The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new definition of non-free

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:

> Note, that this is a change in policy: All packages without source, for
> example, would have to be moved from contrib to non-free then.

Do we maintain packages for which we do not have source code???
Why don't we just get rid of them?

I understand to have a motif-compiled version of something, but I
don't see the point in having packages with no sources at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBM9dkYSqK7IlOjMLFAQGKsQP/cPDfETYujnchzSKWU+kAGVgXBq6pzBx/
/yZZD9yw+g0PXqAXxvKAR2iq9qbOX36wNs76LbfXmwKfIOZo1R1OnFPReC58cVLI
GBNkdFHEa0354m4hG5gYPVYp7DGNTpbnoJdHT4KwqTqxR1JozQhCaHks2rIJjYRp
LA6Qp/EDJG4=
=JQ3R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .