Join us now at the IRC channel.
*oiaohm (~oiaohm@unaffiliated/oiaohm) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 07:39 | |
schestowitz | Now the mobbyist is feeding off my argument with Jan. Blech... | Jan 15 10:18 |
---|---|---|
schestowitz | https://twitter.com/FOSSpatents/status/26215042500268032 https://twitter.com/FOSSpatents/status/26215277075103744 https://twitter.com/FOSSpatents/status/26215899333660672 https://twitter.com/FOSSpatents/status/26217598853054464 https://twitter.com/FOSSpatents/status/26218731763933187 | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @FOSSpatents: @schestowitz cc: @jwildeboer If lobbying is done honestly, it *can* be a valuable contribution to any democratic decision-making process. | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @FOSSpatents: @schestowitz cc: @jwildeboer (cont) For example, an MEP usually has 1 adviser plus secy/interns. They need external help in complex debates. | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @FOSSpatents: @jwildeboer cc: @schestowitz All it takes for bad things to happen is for good people to do nothing. That also applies to lobbying. | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @FOSSpatents: @schestowitz cc: @jwildeboer No. I never complained if people called lobbying lobbying *when* I actually did it. At most it was incomplete. | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @FOSSpatents: @schestowitz cc: @jwildeboer I had no problem with this (even if too narrow): http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2007/mar/22/sport.comment4 | Jan 15 10:18 |
TechrightsBot-sc | -> Title: Digger: Soca Warriors want World Cup money | Football | The Guardian .::. Size~: 95.69 KB | Jan 15 10:19 |
*MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | Jan 15 11:33 | |
*MinceR (~mincer@unaffiliated/mincer) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 11:35 | |
schestowitz | Topic that are assured to stir up discussion at table: overpopulation, politics, religion | Jan 15 12:26 |
schestowitz | Not necessarily mutually exclusive :-) | Jan 15 12:26 |
schestowitz | MinceR: http://www.slate.com/?id=2281146 | Jan 15 12:55 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: Two spaces after a period: Why you should never, ever do it. - By Farhad Manjoo - Slate Magazine .::. Size~: 55.04 KB | Jan 15 12:55 |
schestowitz | "Why you should never, ever use two spaces after a period." | Jan 15 12:55 |
schestowitz | New article | Jan 15 12:55 |
schestowitz | And since you brought it up the other day... | Jan 15 12:56 |
MinceR | no, i reacted to this article yesterday | Jan 15 12:56 |
MinceR | :> | Jan 15 12:56 |
schestowitz | Ah, OK | Jan 15 12:56 |
schestowitz | I didn't realise this | Jan 15 12:56 |
MinceR | and it doesn't really answer the question it asks | Jan 15 12:56 |
schestowitz | My understanding is that it's typewriters legacy | Jan 15 12:57 |
schestowitz | MinceR: it's Slate | Jan 15 12:57 |
schestowitz | The writers is a Microsoft boosters from this publication which Microsoft once owned | Jan 15 12:57 |
schestowitz | IIRC they passed it to Melinda's Post | Jan 15 12:57 |
schestowitz | Melinda's Post (WashPo Co.) dumped Melinda though | Jan 15 12:58 |
schestowitz | https://twitter.com/glynmoody/status/26254856020819968 | Jan 15 13:24 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @glynmoody: @schestowitz maybe they'll reconsider that in the light of events... | Jan 15 13:24 |
schestowitz | re: "re "Open Source for America ... name & shame: good idea" -> see their logo that looks like Palin's infamous "target" maps." | Jan 15 13:24 |
*gnufreex (~quassel@93-87-125-13.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 13:55 | |
*oiaohm has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | Jan 15 15:31 | |
MinceR | http://redd.it/f2rag | Jan 15 16:09 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Not a web page! Aborting type | Jan 15 16:09 |
schestowitz | dented | Jan 15 16:19 |
schestowitz | I reckon I alienated all my theistic followers by now anyway :-) | Jan 15 16:20 |
schestowitz | Those who can't take it leave sooner or later ;-p | Jan 15 16:20 |
schestowitz | https://identi.ca/notice/62269132 | Jan 15 16:34 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @Dr. Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jan-11 16:31:50 UTC - Identi.ca: Non-free Art In Open-source Video #Games http://is.gd/tz1Eh0 "This information is lost if source is not provided." #freesoftware !linux | Jan 15 16:34 |
TechrightsBot-sc | -> Title: Non-free Art In Open-source (FOSS) Video Games | Do Know Evil - A Blog by Tyler Mulligan .::. Size~: 75.81 KB | Jan 15 16:34 |
schestowitz | https://identi.ca/notice/62269147 | Jan 15 16:51 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @Wayne Borean (themadhatter)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jan-11 16:32:28 UTC - Identi.ca: RT @schestowitz: "I am a Creationist- I believe God was created by man." http://www.reddit.com/tb/f2rag #LOL | Jan 15 16:51 |
TechrightsBot-sc | -> Title: Lopsided coin {pic} via reddit.com .::. Size~: 1.62 KB | Jan 15 16:51 |
*gnufreex has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Jan 15 16:58 | |
*gnufreex (~quassel@93-87-125-13.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 16:59 | |
schestowitz | https://identi.ca/notice/62270948 | Jan 15 17:10 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @Stefano Zacchiroli (zack)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jan-11 17:07:33 UTC - Identi.ca: @schestowitz: there is no such thing as "!Debian Squeeze RC1", rather there's an RC1 of Squeeze's *installer* http://ur1.ca/2u0m3 | Jan 15 17:10 |
schestowitz | Hm.... | Jan 15 17:10 |
TechrightsBot-sc | -> Title: Debian -- News -- Debian Installer 6.0 Release Candidate 1 published .::. Size~: 6.03 KB | Jan 15 17:10 |
schestowitz | He should correct the author then | Jan 15 17:11 |
*m4n1sh (~manish@ubuntu/member/m4n1sh) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 17:24 | |
schestowitz | [17:15] <ThistleWeb> o/ | Jan 15 17:36 |
schestowitz | [17:15] <ThistleWeb> had a lookie at the site today? | Jan 15 17:36 |
schestowitz | [17:16] <ThistleWeb> it's had a slight change, see if you can spot the difference | Jan 15 17:36 |
schestowitz | [17:36] <schestowitz> ThistleWeb: wow! very neat | Jan 15 17:37 |
schestowitz | [17:36] <schestowitz> Sorry, not been watching this channel for a day | Jan 15 17:37 |
schestowitz | [17:36] <ThistleWeb> no worries | Jan 15 17:37 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: what did you mean by directx pushing to silicon? | Jan 15 17:37 |
m4n1sh | why is it possible? | Jan 15 17:37 |
schestowitz |  | Jan 15 17:38 |
schestowitz | [17:37] <ThistleWeb> yeah I found a much cooler and more flexable theme | Jan 15 17:38 |
m4n1sh | i mean how | Jan 15 17:38 |
schestowitz | GPUs handle a different insturction set | Jan 15 17:38 |
schestowitz | To render vertices | Jan 15 17:38 |
schestowitz | They get their input in raw instruction form via the driver | Jan 15 17:38 |
m4n1sh | wasnt that talk about HW vendor providing drivers? | Jan 15 17:38 |
m4n1sh | directx is written over graphics drivers AFAIK | Jan 15 17:38 |
schestowitz | The driver translates API stuff into streamlined instruction set, like instruction code in a way | Jan 15 17:39 |
m4n1sh | yes, true | Jan 15 17:39 |
schestowitz | DirectX is intermediate | Jan 15 17:39 |
m4n1sh | so? | Jan 15 17:39 |
m4n1sh | directx lies above driver in the stack | Jan 15 17:39 |
schestowitz | I quoted someone who mailed me that/said it in IRC | Jan 15 17:39 |
m4n1sh | hardware --> driver -> directx and so on | Jan 15 17:40 |
m4n1sh | how come it be in the silicon? | Jan 15 17:40 |
schestowitz | Not literally | Jan 15 17:40 |
schestowitz | BUT.. | Jan 15 17:40 |
schestowitz | the driver has some neat movement of driver stuff to h/w | Jan 15 17:40 |
m4n1sh | i cant find any difference between the sensationism between MS's announcement and techright's post | Jan 15 17:41 |
schestowitz | That's part of the reluctance to give away free drivers | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | both carry the same amount of misinformation | Jan 15 17:41 |
schestowitz | Cheaper in hardware than in... well... hardware/CPU (driver) | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | the truth is the most of the hardware is closed and so are drivers | Jan 15 17:41 |
schestowitz | Yes | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | and vendors write drivers | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | which we reverse engineer | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | and use | Jan 15 17:41 |
m4n1sh | since we dont know how the drivers talk to hardware | Jan 15 17:42 |
m4n1sh | so what is something new in this announcement, it is just that hw vendor is providing the driver | Jan 15 17:42 |
m4n1sh | Intel and MS and any other hw vendor relies on buzzwords | Jan 15 17:42 |
m4n1sh | and carefully crafted replies and posts to sensationlize | Jan 15 17:42 |
m4n1sh | dont fall for it | Jan 15 17:42 |
schestowitz | I don't know how Intel's pipeline works | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | BUT>>> | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | Increasingly software side is put in silicon | Jan 15 17:44 |
m4n1sh | is @azuthian from identica online? I need to talk to him too | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | Even DRM is now playing a role | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | Since Viiv | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | I don't know if the two are inseparable anymore, since I read about this in Slashdot around 2008 | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | m4n1sh: I don't know who that is | Jan 15 17:44 |
schestowitz | I got complaints about him, I never spoke to him... | Jan 15 17:45 |
m4n1sh | well, DRM support is added in hardware to prevent all those misuse (sic) | Jan 15 17:45 |
schestowitz | I am not going to,either... judging by how it developed when I was asked to distance myself from others of that type | Jan 15 17:46 |
m4n1sh | so dont post it as if it was your view | Jan 15 17:46 |
schestowitz | "misuse (sic)" | Jan 15 17:46 |
schestowitz | :-) | Jan 15 17:46 |
m4n1sh | or confirm the facts | Jan 15 17:46 |
m4n1sh | the good part is that I dont have to worry about DRM and patents as of now | Jan 15 17:46 |
schestowitz | In relation to what? | Jan 15 17:46 |
schestowitz | You do... | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | I think.. | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | Software patents already harm FOSS | Jan 15 17:47 |
m4n1sh | well, misuse(sic) of intellectual property | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | Look at their war on Android | Jan 15 17:47 |
m4n1sh | ete cte | Jan 15 17:47 |
m4n1sh | all those fancy terms like IP etc | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | TrauL Allen, Microsoft, Myhrvold.. | Jan 15 17:47 |
m4n1sh | well, the space which has money is filled with patent | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | It's all bubble | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | Like the economic bubble | Jan 15 17:47 |
m4n1sh | you cant write anything more than "Hello World" without stepping on someone else's patents | Jan 15 17:47 |
schestowitz | And in 2008 people drew the similarity | Jan 15 17:48 |
schestowitz | Companies whose 'vlaue' is not just people they employ but pieces of paper that embody monopolies | Jan 15 17:48 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: one more thing | Jan 15 17:48 |
m4n1sh | http://techrights.org/2011/01/14/no-interest-in-banshee/ | Jan 15 17:48 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: Linux Mint Founder Does Not Follow Ubuntu’s Banshee Travesty | Techrights .::. Size~: 95.98 KB | Jan 15 17:48 |
schestowitz | And that should scare you cause China and India don't honour these losuy papers | Jan 15 17:48 |
m4n1sh | David Nielsen was psushed out of Fedora? | Jan 15 17:48 |
schestowitz | China gets its own patents to trash pressure from USPTO | Jan 15 17:48 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: well, software patents are not valid in India | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | m4n1sh: "draw your own conclusion" | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | Pushback | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | They didn't want his stuff | Jan 15 17:49 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: he was not thrown out | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | So he left | Jan 15 17:49 |
m4n1sh | he left | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | Yeah | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | He cannot be thrown out | Jan 15 17:49 |
m4n1sh | after being pissed off at fedora's unclear stand on mono | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | He's not an employee | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | You can't fire a volunteer | Jan 15 17:49 |
schestowitz | There's a good episode about this in Seinfeld | Jan 15 17:49 |
m4n1sh | "For those who did not pay attention, Neilson was marginalised/pushed out of Fedora after he had promoted Mono" | Jan 15 17:49 |
m4n1sh | what is this? marginalized/pushed? | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | About.. how basically when you don't work for someone (Cramer or George), they can't show you the door | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | They can give clues | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | marginalised | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | put aside | Jan 15 17:50 |
m4n1sh | pushed? | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | I saw that before | Jan 15 17:50 |
m4n1sh | this word? | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | People whom Fedora sees as a burden | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | They give them hints | Jan 15 17:50 |
schestowitz | Then they leave | Jan 15 17:51 |
schestowitz | pushes.. prodded | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | why doesn't fedora stand for or against mono | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | and make it clear? | Jan 15 17:51 |
schestowitz | Anyway, I can have this convo forver | Jan 15 17:51 |
schestowitz | Is this going anywhere? | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | well, yes, it can | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | just stick to facts | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | and it will end | Jan 15 17:51 |
schestowitz | I do | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | fedora should make it's stand clear | Jan 15 17:51 |
m4n1sh | like Ubuntu did | Jan 15 17:51 |
schestowitz | I've explained to you the silicon thing | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | hexx is a troll | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | He's showing up to defend mono | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | In IRC and comments | Jan 15 17:52 |
m4n1sh | but he did raise imp points | Jan 15 17:52 |
m4n1sh | that is not trolling | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | He's there acting rather hostile | Jan 15 17:52 |
m4n1sh | stating facts is not trolling | Jan 15 17:52 |
m4n1sh | hostility and name-calling is seperate things | Jan 15 17:52 |
m4n1sh | defending mono is not trolling | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | If he comes to a place where he's an antagonist as principle, then he looks to heckle | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | Which he did | Jan 15 17:52 |
schestowitz | By insulting people in that last post | Jan 15 17:53 |
schestowitz | m4n1sh: I gave you a compliment earlier | Jan 15 17:53 |
schestowitz | Can't recall in which channel | Jan 15 17:53 |
m4n1sh | for? | Jan 15 17:53 |
schestowitz | [17:09] <schestowitz> Although Manish is exceedingly polite | Jan 15 17:53 |
schestowitz | I saw you being subjected to that abuse from user **** | Jan 15 17:54 |
m4n1sh | I ignore abuses | Jan 15 17:54 |
schestowitz | cause he mentioned my username, it shows up in "replies" | Jan 15 17:54 |
schestowitz | Feel free to ignore that person | Jan 15 17:54 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: that is fine | Jan 15 17:54 |
schestowitz | he thinks he helps, but he's just damaging the platform's objective sometimes | Jan 15 17:54 |
m4n1sh | he is damaging everyone's image | Jan 15 17:55 |
m4n1sh | pro and for mono | Jan 15 17:55 |
schestowitz | If you want to debate techrights, speak to me of someone who's admin her | Jan 15 17:55 |
schestowitz | *here | Jan 15 17:55 |
m4n1sh | sure | Jan 15 17:55 |
m4n1sh | he stopped replying anyway | Jan 15 17:55 |
m4n1sh | now I see that you are actually agreeing to listen to things, one more thing to clarify is that " former Microsoft employee that Canonical had hired decided to remove the GIMP" | Jan 15 17:56 |
schestowitz | Reminds me of that person who insulted Neilsen | Jan 15 17:56 |
schestowitz | Matt something | Jan 15 17:56 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: just because he works in MS doesn't mean he is a a devil | Jan 15 17:56 |
schestowitz | I know | Jan 15 17:56 |
schestowitz | I spoke about this with JONO MANY times | Jan 15 17:56 |
schestowitz | oops. Caps a keyboard issue | Jan 15 17:57 |
m4n1sh | even though Neilsen supports mono, does not mean he has a hidden agenda | Jan 15 17:57 |
m4n1sh | he pushes forwards what he likes | Jan 15 17:57 |
schestowitz | I know | Jan 15 17:57 |
schestowitz | It wasn't my point | Jan 15 17:57 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: and about that MS employee, people work in MS to earn their break and butter | Jan 15 17:58 |
m4n1sh | s/break/bread | Jan 15 17:58 |
m4n1sh | and many of those MS employees have no interest in spewing venom against FOSS | Jan 15 17:58 |
schestowitz | That's another point | Jan 15 17:59 |
schestowitz | And a huge discussion to have | Jan 15 18:00 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: blame Ubuntu if a top MS executive who steers Ms policy is sitting on Ubuntu board | Jan 15 18:00 |
schestowitz | Cause you don't address it from the correct angle IMHO | Jan 15 18:00 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: then tell with which point i need to look at it | Jan 15 18:00 |
schestowitz | Microsoft is not a person | Jan 15 18:00 |
schestowitz | And people are not Microsoft | Jan 15 18:00 |
schestowitz | And it leads to a long discussion | Jan 15 18:00 |
schestowitz | About peers and ex-colleagues | Jan 15 18:00 |
m4n1sh | by the rule of thumb , we cannot generalize that former MS employees are here to taint FOSS world | Jan 15 18:01 |
m4n1sh | that's bad to them, they might even feel bad | Jan 15 18:01 |
MinceR | despite that they keep providing evidence that that is what they're here to do? | Jan 15 18:01 |
MinceR | they deserve to feel bad, they furthered the goals of m$ and probably still do | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: sadly the world is not filled with software developers who live by FOSS ideologies | Jan 15 18:02 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | they need to work | Jan 15 18:02 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | earn their money | Jan 15 18:02 |
MinceR | does work mean acting like m$? | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | raise their family | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | who acts like MS? | Jan 15 18:02 |
m4n1sh | i am talking about those normal employees | Jan 15 18:03 |
MinceR | are anticompetitive practices the only way to earn money, is that what you're trying to say? | Jan 15 18:03 |
MinceR | or forcing people to buy the crap code those employees hacked up? | Jan 15 18:03 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: those people dont create policies | Jan 15 18:03 |
m4n1sh | normal employees dont care about those, only thing they know if that they can bring up their children properly | Jan 15 18:03 |
MinceR | they happily follow those policies though | Jan 15 18:03 |
m4n1sh | have a good life | Jan 15 18:03 |
MinceR | they make my everyday work by supporting m$ | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: have you worked in MS to be sure that they follow these principles? | Jan 15 18:04 |
MinceR | they make my everyday work harder by supporting m$ | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | they dont supoprt MS | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | it is striclty a contract | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | you work for me, I pay you | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | DONE | Jan 15 18:04 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: i have too much respect for my field of work for m$ | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | yes, I have many friends working in MS right now | Jan 15 18:04 |
m4n1sh | she cant leave | Jan 15 18:04 |
MinceR | so, since ballmer profits from m$'s crimes he's not guilty of them? | Jan 15 18:05 |
MinceR | interesting diea | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | her parents want her to work there, so does people have expectations | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | she uses Ubuntu at home | Jan 15 18:05 |
MinceR | how can't she leave? | Jan 15 18:05 |
MinceR | is her contract impossible to terminate? | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: everything is not no easy as it sounds | Jan 15 18:05 |
MinceR | and just who cares what the parents want? | Jan 15 18:05 |
MinceR | does she not have free will? | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: it does | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | just because it doesnt matter to me or someone else doesnt mean it doesnt matter to them | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | people do want their parents happy | Jan 15 18:05 |
m4n1sh | I can say NO, I wont work | Jan 15 18:06 |
m4n1sh | but not everyone | Jan 15 18:06 |
MinceR | yeah, you know, working in IT is not so easy when drones like the people you're defending further an agenda of foisting crap products on everyone who works in IT | Jan 15 18:06 |
MinceR | it was not my choice to have to use winblows, outlook, visual studio and useless crap like that at work | Jan 15 18:06 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: be polite to people and stick at the point | Jan 15 18:06 |
m4n1sh | we are talkign about why we should stop mud-slinging at normal MS employeess | Jan 15 18:06 |
MinceR | somehow you think that m$ employees are right to do whatever they please, no matter the damage | Jan 15 18:06 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: it is not your choice, if you want to use it . use it, if not dont | Jan 15 18:06 |
MinceR | i don't want to use it | Jan 15 18:07 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: they are right to earn their bread and butter | Jan 15 18:07 |
schestowitz | [18:03] <m4n1sh> normal employees dont care about those, only thing they know if that they can bring up their children properly <<< yuppie Nuremberg defence | Jan 15 18:07 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: are bank robbers right to earn their bread and butter? | Jan 15 18:07 |
m4n1sh | Nuremberg? | Jan 15 18:07 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: are muggers right to earn their bread and butter? | Jan 15 18:07 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: that is illegal by law | Jan 15 18:07 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: many things m$ does are also illegal by law | Jan 15 18:07 |
m4n1sh | what MS employees are doing is not illegal | Jan 15 18:07 |
m4n1sh | catch the board execs | Jan 15 18:07 |
MinceR | depends on which ones | Jan 15 18:08 |
m4n1sh | if you want to punish | Jan 15 18:08 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: Nuremberg means? | Jan 15 18:08 |
MinceR | so you're pushing the "just following orders" bullshit, right? | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | look the phrase up | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | It's from "thank you for smoking" IIRC | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | Some people made a living selling death | Jan 15 18:08 |
m4n1sh | no clue | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | They killed my grandma and uncle | Jan 15 18:08 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: they are not selling death | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | Tobacco industry | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | SELLING. Death. | Jan 15 18:08 |
m4n1sh | nope | Jan 15 18:08 |
schestowitz | With PR nonsense. | Jan 15 18:09 |
m4n1sh | tobacco doesnt kill people | Jan 15 18:09 |
schestowitz | Yes | Jan 15 18:09 |
m4n1sh | people kill themselves with tobacco | Jan 15 18:09 |
schestowitz | The snoke does. | Jan 15 18:09 |
schestowitz | LOL | Jan 15 18:09 |
schestowitz | OK, I have other things to do | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | in m4n1sh's work, everything is allowed EXCEPT not being polite to m$ drones | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | that's the only crime in his world, apparently | Jan 15 18:09 |
m4n1sh | gun dont kill people | Jan 15 18:09 |
m4n1sh | people kill people | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | corporations are driven by people | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | those people are guilty of the crimes of the corporation | Jan 15 18:09 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: whatever be the case, you cant achieve anything by being rude | Jan 15 18:09 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: can i achieve anything by being nice? | Jan 15 18:10 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: I cant stab someone and put the blame on the knife | Jan 15 18:10 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: yes | Jan 15 18:10 |
MinceR | has being nice ever convinced a m$ apologist of being wrong? | Jan 15 18:10 |
MinceR | i don't think it ever did | Jan 15 18:10 |
m4n1sh | Gandhi got independence by non-violence | Jan 15 18:10 |
MinceR | that was a very special case | Jan 15 18:10 |
MinceR | read up on it | Jan 15 18:10 |
m4n1sh | not very special case | Jan 15 18:10 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: read up on what? | Jan 15 18:10 |
MinceR | also, thank you very much but i'm not going to let someone harm me just because you think that the greatest crime in the world is exposing m$ drones for the criminals they are | Jan 15 18:11 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: read on how Gandhi got independence? | Jan 15 18:11 |
MinceR | yes | Jan 15 18:11 |
m4n1sh | lol | Jan 15 18:11 |
m4n1sh | telling that to me? | Jan 15 18:11 |
MinceR | yes | Jan 15 18:11 |
m4n1sh | lol again | Jan 15 18:11 |
m4n1sh | I am Indian, and he is the role model of thousands of Indins | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | Indians | Jan 15 18:12 |
MinceR | it would be more productive if you read about it instead of typing "lol" over and over again | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | we have been reading about him since I can ever recall | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: it would be more productive if you read about him instead of typing MS instead of M$ | Jan 15 18:12 |
MinceR | about the prerequisites for civil disobedience actually working | Jan 15 18:12 |
MinceR | and about its price | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | for civil disob | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | we are doing it | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | not using Windows | Jan 15 18:12 |
m4n1sh | right? | Jan 15 18:12 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: i'll type MS once they earn respect | Jan 15 18:12 |
MinceR | they aren't worthy of any respect currently | Jan 15 18:13 |
MinceR | and neither are any people who further m$'s agenda worthy of any respect either | Jan 15 18:13 |
m4n1sh | so you will abuse them? | Jan 15 18:13 |
MinceR | i'm not going to be nice or grateful people who make my life worse | Jan 15 18:13 |
MinceR | if i can, i will | Jan 15 18:13 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: you needed now? | Jan 15 18:13 |
MinceR | i reserve the right to fight back | Jan 15 18:13 |
m4n1sh | fighting back is not abusing | Jan 15 18:13 |
m4n1sh | civil disobidience is fighting back without abusing | Jan 15 18:14 |
MinceR | it is also letting yourself be abused | Jan 15 18:14 |
MinceR | and that is not right | Jan 15 18:14 |
m4n1sh | I have been abused many times | Jan 15 18:14 |
MinceR | i don't buy the "show the other cheek" bullshit | Jan 15 18:14 |
m4n1sh | for not opposing mono with full vigour | Jan 15 18:14 |
MinceR | those who do, will get slapped on both cheeks | Jan 15 18:15 |
MinceR | apparently you support mono instead | Jan 15 18:15 |
m4n1sh | lol | Jan 15 18:15 |
MinceR | i don't see why you expect people to celebrate you for doing that | Jan 15 18:15 |
m4n1sh | i write code in Python the most times | Jan 15 18:15 |
MinceR | yet here you are apologizing for m$ and the drones who keep m$ going | Jan 15 18:15 |
m4n1sh | apologizing? | Jan 15 18:16 |
MinceR | yes | Jan 15 18:16 |
m4n1sh | i think you are taking it out of context | Jan 15 18:16 |
m4n1sh | I just meant "be polite to everyone" | Jan 15 18:16 |
m4n1sh | you wont see me shouting at anyone | Jan 15 18:16 |
MinceR | you don't see me shouting either | Jan 15 18:17 |
m4n1sh | well, I do feel you can be bit more polite | Jan 15 18:17 |
MinceR | i do not feel the need nor the reason | Jan 15 18:18 |
MinceR | it is not in my interest to feel m$ drones feel nice for the crimes they're doing and aiding | Jan 15 18:18 |
MinceR | s/feel/make/ | Jan 15 18:18 |
m4n1sh | see | Jan 15 18:18 |
m4n1sh | as I said | Jan 15 18:18 |
m4n1sh | be polite | Jan 15 18:18 |
MinceR | let those who agree with their goals comfort them and tell them it's all right | Jan 15 18:18 |
m4n1sh | dude, I have been working on python, vala etc codebase | Jan 15 18:19 |
m4n1sh | I am also trying to fight their monopoly | Jan 15 18:19 |
MinceR | well, congratulations, that gives you n defend-m$ credits | Jan 15 18:19 |
MinceR | oh wait | Jan 15 18:19 |
m4n1sh | but not as an armchair revolutionist | Jan 15 18:20 |
MinceR | it doesn't make any sense, does it? | Jan 15 18:20 |
MinceR | please define this "armchair revolutionist" thing | Jan 15 18:20 |
m4n1sh | writing how a thing is dangerous | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | and how it should be removed | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | rather than working on an alternative | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | in a race | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | you try to climb up the stairs | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | not pull others down | Jan 15 18:21 |
MinceR | so what do you do if others are trying to kick you down the stairs? | Jan 15 18:21 |
m4n1sh | so what is the difference left? | Jan 15 18:22 |
m4n1sh | if I do that I would lose my right to complain | Jan 15 18:22 |
MinceR | and what do you think the competitors m$ destroyed using unfair and often illegal means did? weren't they working on an alternative? what good did it do them? | Jan 15 18:22 |
m4n1sh | now I can complain about me being pulled down | Jan 15 18:22 |
MinceR | you apparently don't complain at all | Jan 15 18:22 |
m4n1sh | we were blessed with Firefox | Jan 15 18:22 |
m4n1sh | from Netscape | Jan 15 18:22 |
MinceR | because you believe you have no right to complain | Jan 15 18:22 |
m4n1sh | lol | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | i have right to complain | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | but not at that place where it doesnt make any sense | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | I can tweet or dent randomly | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | and complain | Jan 15 18:23 |
MinceR | so what doesn't make any sense here? | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | what difference it makes | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | instead of tweeting or denting against mono/MS/random-foo | Jan 15 18:23 |
m4n1sh | spend that time in improving the technology of your choise | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | *choice | Jan 15 18:24 |
MinceR | why, what difference would it make if i kept saying nice things about the people who are the reason the IT industry has been set back decades? | Jan 15 18:24 |
MinceR | would that magically make them stop their efforts? | Jan 15 18:24 |
MinceR | funny, i'm not even on twitter or identica | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | what difference would it make if i continue cribbing | Jan 15 18:24 |
MinceR | and yet you keep lecturing me about tweeting and denting | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: just taking an example | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | not telling abt you | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | anyone who does that | Jan 15 18:24 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: secondly about the mono patent issues, I know which part of mono is dangerous and which not | Jan 15 18:25 |
MinceR | or perhaps nobody should dent, tweet or blog anymore, just write code and be nice to m$ drones and hope that (in contrast with everything that has happened so far) they'll just let you compete nicely? | Jan 15 18:25 |
m4n1sh | how does denting/tweeting/blogging make a difference | Jan 15 18:26 |
MinceR | it helps open some people's eyes | Jan 15 18:26 |
m4n1sh | I am sure that redmond gets scared at my tweets/dents/blogs right? | Jan 15 18:26 |
MinceR | no, but the more people know what's going on the less freely m$ gets to commit its crimes | Jan 15 18:26 |
MinceR | there's more resistance to them | Jan 15 18:26 |
m4n1sh | those who care about FOSS already know and those who dont care, will well never care | Jan 15 18:26 |
MinceR | neither of those assertions are true | Jan 15 18:27 |
m4n1sh | which assertion? | Jan 15 18:27 |
MinceR | "caring about FOSS" is not a binary switch | Jan 15 18:27 |
MinceR | neither is "already knowing" | Jan 15 18:27 |
MinceR | also, m$ drones keep trying to convince people that m$ is being nice and "open source" now. if nobody's exposing their lies people will believe them | Jan 15 18:28 |
MinceR | and free software loses | Jan 15 18:28 |
MinceR | bbl | Jan 15 18:28 |
m4n1sh | well, how will MS improve itself? | Jan 15 18:29 |
MinceR | re | Jan 15 18:50 |
MinceR | i don't think they ever will | Jan 15 18:50 |
MinceR | i just hope m$ dies as quickly as possible, causing as little damage as possible as it does so | Jan 15 18:50 |
MinceR | if course they don't want to do that | Jan 15 18:50 |
MinceR | they want to keep thrashing around for as long as they can | Jan 15 18:50 |
MinceR | and how is being nice to them going to help the IT industry? | Jan 15 18:51 |
MinceR | btw, you did show a good example of why it's important to get the word out: if ignorant m$ drones realize what their employer is doing, they might quit | Jan 15 18:52 |
m4n1sh | bck. lemme read | Jan 15 18:53 |
m4n1sh | they wont quit\ | Jan 15 18:54 |
m4n1sh | wrong thinking | Jan 15 18:54 |
MinceR | why? | Jan 15 18:54 |
m4n1sh | people will prefer compromising their ideology than being unemployed | Jan 15 18:54 |
m4n1sh | please be practical | Jan 15 18:55 |
MinceR | so you say those people are evil | Jan 15 18:55 |
MinceR | well, there's a practical solution to that, but i don't think you'd like it | Jan 15 18:55 |
m4n1sh | practical solution? | Jan 15 18:55 |
m4n1sh | those people are not evil | Jan 15 18:56 |
m4n1sh | they dont care | Jan 15 18:56 |
m4n1sh | about ideology | Jan 15 18:56 |
MinceR | so they commit crimes out of negligence | Jan 15 18:56 |
MinceR | what is that if not evil? | Jan 15 18:56 |
m4n1sh | they need to feed their families | Jan 15 18:56 |
MinceR | why should we care about that? | Jan 15 18:56 |
m4n1sh | why should they care about us? | Jan 15 18:56 |
MinceR | they'll probably become just as attached to m$ as the drones feeding them are | Jan 15 18:57 |
MinceR | why should anyone care about not doing as much damage to other people as possible? good question :> | Jan 15 18:57 |
m4n1sh | same way as you think its useless for us to care about their families | Jan 15 18:58 |
MinceR | so being impolite is bad, but who cares about crime? is that what you're trying to say? | Jan 15 19:01 |
MinceR | that's a thoroughly warped "morality" | Jan 15 19:01 |
m4n1sh | didnt get "so being impolite is bad, but who cares about crime?" | Jan 15 19:02 |
MinceR | well, you criticize me for being impolite, but you keep claiming that it's perfectly acceptable that m$ drones support their criminal organization | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | they dont support | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | my friend works there | Jan 15 19:03 |
MinceR | yes they do | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | you worked there? | Jan 15 19:03 |
MinceR | do you think m$ could continue to function without their slaves? | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | you seem so confident | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | yes | Jan 15 19:03 |
m4n1sh | it can | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | how? | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | MONEY dude MONEY | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | explain. | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | its a contract | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | between employees and company | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | contract with whom? | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | they give money | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | employees work for them | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | that's it | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | no affection | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | no loyalty | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | do the employees get to decide? | Jan 15 19:04 |
m4n1sh | get to decide what? | Jan 15 19:04 |
MinceR | whether to work for m$ | Jan 15 19:05 |
MinceR | does getting money out of the deal somehow make them innocent? | Jan 15 19:05 |
m4n1sh | in some cases, yes and in some cases no | Jan 15 19:05 |
MinceR | if someone robs you on the street but gets your money, is it suddenly all right? | Jan 15 19:05 |
MinceR | does m$ have indentured slaves in india or something? | Jan 15 19:05 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: means? | Jan 15 19:06 |
MinceR | in what way do the employees not get to decide whether or not to work for m$? | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | to be precise | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | in any for-profit company you work, the situation is same | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | you work for them | Jan 15 19:06 |
MinceR | are they locked into the local m$ sweatshop or something? | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | nope | Jan 15 19:06 |
MinceR | are they chained to their desks? | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | nope | Jan 15 19:06 |
m4n1sh | it is their decision | Jan 15 19:06 |
MinceR | so why can't they leave? | Jan 15 19:07 |
MinceR | why can't they get a job at another company instead? | Jan 15 19:07 |
m4n1sh | how can I tell them to leave | Jan 15 19:07 |
m4n1sh | to satisfy my ego? | Jan 15 19:07 |
MinceR | no, to reduce the damage m$ gets to do in the future | Jan 15 19:07 |
MinceR | at the very least, reduce the supply of workforce to them, increasing their costs | Jan 15 19:08 |
MinceR | sadly, the damage they've already done can not be undone | Jan 15 19:08 |
m4n1sh | so we are left with one thing | Jan 15 19:08 |
m4n1sh | how can MS improve now | Jan 15 19:08 |
MinceR | though taking ballmer's and gate$' and the other ringleaders' money away could help somewhat in fixing what they've done | Jan 15 19:08 |
MinceR | like i said, the only likely way for m$ to improve is that if they hurried up and stopped operating | Jan 15 19:09 |
MinceR | if you've read the Halloween Documents and the Comes vs m$ documents, you'd know that evil is deeply ingrained in their corporate culture | Jan 15 19:09 |
m4n1sh | yes | Jan 15 19:09 |
m4n1sh | you cannot kill | Jan 15 19:09 |
m4n1sh | be practical | Jan 15 19:09 |
MinceR | ? | Jan 15 19:10 |
m4n1sh | you can only make them improve | Jan 15 19:10 |
MinceR | sure, killing them would improve them | Jan 15 19:10 |
MinceR | since they have a negative worth now, and they'd have a zero value then | Jan 15 19:10 |
m4n1sh | well, be practical. Killing is not feasible | Jan 15 19:10 |
m4n1sh | think of a feasible solution | Jan 15 19:10 |
MinceR | locking them all up would also be feasible | Jan 15 19:12 |
m4n1sh | lol | Jan 15 19:13 |
MinceR | and spending all their money on compensation | Jan 15 19:13 |
*m4n1sh faints at the practical solutions offered | Jan 15 19:13 | |
MinceR | having them work in prison to do as much as they can to compensate the damage they've done so far | Jan 15 19:13 |
MinceR | but don't worry, as long as m$ has a lot of control over most governments it won't happen | Jan 15 19:14 |
MinceR | they've even managed to steal a lot of hungarian taxpayers' money | Jan 15 19:14 |
MinceR | and that didn't get much press coverage, most of the coverage it got was the dude who threw eggs at ballmer for it | Jan 15 19:14 |
m4n1sh | and most people must have shown sympathies with ballmer | Jan 15 19:15 |
m4n1sh | no one understood that he was doing because MS undertakes bad practice | Jan 15 19:15 |
MinceR | most people are idiots | Jan 15 19:15 |
m4n1sh | yeah | Jan 15 19:15 |
m4n1sh | so are MS employees | Jan 15 19:15 |
m4n1sh | ignorants | Jan 15 19:16 |
MinceR | militant ignorance is no excuse though | Jan 15 19:16 |
m4n1sh | it isnt military | Jan 15 19:16 |
MinceR | i didn't say "military", i said "militant" | Jan 15 19:17 |
MinceR | it isn't just plain no access to information | Jan 15 19:17 |
MinceR | they actively keep themselves in the dark if they're still ignorant about what their employer does | Jan 15 19:17 |
m4n1sh | just like most people(general public) dont know what MS does | Jan 15 19:17 |
m4n1sh | whole world is in dark | Jan 15 19:18 |
MinceR | see, that's why the word must spread | Jan 15 19:18 |
MinceR | it's pretty easy to find out for someone who actually seeks the information, but most people don't do that | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | yeah | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | without shouting at MS employees | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | or abusing them | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | I agree about informing people | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | and making them aware | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | but you dont make them aware by screaming at them | Jan 15 19:18 |
m4n1sh | or by mud-slinging | Jan 15 19:19 |
MinceR | they also do not deserve politeness | Jan 15 19:19 |
MinceR | or political correctness (which is just a load of bullshit anyway) | Jan 15 19:19 |
m4n1sh | why because they are ignorants? | Jan 15 19:19 |
m4n1sh | ignorants needs to be educated | Jan 15 19:19 |
m4n1sh | not screamed at | Jan 15 19:19 |
MinceR | ignorants don't need to be told that it's all right what they're doing | Jan 15 19:20 |
MinceR | and the name of a criminal organization does not need to be uttered with respect | Jan 15 19:21 |
MinceR | the ignorants should understand that what they're doing in this case is not respectable | Jan 15 19:21 |
m4n1sh | they need to understand | Jan 15 19:21 |
m4n1sh | they need to be educated | Jan 15 19:21 |
MinceR | perhaps they'll feel more of a need to find out if they see that IT professionals tend to utter their name with hatred and disgust | Jan 15 19:22 |
m4n1sh | sadly most IT professional dont tend to utter their name with hatered and disgust | Jan 15 19:22 |
m4n1sh | not everyone believes in name-calling | Jan 15 19:23 |
MinceR | and so the drones keep on living in their bubble, believing that they aren't doing harm | Jan 15 19:23 |
m4n1sh | yes | Jan 15 19:23 |
m4n1sh | since no one told them the reality | Jan 15 19:24 |
m4n1sh | with politness | Jan 15 19:24 |
m4n1sh | if you insult anyone, you should not expect them to change so fast | Jan 15 19:24 |
m4n1sh | it actually make them more defensive | Jan 15 19:24 |
MinceR | i don't expect them to change at all | Jan 15 19:24 |
MinceR | i have no illusions, i know that most of the human species is garbage | Jan 15 19:24 |
m4n1sh | you have up hope | Jan 15 19:24 |
m4n1sh | s/have/gave | Jan 15 19:24 |
MinceR | i'm tread on every day and i'm sick of it | Jan 15 19:25 |
MinceR | i'm not going to help these people feel good about it | Jan 15 19:25 |
m4n1sh | I have managed to change | Jan 15 19:25 |
m4n1sh | I have not lost hope | Jan 15 19:25 |
m4n1sh | so when you dont try changing people | Jan 15 19:25 |
m4n1sh | will screaming or name-calling help? | Jan 15 19:25 |
MinceR | do you think i spend time with screaming and name-calling? | Jan 15 19:26 |
m4n1sh | well, calling them drones | Jan 15 19:27 |
m4n1sh | or whatever | Jan 15 19:27 |
m4n1sh | you said they dont deserver respect | Jan 15 19:27 |
m4n1sh | have you told them why they dont deserve respect | Jan 15 19:27 |
m4n1sh | did you tell them what they should do to earn respect? | Jan 15 19:27 |
MinceR | they can ask me if they lack the resourcefulness to find out otherwise | Jan 15 19:27 |
m4n1sh | like you everyone thinks they are perfet | Jan 15 19:28 |
m4n1sh | and know well | Jan 15 19:28 |
MinceR | btw, the m$ employees that do show up on irc tend to be rather aggressive supporters of the criminal organization that mostly just exploits them | Jan 15 19:29 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: name those people? | Jan 15 19:30 |
m4n1sh | who all? | Jan 15 19:30 |
MinceR | i remember a guy called "Adus" or something | Jan 15 19:30 |
MinceR | but #techrights does get the incursion of m$ apologists from time to time | Jan 15 19:31 |
MinceR | they come here to troll | Jan 15 19:31 |
m4n1sh | lol, they think same about you as a troll | Jan 15 19:31 |
m4n1sh | natural for humans | Jan 15 19:31 |
MinceR | most m$ employees of course isn't quite so forthcoming about their status as a m$ employee | Jan 15 19:31 |
MinceR | do i join their irc channel, spouting lies about them? | Jan 15 19:31 |
MinceR | no | Jan 15 19:31 |
MinceR | so which of us is the troll again? | Jan 15 19:31 |
m4n1sh | they hide their status of MS emlpoyees because they fear of getting abused when they come to this channel | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | make sense for them | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: so the whole thing is "us" and "them" | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | bravo | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | they can surely come here | Jan 15 19:32 |
MinceR | so how do you think they should get special treatment as m$ employees if we don't immediately know that's what they are? | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | and defend their actions | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | if they can | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | it is fine | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | go with facts/proof/figures | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | and not defending | Jan 15 19:32 |
MinceR | sure. it's "us", who care about the IT industry and create stuff that works | Jan 15 19:32 |
m4n1sh | if they have a point, they win and you lose | Jan 15 19:33 |
m4n1sh | if they cant defend, then they lose and you win | Jan 15 19:33 |
MinceR | and "them" who try to exploit the industry to take over the world and crush anyone who tries to oppose them | Jan 15 19:33 |
MinceR | or just compete with them | Jan 15 19:33 |
m4n1sh | when did defending oneself become wrong? | Jan 15 19:34 |
m4n1sh | or defending the thing you like become wrong | Jan 15 19:34 |
MinceR | well, is it wrong if i do it? | Jan 15 19:34 |
m4n1sh | not | Jan 15 19:34 |
m4n1sh | but how can you call they trolls | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | just because they came to your channel | Jan 15 19:35 |
MinceR | because they behave like trolls | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | how? | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | they defend themselves? | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | this is trolling? | Jan 15 19:35 |
MinceR | no, not just because they came to these channels | Jan 15 19:35 |
MinceR | there's more to trolling than that, of course | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | like? | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | again... furnish proofs and facts | Jan 15 19:35 |
m4n1sh | claims - proof/facts = myths | Jan 15 19:36 |
MinceR | if you want proof and facts, search the logs online | Jan 15 19:36 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: you know better where it is | Jan 15 19:36 |
MinceR | for a long time, the TR channels have been logged and it's online | Jan 15 19:36 |
m4n1sh | you can point me out | Jan 15 19:36 |
MinceR | we usually get random people showing up, spouting pro-mono/pro-m$ talking points | Jan 15 19:36 |
MinceR | andd when we point them out, we get abuses | Jan 15 19:36 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: to prove your point you need to furnish proofs | Jan 15 19:36 |
m4n1sh | not me | Jan 15 19:36 |
MinceR | we also get trolls who abuse bugs in the title reporting bot | Jan 15 19:37 |
MinceR | (to flood the channel) | Jan 15 19:37 |
m4n1sh | how you know they are MS employees? | Jan 15 19:37 |
m4n1sh | when the dont disclose | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | or you label them so? | Jan 15 19:38 |
MinceR | usually the most we can do is suspect | Jan 15 19:38 |
MinceR | like i said, there is one case when the user himself confirmed it | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | he was bold to do so | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | he knew he would be bad-mouthed | Jan 15 19:38 |
MinceR | you propose that we be nice and polite to m$ employees, but how do you propose we do it if they don't reveal it? | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | suspect is not a proof | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | from any angle | Jan 15 19:38 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: if someone is acting badly, set a ban on them | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | i can't | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | ban their IP | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | tell schestowitz | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | we often do | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | :> | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | good | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | ban and ignore | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | ignore doesn't help | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | and plus there is no proof that they are from MS | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | i can also claim I am from RedHat | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | or Canonical | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | or foo | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 19:39 |
m4n1sh | you called them "MS employees" | Jan 15 19:39 |
MinceR | so? | Jan 15 19:40 |
m4n1sh | who come and troll | Jan 15 19:40 |
m4n1sh | how can you call them "MS employees" when you dont even know | Jan 15 19:40 |
m4n1sh | even if they say , they must be saying just like that | Jan 15 19:40 |
m4n1sh | even I can say that | Jan 15 19:40 |
MinceR | well, there's at least one and i suspect there are more | Jan 15 19:41 |
MinceR | m$ is well known to employ astroturfing companies | Jan 15 19:41 |
m4n1sh | suspect != proof | Jan 15 19:41 |
MinceR | still, plural is a better fit in this case | Jan 15 19:41 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: suspect != proof | Jan 15 19:42 |
MinceR | so, once again, what do you want us to do? | Jan 15 19:42 |
m4n1sh | dont claim anything which you cant prove | Jan 15 19:42 |
m4n1sh | like everyone else | Jan 15 19:42 |
MinceR | most people don't hold themselves to that rule | Jan 15 19:42 |
MinceR | especially not m$ apologists | Jan 15 19:43 |
m4n1sh | which ones? | Jan 15 19:43 |
MinceR | in fact, probably nobody ever does, including you | Jan 15 19:43 |
MinceR | btw, are you religious? :> | Jan 15 19:43 |
m4n1sh | no way | Jan 15 19:43 |
m4n1sh | i dont claim anything which i cant provw | Jan 15 19:43 |
MinceR | prove that. | Jan 15 19:44 |
MinceR | :> | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | if i heard, I do add that it is overheard | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | i dont need to prove | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | you asked for me | Jan 15 19:44 |
MinceR | that sounds like a contradiction to me | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | you asked for my religion | Jan 15 19:44 |
MinceR | oh, answers to questions aren't claims now? | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | i did not claim | Jan 15 19:44 |
MinceR | interesting | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | if I claimed, then it rests on me to provide proof | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | if you asked, i told the answer | Jan 15 19:44 |
MinceR | though my "prove that" referred to 204206 < m4n1sh> i dont claim anything which i cant provw | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | then it is not on me to provide proof | Jan 15 19:44 |
m4n1sh | i never claimed | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | you asked | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | i answered | Jan 15 19:45 |
MinceR | that's not what "claim" means | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | did I say "do you know I am agnostic" ? | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | this is claim | Jan 15 19:45 |
MinceR | that's a question | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | that is a claim | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | you can ask | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | really? | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | then i have to furnish proof | Jan 15 19:45 |
m4n1sh | i am obliged to furnish proof | Jan 15 19:46 |
m4n1sh | since I am telling something which i want others to belive | Jan 15 19:46 |
MinceR | but you aren't, if you're answering a question? | Jan 15 19:46 |
m4n1sh | if you ask, then i am not obliged to answer, but still i answered as you asked | Jan 15 19:46 |
MinceR | wait, if you answer this question, that will only be an answer, which you claim to not be a claim... | Jan 15 19:46 |
m4n1sh | well, it is on you | Jan 15 19:46 |
m4n1sh | to believe or not | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | as you wanted to know | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | in that case I am not obliged to provide a proof | Jan 15 19:47 |
MinceR | and i'm not obliged to believe you | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | dont believe | Jan 15 19:47 |
MinceR | that trick won't work on me :> | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | i was never interested in telign the world about my religious belief | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | you asked for me | Jan 15 19:47 |
m4n1sh | so I showed goodwill and told | Jan 15 19:48 |
m4n1sh | if I say - I am agnostic | Jan 15 19:48 |
m4n1sh | you can say -- how can we believe you? | Jan 15 19:48 |
m4n1sh | then i have to provide proofs | Jan 15 19:48 |
m4n1sh | it isnt a trick | Jan 15 19:48 |
m4n1sh | it is more of the responsibility lying on which side | Jan 15 19:48 |
MinceR | so if someone asks you something, you aren't interested in telling the truth, only if you say something on your own | Jan 15 19:49 |
m4n1sh | well, I would tell the truth | Jan 15 19:49 |
m4n1sh | but it is not on me to provide proof | Jan 15 19:49 |
m4n1sh | as I am not obliged | Jan 15 19:49 |
m4n1sh | if I am not interested in telling, i would clearly say - Not interested in answering | Jan 15 19:50 |
gnufreex | [19:54:44] <m4n1sh> even though Neilsen supports mono, does not mean he has a hidden agenda | Jan 15 22:14 |
gnufreex | Nielsen's agenda is not hiden. See propaganda he is spreading on Ubuntu forums. | Jan 15 22:14 |
gnufreex | It is pretty obvious agenda. | Jan 15 22:15 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: gnufreex Have you seen his leaving Fedora blog post from before? | Jan 15 22:20 |
sebsebseb | and well comments to people replying to that, as well for that matter | Jan 15 22:20 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: I know him for long | Jan 15 22:21 |
m4n1sh | and also that blog post | Jan 15 22:22 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: oh your one of the Ubuntu members | Jan 15 22:22 |
m4n1sh | m4n1sh - ubuntu/member/m4n1sh | Jan 15 22:22 |
m4n1sh | yes, I am | Jan 15 22:22 |
sebsebseb | why are you here? :D maybe the back log will say why though | Jan 15 22:22 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: came here to talk to Roy about some factual errors on techrights | Jan 15 22:23 |
m4n1sh | we had a good, sensible and calmed discussion | Jan 15 22:23 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: was that in #techrights | Jan 15 22:23 |
sebsebseb | ? | Jan 15 22:23 |
m4n1sh | yes | Jan 15 22:23 |
sebsebseb | when was that earlier? | Jan 15 22:24 |
m4n1sh | about directX in silicon | Jan 15 22:24 |
gnufreex | [00:17:34] <sebsebseb> m4n1sh: gnufreex Have you seen his leaving Fedora blog post from before? | Jan 15 22:24 |
gnufreex | Yes I read it. He tried to paint himself as victim, he failed. Read comment of that guy who he defamed. | Jan 15 22:24 |
m4n1sh | call it factual error or sensationalization.. it did not reflect the true picture | Jan 15 22:24 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex: uhmm I think your time stamps are wrong | Jan 15 22:24 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex: unless your in Finland or something like that at the moment I guess | Jan 15 22:24 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: it shows your local ones | Jan 15 22:24 |
m4n1sh | it doesnt show UTC | Jan 15 22:25 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: he was a victim | Jan 15 22:25 |
m4n1sh | of vague mono position of fedora | Jan 15 22:25 |
gnufreex | Yeah. | Jan 15 22:25 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: this is the social channel | Jan 15 22:26 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: #techrights is the other one, but yes there is a chat in here you had | Jan 15 22:26 |
gnufreex | Ther is no vague mono position | Jan 15 22:26 |
gnufreex | No Mono | Jan 15 22:26 |
gnufreex | Pretty clear | Jan 15 22:26 |
sebsebseb | vague mono position meaning? | Jan 15 22:26 |
m4n1sh | means their stand on mono | Jan 15 22:27 |
gnufreex | Red Hat execs said on Red Hat summit year after year that mono is "IP trap" | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | allowed or not | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | then why is it present in fedora repos | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | ? | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | it is still vague | Jan 15 22:27 |
gnufreex | It can be striped easily from repo. | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | they are against it | Jan 15 22:27 |
gnufreex | It can't from shipped CD | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | "can be" is not same as" is tripped" | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | that doesnt matter | Jan 15 22:27 |
m4n1sh | availablity matters | Jan 15 22:27 |
gnufreex | It matters. | Jan 15 22:28 |
m4n1sh | if you are against mono, keep yourself distanced | Jan 15 22:28 |
MinceR | there's a big difference between building a system that's dependent on mono and shipping mono by default and including mono in a repository | Jan 15 22:28 |
gnufreex | You want Mono to be removed completely? | Jan 15 22:28 |
MinceR | of course, it should be a nonfree repository then if there's such a thing | Jan 15 22:28 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: from the repos if they are against mono | Jan 15 22:28 |
m4n1sh | that's what I am saying vague stand | Jan 15 22:28 |
m4n1sh | they are against it | Jan 15 22:28 |
m4n1sh | but allow it in repos | Jan 15 22:28 |
gnufreex | It is not vague, things that are in Fedora usually end up in RHEL | Jan 15 22:29 |
m4n1sh | RHEL wont ship with mono at all | Jan 15 22:29 |
gnufreex | So they need to support it. | Jan 15 22:29 |
m4n1sh | so they dont need it in fedora | Jan 15 22:29 |
gnufreex | That is what I am saying | Jan 15 22:29 |
m4n1sh | since it wont end up in RHEL, so why support it in fedora | Jan 15 22:29 |
m4n1sh | when they are against mono | Jan 15 22:29 |
gnufreex | So for Mono movemen it is either "all mono" or "you are hater" ? | Jan 15 22:30 |
gnufreex | And then they blame people for being black and white. | Jan 15 22:30 |
gnufreex | pot kettle black | Jan 15 22:30 |
m4n1sh | well, isnt that what techrights is allow about | Jan 15 22:30 |
m4n1sh | black and white? | Jan 15 22:30 |
gnufreex | I don't think so. | Jan 15 22:31 |
m4n1sh | from all the blog posts on techright | Jan 15 22:31 |
m4n1sh | that is the obvious conclusion | Jan 15 22:31 |
m4n1sh | and 2ndly who was the person who mailed david | Jan 15 22:31 |
m4n1sh | Matthew Woehlke: | Jan 15 22:32 |
m4n1sh | his reply was so harsh | Jan 15 22:32 |
gnufreex | It was not harsh. | Jan 15 22:32 |
m4n1sh | it was | Jan 15 22:32 |
MinceR | that's a fun game | Jan 15 22:32 |
MinceR | it was not | Jan 15 22:33 |
gnufreex | Nielsen promoted things that he knew there is going to be a pushback | Jan 15 22:33 |
m4n1sh | it was | Jan 15 22:33 |
gnufreex | Then when he meet pushback | Jan 15 22:33 |
MinceR | it was not | Jan 15 22:33 |
gnufreex | He blamed people for hate | Jan 15 22:33 |
MinceR | (what are we talking about?) | Jan 15 22:33 |
m4n1sh | techrights people call everyone who disagrees with them as trolls | Jan 15 22:33 |
m4n1sh | isnt that harsh too | Jan 15 22:33 |
MinceR | no, techrights people call trolls trolls | Jan 15 22:33 |
gnufreex | Read Nielsen's mails. | Jan 15 22:33 |
MinceR | there's nothing harsh about that | Jan 15 22:33 |
gnufreex | I find it harsh too. | Jan 15 22:33 |
m4n1sh | I’m going to guess a lot of that “disrespectful personal mail” revolves around the use of mono? And why shouldn’t it? | Jan 15 22:33 |
m4n1sh | so why disrespectful personal mails? | Jan 15 22:34 |
gnufreex | It is as if he is Microsfot sales person. | Jan 15 22:34 |
gnufreex | That is how he behaves. | Jan 15 22:34 |
m4n1sh | “disrespectful personal mail” revolves around the use of mono? And why shouldn’t it? | Jan 15 22:34 |
m4n1sh | is it so hard to read | Jan 15 22:34 |
gnufreex | Of course there will be pushback on that. | Jan 15 22:34 |
m4n1sh | he approves “disrespectful personal mail” | Jan 15 22:34 |
m4n1sh | he says.. its good that you were being treated badly | Jan 15 22:35 |
m4n1sh | isnt that harsh | Jan 15 22:35 |
m4n1sh | how can you support someone who is involved in abusing someone | Jan 15 22:35 |
m4n1sh | ? | Jan 15 22:35 |
gnufreex | He promoted things that only can get you hars response. | Jan 15 22:35 |
gnufreex | That is exactly what he counted. | Jan 15 22:35 |
gnufreex | I tihnk | Jan 15 22:35 |
MinceR | once again, m4n1sh explains that verbal abuse is the greatest crime one can commit | Jan 15 22:36 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: that is not an excuse | Jan 15 22:36 |
*qu1j0t3 (~qu1j0t3@98.124.60.149) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 22:36 | |
m4n1sh | MinceR: yes it is | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | presumably right ahead of copyright infringement. :> | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | murder is way behind | Jan 15 22:36 |
m4n1sh | copyright infringerment? | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | of course. | Jan 15 22:36 |
m4n1sh | how it came into picture? | Jan 15 22:36 |
m4n1sh | who did copyright infringerment? | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: well, there's this completely warped idea of what crime is greater than what | Jan 15 22:36 |
gnufreex | So I can go to Microsoft forums, promote GNU/Linux, and then cry when they flame me? | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | including that copyright infringers are punished more than rapists and murderers | Jan 15 22:36 |
MinceR | i was guessing that it's connected to your ideology somehow | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: which copyright infringement? | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | you talking about | Jan 15 22:37 |
MinceR | things such as using p2p filesharing technology to download and upload music | Jan 15 22:37 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: hmm more of this as I was catching up on backlog | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | as usual, you people have diverted the topic | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | what was the origin topic? | Jan 15 22:37 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: anyway uhmm not all of us here are 100% anti Mono | Jan 15 22:37 |
sebsebseb | wrong one | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | nielsen was abused? | Jan 15 22:37 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | right | Jan 15 22:37 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: hard to follow the topic when you keep spouting nonsense | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: nonsense? | Jan 15 22:37 |
m4n1sh | which nonsense? | Jan 15 22:38 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: i suspect you're pulling our legs | Jan 15 22:38 |
m4n1sh | nielsen was abused and you people are supporting this move? | Jan 15 22:38 |
MinceR | nonsense like "answers to questions aren't claims" | Jan 15 22:38 |
MinceR | and "i never claim anything, ever, that i can't prove" | Jan 15 22:38 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: I am in the middle personally when it comes to Mono, I can see how it can be a possible threat, because it uses a Microsoft thing, and Microsoft may play dirty as a result in the future, but I also see how some pretty interesting apps are made with it really such as Banshee and F-Spot | Jan 15 22:38 |
MinceR | and "verbal abuse is the worst possible crime one can commit" | Jan 15 22:38 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: ,but I am also not a proper techrights person anyway, I used to help loads with Ubuntu people online and that, uhmm I will be doing community stuff for another distro and yep :) | Jan 15 22:38 |
gnufreex | You didn't answer m4n1dh. Could I cry about being flamed if I go to MSFT forums and promte competing technlogies? That is exactly what Nielsen did. | Jan 15 22:39 |
MinceR | and that you apparently don't understand the difference between depending on it in base system components (and installing it by default) and offering it as a nondefault package in a repository | Jan 15 22:39 |
gnufreex | He tried to push trojan horse into Fedora. | Jan 15 22:39 |
MinceR | gnufreex: oh, but m$ people are allowed to do anything. didn't you get the memo? | Jan 15 22:39 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: personalley I do not read many of schestowitz blog posts either, but some of them are quite good, the latest one about omgubuntu and David Neilson I wasn't that keen on though | Jan 15 22:39 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: I know which part of mono is dangerous | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | and which not | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | nielsen was abused and you people are supporting this move? | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | that is my major question | Jan 15 22:40 |
MinceR | another piece of nonsense: "it's all right if you commit crimes as long as you get paid for it" | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | so if I do something which you people dont like, you got an excuse to abuse me? | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | s/excuse/right | Jan 15 22:40 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: omgubuntu doesnt care about technology. The editors are non-techies | Jan 15 22:40 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: (obviosuly he has done a load of blog posts since then, but I meant the latest one about omgubuntu) also many people in the Linux community or at least if you look closely enough at identica, don't really like omgubuntu that much | Jan 15 22:41 |
MinceR | also, "m$ employees don't have to care about what harm they cause but i must be careful not to offend them or their families" | Jan 15 22:41 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: people on identica dont liek omgubuntu, I know. Known fact | Jan 15 22:41 |
MinceR | i wonder why | Jan 15 22:41 |
m4n1sh | I left identica, its impossible to have a rationale discussion with people on identica | Jan 15 22:41 |
MinceR | perhaps because omgubuntu is a hive of monomaniacs | Jan 15 22:41 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: oh? | Jan 15 22:42 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: because it is successful | Jan 15 22:42 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: so you think we only take an issue with your beloved m$ because they're "successful"? | Jan 15 22:42 |
m4n1sh | not ms dude | Jan 15 22:42 |
schestowitz | Fox is also "successful" | Jan 15 22:42 |
m4n1sh | am talking about omgubuntu | Jan 15 22:42 |
schestowitz | High ratings | Jan 15 22:42 |
gnufreex | IMHO, Nielsen is Microsoft TE. He fits into Evangelism is War quite nicely. I will write blog post about that. | Jan 15 22:42 |
schestowitz | Doesn't make it good | Jan 15 22:42 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: so you assert that people have an issue with omgubuntu because it's "successful", not because it's full of shit and because they insult free software proponents? | Jan 15 22:43 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: tell one one more source of ubuntu news which is good? | Jan 15 22:43 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: read their rant on "neckbeards" | Jan 15 22:43 |
schestowitz | MinceR: I keep a Ubuntu section | Jan 15 22:43 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: it dont agree on it much | Jan 15 22:43 |
MinceR | of course, they don't have to be polite, do they? | Jan 15 22:43 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: techrights uhmm, well obviously certain people get annoyed at it at times, because schestowitz isn't scared to express his opinion about stuff, and stuff that yes will annoy other people at times, but hey its the Internet right, people are alloweed to express their opinions on it? | Jan 15 22:43 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: it only contains mono hatred | Jan 15 22:43 |
schestowitz | twice a day or once I post many Ubuntu/Canonical links | Jan 15 22:43 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: same with omgubutnu | Jan 15 22:43 |
schestowitz | I remove thr chaff | Jan 15 22:43 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: what do you don't agree with much? | Jan 15 22:44 |
m4n1sh | schestowitz: omgubuntu does better reviews. They cater to newbies and not idealists | Jan 15 22:44 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: all the points on neckbeards post | Jan 15 22:44 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: as schestowitz basically said before omgubuntu is a good site for finding out about Ubuntu, but they mention Mono a bit to much. ok he didn't quite say like that, but something like that, and he can tell you for himself what he thinks of omgubuntu anyway | Jan 15 22:44 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: they are agnositc of technology | Jan 15 22:44 |
MinceR | they indoctrinate newbies to like mono without knowing the issues and to disregard freedom, you mean? | Jan 15 22:45 |
m4n1sh | joey told this | Jan 15 22:45 |
m4n1sh | he is not a programmer | Jan 15 22:45 |
m4n1sh | just a normal user | Jan 15 22:45 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: they present applications, choose yourself | Jan 15 22:45 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: omgubuntu people don't really care that much about lisences, so they will mention propritary software sometimes for Linux, Mono software sometimes well a lot of the time, and then other types at times | Jan 15 22:45 |
m4n1sh | they dont push it down the throat | Jan 15 22:45 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: but you do realise that some identica users might have taken offense at the "neckbeards" post, right? | Jan 15 22:45 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: Joey started using Ubuntu back in 2007 as his first distro I think, and that Benjamin guy in 2009 I think, so they are both newbies still really, when it comes to Desktop Linux | Jan 15 22:46 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: why am I concerned with this? ask Ben for neckbeard post. i did not write it | Jan 15 22:46 |
gnufreex | No, he don't get that. Because SpaceBoy and Buntus can insult anyone. | Jan 15 22:46 |
MinceR | 233954 < m4n1sh> sebsebseb: people on identica dont liek omgubuntu, I know. Known fact | Jan 15 22:46 |
MinceR | 234011 < m4n1sh> I left identica, its impossible to have a rationale discussion with people on identica | Jan 15 22:46 |
gnufreex | And when you say something, you are crazy hater. | Jan 15 22:46 |
gnufreex | Or necbird. | Jan 15 22:46 |
m4n1sh | I am not | Jan 15 22:46 |
m4n1sh | i found it impossible ot use identica | Jan 15 22:46 |
qu1j0t3 | the neckbeard post was juvenile, ignorant, and not worth our attention | Jan 15 22:46 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: which is good. actually | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | newbies can write blog posts on linux | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | isnt it good | Jan 15 22:47 |
MinceR | the entirety of omgubuntu is juvenile, ignorant, and not worth our attention | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: catch ben for that | Jan 15 22:47 |
MinceR | and most monomaniac stuff is like that | Jan 15 22:47 |
qu1j0t3 | probably, MinceR | Jan 15 22:47 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: thing with Mono is, mention Mono I mean advertise a program for example that's Mono, and going to annoy quite a lot of people in the Linux community, because of how things are | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: same for techrights | Jan 15 22:47 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: how so? | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | more people like omgubuntu than techrights | Jan 15 22:47 |
qu1j0t3 | so what? | Jan 15 22:47 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: remember, that even by your definition that was a claim | Jan 15 22:47 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: so time to show us the proof | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: for which one? | Jan 15 22:47 |
qu1j0t3 | it's not a popularity contest. | Jan 15 22:47 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: a bit like how Canonical doing big moves such as Unity instead of Gnome Shell, and now even as an option instead of the Gnome 2 fall back option, with Unity 2D, will annoy people in the Linux community, when they are a for profit company who use copyright assignmetns | Jan 15 22:47 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: talk to Canonical about this. Why me? | Jan 15 22:48 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: take upstream Gnome for example, they can't adopt Unity whilst it has copyright assignments | Jan 15 22:48 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: you claimed that techrights was juvenile, ignorant, and not worth our attention. | Jan 15 22:48 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: I dont speak for canonical | Jan 15 22:48 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: I know | Jan 15 22:48 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: exactly | Jan 15 22:48 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: so, where's the proof? | Jan 15 22:48 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: so what are you doing here? | Jan 15 22:48 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: neither Jono for the techboard, but I am just using as an example | Jan 15 22:48 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: i came to talk to schestowitz | Jan 15 22:48 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: go away and give your atetention to worthies elsewhere | Jan 15 22:48 |
MinceR | correction: you came to troll schestowitz | Jan 15 22:48 |
sebsebseb | qu1j0t3: shh | Jan 15 22:48 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: you have no right to ask me to go | Jan 15 22:48 |
MinceR | not exactly the same thing | Jan 15 22:48 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: LOL! | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: schestowitz doesnt think so, we had s good chat, not like this | Jan 15 22:49 |
*sebsebseb thinks its ok for m4n1sh to be here, public channel after all | Jan 15 22:49 | |
MinceR | also, for a while i was unsure if m4n1sh was trolling or just stupid | Jan 15 22:49 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: i'm just pointing out the contradiction, you think TR is not worth your attention, but here you are giving it attention. why? | Jan 15 22:49 |
MinceR | now i'm pretty sure he's just pretending to be that stupid | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: i dont care, I support omgubuntu more than techrights | Jan 15 22:49 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: so what? | Jan 15 22:49 |
MinceR | qu1j0t3: he's reaching for any insult he can hurl at us | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: less than you | Jan 15 22:49 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: what did you want to ask schestowitz? | Jan 15 22:49 |
MinceR | or at the free software community | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: you called omgubtu as that | Jan 15 22:49 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: are you here, because of the recent attack on omgubuntu and David Neilson? | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | i pointed my views | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: nope | Jan 15 22:49 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: no, i said the neckbeard post was. | Jan 15 22:49 |
m4n1sh | different topic | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: please pay attention | Jan 15 22:50 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: not you. someone else said that | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: right | Jan 15 22:50 |
MinceR | he can't pay attention, both of his neurons are occupied with worshipping m$. | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: then you said the same of TR. | Jan 15 22:50 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: yeah something else | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: yet, here you are. | Jan 15 22:50 |
sebsebseb | he came here to tell schestowitz about something he wrote wrong on the blog | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: maybe you were joking? | Jan 15 22:50 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: there's a contradiction somewhere... | Jan 15 22:50 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: 4 of your are writing | Jan 15 22:51 |
m4n1sh | I am replying to all of you at a time | Jan 15 22:51 |
qu1j0t3 | m4n1sh: what did you want to tell schestowitz? | Jan 15 22:51 |
m4n1sh | qu1j0t3: why you have to care why i came to talk to schestowitz | Jan 15 22:51 |
sebsebseb | qu1j0t3: see above | Jan 15 22:51 |
sebsebseb | qu1j0t3: he's done it already | Jan 15 22:51 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: you didn't make more sense when there was only 1 person talking to you | Jan 15 22:51 |
qu1j0t3 | he didn't come here to make sense, methinks | Jan 15 22:51 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: see, you cant talk straight | Jan 15 22:51 |
m4n1sh | instead relying on attacking me | Jan 15 22:52 |
m4n1sh | like | Jan 15 22:52 |
m4n1sh | <MinceR> he can't pay attention, both of his neurons are occupied with worshipping m$. | Jan 15 22:52 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: talking straight didn't work, did it? | Jan 15 22:52 |
*sebsebseb m4n1sh didn't come here to cause trouble, as is shown in the chat above | Jan 15 22:52 | |
MinceR | m4n1sh: you've failed to answer most of my questions | Jan 15 22:52 |
sebsebseb | uh wrong useage of /me there, but it stands out better like that :D | Jan 15 22:52 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: you claimed that you can prove all your claims | Jan 15 22:52 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: which ones? | Jan 15 22:52 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: yet when you were called upon it, you failed to deliver | Jan 15 22:52 |
m4n1sh | name it | Jan 15 22:52 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: you said you could prove every one of your claims that weren't answers to questions, did you not? | Jan 15 22:53 |
MinceR | i've named it twice | Jan 15 22:53 |
MinceR | i won't name it more times | Jan 15 22:53 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: I think many of these people are rather worried about the direction of Ubuntu and where it is heading, not just Mono, but Unity and so on as well realy | Jan 15 22:53 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: "directX is embedded within silicon" isnt it a bit weird soundthing thing? | Jan 15 22:53 |
MinceR | sorry, your imbecile m$ troll tactics won't work | Jan 15 22:53 |
m4n1sh | that was what i came to ask | Jan 15 22:53 |
MinceR | including the "make the other person ask you the same question over and over, never replying" | Jan 15 22:53 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: I dont have control over Unity and desktop team | Jan 15 22:53 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: yep I guess so | Jan 15 22:53 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: I know | Jan 15 22:53 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: it is a meritocracy and I need to work on it to gain powers to influence | Jan 15 22:53 |
MinceR | and including the "ask the same stupid question over and over until your opponents get tired of it" | Jan 15 22:54 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: ,but this is why, well your getting some of the stuff from these guys your getting now, I guess | Jan 15 22:54 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: .. and I cant sit on an armchair and dictate the desktop development guys | Jan 15 22:54 |
sebsebseb | m4n1sh: since they are not keen on the direction of Ubuntu at the moemnt | Jan 15 22:54 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: keen on the direction? I know the inside out, but cant force my views | Jan 15 22:54 |
gnufreex | <m4n1sh> sebsebseb: "directX is embedded within silicon" isnt it a bit weird soundthing thing? | Jan 15 22:55 |
gnufreex | So you found one mistake in 10 000 posts. Are you happy? | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: more | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | this is the latest | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | and i have no interest in goign back | Jan 15 22:55 |
*sebsebseb thinks its fine for m4n1sh to come here to point out a mistake in schestowitz blog post | Jan 15 22:55 | |
gnufreex | What DirectX had to do with anything here? | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: I am not a part of armchair revolutionary army | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: in that blog post | Jan 15 22:55 |
m4n1sh | hw come directx be embedded in silicon? | Jan 15 22:56 |
MinceR | i suspect it's just a strange way to phrase "hw support for certain directx 11 features", which would be the same as recent opengl features anyway | Jan 15 22:56 |
gnufreex | What revolutionary army? What that supose to mean? | Jan 15 22:56 |
m4n1sh | sebsebseb: schestowitz did accept that it is not the case. He was polite | Jan 15 22:56 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex: MinceR ok so he found a mistake on the blog, and comes here to point it out, thats a good thing really :) mistakes don't look good in text | Jan 15 22:56 |
MinceR | sebsebseb: sure, but that's not all he did, was it? | Jan 15 22:56 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: there is nothing ask directx support in card | Jan 15 22:56 |
m4n1sh | directx talks to drivers | Jan 15 22:56 |
m4n1sh | they just told they will provide drivers for windows | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | that's ot | Jan 15 22:57 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: sure, but it specifies certain features | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | it | Jan 15 22:57 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: I went through back log, m4n1sh hasn't trolled here | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | the driver will have features | Jan 15 22:57 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: at least that's how GPU marketing has worked for years | Jan 15 22:57 |
MinceR | it's sad, of course | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: its marketing | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | sensationalism | Jan 15 22:57 |
MinceR | they shouldn't promote a closed m$ API when they're aiming to promote GPU features | Jan 15 22:57 |
gnufreex | "DirectX in chip" is same as OpenGL in chip. | Jan 15 22:57 |
gnufreex | Unless they found a way to lock out OpenGL | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: none of them are on a chip FYI | Jan 15 22:57 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: closed MS API? | Jan 15 22:58 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: directx | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | it is closed GPU API to be precise | Jan 15 22:58 |
gnufreex | I know they are not in chip... you mean I am idiot? | Jan 15 22:58 |
MinceR | m4n1sh: they did name directx, so that's what they're addvertising | Jan 15 22:58 |
MinceR | s/dd/d/ | Jan 15 22:58 |
gnufreex | Features are in chip | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: its advertisement | Jan 15 22:58 |
gnufreex | and they support both | Jan 15 22:58 |
MinceR | i know, right? | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | so how come dirextc be in a chip? | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | its just that the driver will be powerufl enough | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | that's it | Jan 15 22:58 |
m4n1sh | and rest is marketing terms | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | with saurce | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | and spices | Jan 15 22:59 |
MinceR | that's pretty much what i said | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | to make ti look professionak | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | MinceR: yes, so directx in silicon sounds weird | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | doesnt make sense | Jan 15 22:59 |
MinceR | agreed | Jan 15 22:59 |
m4n1sh | that's what I came to point here | Jan 15 22:59 |
MinceR | but it isn't all that new, afaict | Jan 15 22:59 |
MinceR | also, it was probably taken from another article | Jan 15 23:00 |
gnufreex | So, what that has to do with Mono? | Jan 15 23:00 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: nothing | Jan 15 23:00 |
m4n1sh | how did mono come in picture. i have no clue | Jan 15 23:00 |
m4n1sh | i came for this post | Jan 15 23:00 |
m4n1sh | gn people | Jan 15 23:02 |
m4n1sh | need to sleep | Jan 15 23:02 |
gnufreex | Where is that DirectX post, I can't find it again. | Jan 15 23:02 |
m4n1sh | check it | Jan 15 23:02 |
m4n1sh | it is pretty new | Jan 15 23:02 |
MinceR | probably the one about new intel stuff | Jan 15 23:02 |
m4n1sh | yes | Jan 15 23:03 |
gnufreex | Can't find it. | Jan 15 23:04 |
m4n1sh | gnufreex: http://techrights.org/2011/01/12/arm-harm-by-microsoft-windows/ | Jan 15 23:04 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: Microsoft’s ARM Strategy Part of Vapourware Pitching, Maybe Plot to Harm Linux | Techrights .::. Size~: 111.89 KB | Jan 15 23:04 |
m4n1sh | gn | Jan 15 23:05 |
*m4n1sh has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jan 15 23:05 | |
MinceR | so, canonical is all about the "no matter what you do as long as you're polite" bullshit now? | Jan 15 23:08 |
gnufreex | Yeah, but they are never polite | Jan 15 23:08 |
MinceR | well, there's that | Jan 15 23:09 |
gnufreex | They call people crazy neckbeards when they criticize mono. | Jan 15 23:09 |
gnufreex | And they use their attack dogs to smear anyone who they don't like. | Jan 15 23:10 |
gnufreex | Like for example, Mono Bacon called me crazy when I asked him why Canonical supports Mono. There goes OpenDisrespect. Talking with them is like asking cow to fart in your face. | Jan 15 23:15 |
schestowitz | cows don't smell much | Jan 15 23:16 |
schestowitz | it's farmy balmy smell | Jan 15 23:16 |
MinceR | well, when i saw mono bacon chat on irc it was basically his exercise in never saying anything at all | Jan 15 23:19 |
MinceR | then again, i've heard the hatchet job against roy | Jan 15 23:19 |
schestowitz | https://twitter.com/mjasay/status/26411534909444096 | Jan 15 23:20 |
TechrightsBot-sc | @mjasay: @jwildeboer @schestowitz I was talking abt the biz side, Jan, so not abt ppl really. Roy, good pt | Jan 15 23:20 |
schestowitz | mac is nice to me | Jan 15 23:20 |
schestowitz | "mjasay - 28 mins ago - Twitter for iPhone - in reply to ☛ " | Jan 15 23:21 |
schestowitz | Twitter only | Jan 15 23:21 |
schestowitz | iPhone | Jan 15 23:21 |
MinceR | apparently the hypePhone virtual keyboard fails harder than i thought | Jan 15 23:21 |
MinceR | "abt ppl" | Jan 15 23:21 |
MinceR | "pt" | Jan 15 23:21 |
gnufreex | iGroan | Jan 15 23:21 |
gnufreex | iMoan | Jan 15 23:21 |
schestowitz | iGrope | Jan 15 23:21 |
gnufreex | iBad | Jan 15 23:22 |
schestowitz | ja ja!! | Jan 15 23:22 |
MinceR | at least he's back to his true crApple-worshipper colors | Jan 15 23:24 |
gnufreex | That is what "open source" rebranding gives you. Yeah, more people will come. But wrong people. | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | http://techrights.org/2010/04/07/ipad-misconceptions-in-the-press/ | Jan 15 23:25 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: Apple Apologists | Techrights .::. Size~: 110.99 KB | Jan 15 23:25 |
MinceR | indeed | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | gnufreex: see the IDG 'open source' blog | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | They have Microsoft staff there | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | and stephen from xen | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | right now bragging about his mac | Jan 15 23:25 |
schestowitz | in an 'open source' blog | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | Butt... | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | It's worse | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | He uses this open source blog to repeatedly mock desktop Linux with the "1%" lie | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | "Linux dead" and all | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | worse than omgubuntu | Jan 15 23:26 |
schestowitz | at least the latter want linux to be popular | Jan 15 23:27 |
gnufreex | No, OMGBUNTU wants Ubuntu to be popular | Jan 15 23:27 |
gnufreex | Failing that, then at least encumbered with Mono. | Jan 15 23:27 |
MinceR | well, m$ doesn't mind if mono-based gnu/linux gets popular | Jan 15 23:27 |
MinceR | because they can kill that with swpatent FUD/lawsuits | Jan 15 23:28 |
gnufreex | Even better, they can make money from it | Jan 15 23:28 |
MinceR | yeah | Jan 15 23:28 |
gnufreex | Make it more expensive than Windows, with 0 R&D spendings for them. | Jan 15 23:28 |
MinceR | i was about to say "or just kick all the competitors out of the market and take over it" | Jan 15 23:28 |
MinceR | maybe even rebrand it to "windows" | Jan 15 23:29 |
schestowitz | seven is stronger brand now | Jan 15 23:30 |
schestowitz | KIN absorbed the skull and bones | Jan 15 23:30 |
schestowitz | And now Vista Phony 7 ruins "Windows" | Jan 15 23:30 |
schestowitz | Ubuntu Seven | Jan 15 23:30 |
MinceR | :> | Jan 15 23:30 |
schestowitz | Ubuntu Eleven Seven | Jan 15 23:30 |
gnufreex | Funny thing is, most of Canonical management is fine with that, and that is probably the reason why they are hostile to Free Software. | Jan 15 23:30 |
schestowitz | Delay by 3 months | Jan 15 23:31 |
MinceR | and then they don't understand why we hate them... | Jan 15 23:31 |
gnufreex | They would like to have users that don't mind Canonical getting bought. | Jan 15 23:31 |
gnufreex | By Microsoft | Jan 15 23:31 |
schestowitz | "why do they hate us?"(R) | Jan 15 23:31 |
MinceR | "haters" | Jan 15 23:31 |
schestowitz | Wasn't it a famous phrase post-9/11? | Jan 15 23:31 |
MinceR | dunno | Jan 15 23:32 |
schestowitz | A: cause we are the bestest | Jan 15 23:32 |
schestowitz | gn | Jan 15 23:32 |
MinceR | i wasn't so immersed in it | Jan 15 23:32 |
MinceR | going? | Jan 15 23:32 |
gnufreex | And users who dont mind paying for proprietary software. | Jan 15 23:32 |
*MinceR waves to schestowitz | Jan 15 23:32 | |
sebsebseb | MinceR: what was that about re branding? | Jan 15 23:45 |
sebsebseb | oh that was gnufreex | Jan 15 23:45 |
gnufreex | sebsebseb: ? | Jan 15 23:45 |
sebsebseb | [23:23] <gnufreex> That is what "open source" rebranding gives you. Yeah, more people will come. But wrong people. | Jan 15 23:46 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex: oh something about the Ipad | Jan 15 23:46 |
sebsebseb | I guess you meant it uses quite a bit of open source really, but then Apple re brand it? | Jan 15 23:46 |
gnufreex | No | Jan 15 23:46 |
MinceR | sebsebseb: well, if m$ managed to make gnu/linux dependent on mono (just as monomaniacs want it), and thus on their sw patents, they could acquire one gnu/linux distro (say, suse) and rebrand it to windows and sell it as the new version of windows | Jan 15 23:46 |
gnufreex | I meant that "Open sore" is rebrand of "Free SOftware" | Jan 15 23:47 |
MinceR | i see | Jan 15 23:47 |
sebsebseb | open sore? | Jan 15 23:47 |
sebsebseb | open source | Jan 15 23:47 |
gnufreex | With purpose of geting more people. | Jan 15 23:47 |
MinceR | open sores. | Jan 15 23:47 |
gnufreex | And more people come | Jan 15 23:47 |
gnufreex | But not kind of people you would like. | Jan 15 23:47 |
MinceR | well, it was originally aimed at businessmen. | Jan 15 23:47 |
sebsebseb | I think we need strong alternative distros that are user friendly and suitable for newbies, but also expereinced users | Jan 15 23:48 |
sebsebseb | alternatives to Ubuntu that is | Jan 15 23:48 |
MinceR | indeed | Jan 15 23:48 |
sebsebseb | I had a chat with someone about this kind of thing else where a little while ago | Jan 15 23:48 |
sebsebseb | anyway if we look at current distros they all suck really for this | Jan 15 23:48 |
MinceR | also, free software needs to be driven by developers, not profit-oriented businesses | Jan 15 23:48 |
sebsebseb | however give it some time and Mageia may be the kind of thing I am wanting :D | Jan 15 23:48 |
MinceR | at least the software that forms the basis of the infrastructure | Jan 15 23:49 |
sebsebseb | also people who want appliances like this guy was basically saying, would find Unity suitable | Jan 15 23:49 |
sebsebseb | ,but us that want a generic desktop won't really like it | Jan 15 23:49 |
sebsebseb | anyway Unity is hmm, but so is recent Gnome Shell from what I seen, they both got docks uh! | Jan 15 23:50 |
*sebsebseb still hasn't tried a later Gnome Shell with the dock | Jan 15 23:50 | |
MinceR | afaict unity is the idea that "hey, netbooks have low-resolution screens. what should we do about that? oh, i know, waste even more screen space!" | Jan 15 23:50 |
MinceR | and they put a huge vertical panel there | Jan 15 23:50 |
MinceR | in addition to the horizontal one | Jan 15 23:51 |
sebsebseb | now instead of only the Gnome 2 fall back, they got Unity 2d | Jan 15 23:51 |
*gnufreex_ (~quassel@79-101-134-55.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs) has joined #boycottnovell-social | Jan 15 23:51 | |
sebsebseb | as well | Jan 15 23:51 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex: oh lost you? | Jan 15 23:51 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: anyway I think Desktop Linux is starting to get a bit worrying really | Jan 15 23:52 |
MinceR | i've set my netbook up to have only a thin vertical panel, but i had to realize that websites tend to expect that the screen is at least 1024 pixels wide | Jan 15 23:52 |
gnufreex_ | Yeah, it timed out. | Jan 15 23:52 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: I mean where things are heading or seem to be heading | Jan 15 23:52 |
*gnufreex has quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | Jan 15 23:52 | |
gnufreex_ | Give me a back log | Jan 15 23:52 |
gnufreex_ | from my last comment | Jan 15 23:52 |
MinceR | sebsebseb: agreed, especially if the monomaniacs and novell2.0 get their way | Jan 15 23:52 |
MinceR | but even kde4 is somewhat worrying for me | Jan 15 23:52 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: well ok if you like Mono to an extent, but I mean Unity and Gnome Shell and that kind of thing mainly | Jan 15 23:52 |
gnufreex_ | Gnome Shell don't have mono | Jan 15 23:53 |
MinceR | also crackpot ideas such as client-side decorations | Jan 15 23:53 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex_: no, but it has a dock | Jan 15 23:53 |
sebsebseb | like I was saying just now | Jan 15 23:53 |
gnufreex_ | Dock is not mono | Jan 15 23:53 |
MinceR | http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/333 | Jan 15 23:53 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Window indicators .::. Size~: 265.69 KB | Jan 15 23:53 |
MinceR | that's pure, concentrated idiocy right there | Jan 15 23:54 |
MinceR | crApple-grade | Jan 15 23:54 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex_: back log, here or pm? | Jan 15 23:54 |
sebsebseb | gnufreex_: no, but docks suck really | Jan 15 23:54 |
sebsebseb | Dock is like Apple | Jan 15 23:54 |
gnufreex_ | actually I think Dock is one of few good features in crApple OSX | Jan 15 23:54 |
MinceR | and of course this crap >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators | Jan 15 23:54 |
TechrightsBot-sc | Title: DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators - Ubuntu Wiki .::. Size~: 69.09 KB | Jan 15 23:54 |
gnufreex_ | I agree with MinceR on "windicators" | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:45] <MinceR> well, it was originally aimed at businessmen. | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <sebsebseb> I think we need strong alternative distros that are user friendly and suitable for newbies, but also expereinced users | Jan 15 23:55 |
gnufreex_ | Idiocy | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <sebsebseb> alternatives to Ubuntu that is | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <MinceR> indeed | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <sebsebseb> I had a chat with someone about this kind of thing else where a little while ago | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <sebsebseb> anyway if we look at current distros they all suck really for this | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <MinceR> also, free software needs to be driven by developers, not profit-oriented businesses | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:46] <sebsebseb> however give it some time and Mageia may be the kind of thing I am wanting :D | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:47] <MinceR> at least the software that forms the basis of the infrastructure | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:47] <sebsebseb> also people who want appliances like this guy was basically saying, would find Unity suitable | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:47] <sebsebseb> ,but us that want a generic desktop won't really like it | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:48] <sebsebseb> anyway Unity is hmm, but so is recent Gnome Shell from what I seen, they both got docks uh! | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:48] * sebsebseb still hasn't tried a later Gnome Shell with the dock | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:48] <MinceR> afaict unity is the idea that "hey, netbooks have low-resolution screens. what should we do about that? oh, i know, waste even more screen space!" | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:48] <MinceR> and they put a huge vertical panel there | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:49] <MinceR> in addition to the horizontal one | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | [23:49] <sebsebseb> now instead of only the Gnome 2 fall back, they got Unity 2d | Jan 15 23:55 |
sebsebseb | heh in many channels I would have been kicked out for flooding or put on quite at least, because of that ^ | Jan 15 23:56 |
sebsebseb | ,but anyway gnufreex_ you asked for it :) | Jan 15 23:56 |
MinceR | notice that most of these "features" are also designed to make sane applications incompatible with these new insane desktops and new insane applications incompatible with sane desktops | Jan 15 23:56 |
MinceR | elimination of tray icon support and new crapplications becoming dependent on client-side decorations | Jan 15 23:57 |
gnufreex_ | Yeah, that is what I noticed too. | Jan 15 23:58 |
gnufreex_ | Canonical tries to diferentiate. | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | MinceR: yeah the indicitaors | Jan 15 23:58 |
MinceR | or rather, canonical is playing the m$ game | Jan 15 23:58 |
gnufreex_ | And that might be one of the reasons why they push mono | Jan 15 23:58 |
MinceR | embrace, extend, extinguish | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | Canonical took advantage of many of us really, including myself | Jan 15 23:58 |
gnufreex_ | They know Red Hat won't use it. | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | you know promoting their product | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | helping people use it | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | for years | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | being a fan boy really even in my case | Jan 15 23:58 |
gnufreex_ | And they push CA because others wont use their corporate projects. | Jan 15 23:58 |
sebsebseb | ok I didn't know as much about this stuff as I know now by a long way, but still | Jan 15 23:59 |
sebsebseb | they took advantage of me | Jan 15 23:59 |
sebsebseb | then started to let me down with 9.04 | Jan 15 23:59 |
sebsebseb | and well much more of that as the releases went on | Jan 15 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!