Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Monday, September 09, 2024

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 00:39
*jacobk (~quassel@rr2rh58ht72yy.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 00:49
*x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@xxdhuy6fkasjn.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 03:19
schestowitz[TR2]https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1unmJp5oSep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]"Sep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]You need to look no further than IBM’s SW division to see what writing is on the wall for CIO. IBM has abandoned the “not invented here” mantra, and SW division is being shrunk by at least 50% as IBM shops outside for Hybrid solutions. Just look at the last 7 major purchases by IBM. All are outside firms that IBM has bought at a premium, and all are replacing legacy products and personnel. The same is/will happen to CIO. IBM Sep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]can’t afford to wait on CIO to make IBM efficient. They will buy good enough products from existing vendors, and outsource the implementation of these products in the name of efficiency. You may not like that answer, but IBM is all about driving down costs, and buying vs innovating has become the go to play. Every division has adopted a form of “drive costs out of IBM” (Consulting = automate repetitive processes via AI, SW = Sep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]buy vs innovate, infrastructure = partner vs manufacture internally) CIO will be no exception and will adopt what works well for each division into their play book. Driving costs down is job 1 at Armonk right nowSep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]"Sep 09 03:39
schestowitz[TR2]https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1upIiR7jSep 09 03:42
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1upIiR7j )Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]"Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]I think IBM is not giving Austin accurate headcount’s, or IBM is planning for only 1/3-1/2 of the employee population to show up on any given daySep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]August 2024 Chamber of Commerce statementSep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]“While the company does not break out local workforce figures, recent estimates from the Austin Chamber of Commerce put IBM's Austin workforce around 6,000 local employees.”Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]12 hours ago by AnonymousSep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]| no reactionsSep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]Post ID: @udm+1upIiR7jSep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2] 0 Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]How did you come up with the 187k reduction in space? Is the reduction from their current legacy space, or their future proposed space? Reason I ask is the articles you referenced say IBM just swapped 320k of space from one location (Hines property (IBM was going to take 320k of space from 500k available)) to 320k of space in domain 12Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]Either way it certainly looks like IBM has substantially reduced their footprint vs the past 10 yearSep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]"Sep 09 03:42
schestowitz[TR2]"    > Hi Roy,Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > How are you?Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > Recently, I have been working on some privacy (and surveillance) issues.Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > For 2600 Hope, I submitted a cfp and was accepted. Basically, I haveSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > been analyzing terms of service and plan to analyze a few more.Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > Obviously some are overreaching and interesting enough, I analyzedSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > RealVNC terms just prior to Raspberry Pi connect release. The CIO askedSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > me for the analysis, which by the way, the terms of service includingSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > Personal info as well as... chat transcripts?Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > Chat transcripts? You want my chat logs? That was actually my firstSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > analysis. Moving forward, I discovered clauses in other terms of serviceSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > that included: limitations to sue, limitations to post a public review,Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > and of course, rights to your content.Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    >Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > I was thinking what might be fun is to have you and/or your readers -Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > maybe in IRC or somewhere - suggest a TOS that I analyze and reportSep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > results to you.Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > What do you think?Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    >Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    > I'm up for it.Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]    I am totally interested!Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]         Awesome"Sep 09 04:08
schestowitz[TR2]"Sep 09 04:10
schestowitz[TR2]So let me know what terms of service you think might be good to look at or any your readers suggest and I’ll start the analysis."Sep 09 04:10
schestowitz[TR2]x https://futurism.com/bill-gates-chatgpt-researchSep 09 05:21
schestowitz[TR2]# bill sezSep 09 05:21
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-futurism.com | Bill Gates, Who Could Afford a Private Army of Researchers, Says He Does His Research Using ChatGPT, Which Makes Mistakes ConstantlySep 09 05:21
schestowitz[TR2]x https://www.pcworld.com/article/2445372/why-pay-microsoft-365-fees-when-this-office-lifetime-license-pays-for-itself.htmlSep 09 05:25
schestowitz[TR2]# spam, aiming to pre-empt open formats through the sunk cost fallacySep 09 05:25
schestowitz[TR2]x https://www.pcworld.com/article/2445372/why-pay-microsoft-365-fees-when-this-office-lifetime-license-pays-for-itself.htmlSep 09 05:25
schestowitz[TR2]# spam, aiming to pre-empt open formats through the sunk cost fallacySep 09 05:25
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Why pay Microsoft 365 fees when this Office lifetime license pays for itself? | PCWorldSep 09 05:25
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 10:02
*jacobk (~quassel@rr2rh58ht72yy.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 10:04
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesSep 09 10:31
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 10:44
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesSep 09 12:01
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 12:02
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 16:29
*parsifal (~parsifal@6thegygyadsu4.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 19:37
*parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving)Sep 09 19:38
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 19:51
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 19:51
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 19:54
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 20:25
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)Sep 09 20:40
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 20:55
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 21:12
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 21:13
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 21:21
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 21:23
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 21:30
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 21:35
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 21:49
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.2.4 Quasar http://www.kvirc.net/)Sep 09 21:53
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 22:02
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 23:00
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 23:17
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.2.4 Quasar http://www.kvirc.net/)Sep 09 23:17
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@gcs5ikfy64ubg.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 23:18
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.2.4 Quasar http://www.kvirc.net/)Sep 09 23:32
*jacobk (~quassel@dt7mrnex4e9nw.irc) has joined #techbytesSep 09 23:43
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Sep 09 23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.