The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: prototype questions for developer vote

On Mar 27, Philip Hands wrote
> A good example of this is the Hansard reports on proceedings in the House of Commons in the UK.  Hansard cleans up what is said by removing verbal stumbles and deleting statements that are later withdrawn, which makes the proceedings look more dignified without changing the intent.
> 
> If no one else is up for the ``Hansard'' post, I'll do it.

great.

> Another alternative would be to have the debian-board discussions published a week or two late on the web pages, with a chance for BoD members to withdraw messages before publication (a withdrawal would need to be treated as though it had never been written).
 
hmm. maybe board of director things shouldn't go into public (like
debian-private discussions). some sort of a report would be great. 

greetings, andreas



-- 
http://www.boutell.com/boutell/usenet.html Saving USENET and Then Some