europe: who can arrogantly take such a decision at the expense of each of us only for making at the end his own life easier at work??)Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzExperienced ExaminerJan 09 17:52
schestowitzJUNE 25, 2022 AT 12:38 PMJan 09 17:52
schestowitzThe situation at the EPO was bad and is worsening.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzThe money discussion overlooks a huge number of facts:Jan 09 17:52
schestowitz– the salaries paid in any international organisation have to be competitive with the highest salary of a member state. Otherwise, persons from this state will not apply. Local salaries will normally be lower.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitz– the salaries paid have to provide the same standard of living regardless of the location. This goes back to the League of Nations, the predecessor of the United Nations. Some countries have higher expenses than others. This is where inflation kicks in. The point is not whether EPO employees have their salaries adjusted in line with inflation. The point is why inflation is ignored for national civil servants and also for subsidies paid (e.g. Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzHartz IV in Germany) or when determining how much tax you have to pay.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzLaw Sniffer & Bitter Worker: You have your real income nibbled away by inflation, and you seem to believe this is ok and should be done everywhere.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitz– The EPO has a huge surplus, see the blog. And if there still were a shortage, one may reasonably ask why the EPO share of post-grant renewal fees is only at 50%. Article 39 EPC allows to go up to 75%. The EPO share was at 60% until 1984. But the national offices want to keep this free money, and their heads are sitting in the Administrative Council.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitz– employees of an international organisation give up their rights. There is no fast track route involving an independent decision making body. The only such body is ILO-AT in Geneva, you get a decision roughly 6 to 8 years after the dispute has started. Justice delayed for this amount of time is justice denied.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzLaw Sniffer & Bitter Worker: You think it is ok to get sacked while holding a position as elected staff representative, and then you have to wait for about 5 (FIVE) years for a decision from an independent court?Jan 09 17:52
schestowitz– It seems to have been completely forgotten that EPO employees for about 8 (EIGHT) years were allowed to strike only after approval of the EPO President. It also seems to have been forgotten that the same President interfered with a decision from the Enlarged Board of Appeal, see G2301/16, headnote “threat of disciplinary measures against the members of the Enlarged Board”.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzWhatever a President of the EPO does, the signals are clear: it will not have consequences. We see this not only in the past, but also in ongoing developments: forcing applicants and parties to opposition proceedings into video conferences – the emphasis is on “forcing”: whoever wants life oral proceedings should simply get them, for all others, video is fine.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzMy higher layers – as far as I can judge – live in blissed ignorance on what a patent application is, what a “search” is and how a search can and should be done (that depends on the case). The recent developments focus on machine based searches providing many documents, you have to apply some filters to reduce the number, you browse them and then you stop. This is a paradigm shift from a “finder” – someone who knows the area of Jan 09 17:52
schestowitztechnology and keeps hunting until something is found – to a “searcher” – someone who follows a predefined approach and stops regardless of the result.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzTypcially, a “searcher” does not have in-depth experience in the area of technology and lacks the needed gut feeling. It takes about a decade to build this gut feeling. Frequent changes of the area of technology are not supportive. I recall a management meeting where the work of a substantive examiner was compared to the work of a post office: weighing letters, selling stamps, and so on. This comparison left me flabbergasted and insulted.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzMy Vice President is not technically skilled (DG1 – Steve Rowan, legally skilled, a bachelor, if I remember correctly). The person in charge of search and examination lacks the qualification necessary to understand an application. We are getting more and more instructions on procedure, probably because that is what Steve feels comfortable with. I personally disagree with this approach. Procedure is important, yes, but applicants do not file to Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzhave a good procedure. They file to have a good search and then a thorough examination. Procedural violations are very rare.Jan 09 17:52
schestowitzLast, if want to learn where a major problem is, please move to the EPO intranet site, “about us”-> “our leadership and management” -> “the management advisory committee”. There are way too many chiefs who do not have any purpose enshrined in Articles 10, 11 or 15 EPC. Thorsten touched on this topic in an earlier blog.Jan 09 17:53
schestowitzI am a member of an examining division, enshrined in Article 15 and 18 EPC. I do not need any of those chiefs to carry out my tasks. I believe we could with a quarter of those chiefs without even noting that the others have gone.Jan 09 17:53
schestowitzSmurfyJan 09 17:53
schestowitzJUNE 26, 2022 AT 8:18 AMJan 09 17:53
schestowitzThe naivety of the decision makers is highly worrying. In time e.g. Chinese applicants flood the patent office with applications, all is done to lower the examination standards in order safe money, increase the renewal fees and maximize the income. That this policy may lead to low quality patents the European industry will have to deal with later on is simply not understood. Should a patent office really maximize its income at all costs? If yes, Jan 09 17:53
schestowitzcosts could also be saved by reducing the ever growing number of managers, communicators etc.Jan 09 17:53
schestowitz"Jan 09 17:53
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jan 09 18:02
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesJan 09 18:03
schestowitz"Jan 09 18:59
schestowitzThe Container Tabs feature in Firefox lets you “keep parts of your online experience separated into color-coded tabs that help to preserve your privacy,” says Jack Wallen. Jan 09 18:59
schestowitz“With this feature you can ensure that cookies from, say, Facebook cannot interact with cookies from, say, Amazon, and it also allows you to log in to multiple accounts of the same service in the same browser.”Jan 09 18:59
schestowitz"Jan 09 18:59
schestowitzhttps://www.fosslife.org/improve-online-privacy-firefox-container-tabsJan 09 18:59
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fosslife.org | Improve Online Privacy with Firefox Container TabsJan 09 18:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.