The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: developer criteria

Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org> writes:

>   3) If the developper doesn't answer in a delay (which could vary along with
>      the bug severity), an other message is sent to debian-devel-bugs, saying
>      the maintainer of the package isn't answering and asking for someone else
>      to do the work.
>   4) If someone doesn't take the bug in charge (by sending an email to the bug
>      system), the message is re-sent every couple of days.
>   5) Finally the bug is closed, and something is uploaded.
> 
> If several developpers reply at step 3-4, the first one gets the bug assigned to him, and the others receive a message saying that developper X gets the bug.

With all but the worst bugs, anyone providing a fix should email the
developer with the suggested fix at least two weeks before actually
uploading the fix.  This gives one more chance for informing the
developer of a non-standard upgrade.


-- 
Kevin Dalley
kevin@aimnet.com


--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com