The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shrinking the distribution

On Mon, Dec 08, 1997 at 09:56:58PM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote:

(mayby this discussion should move somewhere else...)

> I still see a need for specifying limits to the number of packages in our
> distribution. The other reactions have shown me that I'm not the only one
> who requests that.

Hmmm. I'm 50% for it. The other 50% of me is asking for a good reason
to do so. If we are referring to the speed redhat did their libc6 conversion,
which thought to be because they have a smaller core distribution, I think
we have alternative solutions to make our distribution to move faster.

For example, I don't think it is too much asked, if we would require
developers to upgrade their packages to the latest standards during every
release cycle. Right now it doesn't seem to be clear to all developers.

If a package isn't up to latest standard at the time of freeze, it should
be dropped to contrib.

Riku Voipio


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .