(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 07:08 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 07:10 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2mpyssw | Aug 15 07:21 |
|---|---|---|
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2mpyssw ) | Aug 15 07:21 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | India’s programming default for ELSE leg is ‘Shut Down’ | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 4 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @bp+1k2mpyssw | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +1 | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Who is still buying IBM in 2025?? | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 7 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @b6+1k2mpyssw | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +2 | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Most likely caused by laying off too many people. | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 9 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @ay+1k2mpyssw | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 0 | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Sanchit Vir Gogia, CEO and chief analyst at Greyhound Research. | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Based in India. | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 9 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | no reactions | Reply | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @ax+1k2mpyssw | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +4 | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Alvind is trying desperately to sink the IBM Titanic with his "IBM India Friends And Family" recruits, so he can take off with his looted bonus. | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Not only are they incompetent, but the Indians are downright hopeless, running around like chickens without their heads. My dog is more proactive than Alvind's Pipmunks will ever be. Clouds are those fluffy white things you see in the bright blue summer sky, aren't they ? | Aug 15 07:21 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Aug 15 07:21 |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 07:46 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | gemini://gemini.techrights.org/archive/EPC-1973-volume-1065-i-16208-english.gmi | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | I've not made a second pass through EPC, that is for someone else | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | but the part pertaining to the treaty seems to be done. | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Look at the PDF and compare. If you think the rest should be done, | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | then I can do it. But for now I think what is there is enough. | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | The next part looks like administrivia. | Aug 15 07:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Also, as mentioned, the official document was updatedd at least once" | Aug 15 07:48 |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 07:59 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 12:08 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 12:13 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 13:21 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 13:46 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 13:52 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 13:54 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Aug 15 15:10 | |
| *Disconnected (Connection timed out). | Aug 15 15:55 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Aug 15 15:56 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 16:04 | |
| *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Aug 15 16:08 | |
| *psydroid3 (~psydroid@36imbvshpgubk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 17:24 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2n6mfy7 | Aug 15 18:40 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2n6mfy7 ) | Aug 15 18:40 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | You could take transcripts of all the Earnings Calls, feed them into Watson, and have an AskCEO and AskCFO bot and save tens of millions a year by RAing these guys. | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @df+1k2n6mfy7 | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +2 | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | With all these Ask tools someone should Ask Alvind why he’s a pompous j-rk | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Or Krabanaugh with his obsession with Upskilling | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Or Slob Thomas . Why does a middle aged man dress like he’s in some startup | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2 hours ago by Anonymous | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @dc+1k2n6mfy7 | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +4 | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | You would have better luck going to the Oracle In Delphi and getting a straight answer (LOL) than from WatsonAI. Nothing but a load of bulls droppings from India if anything...the dimwits go back and forth with the same garbage that you get with the IBM India Helpdesk support till your patience wears thin, your eyes sc--w up, you get a terrible migrane and you stop responding in sheer frustration. That's what Alvind and Gin(ni) and | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Tonic have made of IBM AI. | Aug 15 18:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Aug 15 18:40 |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Aug 15 19:11 | |
| *psydroid3 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Aug 15 21:03 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li><h5><a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/08/divergence-between-upc-and-epo-on-claim.html?showComment=1755104932843#c3220685511660672641">Had D1 (US2010233441A1) disclosed "white&quot...</a></h5><blockquote>Had D1 (US2010233441A1) disclosed "white" instead of "yellow" (cf. D1 @ [0099]) would the applicant then shifted instead to a "chromatic" colour? Is a "technical" problem | Aug 15 23:08 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | solved? Or is the background colour chosen for esthaetic considerations?<br /><br />If the base coat colour was in fact critical to the definition of the invention, why wasn't it</blockquote></li> | Aug 15 23:08 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li><h5><a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/08/divergence-between-upc-and-epo-on-claim.html?showComment=1755104905621#c6407366275325931628">Whatever possessed Agfa to go out and assert this ...</a></h5><blockquote>Whatever possessed Agfa to go out and assert this heap?<br /><br />To recap, the decision revolves around this passage of the disclosure to clarify the meaning of the claims, and set out their "metes and bound | Aug 15 23:08 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | s", like the Muricans say:<br /><br /><i>[0021] A chromatic colour is any colour in which one particular wavelength or hue predominates. For example, blue and green are chromatic</blockquote></li> | Aug 15 23:08 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat | Aug 15 23:08 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat | Aug 15 23:08 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li><h5><a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/07/guestpost-has-g124-made-referral-of.html?showComment=1755155795207#c3856883657899257665">@ Proof of the pudding, | Aug 15 23:12 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | There is nothing pugilist...</a></h5><blockquote>@ Proof of the pudding,<br /><br />There is nothing pugilistic in the style of my reply. The mere fact that I can return the compliment by return of post actually shows the inanity of your argumentation, and the fact that it fails to convince.<br /><br />I would be prepared to acknowledge that we strongly disagree on many points, and leave at this. The problem is that you systematica | Aug 15 23:12 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | lly come back</blockquote></li> | Aug 15 23:12 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | [GuestPost] Has G1/24 made the referral of the question of amendment of the description from T697/22 inevitable? - The IPKat | Aug 15 23:12 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li><h5><a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/08/divergence-between-upc-and-epo-on-claim.html?showComment=1755097347625#c4606153440106719332">Agfa v Gucci should be taken with caution, as the ...</a></h5><blockquote>Agfa v Gucci should be taken with caution, as the problem appears to stem primarily from inconsistent statements within the description itself. And I agree with previous comments that it is not a case of a patent m | Aug 15 23:53 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | onopoly being its own dictionary. The description does not contain authoritative definitions comparable with the set of definitional statements of EP3076804 which gave rise to referring decision</blockquote></li> | Aug 15 23:53 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat | Aug 15 23:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.