Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Tuesday, October 31, 2023

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

schestowitzhttp://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/10/adding-matter-by-cherry-picking-from.html?showComment=1698674471612#c2096933957581403308Oct 31 00:07
schestowitz"As Rose has mentioned the USA, I should welcome a BTL discussion here about the differences and similarities between the EPO and the USPTO on our &quot;added matter&quot; versus US lack of written desciption (WD).  <br /><br />Historically, the US has been liberal on the WD issue but seems now to be tightening up (although not yet as far as the EPO &quot;Gold Standard&quot; of &quot;clear and unambiguously derivable&quot; (let's call iOct 31 00:07
schestowitzt cud). Me, I think it inevitable for all FtF jurisdictions assymptotically to approach the EPO's cud standard, if only because the courts are ever-increasingly called upon to do justice between rival Applicants fighting high value priority contests. The monumentally costly priority contest in CRISPR-cas9 technology might be a case in point. <br /><br />It is my feeling, that not just the courts in England but also patent monopoly practOct 31 00:07
schestowitzitioners in the USA are increasingly accustoming themselves to, and ruefully accepting, a strict cud standard imposed on all their post-filing prosecution amendments, but that it takes at least one full patent monopoly term for such sea-changes to become part of the consciousness of patent monopoly litigators."Oct 31 00:07
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Adding matter by cherry-picking from separate embodiments: Philip Morris v BAT ([2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat)) - The IPKatOct 31 00:07
*intense has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)Oct 31 00:27
*Ascension has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)Oct 31 00:28
*Ascension (~Ascension@176.254.244.83) has joined #techbytesOct 31 00:33
*intense (~intense@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytesOct 31 00:42
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 31 01:39
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@xrrqsey9gh7ve.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 01:44
*jacobk (~quassel@838aynky6btpe.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 02:26
schestowitzRe: Thank you for your support :)Oct 31 02:59
schestowitz> Hi,Oct 31 02:59
schestowitz> Oct 31 02:59
schestowitz> As always, thank you for your support!Oct 31 02:59
schestowitzAlways OUR pleasure. Keep at it!Oct 31 02:59
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 03:46
*jacobk (~quassel@6d3uucy6pzkuq.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 04:01
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 04:19
*jacobk (~quassel@rwyqeimrks6ci.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 04:47
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 05:01
*jacobk (~quassel@rwyqeimrks6ci.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 05:05
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 05:08
*jacobk (~quassel@rwyqeimrks6ci.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 05:09
schestowitz                                <li>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2023-10-27-potw-qprint.html">Read quoted-printable emails with qprint</a></h5>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                        <p> You may already have encountered emails in raw text that contained weird characters sequences like =E3 or =09, especially if you work with patch files embedded as text in emails. </p>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                        <p> There is nothing wrong with the text itself, or the sender email client. In fact, this shows the email client is doing the right thing by applying the RFC 1521. Non-ASCII character should be escaped in some way in emails. </p>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Oct 31 05:43
schestowitz                                </li>Oct 31 05:43
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-dataswamp.org | Solene'% : Read quoted-printable emails with qprintOct 31 05:43
schestowitz <li>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-main-differences-between-openbsd-freebsd-netbsd-and-dragonflybsd.html">The main differences between OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and DragonFly BSD</a></h5>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                        <p>Even though all the four BSDs share a common ancestry with the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD), and even though all the BSDs can serve as a multi-purpose operating system, they are independent projects and they are very different. </p>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                        <p> None of the BSDs are distributions, they are all complete operating systems. </p>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Oct 31 05:45
schestowitz                                </li>Oct 31 05:45
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-unixsheikh.com | The main differences between OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and DragonFly BSDOct 31 05:45
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 05:48
schestowitz <li>Oct 31 06:09
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://rubenerd.com/i-miss-4-by-3-and-16-by-10/">I miss 4:3 and 16:10</a></h5>Oct 31 06:09
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Oct 31 06:09
schestowitz                                        <p>16:10 was amazing. You could have two full sized A4 documents in view at a comfortable size, and the added vertical space meant your eyes spent less time darting from side-to-side. 4:3 was great for writing code and prose without distractions. 16:9, sadly, is neither.</p>Oct 31 06:09
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Oct 31 06:09
schestowitz                                </li>Oct 31 06:09
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Rubenerd: I miss 4:3 and 16:10Oct 31 06:09
*jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 06:31
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 10:10
*MinceR gives voice to u-amarsh04 jacobk psydroid2Oct 31 11:47
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 31 13:11
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@xrrqsey9gh7ve.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 13:12
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 31 13:58
*Despatche (~desp@dycvpzw6dvcrw.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 14:02
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@xrrqsey9gh7ve.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 14:02
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 15:17
*jacobk (~quassel@6wygwq2t5e2hw.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 15:43
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 16:06
*MinceR gives voice to Despatche u-amarsh04Oct 31 16:42
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 18:05
*MinceR gives voice to jacobkOct 31 18:24
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 19:00
*jacobk (~quassel@6wygwq2t5e2hw.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 20:05
*MinceR gives voice to jacobkOct 31 20:17
*intense has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)Oct 31 20:20
*intense (~intense@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytesOct 31 20:24
*Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)Oct 31 20:46
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 20:55
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 21:03
*MinceR gives voice to jacobkOct 31 21:09
schestowitzhttp://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/10/upc-and-language-transition-towards.html?showComment=1698701697298#c2136340666338126753Oct 31 21:54
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | UPC and language: a transition towards English? - The IPKatOct 31 21:54
schestowitz"It is politically unthinkable that ...</a></h5><blockquote>@Patent Robot<br /><br />It is politically unthinkable that English will ever become the only official language of the EPO or the UPC. As the UK has left (?) the UPCA (has no exit clause), it is more than wis/hful thinking to have English as sole official language of the UPC. <br />You also seem to forget that a patent monopoly with unitary effect is a patent monopoly granted bOct 31 21:54
schestowitzy the EPO in one of its three official languages. <br />There are numerous Rules of Procedure of the UPC in which the language of proceedings before the UPC can be the language in which the patent monopoly has been granted. <br />In any action before the “central” division, the language of proceedings will be the language in which the patent monopoly has been granted.  <br />That English is a language mastered by most of the people Oct 31 21:54
schestowitzdealing with patents in Europe is not in dispute, but only using English as official language is a no-go. <br />During an oral hearing before a local or regional chamber of the UPC, the panel can even decide to hold the hearing in the local official language. Amendments to the patent monopoly do then not only have to be filed in the language in which the patent monopoly was granted, but also in the local language. <br />"Oct 31 21:54
schestowitz"I understand that the UPC cannot be amended now but 12 years ago English could (and in my opinion should) have become the only language of the proceedings of the UPC and of the unitary patent, as proposed by several users and member states.<br /><br />The EPO is not a branch of the UPC so the UPC is not obliged to use the three official languages of the EPO."Oct 31 21:55
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)Oct 31 22:05
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 22:14
*jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytesOct 31 22:21
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 22:25
*psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Oct 31 23:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.