(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
schestowitz | Jack from E.ON Next wrote on 11/04/2022 17:38: | Apr 19 00:01 |
---|---|---|
schestowitz | > Hello, | Apr 19 00:01 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:01 |
schestowitz | > I would like to sincerely apologise for the time your query has been | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > left unanswered. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > This is not to my own or E-on Next's expectations and for this we | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > apologise and take this an opportunity to do better. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > Energy companies are only legally obligated to take meter readings once | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > in a two year period, which means the onus falls upon the bill payer to | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > provide these readings, should they wish to not be billed to an estimation. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > You are not obliged to give these readings however, your energy account | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > will be estimated and things such as EAC/AQ (yearly estimations), tariff | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > quotes, payment adequacy and much more will not be as accurate as your | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > energy provider and yourself would like. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > May I ask if your query has been resolved? | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > If not please can you confirm your account number (A-), property | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > address, name on the account and more information in related to your | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > query, and I will be happy to assist you further. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > Alternatively you can contact E-on Next via phone on 0808 501 5200 | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | > (Monday-Friday 09:00-16:00). | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | Dear Jack Platten, | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | You need to send people to take meter readings a lot more often. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | It seems like you have exploited the lockdowns to never restore proper service, only increase your prices by like 30-40% (while making services worse, probably to cut your own costs at our expense). | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | If this carries on, Jack, you too might be on the company's "chopping block". | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | So please relay my concerns upwards to your bosses. If I pay EXTRA* to secure the job of people who take meter readings, they should be dispatched regularly. Now a couple of times a year. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | Do not send me emails nags trying to get me to do their job instead. I already pay extra for that not to happen**. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | Regards, | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | Roy | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | ___ | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | * The lower tariffs are only available if the job your company used to do (or NPower before the takeover) is outsourced to me. | Apr 19 00:02 |
schestowitz | ** Companies come and go. Companies that mistreat their clients go away faster. | Apr 19 00:02 |
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Apr 19 01:45 | |
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 02:19 | |
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 02:54 | |
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Apr 19 04:01 | |
schestowitz | <li> | Apr 19 05:25 |
schestowitz | <h5><a href="https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=4312">LMDE Upgrade Tool in BETA</a></h5> | Apr 19 05:25 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.linuxmint.com | LMDE Upgrade Tool in BETA – The Linux Mint Blog | Apr 19 05:25 | |
schestowitz | <blockquote> | Apr 19 05:25 |
schestowitz | <p>The BETA of the new Upgrade Tool is now available for testing.</p> | Apr 19 05:25 |
schestowitz | <p>It can be used to upgrade LMDE 4 to LMDE 5.</p> | Apr 19 05:25 |
schestowitz | </blockquote> | Apr 19 05:25 |
schestowitz | </li> | Apr 19 05:25 |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 08:08 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Apr 19 12:11 | |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 12:12 | |
*GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed) | Apr 19 12:34 | |
*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@cbwgpji3y5p7s.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 12:35 | |
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 15:04 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Apr 19 16:59 | |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 17:01 | |
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Apr 19 19:35 | |
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 19:36 | |
*acer-box has quit (Connection closed) | Apr 19 20:27 | |
*schestowitz-TR has quit (connection closed) | Apr 19 20:27 | |
*schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 20:28 | |
*schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Apr 19 20:28 | |
*u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed) | Apr 19 21:44 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Apr 19 22:48 | |
schestowitz | > Hi Roy, | Apr 19 23:46 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:46 |
schestowitz | > I hope you are well, | Apr 19 23:46 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:46 |
schestowitz | > *Energy companies are only legally obligated to take meter readings once | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > in a two year period*, which means the onus falls upon the bill payer to | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > provide these readings, should they wish to not be billed to an estimation. | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > You are not obliged to give these readings however, your energy account | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > will be *estimated and things such as EAC/AQ (yearly estimations), | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > tariff quotes, payment adequacy and much more will not be as accurate as | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > your energy provider and yourself would like.* | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > If you are on the priority service register, these data collection | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > readings can be taken more frequently, however without confirmation of | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > your account details, I would be unable to look into this further. | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > E-on Next offer a very good service package for customers, with | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > renewable energy at the forefront of our operations, market leading | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > customer service (14,000+ 5* trust pilots) and extremely competitive | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > tariff agreements in the current energy market, and for these reasons | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > and so much more, do not charge exit fees at this time. | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | Hi, | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | Your response fails to actually address the points I made in my previous message -- maybe it intentionally bypasses them. | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | Could you please consider responding to my message not like a lawyer but as a person? | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | Thanks in advance. | Apr 19 23:47 |
schestowitz | > Debian is not using SLAPP | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > They are using distraction instead: the non-free firmware "debate" to | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > get people away from the emails and blogs about intelligence agencies | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > Notice the lkcl email completely snips my own comments on the topic | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:52 |
schestowitz | > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/04/msg00125.html | Apr 19 23:52 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-lists.debian.org | Re: Concerns about Security of packages in Debain OS and the Operating system itself. | Apr 19 23:53 | |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | > only one mail was allowed on debian-project: | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2022/04/threads.html | Apr 19 23:53 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-lists.debian.org | debian-project Apr 2022 by thread | Apr 19 23:53 | |
schestowitz | > | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | > The Mossad blog appeared at 01:00 and the non-free firmware emails | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | > started at 02:27 | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | If that was 8 hours apart, considering the length of the post from Steve, this would be believable. Otherwise I call it a coincidence. | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | By the way, conflating the military with "Mossad" isn't helping, as Mossad is notorious even domestically. A better headline would speak of the military (like the body) rather than Mossad. It would pass "clickbait" smell test. | Apr 19 23:53 |
schestowitz | I wrote about Debian 30 mins ago: http://techrights.org/2022/04/19/proprietary-firmware-debian/ | Apr 19 23:53 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Debian GNU/Linux Means Free as in Freedom, But the Firmware Question Remains Relevant | Techrights | Apr 19 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py
2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.