A decade ago they spoke about this issue, but not anymore

Full interview [PDF]

Summary: Those who believe in Software Freedom cannot at the same time believe that software patents are desirable; we've sadly come to a point where many companies that dominate so-called 'Open Source' groups actively lobby for such patents, in effect betraying the community they claim to be a part of

"Open Source is nowadays a by-product of Proprietary Software," Benjamin Henrion wrote or quoted, "permissive licenses, repositories with subscriptions, open client but not the server, "APIs", cloud lock-in, software patents all over. And hipsters with their Macbooks..."

Like people who run the Linux Foundation and lie to everyone...

"Open Source" is nowadays a whole different beast, different if not wholly distinguishable from what it was two decades ago. Back then it was supposed to just be a substitution of Free software, but today it is just proprietary software with some openwashing (for marketing purposes or bait); so we've 'lost' the cause and must revert back to Free software, this time insisting that openwash isn't credible and cannot be tolerated (those who do this should state upfront it's proprietary).

"On the patent front we got our way; openwashing is another, newer problem. We're nowadays focusing more on the latter one."Henrion went further; he mentioned software patents and linked to this new tweet from IAM ("In an exclusive interview with IAM, @danielnazer of @mozilla shares top tips for software IP protection, his evolving role as Senior IP & Product Counsel and why he’s looking forward to speaking at #SoftwareIP this October."). Oddly enough a former EFF lawyer/attorney, who fought software patents, decided to participate/speak at an event of the patent trolls' lobby to give false impression of 'balance'. He represents Mozilla, which isn't supposed to use terms like "software IP protection". It's typically the likes of OIN who are attending this event, but they're pro-software patents, unlike most Mozilla staff.

Observation worth making: most patent blogs went totally or almost totally silent this year; few remain active and they're hardly covering Section 101 cases anymore. Coons et al have gone nowhere with their bill, either, so it's just like in prior years and just what we predicted all along. We're winning the patent policy battles and IAM became irrelevant. On the patent front we got our way; openwashing is another, newer problem. We're nowadays focusing more on the latter one. ⬆