Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Tuesday, April 23, 2024

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving)Apr 23 01:15
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 01:18
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 01:19
*jacobk (~quassel@b6cmzuyau3uv2.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 02:33
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 02:37
*SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 03:34
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesApr 23 03:47
*jacobk (~quassel@skdysgiaygtcc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 03:47
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 03:53
schestowitz[TR2]> Be sure to always include the police report numbers.Apr 23 04:54
schestowitz[TR2]> As mentioned, the case numbers should be forwarded to the ISP in these messages so that your reply has more weight than just his word against you two.Apr 23 04:54
schestowitz[TR2]+Apr 23 04:54
schestowitz[TR2]Translating latest Stjerna FOIA leaksApr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> Hi,Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]>Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> Would you have time to translate the latest Stjerna leaks?Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]>Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> There is nice infos on what arguments were in his complaint from 2017,Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> notably the parallelism with the Benelux Court of Justice forApr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> trademarks.Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]>Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> I started to do OCR with Tesseract, and some translations with GoogleApr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> Lens, do you know any floss tool that could translate from German toApr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> English?Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]>Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> Best,Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]Good that this leaked out.Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]It cannot be done properly by a machine, needs a person fluent in both German and English and knows some legal/patent stuff. Does FFII not have several?Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> There was Harmut, but he is not active anymore.Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]>Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]> I could try to ping him though...Apr 23 04:55
schestowitz[TR2]He is the one I was going to name and suggest.Apr 23 04:55
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 05:49
*jacobk (~quassel@skdysgiaygtcc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 06:30
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 06:52
*jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 10:19
schestowitz[TR2]"Art from a long-dead civilization springs back to life with augmented reality"Apr 23 10:38
schestowitz[TR2]x https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2024/04/art-from-a-long-dead-civilization-springs-back-to-life/Apr 23 10:38
schestowitz[TR2]# tied to snapchatApr 23 10:38
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-news.harvard.edu | Art from a long-dead civilization springs back to life with augmented reality— Harvard GazetteApr 23 10:38
*schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term)Apr 23 14:08
*acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term)Apr 23 14:08
*acer-box__ (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytesApr 23 14:08
*schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@v2x87byxv2p3s.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 14:08
*parsifal (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 15:01
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 15:48
*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:00
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:18
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:27
*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:29
*parsifal_ (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:33
*psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:33
*von (~von@cpjmm6rhe929q.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:33
*XFaCE has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:34
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:34
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:34
*parsifal has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:34
*Moocher5254 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 16:34
*Moocher5254 (~quassel@6i8ckjmvfhgyw.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:34
*Disconnected (Connection reset by peer).Apr 23 16:38
*Now talking on #techbytesApr 23 16:39
*Topic for #techbytes is: Welcome to the official channel of the TechBytes AudiocastApr 23 16:39
*Topic for #techbytes set by schestowitz!~roy@haii6za73zabc.irc at Tue Jun 1 20:21:34 2021Apr 23 16:39
*tokwe_ (~tokwe@v2x87byxv2p3s.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:39
*Techrights-sec (~quassel@v2x87byxv2p3s.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:39
*Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@v2x87byxv2p3s.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:39
*pi (~quassel@v2x87byxv2p3s.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 16:39
*pi is now known as techrights-sec3Apr 23 16:41
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 17:17
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 17:17
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 17:18
*jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 17:32
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 18:54
*Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)Apr 23 19:37
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 19:37
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 19:40
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 19:43
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)Apr 23 20:00
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:05
*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 22:07
*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:07
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 22:15
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:16
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 22:37
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:38
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 22:50
schestowitz[TR2]http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/04/upckat-court-of-appeal-gives-guidance.html?showComment=1713696711180#c5371956452825471142Apr 23 23:40
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | [UPCKat] Court of Appeal gives guidance on change of language request - The IPKatApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2]"As far as languages before the UPC are concerned, there is more than a change of language to that in which the patent monopoly has been granted which is to be considered.  <br /><br />Even if the language of the proceedings before the EPO is adopted, the question of simultaneous interpretation during the hearing=OP remains.  <br /><br />According to R 14 UPC, even if the parties themselves have chosen to use an additional languageApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2] of the EPO as the language of proceedings, the judge-rapporteur may order in the interest of the panel to provide that judges may use in the oral hearings the official national language(s) of the country where it is situated. In case the official language is used over the chosen language, each order and decision shall be accompanied with a certified translation for enforcement.<br /><br />Simultaneous interpretation can be requestApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2]ed and the judge-rapporteur will decide on the request or even order simultaneous interpretation for the oral hearing, see R 109 UPC.<br /><br />Costs for simultaneous interpretation are costs of the proceedings, and hence the losing party will have to bear the costs, up to the ceilings in place, cf. R 155-157 UPC. <br /><br />It was noted in the blog that “If a party suspects that some of the judges on the panel will not understApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2]and the nuances of the case, they are free to file translations of their submissions and organise simultaneous translation at the hearing”. In view of R 109 UPC, it might be doubted that a party might simply turn up at the hearing with its own interpreters. The judge rapporteur might query the qualification of those interpreters.  In any case, providing translations of submissions implies extra costs, and those costs will have toApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2] be borne by the losing party. <br /><br />Contrary to opposition proceedings before the EPO, where the EPO bears, in general, the costs for simultaneous interpretation in the two other official  languages, this is not the case at the UPC.  <br /><br />It was heralded by staunch supporters of the UPCA that the language problem would be solved with the upcoming of the UPC. The present decision and preceding ones on change of languagApr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2]e show clearly that this is not the case. When looking at the language regulations for hearings before the UPC, the situation can end up in a nightmare and lots of costs for the losing party. <br /><br />It is thus very nice that the CoA of the UPC has decided on the possibility of changing the language of proceedings, but that this can induce a large amount of costs has never been made clear when the UPCA was ratified. <br /><br /Apr 23 23:40
schestowitz[TR2]>"Apr 23 23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.