The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new maintainers



Tim Sailer wrote:
> On Mar 23, bruce@debian.novare.net wrote
> > The part that seems to be intolerable to me is that I can not, in all hones
ty,
> > tell someone that I know who the programs in Debian came from.
> 
> This is one of the major stumbling blocks I have getting Debian in at
> BNL. 

Right on.  For example, look at the "copyright" file on the qcrack package:
--no author is named, 
--there is no copyright definition for the qcrack program itself (just
  a copyright date)
--there is no copyright definition for the fcrypt program on which 
  qcrack is based (just a copyright date), and 
--fcrypt itself is probably under ITAR control!

I filed a bug report last week saying qcrack should be removed, but the 
existence of even one package like this in the distribution is 
frightening to me.

Susan Kleinmann