The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Need status reports on PAM and LIBC 6, please



On Wed, 15 Jan 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:

bruce >I would like to see a status report on PAM. Is it solid enough to put it in
bruce >"bo" now? We need to make a go-or-no-go decision on it soon. What is our
bruce >fall-back plan if PAM is still not ready? Do we deploy shadow password
bruce >everywhere and save PAM for later?

I know the developer of PAM personally and since RedHat already uses it I
cannot see a reason why it would not be stable enough to go into the
distribution.

bruce >My impression of LIBC 6 is that things are still less-than-solid, and HJ is
bruce >still working on fundamental issues that have to be done before he makes a
bruce >full Linux release. Am I incorrect in this? Is it still not time for us to
bruce >switch to LIBC 6 for the i386 architecture? We do need it for ALPHA and
bruce >other architectures.

I have debianized glibc on request of David Engels and he is now working
on it as far as I know.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.


--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com