The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which libc should we use in the future?

Michael Meskes writes:
> David Engel writes:
> > There is one catch with libc 5.4.x that people need to be aware of.
> > Programs built with it may not run with libc 5.3.x or lower.  What
> > this means is that once someone installs libc 5.4.x and programs built
> > with it on their system, they can't downgrade back to libc 5.2.18
> > without risking breaking things.  This could be a real problem for a
> > developer who needed to update a package in the stable tree because it
> > would need to be built with libc 5.2.18.  
> 
> Where's the problem with 5.4.7 binaries David? I only remember the __environ
> problem but that was from 5.3.* down to 5.2.18. Beside HJ took care of this.

I never bothered with libc 5.4.x so I don't know all of the details.
I think some of it had to do with locale support.

David
-- 
David Engel                        Optical Data Systems, Inc.
david@ods.com                      1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com