The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debian testing organization: a proposal (long)



On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Lars Wirzenius wrote:

I like this idea.  It sort of seems like unstable will always be
unstable and tested will get frozen and rolled into a new tested.
So, the code name should be for tested instead, right?

Some other ideas for testing:  Should a package be tested for
installation, operation and uninstallation?  It seems to me that
all three should happen cleanly.  It also seems that upgrading
should be tested.  Should an upgrade get tested from its last
stable released version or from the last two versions, etc?

Cheers,

Richard G. Roberto
richr@bear.com
011-81-3-3437-7967 - Tokyo, Japan


--
*******************************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or
agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account
activity contained in this communication.
*******************************************************************************


--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com