The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IMPORTANT: Debian QA Group Organisation Draft.

On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Andy Mortimer wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> 
> > 	Here's the draft I typed about the planned organisation of the Debian
> > QA group. Please submit me your input/comments/flames/etc about it. If
> > everyone agrees on this, I'll create the appropriate mailing-list and call
> > for testers/patchers on debian-{devel,user}. 
	

> I do have one comment, though; what you've described here seems to me to
> be slightly more than just QA, especially the bits about taking over
> orphaned packages. This could perhaps be split off and made a different
> effort---after all, the people who are interested in QA are not
> necessarily those who are interested in updating other peoples'
> packages---or the name of the team could be changed slightly. The same
> goes for testing of releases; there's no reason that I can see why a
> tester should be part of the QA mailing list.

I'm leading the QA group, while Dale Scheezt leads the testing group.

The jobs of the Testing & QA group differ slighly, but interested people 
can of course be part of both groups... 
Also if Dale gives me more info about what he planned, we could rename 
this document to "QA & Testing groups organisation" ?

> I guess, in summary, that looks like quite a large job for one team.

It depends on the size of the team...
Don't you think building and maintaining a Linux distribution is a large 
job for a team? _(;

> One other thing has just occurred to me: could a member of the QA team
> perhaps be mandated to post summaries of recent bug reports to
> debian-devel every week or so? This would be quite useful for people like
> me, who don't have time to read all the bug reports carefully, but still
> would quite like to know what's likely to go wrong!

	I will take care of this.

		Cordialement,

--
-     ** Linux **         +-------------------+             ** WAW **     -
-  vincent@debian.org     | RENARDIAS Vincent |          vincent@waw.com  -
-  Debian/GNU Linux       +-------------------+      http://www.waw.com/  -
-  http://www.debian.org/           |            WAW  (33) 4 91 81 21 45  -
-                                   |         Luminy  (33) 4 91 82 85 32  -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------