The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not to use CVS

On Sun, 23 Feb 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:

> I'd prefer the workflow go this way:
> 
> 	1. Maintainer uploads source and binary package
> 	2. Testers test package.
> 	3. Testers submit bugs/patches to maintainer.
> 	4. If package doesn't have known bugs, or if it's an improvement on
> 	   the previous version and its bugs are non-critical, package is
> 	   moved to the "tested" distribution.
> 	5. Maintainer reviews bug reports and merges in patches.
> 	6. Go to step one.
> 

When all is said and done I think I'd prefer your way too.  I think it
would still be a good idea to work in a source tree (step 4.5?) for the
reasons I mentioned.

-- Jaldhar 



--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com