Shameless lies spun as "news"
Summary: Media in Microsoft's pocket is telling Microsoft's lies and deceives the public for Microsoft's bottom line
There is Microsoft spin the media which continues to disturb because it is quite shallow and very easy to spot. Just watch Microsoft Peter with his latest shameless vapourware (Microsoft ads disguised as "journalism"). That's positive advertising as opposed to negative advertising (against the competition), but it is still advertising and it should have no room in journalism.
The Microsoft-funded (through ads) propaganda apparatus
CBS says "Gmail" to make a widespread Internet issue sound like Google's. This, in a sense, is like anti-Google advertising. It is a bit like
The Intercept associating Google -- with the word "Google-like" -- when speaking about NSA search of people's personal data. It is not just CBS though (notorious for NSA and CIA connections). A writer who was typically writing for the
CBS-owned
ZDNet UK is now moving on a bit. A few days ago we saw Simon Bisson, a longtime Microsoft booster with conflicting interests that ought to make him unsuitable to cover Microsoft matters, showing up in
IDG. It is a new site and the article is unsurprisingly a Microsoft-serving one, following a longtime tradition (his bio at IDG completely omits his connection to Microsoft this time around). It is
a puff piece/advertising/spam for
a de facto extension/proxy of Microsoft, working with Microsoft and funded by 'former' Microsoft executives to promote
Mono and .NET.
The only thing worse than that was this piece from IDG trying to portray Microsoft as "open source" (openwashing). Microsoft is trying to crush all FOSS projects from within, so IDG helps with puff pieces like this one titled "Does Microsoft Really Love Open Source?" It is just an assortment of quotes from Microsoft and
Microsoft propaganda entities like Directions on Microsoft. Here is
an example:
"Compared to 10 years ago, it's mind-blowing that Microsoft is doing what [it's] doing now," says Wes Miller, a research vice president at Directions on Microsoft. "If you look at open source projects like Hadoop or Docker (both of which Microsoft is involved in), in the past Microsoft would have tried to crush them with its own closed source product."
Microsoft-linked and Microsoft-friendly sources to piece together quite a propaganda piece which omits the fact that the above is intended to promote proprietary Windows. If anything, it show Microsoft subverting FOSS to tie it to proprietary. Here is
one comment I received about this article:
Rabellino points to how Microsoft has helped bring Linux support to Azure in what he deems the right way. "We could have made proprietary drivers, but no, we've open sourced them," he says. The same is true of the way Microsoft has helped bring Hadoop support to Windows and Node.js support to Azure.
Seriously, WTF?! What about the UEFI? this is made to help GNU/Linux too, isn't it? c'mon...
About Microsoft becoming friendly to FOSS one person told me: "Of course it does!! don't you see how open is the Windows source? oh, wait..."
In less disturbing news, here is an
example of potential Microsoft spin, portraying Microsoft as a gainer by comparing it only to the biggest loser, the
patent troll BlackBerry.
As a reader is ours put it: "LosePhone is not rising, BB is just falling that much."
Very clever way to create Microsoft spin; find a contender that falls even quicker. This is essentially what we often find in the media, namely pro-Microsoft deception which if remains unchallenged might recur until it is widely accepted.
According to
this article and
this other new article, BlackBerry has 44,000 patents that it
can use against Android/Linux one day. Just watch
the latest on what Apple does to Samsung's software side. It is a direct attack on Android itself:
Supreme Court ruling won’t kill Apple’s ‘slide to unlock’
In June, the US Supreme Court decided the Alice v. CLS Bank case, tweaking patent law in a way that suggests a lot more patents should be thrown out as overly abstract.
Samsung hoped that case would allow it to knock out two patents that Apple had successfully used against it in the long-running patent war between the two smartphone leaders. Last month, Samsung lawyers filed papers arguing that Apple's patents on universal search and "swipe-to-unlock" are exactly the type of basic ideas that the US Supreme Court wants to see rejected.
Of course one could relate this whole patent strategy to Microsoft's hatred of FOSS and also note that Microsoft, under Nadella, recently
sued Samsung like Apple had done. It is an attack on Free software using software patents. To call Microsoft friendly towards Open Source requires either a propagandist or a liar. Sounds like a job for IDG!
⬆
