The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Recent dselect experience



In message <m0u9jl4-000Bj2C@elo.ods.com>, David Engel writes:
>1. Make the info window smaller and optionally remove it completely.
>I prefer to see the status of more packages at the same time.

I agree---make the "short description" display somewhere unobtrusive
(first or final line), and stick the rest of the infomation "behind" a
hotkey.

>2. Allow TAB and shift-TAB to toggle between the status and info
>windows.  That is more natural to me than using separate directional
>keys to scroll the info window.

This would be superfluous is you just used 'F1' (or something) to
bring up the status window---it would have focus by virtue of your
having requested it, so it would just eat keystrokes untill dismissed.

>3. Get rid of the "All xyzzy packages in section plugh" lines.  I know
>what they are for, but I still find them confusing and distracting.
>In their place, put a single, non-functional, header line per major
>sorting criterion, eg. Required/Important/Optional or base/admin/devel.

Further, they are superfluous, since that information is also displayed for each individual package.

>4. Make the default sorting order be by section instead of by
>priority.  Looking at things by section is much more natural to me.

Maybe sort by priority within section?

>5. Ignore any Recommends and Suggests lines for packages that are
>already installed.  One thing I find especially infuriating is getting
>dropped into the conflict resolution screen because of packages that
>I've specifically deselected previously.

I, too, am getting tired of having to cancel the 'babel' packaged
every time I go to exit dselect.

I must admit, it's only in this last week that I've actually bothered
to use dselect---though I still don't love it, I'll grudgingly admit
(in much the same way I have about vi) that it's a very useful tool
once you figure your way around it.

I may have more comments before long.

Mike.
--
"Don't let me make you unhappy by failing to be contrary enough...."