The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debian testing organization: a proposal (long)

[ Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list. ]

"Richard G. Roberto":
> So, the code name should be for tested instead, right?

Yes.

> Some other ideas for testing:  Should a package be tested for
> installation, operation and uninstallation?

Yes.

> It seems to me that
> all three should happen cleanly.  

> It also seems that upgrading should be tested.

Yes.

> Should an upgrade get tested from its last stable released version or
> from the last two versions, etc?

Yes.

Ultimately, from all previous stable releases, but let's start
with the previous stable.

-- 
Please read <http://www.iki.fi/liw/mail-to-lasu.html> before mailing me.
Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list.

Attachment: pgpjdZ4iskq0y.pgp
Description: PGP signature