The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guidelines docs on ftp.debian.org.

Hi,

	I must be missing something here.  What are the arguments
 against making the revision compulsory?  Any such arguments that I
 could come up with were as arbitrary as the esthetics argument for
 the revision; Surely adding an revision field is not that onerous a
 task? 

	IMHO, the added consistency and ease of parsing of the package
 name (no, I don't know yet why I need that, but I'd rather have an
 option) are desirable, and a strong argument to the contrary is
 needed _not_ to require the revision field.

	If the argument is that it ``reduces flexibility'', then my
 answer is that any amount of discipline does that. I just don't get
 it. 

	awaiting enlightenment,



		manoj