The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IMPORTANT: Debian QA Group Organisation Draft.

Ok, I agree that this is a well done draft. However, There is one hole in
the proposal:

I doesn't talk about broken packages - fx: important binary missing,
making the package unusable, or an dependency problem that makes it
impossible to install. 

It doesn't also issue wich bugs are critical and which aren't. I think
it's critical if anyone can attack your system and "just" a security bug
if only applies to people who already have access to your system. 

>The above delays are reduced by a factor of 2 in the month preceding a
>freeze 

I don't get the reason behind this. development should continue as normal,
we don't have any pre-freeze state... 

I feel a little mixed by the tight dates - there really are cases when a
developer is not around for a month or so... I wish it would somehow be
possible to note the qa-team that "don't orphan my packages, I just won a
trip around the world and I won't be around for a month.."

Riku Voipio

ps. please limit your message lines to 80... :)