"He was not capable of solving any tickets, could barely even figure out how to access clients' machines."Let's start with D. S. who seems to be related (family connection) to management, hence hired. He was not capable of solving any tickets, could barely even figure out how to access clients' machines. Even coming late, despite this being the bare minimum! While proving the family connection was always tricky, the surname was a giveaway (the first name is a very common one). Not every time the surname matches does that imply a family connection (we previously gave the example of the CEO's surname and a new hire with the surname; they were quick to point out in writing there was no connection!). Was that a nephew? More relatives as new/temporary recruits?
For those who like to pick on my wife for this, remember she was suitably qualified and educated (Bachelors degree in Computer Science).
"Nepotism hurts not just on the technical front."If that's not compelling enough an example, consider the manager who brought three romantic partners to the company (including a wife). There might be faction at play (Mr. Kink and 'the Angels'), but it would not be a problem if the new arrivals had a relevant degree or relevant work experience. As we noted before, you risk having people who paste a wall of text into the command line (the client did notice this error and was very unhappy; not even history -c was run after this mistake).
Nepotism hurts not just on the technical front. It makes people unable to do the job or key aspects of the job; it moreover harms morale. Some people get special access and treatment owing to 'bedroom politics' rather than actual achievement or seniority. This is not good. It ruins companies.
"They don't apologise and never face consequences. That too is connected to endemic nepotism."Then there's the immunity. When it comes to technical failures, procrastination, negligence etc. the Support Manager and the romantic partners never ever get reprimanded or criticised because he's part of the inner clique; when he was a Support Engineer he got serious bollocking, in person, from our biggest client (at the time), right in front of the rest of the team. It was painful to witness and even seemed over the top, definitely inappropriate; either way, now he's immune from criticism. As we noted in the last video (less than 24 hours ago), the rules apply only to "lesser" staff; the people at the top are immune from their own rules and they're the ones monopolising actual enforcement. They don't apologise and never face consequences. That too is connected to endemic nepotism.
"In the next part of this series we'll travel back in time to 2010 and show how the CEO of the company married a manager 2 years after she had joined the company and after they had gotten a child (and a second pregnancy)."So we've thus far covered several examples of nepotism and kinship in the management. Had the technical qualifications been satisfactory, it would probably not be a problem (or a lesser problem).
In the next part of this series we'll travel back in time to 2010 and show how the CEO of the company married a manager 2 years after she had joined the company and after they had gotten a child (and a second pregnancy). It wasn't his first wife and wasn't his first pair of daughters. It seems like in Sirius grasping the concept of nepotism would lead to inner conflicts over double-standards. ⬆