The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Release of 1.3.2?

On Wed, Aug 13, 1997 at 04:27:00PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> The main consideration is that we not bump the _version_number_ without a
> big change. It's fine to update the archive and even the official CD any
> time we want, but inventory seems to rot when we change the version number.
> It's about perception. Thus, I've been thinking about a revision date or
> something that would let us distinguish changes without changing the release
> number.
>

I agree with the revision date idea. (actually I just sent a message to
deb-private proposing the same thing. ;)

Shaya

Attachment: pgpzsRYb0a0KU.pgp
Description: PGP signature