The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

architectures (was: Re: master.debian.org)

On Thu, 22 Feb 1996, Dominik Kubla wrote:

> I uploaded the m68k stuff, but the *.tar.gz files are not from me, they were
> already in the directory.

This (rhetorical) question is a bit late, and probably naive, but I 
wonder if m68k is a good architecture name.  Presumably, the m68k stuff
presumes some particular platform, and there are lots of platforms
using m68k chips.  What to do when a distribution for another
m68k-based platform appears?

Somewhat related, also late, and also naive -- `arch` says variously
i386, i486, ... for PC platforms.  I guess we're presuming that all of 
these mean "pc", and that we'll use some particular one of these (or, 
perhaps, "intel" or "pc") as an architecture designator for the debian
distribution.