The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Proposal for signed packages

On 12 Feb 1997, Christian Leutloff wrote:

leutloff >Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@molec1.dfis.ull.es> writes:
leutloff >
leutloff >> - One Debian developer should be choosen to sign with that key every
leutloff >> new release of a package. (Perhaps Guy Maor, via his dinstall script?).
leutloff >
leutloff >this requires an automated procedure. Guy can't check all packages
leutloff >manually. So it's possible to get a trojan signed by Guy oder the
leutloff >Debian project. It's really bad for debian to officially sign a
leutloff >trojan!! So it's better to get all packages signed by persons
leutloff >individuelly. In the cases where it isn't possible there can be
leutloff >someone signing for another developer.

Packages are already uploaded with a signed .changes file. Verifying the
changes file is avoiding a Trojan horse from a non-developer.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.

Attachment: pgpCHu7lGv7RE.pgp
Description: PGP signature