The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Reorg stuff and all the like.

I've tried to follow all the discussions regarding the Debian project 
reorganization. Having experimented with many company 
reorganizations, I'm kind of wary of what's going on there. I'm also 
wary about this democracy (vote = developer) / codocracy (vote = 
package size) / packageocracy (vote = package count) / gerontocracy 
(vote = how long have you been working for debian) thing.
Furthermore, I'm rather happy with how the whole thing is handled 
right now, and don't see a real urge to change it.

Can anyone (Bruce ?) precise:

1) what would be the function of this board ?
     just handling releases ?
     directing the project ?
     other ?

2) what about the vote ?
     Many suggestions have been made, but what is the best yet ?

3) I already suggested (without raising a lot of enthusiasm) a kind 
of `meta-vote' (call it constituent vote or referendum or whatever) 
on what should be the Debian project, and what should be its 
directing body. What do you think about it ?

Phil.



--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com