Posted in Site News at 4:57 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: ‘Solderpunk’ is back from a long hiatus; this bodes well for Geminispace, which grew fast in spite of the conspicuous absence
AS we noted 4 days ago, Gemini space had become very important to us. It’s growing very rapidly (it’s hard to correctly estimate the overall size, but crawlers/spiders see almost 4 times as many capsules this year compared to last year). Recently, some people expressed concerns about alleged stagnation or rather a lack of changes to the original specification (not that everything must change or expand over time). Then, some people asked for patience [1, 2], knowing that ‘Solderpunk’ was likely to return some time soon and finalise the specification. As of minutes ago, there is already a proposal to freeze the Gemini specification.
Well, ‘Solderpunk’ probably wants to keep it simple. And he’s back now, having just posted an update with plan for the specification:
Geminauts!
Lo, I have returned.
And I have come not to bring peace, but the sword.
Well, not really. Sorry, couldn't resist a little drama.
But I *have* come with a strong resolve to move things forward quickly,
decisively, and if necessary unilaterally. I will be putting the
"dictator" in BDFL (but not ignoring the "benevolent").
My thoughts are something like this:
The never ending discussion (and at times heated argument) that has
characterised the efforts to collectively and openly finalise the spec
using this mailing list, and the associated risk of leader burnout, now
feel to me like they are a larger risk/liability to the project than the
prospect of making slightly suboptimal and/or unpopular decisions when
wrapping things up relatively quickly and without agonising over every
little detail. The sooner the spec is finalised the sooner we can spend
more of our time and energy reading and writing Geminispace content.
People who aren't interested in spending time and energy doing those
things have no place playing a strong role in deciding how to finalise
things, anyway.
It's clear that any hope of unanimity in the community on exactly what
Gemini should look like is long gone. There are too many people coming
from too many technical backgrounds for us all to agree on what is
necessary and what is extraneous. Anything resembling "design by
committee" will likely result in bad compromises leaving everybody
unhappy. Better to have decisive leadership with a clear vision. This
will leave some unhappy. It's unfortunate, but it's inevitable. Gemini
can't be everything to everybody.
Despite my total lack of involvement for several months and the lack of
any progress on the spec, Geminispace *itself*, which is our real goal,
has neither stagnated nor shrunk. It has only gotten better. Awesome
things like smol.pub have turned up. All the time there are more and
more people setting up little digital homes in Geminispace, who accept
and embrace Gemini as it is right now, and many of them are very happy
with the status quo. They are writing truly wonderful content, and I
have not come across a single thing written there yet which made me
think "right now this is merely good, but it could be excellent if only
Gemini supported X, Y or Z". And all of this is hosted on diverse
servers and compatible with diverse clients, including clients which
have not been updated in months. All of this says we have gotten the
most important things right or close enough to right already, and there
is no risk of catastrophically messing anything up if we simply resolve
outstanding technical issues with the minimum possible change.
Additional capacities in the gemtext format are not necessary. That's
not just, like, my opinion, man, that's an empirical fact. Geminispace
is there. It's *exactly* the kind of space I originally envisaged.
I will start wrapping stuff up, via changes to what have always been the
canonical versions of all relevant documents, hosted at
gemini.circumlunar.space, as quickly as I can. I am not going to take
the time to justify every single decision against all real or imagined
objects in long posts to the mailing list or my gemlog. Maybe I will do
this retrospectively some day, but for now I just want to get it done.
I will act largely alone in this regard, but I'm not going to completely
disregard all external input. A lot of people have put a lot of of time
and care into thinking and writing about these issues both on this list
and in the git trackers that sprung up once I delegated spec
finalisation to Sean. I'm going to read that stuff and I'm going to be
be guided by it, and I will reach out to individual people for
clarification when I feel it necessary. I am genuinely thankful to all
of those people for their efforts and I do not intend to be dismissive
of them.
If I sound angry and frustrated, I apologise. I mean, to some extent I
am, but not at particular people or at the community, I'm angry and
frustrated at vague abstract things like human group dynamics and viral
internet hype cycles. I continue to care about this project and I care
about the community that has formed around it. I acknowledge that I am
far from blameless in how this year in Gemini has turned out. I hope
the community still has some faith in me, and I hope everyone
understands that I'm doing this because I honestly think it's for the
best, and not because I want all teh [sic] power. I don't want *any* power!
But nobody I know and trust enough to give the power to wants it either,
and big formal multi-person decision making is not going to yield good
or fast results, so, here we are.
I'm not going to have time to do this *and* follow the list closely and
reply to any and all questions. But I will make a genuine effort to
keep the list informed as I work.
Cheers,
Solderpunk
As a reminder, Gemini is a new project (it only ‘feels’ old or nybrutalist) and the specification is still work in progress. Regardless, we’re an early adopter and we’re pleased to see how fast Gemini grew this past year. Having the founder back in the game (to do technical work on the specification) is icing on the cake. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:26 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Video download link | md5sum 7e555d7cec749b7500ed9b4dca8103dd
Summary: Bulgarian politics seem to have played a big role in selecting chiefs and delegates who backed Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful proposals, which treat workers almost like slaves and ordinary citizens as disposable ‘collaterals’
TODAY we published Part 23 of a very long series which will last over a month in total (we publish parts on a daily basis). Part 23 is about Bulgaria, which is better known than most nations in the Balkan region, partly because of its relative size. The above video places emphasis on 6 PDF files, which are preserved here permanently for reference (to accompany the text). These include English translations.
“Research into these matters generally contributes to the perception, back by reasonably good evidence and plausible explanations, that the Bulgarian patent system is very political/politicised and not necessarily focused on technicalities, laws etc.”Bulgarian politics do not receive much media coverage in “the West” (Western Europe, north America) or maybe it’s just neglected by English-speaking media. So it’s important to make such information more widely accessible, also in the language sense.
Research into these matters generally contributes to the perception, back by reasonably good evidence and plausible explanations, that the Bulgarian patent system is very political/politicised and not necessarily focused on technicalities, laws etc. In other words, it’s a lot like today’s EPO, so we can expect Bulgarian delegates to back autocrats and two-faced politicians, including António Campinos the imposter (pretending to be an expert in science without having had any experience). █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:11 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Series parts:
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part I: Let the Sunshine In!
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part II: A “Unanimous” Endorsement?
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part III: Three Missing Votes
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IV: The Founding States
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part V: Germany Says “Ja”
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VI: A Distinct Lack of Dutch Courage
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VII: Luxembourgish Laxity
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VIII: Perfidious Albion and Pusillanimous Hibernia
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IX: More Holes Than Swiss Cheese
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part X: Introducing the Controversial Christian Bock
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XI: “General Bock” – Battistelli’s Swiss Apprentice?
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XII: The French Connection
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIII: Battistelli’s Iberian Facilitators – Spain
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIV: Battistelli’s Iberian Facilitators – Portugal
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XV: Et Tu Felix Austria…
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki’s Accord
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XX: The Visegrád Group
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXI: The Balkan League – The Doyen and His “Protégée”
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXII: The Balkan League – North Macedonia and Albania
- YOU ARE HERE ☞ The Balkan League – Bulgaria

Head of the Bulgarian delegation in June 2013: Kamen Veselinov
Summary: Today we examine the role of Bulgaria in Benoît Battistelli‘s liberticidal regime at the EPO (as well as under António Campinos, from 2018 to present) with particular focus on political machinations
In this part the focus is on the Bulgarian delegation, which in June 2013 was headed by Kamen Veselinov, Director-General of the Bulgarian Patent Office (BPO).
Some time after he had played his part in rubber-stamping Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations”, Veselinov was relieved of his position as head of the BPO in March 2014.
“Some time after he had played his part in rubber-stamping Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations”, Veselinov was relieved of his position as head of the BPO in March 2014.”According to a bulletin [PDF]
published by ipbulgaria.bg, Veselinov held the position without the required professional experience and under his leadership “the office was brought to a severe crisis” and “as a result of his mismanagement, Bulgaria is on the US Special 301 blacklist”.
Veselinov was replaced by Tanya Naydenova, a graduate in law from the Mikhail Lomonosov Moscow State University who headed the BPO between March and December 2014.

Tanya Naydenova headed the BPO for a brief period between March and December 2014.
But it turned out that Veselinov had only been temporarily ousted. He was reinstated when Boyko Borisov took over as Prime Minister in November 2014.

Veselinov and his political patron, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov.
This meant that Veselinov was able to revisit his old buddies on the EPO’s Administrative Council in Munich at the March 2015 meeting and he could rejoin them in rubber-stamping further dubious proposals tabled by Battistelli. He continued to serve as director of the BPO until the summer of 2016 when he retired at the ripe old age of 70.

Temporarily ousted, Veselinov (left) was reinstated after Boyko Borisov came to power towards the end of 2014. He continued to serve as head of the BPO until the summer of 2016 when he was replaced by Petko Nikolov (right), chairman of the national anti-trust authority.
Veselinov’s successor [PDF]
as head of the BPO was Petko Nikolov who was born in 1958 in Botevgrad in western Bulgaria. According to the Bulgarian media, Nikolov graduated in law from Sofia University, has a master’s degree in finance from the University of Veliko Tarnovo, as well as a specialization in criminal law from the University of Sofia. He also has a doctorate in economics.
“But it turned out that Veselinov had only been temporarily ousted.”Nikolov initially worked as an attorney until 2001 when he entered politics as a member of the National Movement for Stability and Progress (NDSV), originally known as the “National Movement Simeon II”. The NDSV is a liberal, populist political party created as the personal political vehicle of Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, the deposed heir to the throne of the Kingdom of Bulgaria who succeeded in making a post-communist political comeback as Prime Minister between 2001 and 2005.
Nikolov’s first important public sector appointment was as chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Privatization Agency in 2001, under the “Sakskoburggotski government” – or so-called “Tsar’s cabinet” – presided over by Simeon von Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. According to media reports, Nikolov obtained his position on the Supervisory Board “as part of the quota of the Simeon II National Movement”.

Petko Nikolov’s original political patron, Simeon von Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.
In 2003, Nikolov’s career took another leap forward when he was appointed chairman of the Commission for Protection of Competition (CPC), a position which he held for nearly 13 years [PDF]
, somehow managing to survive six different governments. In the turbulent and unstable world of Bulgarian politics that is no small achievement.
“In 2003, Nikolov’s career took another leap forward when he was appointed chairman of the Commission for Protection of Competition (CPC), a position which he held for nearly 13 years, somehow managing to survive six different governments.”Nikolov’s second term as head of the CPC had officially expired in October 2015 and a legislative amendment earlier that year prevented him from serving a further consecutive term. Nevertheless, due to political wrangling over his successor, he remained in charge of the antitrust authority on a caretaker basis until the summer of 2016.
Before he was replaced at the CPC, rumours began circulating that “out of gratitude for the work done, GERB [the political party of Prime Minister Boyko Borisov] would provide him with a new appetizing position”.
“His previous track record as chairman of the anti-trust authority CPC also came in for criticism.”His subsequent appointment as head of the BPO attracted a lot of critical comment in Bulgaria where it was reported that he had been parachuted into the position directly by Prime Minister Boyko Borisov without an open competition. [PDF]
His previous track record as chairman of the anti-trust authority CPC also came in for criticism. This criticism centred around claims that Nikolov had been more than favourable to the Bulgarian politician, media mogul [PDF]
, and oligarch Delyan Peevski in resolving cases which affected Peevski’s interests.
Peevski – nicknamed “Shishi” or “Potbelly” in Bulgaria – is a highly controversial figure who was recently sanctioned by the US Department of the Treasury which described him in the following terms:
“Delyan Slavchev Peevski (Peevski) is an oligarch who previously served as a Bulgarian MP and media mogul and has regularly engaged in corruption, using influence peddling and bribes to protect himself from public scrutiny and exert control over key institutions and sectors in Bulgarian society.”

Nikolov’s appointment as head of the BPO in 2016 attracted critical comment in Bulgaria.
From left to right: Petko Nikolov, Bulgarian PM Boyko Borisov and oligarch Delyan Peevski.
“Given his political allegiance to the monarchistically flavoured NDSV and his reputed subservience to homegrown oligarchs like Peevski, it’s hardly surprising that when it came to EPO affairs, Nikolov followed in the footsteps of his predecessor Veselinov and turned out to be another uncritical “facilitator” of the tyrant Battistelli and his vicious assault on the rights of EPO staff.”Given his political allegiance to the monarchistically flavoured NDSV and his reputed subservience to homegrown oligarchs like Peevski, it’s hardly surprising that when it came to EPO affairs, Nikolov followed in the footsteps of his predecessor Veselinov and turned out to be another uncritical “facilitator” of the tyrant Battistelli and his vicious assault on the rights of EPO staff.
In return, Battistelli did his best to cultivate the goodwill of his Bulgarian vassals. In November 2017 (warning: epo.org
link), he dispatched his faithful lieutenant Raimund Lutz to deputise for him at the 27th Patent Information Conference which took place in Sofia.

From l. to r.: David Sukalinski (BPO), EPO Vice-President Lutz, Ofelia Kirkoryan-Tsonkova (BPO), Petko Nikolov (BPO), and Deputy Minister for Economic Affairs, Lachezar Borosov (November 2017).
In March 2018, as his EPO presidency was drawing to a close, Battistelli paid his respects to his Bulgarian allies by turning up in person as a guest speaker at a conference on “IP” hosted in Sofia (warning: epo.org
link) where he met with Nikolov and various government ministers, including the Deputy Minister for Economic Affairs, Lachezar Borisov.

From l. to r.: Battistelli with Lachezar Borisov and Petko Nikolov (March 2018).
More recently, in June 2021, sources in Bulgaria reported that Nikolov had been replaced [PDF]
by Vladya Borisova [PDF]
following a decision issued by the caretaker government of Stefan Yanev.
“More recently, in June 2021, sources in Bulgaria reported that Nikolov had been replaced by Vladya Borisova following a decision issued by the caretaker government of Stefan Yanev.”No reasons were given for Nikolov’s departure, but it seems that he was “purged” due to his close connections to previous government led by Boyko Borisov. That government had fallen into disfavour and triggered widespread public protests which lasted from July 2020 until April 2021, when Borisov and his cabinet finally resigned at the end of their four-year term.

The new head of the Bulgarian Patent Office, Vladya Borisova.
Prior to her current appointment, the new head of the Bulgarian Patent Office, Vladya Borisova, was a professor at the Institute of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (IIPTT) in Sofia.
On its website the IIPTT describes itself as “a unit of the University of National and World Economy for research in the field of intellectual property”.
“Prior to her current appointment, the new head of the Bulgarian Patent Office, Vladya Borisova, was a professor at the Institute of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (IIPTT) in Sofia.”The University of National and World Economy (UNWE), which was originally established in 1920 as the Free University of Political and Economic Sciences, claims to be the largest and oldest institute for higher economic studies in Bulgaria and Southeastern Europe. During the communist era it was known as the Karl Marx Higher Institute of Economics and it was given its present post-communist name in 1990.

Bust of former “patron” Karl Marx on the UNWE grounds in Sofia.
It remains to be seen what contribution, if any, Borisova will manage to make to EPO affairs.
Maybe she will surprise us all and make a stand for the rights of EPO staff. But don’t hold your breath on that.
“Maybe she will surprise us all and make a stand for the rights of EPO staff. But don’t hold your breath on that.”In the present era of unfettered globalised capitalism, the subject of workers’ rights seems to be an unfashionable topic of discussion, whether at the UNWE in Sofia or at the EPO in Munich. One wonders what the UNWE’s former “patron” Karl Marx would have made of it all…
In the next part we will turn our attention to the delegation representing Bulgaria’s northern neighbour, Romania. █

Permalink
Send this to a friend