Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Sunday, July 03, 2022

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 00:47
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 00:48
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 00:59
*SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)Jul 03 00:59
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 00:59
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 01:05
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 01:06
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 01:12
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 01:14
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 01:19
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 01:20
*schestowitz[TR] has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jul 03 03:08
*schestowitz[TR] (~schestowitz[TR]@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 03:08
*Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)Jul 03 03:12
*Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@freenode-i33.jp8.7132oi.IP) has joined #techbytesJul 03 03:12
*Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jul 03 03:13
*Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 03:13
*techrights_guest|1 (~490bc725@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 05:02
*techrights_guest|1 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)Jul 03 05:20
schestowitz  <li>Jul 03 07:47
schestowitz                                    <h5><a href="https://www.talospace.com/2022/07/and-now-real-risc-v-laptop-maybe.html">And Now A Real RISC-V Laptop ... Maybe</a></h5>Jul 03 07:47
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.talospace.com | And now a real RISC-V laptop ... maybeJul 03 07:47
schestowitz                                    <blockquote>Jul 03 07:47
schestowitz                                        <p>Phoronix is reporting the first production RISC-V laptop, (code?) named ROMA, with "a quad-core RISC-V CPU (although clock frequencies are not noted), a GPU/NPU accelerator [and reportedly other features], up to 16GB of LPDDR4/LPDDR4X RAM [and] up to 256GB of storage." This sounds great, except that I was seriously underwhelmed by the Allwinner D1 in the DevTerm R-01, so the lack of CPU specs is not Jul 03 07:47
schestowitzencouraging. There are also two distinct process nodes for the System-on-Module, 12nm for Pro and 28nm for Normal, so there may be a wide gulf between configurations. On the other hand, it does prominently claim to be upgradable, possibly by swapping out the modules. Strangely, it advertises itself with an ARM SC300 secure enclave, which seems a bit odd as well.</p>Jul 03 07:47
schestowitz                                    </blockquote>Jul 03 07:47
schestowitz                                </li>Jul 03 07:47
schestowitz <li>Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz                <h5><a href="https://linuxgizmos.com/i-mx8m-mini-powers-pico-itx-board-and-supports-yocto-based-linux-distributions/">i.MX8M Mini powers Pico-ITX board and supports Yocto-based Linux distributions</a></h5>Jul 03 07:50
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 520 @ https://linuxgizmos.com/i-mx8m-mini-powers-pico-itx-board-and-supports-yocto-based-linux-distributions/ )Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz                <blockquote>Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz                    <p>The eDM-SBC-iMX8Mm is a Single Board Computer (SBC) which comes in a small Pico-ITX form factor and it’s powered by NXP’s i.MX8M Mini System on Chip (SoC). This compact device was designed to run 24/7 to suit applications such as kiosks , digital signage displays, smart home appliances etc.</p>Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz                    <p>DATA MODUL has designed this SBC to be coupled with NXP’s i.MX8M Mini Dual Cortex-A53 (up to 1800 MHz) or its Quad-core version. Both CPU models integrate a GCNanoUltra GPU with a 2D/3D accelerator and they include up to 512KB L2 in Cache memory.</p>Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz                </blockquote>Jul 03 07:50
schestowitz            </li>Jul 03 07:50
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 08:04
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 08:07
schestowitzare there any access codes or not yet? sorry to hear about the AC...Jul 03 08:31
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Jul 03 09:46
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@5tcc2vuaj9aks.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 09:51
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 10:16
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 11:00
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 11:00
*GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jul 03 13:42
*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@vayqsuzqttqha.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 13:47
*techrights_guest|20 (~d52d6a5b@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 15:57
*techrights_guest|20 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)Jul 03 16:06
schestowitzhttp://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/27/survey-epo-staff-dont-trust-top-management-concerns-about-quality/Jul 03 20:45
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | Survey: EPO staff don’t trust top management, concerns about quality - Kluwer Patent BlogJul 03 20:45
schestowitz"Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzStaff members of the EPO have little confidence in the top management. They don’t think there is a clear and coherent strategy, there are big concerns about quality and also about the increasing work load. This is shown by the fifth Technologia Survey, the results of which have been shared with staff last week.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe survey, which was commissioned by trade union SUEPO, reveals deep divisions between management and staff. It was published just ahead of the meeting of the Administrative Council, 29 and 30 June 2022, in which a decision about the re-appointment of António Campines as EPO president for a second term until 2028 is on the agenda.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzOne sign of the lack of trust between staff and management is the fact that the Technologia survey could be held among SUEPO members only and those among EPO staff who actively opted in, since president Campinos refused SUEPO to use EPO emails*.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzSome results in more detail:Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzI think top management has set out a clear and coherent strategy for the EPO: 31% of respondents said they totally disagree, 33% tend to disagree, 21% are neutral, 14% tend to agree and 2% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzI support the strategy of the EPO set out by top management: 39% totally disagree, 32% tend to disagree, 21% neutral, 7% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzIn my view, the actions of top management and the strategy adopted have departed considerably from the role that the EPO should be playing in the European patent system: 6% totally disagree, 12% tend to disagree, 20% neutral, 31% tend to agree, 32% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzI identify with top management’s view: 46% totally disagree, 35% tend to disagree, 15% neutral, 4% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzI identify with the views of Staff Representation: 1% totally disagree, 5% tend to disagree, 17% neutral, 51% tend to agree, 27% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzQuestions about the level of trust in superiors show a staggering 3% confidence in president Campinos and 1% in the Management Advisory Committee, whereas the confidence in immediate superiors is relatively good.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzTrust in my immediate superior : 7% very little, 12% little, 24% neutral, 35% much, 22% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy director : 20% very little, 19% little, 37% neutral, 18% much, 6% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy Principal Director/COO : 50% very little, 26% little, 20% neutral, 4% much, 1% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy Vice President : 47% very little, 24% little, 23% neutral, 6% much, 1% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe Management Advisory Committee: 60% very little, 24% little, 16% neutral, 1% much, 0% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe President : 61% very little, 23% little, 13% neutral, 3% much, 0% very muchJul 03 20:45
schestowitzQualityJul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe survey also clarifies there are concerns about the quality of the work the EPO produces and about recent reorganizations.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzIn reaction to the statement: ‘Do you consider that the introduction of a performance-related bonus at the level of the individual employee is a good thing for the QUALITY OF THE WORK produced by the European Patent Office?: 61% answered they totally disagree, 28% tend to disagree, 10% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzWith the following statement: ‘the current president and top management have taken useful measures to maintain and improve the quality of the EPO’s products and services’, 38% totally disagrees, 32% tends to disagree, 19% is neutral, 11% tends to agree, 1% totally agrees.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzStaff members were asked as well how many times ‘the operational organigram around your post within the EPO’ had been restructured in the last three years. 19% answered ‘never’, but more than 80% of respondents had experienced such restructuring (once 30%, twice 34%, three times or more 18%).Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzThese reorganizations concerning their post were ‘pointless’, according to 86% of respondents. 72% said that the ‘constant reorganizations and restructuring over recent years are pointless and have a negative effect on my situation’.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzIn the meantime, the economic situation of the EPO is favorable, according to most respondents: 2% say: ‘disagree and it bothers me’, 6% disagree, 66% agree, 26% say ‘agree and I appreciate’Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzEqualityJul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe Technologia survey was also about the personal situation of staff members. A remarkable result is the reaction to the statement: ‘Employees are treated equally at the EPO’: 32% totally disagrees, 30% tends to disagree, up sharp since the 2020 survey, in which these numbers were 8% and 22% respectively.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzSome other findings:Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzI can expand my professional competences: 14% answer: disagree and it bothers me, 38% disagree, 40% agree, 9% says: agree and I appreciateJul 03 20:45
schestowitzThe amount of work I am tasked with is acceptable: 29% disagree and it bothers me, 36% disagree, 30% agree, 5% agree and I appreciateJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy work pace is acceptable: 24% disagree and it bothers me, 34% disagree, 37% agree, 5% agree and I appreciateJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy professional activity allows me to balance work life and private life: 20% disagree and it bothers me, 30% disagree, 41% agree, 10% agree and I appreciateJul 03 20:45
schestowitzMy work is interesting: 7% disagree and it bothers me, 17% disagree, 55% agree, 21% agree and I appreciateJul 03 20:45
schestowitzRemarkable also is the reaction to the statement: Do you work outside the hours provided for by the regulations governing your working hours? 58% work in the evening or at night, 26% during weekends or public holidays, 16% during holidays. 36% don’t work outside working hours.Jul 03 20:45
schestowitzThis a huge change compared to earlier Technologia surveys, in which many more respondents said they did not work outside working hours: 76% in 2010, 69% in 2013, 61% in 2016, 58% in 2020.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzProudJul 03 20:46
schestowitzAsked to describe the work atmosphere at the level of the EPO, respondents mentioned the words: tense (56%), confrontational (35%), cold (31%), warm (2%), cheerful (1%).Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz69% of staff feel very tired (sometimes, often or always), 42% feel depressed and 37% feel desperate. 67% think their current work life affects their health.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz93% of respondents said they were fairly (44%) of very (49%) proud to work for the European Patent Office before. But asked whether they are proud to work for the European Patent Office now, only 34% said they are fairly proud, and a mere 8% is very proud.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz*Over 6545 staff, the questionnaire was sent to 2915 and 1766 participated.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz_____________________________Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzKluwer IP LawJul 03 20:46
schestowitzThis page as PDFJul 03 20:46
schestowitzLIKE? SHARE WITH YOUR FRIENDS.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzPost navigationJul 03 20:46
schestowitzNEXT ARTICLEJul 03 20:46
schestowitzA preliminary injunction can be based on a patent applicationJul 03 20:46
schestowitzMATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 28, 2022Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz PREVIOUS ARTICLEJul 03 20:46
schestowitzThe metamorphosis of the trainee into an employee inventorJul 03 20:46
schestowitzMATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 24, 2022Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz18 commentsJul 03 20:46
schestowitzKluwer Patent BlogJul 03 20:46
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:18 AMJul 03 20:46
schestowitzDear Reader,Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzThe publisher and editor of the blog may at their discretion remove submitted comments and/or other material from the blog if they have reason to believe that the materials are in violation of the editorial policy.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzWe ask our readers and commenters to follow these guidelines:Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz– Be polite. Avoid derogatory comments and respond to the argument, not its messenger. Any ad hominem attacks will not be tolerated. If a comment includes such an attack, the whole comment will not be published. There will be no discussion on this.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz– Avoid repetitiveness. If you haven’t convinced the other person after commenting twice, you will probably not succeed the third time.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitz– Be specific and concise. A reaction of 200 well-chosen words is often better than a lengthy exposé.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzExtraneous AttorneyJul 03 20:46
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:43 AMJul 03 20:46
schestowitzThese results are appalling. In any sane public sector organization, the only conclusion would be that a major shake-up in management is urgently needed.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzNow, of course, this being the EPO, I am not holding my breath.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzMismanagementJul 03 20:46
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 12:33 PMJul 03 20:46
schestowitzOne may say that there is some consistency in EPO’s top management goals/actions for the past 10 years since the same questionnaire over 5 iterations shows a solid coherence in negative results.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzThe dogmatic beliefs of pseudo top managers who have no clues nor competencies with regard to those they are in charge of, prevail over the interests of the applicants or the public at large.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzTheir sole interest is to please the administrative council delegations so that their contract be extended and they get bonuses and functional allowances in return for deteriorations of the working conditions for the examiners and support staff.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzThis mismanagement within a european public organisation is scandalous.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzConcerned observerJul 03 20:46
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 5:29 PMJul 03 20:46
schestowitzThe results of the survey clearly point to a demotivated, stressed and depressed workforce that has little to no trust in management and serious concerns regarding quality of the EPO’s output. There is simply no way of dressing this up: the results demonstrate that the current President has failed miserably to resolve social tensions at the EPO.Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzWhen the AC appointed the current President, their public pronouncements gave the impression that resolving social tensions would be a key priority for him. But will an epic failure with respect to this key performance indicator prevent his reappointment? More specifically, being in mind the potential “gifts” to the AC delegations that CA 32/22 might place at the disposal of the President, how seriously will the AC view the President’s abject Jul 03 20:46
schestowitzfailure to restore social peace?Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzCaballeroJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 7:02 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzConsidering that 92% of those asked agree with the economic situation and that 76% find their work interesting is a pretty good starting point. The communications problem between management and staff has been evident for quite some time and escalated to levels where change appears to be inevitable. Can EPO find a 21st century manager?Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzMartinJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:05 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzThe EPO needs a 1960s or 70s manager.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzSomeone who grew through the organisation and knows the work being done.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzAn engineer/chemist/scientist, not an MBA, nor a politician.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzBut that is true for most companies and organisations…Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzCaballeroJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:55 AMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzThat person would be about 100 years old by now. I like the idea of a wise old man/woman, but I am not sure if he/she would want to put up with this.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzConcerned observerJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:16 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzIn response to your question, ask yourself whether the AC even bothered with interviewing any alternative candidates. My suspicion is that the wait for a manager of the EPO who has any respect for the rule of law – let alone 21st century management practices – will become much like the wait for Godot.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzCaballeroJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 12:02 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzIt was meant more as rhetorical question, with a challenge to a constructive approach. Sort of like “Open your mind”Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzConcerned observerJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 3:45 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzYet again it seems that my suspicions we well founded:Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzhttps://www.epo.org/news-events/news/2022/20220629a.htmlJul 03 20:47
schestowitzAttentive ObserverJul 03 20:47
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.epo.org | EPO - António Campinos reappointed President of the European Patent OfficeJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 27, 2022 AT 9:34 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzThe result of the survey is clearly not in favor of the top management.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzThis is nothing new, but the speed at which the present tenant of the 10th floor has alienated his own staff is flabbergasting.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzIn any well run organisation it would bring about a change in the upper management by the controlling body. But at the EPO the tail is wagging the dog.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzAs long as the AC accepts to rubber stamp any decision proposed by the management the situation will continue to deteriorate.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzThe quality might deteriorate, but until the effects are felt, there is a great latency time. This in favor of management as it allows to show figures of production/productivity which guarantees a steady flow of renewal fees. That all what matters for the AC.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzThat lots of patents come out of the opposition procedure maimed or even revoked is not a problem for bulk filers. They still have enough patents in their portfolio. When it hits a SME with a few patents, the story is different.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzThis is one of the white elephants in the room!Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzThe problem is that the present head of the office and it’s predecessor confuse immunity with impunity!Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzDisgustedJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 28, 2022 AT 1:36 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzThe results of the other survey, the official one with >5000 respondents, organised by the office itself, will be out at the end of July. They will be even more impressive: zero trust from employees towards all managers.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzStill, despite all empty promises. nobody at the EPO expects anything to actually happen.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzI’ll be gone at the end of this year. You are stuck with the Portuguese until 2028.Jul 03 20:47
schestowitzWorking in paradiseJul 03 20:47
schestowitzJUNE 28, 2022 AT 2:53 PMJul 03 20:47
schestowitzTo all those who think that the EPO is heaven on earth, according to my info in 2021 more than 50% – FIFTY – of the job applicants to an examiner position at EPO who were offered a job did not take it, many of them not even bothering to inform the EPO that they would not come.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzSo to those who think that the working conditions at EPO are over the top, that the working atmosphere is cool or the kind of work one performs there is so exciting, well sorry but Gen Z and millennials may beg to differJul 03 20:48
schestowitzlaw snifferJul 03 20:48
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:19 AMJul 03 20:48
schestowitzI am glad to see some figures now, just as a reference: where I work (and is one of the most renowned employers, at least in chemistry) only one out of four positively interviewed candidates accepts the offer at the end and we make use of a consulting company which does for us an intensive and professional “hunting” and pre-selecting job ahead of our interviews. This could depend from the fact that we are very selective and demanding when Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzchoosing our potential new colleagues, if we were to choose with a lower professional expectation and less rigorous selection the acceptance rate would be for sure higherJul 03 20:48
schestowitzTroll snifferJul 03 20:48
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 7:29 PMJul 03 20:48
schestowitzOn average, a job offer is declined in less than 30% of the cases. Google is your friend.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzSo, either you misunderstood your statistics or you work in a really terrible place.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzWorking in paradiseJul 03 20:48
schestowitzJUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:43 PMJul 03 20:48
schestowitzDear law snifferJul 03 20:48
schestowitzall depends from where you start from. I do not dispute that you may find worse conditions elsewhere but this is irrelevant and not the point.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzAll “reforms” forced on the workforce for past two decades were not contributing in any way to make of the EPO a stronger office from a qualitative point of view. It squeezed the lemon dry, with now tired, depressed and more precarious workers rubber-stamping patents to meet their stupid targets and avoid being removed at the end of their contract.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzThis is not a sustainable management, this does not serve the public.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzEPO is lostJul 03 20:48
schestowitzJUNE 28, 2022 AT 5:19 PMJul 03 20:48
schestowitzit’s an open secret for those who know the backstage of the EPO but the only time the EPO hired HR consultancy to run a selection procedure for VPs years ago, the one candidate who was not selected as he was clearly identified as unfit for the position due to his profile, is the very same man who was hired as president of the EPO a few years later and who will lead this beautiful organisation into social chaos as well as the IP community into Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzdespair.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzNothing could stop him to act erratically as he and his minions did, not even the courts, the dozens of EU MPs questioning the EU Commission or the Council of Europe which passed a motion signed by dozens of MPs, and not even the bad press throughout Europe which recurrently reminded the society of the deleterious things that occurred at EPO.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzSo hoping to find competency at the highest level of the EPO is illusory since contrary to the EU institutions in Brussels, the EPO does not dispose upon check and balances and can exercise without any true public scrutiny and transparency, into what is now very much looking like unethical governance.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzI remember a striking parallel done between the EPO and the FIFA in an article which years ago tried to alert the public on the situation to no avail. Not even Germany, Switzerland, the NL or the Scandinavian countries which are always prone to give the world lessons in Ethics and the Rule of Law did act to restore the situation http://www.fosspatents.com/2015/06/striking-structural-parallels-between.htmlJul 03 20:48
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fosspatents.com | FOSS Patents: Striking structural parallels between the European Patent Office and soccer body FIFAJul 03 20:48
schestowitzRoy SchestowitzJul 03 20:48
schestowitzJULY 1, 2022 AT 4:08 AMJul 03 20:48
schestowitzI don’t typically post comments here, but I just wanted to say to whoever posts these articles on EPO issues, well done and carry on. Don’t let EPO management bully you (or the blog’s publisher) into changing topics or sanitising comments. They’ve done this to many sites before. They’re NOT AN ORDINARY PATENT OFFICE!Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzComments are closed.Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzGET BLOG POSTS IN YOUR INBOX!Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzEmailJul 03 20:48
schestowitzwolters KluwerJul 03 20:48
schestowitzwolters KluwerJul 03 20:48
schestowitzGO TO POSTS ONJul 03 20:48
schestowitz(Compulsory) license (Cross-border) jurisdiction (Indirect) infringement Amendments Biologics Brexit Case Law Chemical Engineering Damages Denmark Enforcement EPC EPO EPO Decision Equivalents European Union Exceptions to patentability Extent of Protection France Germany Infringement Injunction Inventive step Italy Litigation Netherlands Novelty Opposition Patents Pharma Pharmaceutical patent Procedure Revocation Scope of protection Second Medical Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzUse SEP Spain SPC Sufficiency of disclosure Switzerland Unitary Patent United Kingdom United States of America UPC ValidityJul 03 20:48
schestowitzNUMBER 3 IN TOP 10 PHARMA PATENT BLOGS TO FOLLOW IN 2022!Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzPharma Patent BlogsJul 03 20:48
schestowitzBLOG CONTRIBUTORSJul 03 20:48
schestowitzBrian CorderyJul 03 20:48
schestowitzBristowsJul 03 20:48
schestowitz Jul 03 20:48
schestowitzRik LambersJul 03 20:49
schestowitzBrinkhofJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzDaniela AmpolliniJul 03 20:49
schestowitzTrevisan & CuonzoJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzThorsten BauschJul 03 20:49
schestowitzHoffmann EitleJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzJohn CollinsJul 03 20:49
schestowitzClayton UtzJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzMatthieu DhenneJul 03 20:49
schestowitzIpsilonJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzSimon HolzerJul 03 20:49
schestowitzMLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd. (MLL)Jul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzBinxin LiJul 03 20:49
schestowitzBaker & McKenzie FenXun (FTZ)Jul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzVaishali MittalJul 03 20:49
schestowitzAnand and AnandJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzMiquel MontañáJul 03 20:49
schestowitzClifford ChanceJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzThomas MusmannJul 03 20:49
schestowitzRospatt Osten ProssJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzAlexa von UexküllJul 03 20:49
schestowitzVossius & PartnerJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzAnders ValentinJul 03 20:49
schestowitzBugge ValentinJul 03 20:49
schestowitz Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzVAEPC-2021Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzVissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 EditionJul 03 20:49
schestowitzKaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew RudgeJul 03 20:49
schestowitz€ 105Jul 03 20:49
schestowitzPractical-Guide-to-Succesful-IP-ValuationJul 03 20:50
schestowitzPractical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and TransactionsJul 03 20:50
schestowitzAlexander PuutioJul 03 20:50
schestowitz€ 135Jul 03 20:50
schestowitzInternet-LawJul 03 20:50
schestowitzInternet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation Around the WorldJul 03 20:50
schestowitzEdward J. SwanJul 03 20:50
schestowitz€ 112Jul 03 20:50
schestowitzChinese-patent-lawJul 03 20:50
schestowitzChinese Patent Law: A Practical GuideJul 03 20:50
schestowitzSun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He YiboJul 03 20:50
schestowitz€ 148Jul 03 20:50
schestowitzKLUWER IP LAW NEWS ALERTJul 03 20:50
schestowitzStay informed on Intellectual Property law & developmentsJul 03 20:50
schestowitzSEARCH POSTSJul 03 20:50
schestowitzRSS FEEDSJul 03 20:50
schestowitzSummary FeedJul 03 20:50
schestowitzArticle FeedJul 03 20:50
schestowitzRELATED SITESJul 03 20:50
schestowitzKluwer IP LawJul 03 20:50
schestowitzKluwer Copyright BlogJul 03 20:50
schestowitzKluwer Trademark BlogJul 03 20:50
schestowitzRegulating for Globalization BlogJul 03 20:50
schestowitzAuthor PortalJul 03 20:50
schestowitz"Jul 03 20:50
*techrights_guest|7 (~92463172@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 22:48
*techrights_guest|7 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)Jul 03 22:54
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jul 03 23:16
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 23:34
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 23:35
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJul 03 23:54
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJul 03 23:54
*Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)Jul 03 23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.