The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Restructuring of the Debian Project

On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Vincent Renardias wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Dominik Kubla wrote:
> 
> > And if you look at the seperate proposal of a Quality Assurance Group
> > isn't that what i am talking about?  Why form a second group to look
> > after the first? Why not merge them and form a core group?
> 
> 	Your 'core team' concept seems to involve only 15 developers working 
> only on the requiered packages. My proposal include the whole 
> distribution and its ~1100 packages.
> 	I don't like the idea of having an hyper tested core release and 
> have no quality control on the other packages. ("required+standard" 
> packages =~ 120 packages)

No, it is not that the other packages should not be tested.
It is that the core should not be released if there are problems.

It is a MUST for the core and a less restrictive situation for the rest.

The core ensures that you have _functional_ machine _without_ conflicts
and problems. The additional packages must of course also be tested,
but are a "second tier".
 
Mike

Michael Neuffer                i-Connect.Net, a Division of iConnect Corp.
mike@i-Connect.Net             Home of the Debian Master Server.
mike@debian.org                14355 SW Allen Blvd., Suite 140
503.641.8774                   Beaverton, OR 97005