Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Saturday, April 23, 2022

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

schestowitz-TR[15:14] <ANON> yeah this is exactly why i've never gone publicApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:14] <ANON> it's my word against hisApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:14] <ANON> and, being on his good side was profitable for a few yearsApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:14] <ANON> ever since the fsf abandoned me back in xxxx, i've had no reason to cosy up to themApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:14] <schestowitz-TR> I've seen worse things from other peopleApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:14] <ANON> you knowApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <ANON> my defense against him last year was actually an attackApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <ANON> do you know why i say that?Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <schestowitz-TR> well, being facetious is not goodApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <ANON> if he had either not publicly re-joined the board, or if he had lost and been kicked out again:Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <schestowitz-TR> and you wanted to be EDApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <schestowitz-TR> now you tell me thisApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:15] <ANON> if that had happened, he would have been a martyrApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:16] <ANON> and he'd have a stronger position in the community than he does nowApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:16] <ANON> him "winning" was the worst thing for him. because it puts him in the spotlight againApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:16] <ANON> well, not a smoking gun but:Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:16] <ANON> have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend?Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:16] <ANON> he has said he had one in his youth, but none sinceApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:17] <ANON> and as you said, he was close to epsteinApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:18] <ANON> this is also another reason why i attacked stallman in xxxxx, while stating another reason - but i was constantly drunk back then and ended up going overboard and i became the topic of debate instead of himApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:18] <ANON> 2021 was my revenge for xxxxxxApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:18] <ANON> my defense served two purposes:Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:18] <ANON> * prevent rms being a martyr. he would have been better off stepping down againApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:18] <ANON> (i targeted the sycophants who enabled him, emboldening them to be more rigorous in their defenses)Apr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> * distract people from my takeover of xxxxApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> i've told xxxxxxx all of thisApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> i decided to tell it all to you, on a whimApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> i hate stallman's gutsApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> thing is, i bet if i came forward, others would too. but i won'tApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> i've seen how that ends. and i don't want to be harassedApr 23 00:10
schestowitz-TR[15:19] <ANON> i will never go public with any of this. but i've told a few peopleApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:20] <schestowitz-TR> [15:16] <ANON> have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend?Apr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:20] <schestowitz-TR> he did have relationshipApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:20] <schestowitz-TR> so the statement is not trueApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:21] <schestowitz-TR> and his exes spoke out in his defenceApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:21] <schestowitz-TR> [15:17] <ANON> and as you said, he was close to epsteinApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:21] <schestowitz-TR> no!Apr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:21] <schestowitz-TR> that's bill gatesApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:21] <schestowitz-TR> rms never met the creep and rms called epstein very bad thingsApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:22] <ANON> oh okApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <schestowitz-TR> the only think you say you can go public with is more trivial than you put itApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <schestowitz-TR> sans name-callingApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <ANON> i don't have strong enough evidence against himApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <ANON> but i know he's a pedoApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <schestowitz-TR> but I don't know the exact words he usedApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <schestowitz-TR> he does stare at many people, even menApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <schestowitz-TR> and he wrote about it, some tried to train him to not do thatApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:23] <ANON> i do have the power to cause doubt in the minds of his inner circle thoughApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <ANON> that's why i've approached several members of the gnu advisory committee privatelyApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <schestowitz-TR> anyway, the chat is over for nowApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <schestowitz-TR> we go in circlesApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <ANON> oh?Apr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <ANON> okApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:24] <ANON> i actually just woke up and have work to do anywayApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <schestowitz-TR> don't be offendedApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <schestowitz-TR> I just got back homeApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <schestowitz-TR> thanks for shasring the story from xxxxxxApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <schestowitz-TR> I want to catch up with news linksApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <ANON> i understandApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <schestowitz-TR> what he wrote publicly is more incriminating Apr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:25] <ANON> you have a very practical and utilitarian mindset. it's one thing i've noticed about youApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <schestowitz-TR> and even though it's "old news" I still object strongly to what he wroteApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> and i respect itApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <schestowitz-TR> but let's leave it at thatApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> btwApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> my new cashcow is bsdApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> rather than fsf/gnuApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> been promoting myself to the bsd crowd lately. they love meApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <schestowitz-TR> openbsd seems robustApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:26] <ANON> been doing openbsd installs on laptops recentlyApr 23 00:11
schestowitz-TR[15:27] <schestowitz-TR> but openbsd lacks a lot of things for "mass" adoptionApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:27] <schestowitz-TR> so I appreciate openbsdApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:27] <ANON> for my customers, it's perfectApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:27] <schestowitz-TR> but not for my workflowApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:27] <ANON> what things does it lack for mass adoption?Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <schestowitz-TR> we talked about it in irc last nightApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <ANON> oh okApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <ANON> summarize it for me while i read itApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <schestowitz-TR> around midnight, search scrollbufferApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <schestowitz-TR> I really want to post news links nowApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <schestowitz-TR> I appreciate what you told me about xxxxxApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:28] <schestowitz-TR> it helps me form an opinionApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> the rest is rehash and some name-calling, like "creep"Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> he's on the spectrumApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> I try to treat differently people who lack tactApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> that's toleranceApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <ANON> okApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> like helping an old lady cross the roadApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> "do you think I'm too weak !!"Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <ANON> i understandApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:29] <schestowitz-TR> "no, I could see you could use seome help"Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:30] <ANON> this reminds me of a louis rossman videoApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:30] <ANON> he was talkingabout what to say to a new employer if your old one was an assholeApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:30] <ANON> and he said: don't say your old boss was an asshole or this and that, just say what he did and why you leftApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:30] <ANON> etcApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:31] <schestowitz-TR> good tipApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:31] <schestowitz-TR> and to borrow an analogyApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:31] <schestowitz-TR> don't say LF "sucks" or RMS "creep"Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> explain what happenedApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> and let people form their opinionApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <ANON> i'll let you get on with your workApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <ANON> thanks for the chatApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> my pleasure!Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> btwApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> quick tip:Apr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:32] <schestowitz-TR> always be consistentApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:33] <schestowitz-TR> if you attack RMS, then defend, then attackApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[15:33] <schestowitz-TR> it'll catch up with youApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[16:22] <ANON> i knowApr 23 00:12
schestowitz-TR[16:22] <ANON> i'm not going to mention his name publicly or do anything for/against him from now onApr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:22] <ANON> 2021 was a "reset" yearApr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:22] <ANON> it served 3 purposes:Apr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:22] <ANON> * restore reputationApr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:23] <ANON> * xxxxx takeover. revive the project (it was dead)Apr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:23] <ANON> * actually distance myself from the fsfApr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:23] <ANON> trying to join fsf as ed wasn't really a serious effortApr 23 00:13
schestowitz-TR[16:23] <ANON> i knew i wouldn't be accepted. i was just trolling them basicallyApr 23 00:13
*orgy has quit (Quit: Connection closed)Apr 23 01:33
*Despatche has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 03:59
*Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 04:00
*rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 05:37
*asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 05:37
*GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 06:20
*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@bkb7tdc7zpz6c.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 06:21
*GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 06:30
*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@9bsrk9cwiznhk.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 06:46
*rianne (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 06:54
*asusbox (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 06:54
schestowitzhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Meovely/comments/u8ra6d/microsofts_human_resources_hr_policy_we_offer/Apr 23 07:13
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.reddit.com | Microsoft’s Human Resources (HR) Policy: We Offer Assistance to Perpetrators of Domestic Violence : MeovelyApr 23 07:13
schestowitz"Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWE WANT MICROSOFT, THEIR CLOWNS AND OTHER PERVERTED STAFFERS, CONTRACTORS OR WHATEVER TO NEVER USE THE NAME MELINA TO POST PR0N EVER AGAIN !Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWE WANT THEM TO F OFF AND STAY AWAY FROM MELINA.Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWHERE IS THEIR INVESTOR SUPER WOMAN ?Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWE WANT THEM TO STAY AWAY FROM OUR SUBREDDITS ALSO !!! WE'RE FED UP OF BEING OBLIGED TO GO RESTRICTED "OR ELSE" !!!Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWe are scared for Melina's safety, as those people have been found guilty of s3x trafficking, assault, r@pe, harassment and the likes !!!!!!Apr 23 07:13
schestowitzWe will keep on screaming in terror until they stop !!!Apr 23 07:13
schestowitz"Apr 23 07:13
*Despatche_ (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 07:38
*Despatche has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 07:39
schestowitz> Hi Roy,Apr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Hope you're very well.Apr 23 07:41
schestowitzYes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago.Apr 23 07:41
schestowitz> If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful andApr 23 07:41
schestowitz> authoritative account of all the official legal cases againstApr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, whatApr 23 07:41
schestowitz> would you recommend?Apr 23 07:41
schestowitzhttp://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653  Apr 23 07:41
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft LitigationApr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Do you know of any initiatives in support of the European DigitalApr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it)Apr 23 07:41
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:41
schestowitz> all good wishes,Apr 23 07:41
schestowitzI am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone who might know better. I can ask if you want.Apr 23 07:41
schestowitzJack from E.ON Next wrote on 21/04/2022 15:21:Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Hi Roy,Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Thank you for your reply,Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Please can you provide more information on why you believe you pay extraApr 23 07:49
schestowitz> to get more frequent data collection readings? This is not a serviceApr 23 07:49
schestowitz> E-on Next provide.Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> JackApr 23 07:49
schestowitz> Apr 23 07:49
schestowitz> E-on NextApr 23 07:49
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 08:50
*u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 08:56
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 08:57
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Apr 23 10:08
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 10:23
*Despatche_ has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)Apr 23 10:47
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Apr 23 14:56
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 17:24
*psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 17:26
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 17:26
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 17:46
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 18:00
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 18:00
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:01
schestowitz>> Yes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz> Sorry I've not had time to write anything lately for Techrights.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz> But techrights  always in my mind when considering an idea asApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> a possible destination.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitzWe've been around for many years and will stay afloat for many years.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz>>> If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful andApr 23 22:04
schestowitz>>> authoritative account of all the official legal cases againstApr 23 22:04
schestowitz>>> Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, whatApr 23 22:04
schestowitz>>> would you recommend?Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz>> http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653Apr 23 22:04
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft LitigationApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> Thanks very much. Apr 23 22:04
schestowitzTell  me if you need more.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz>>> Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it)Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz>> I am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone whoApr 23 22:04
schestowitz>> might know better. I can ask if you want.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitz> If you know anyone who has written intelligently on it I'd beApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> curious. There's always a downside to these things (and I know you'reApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> rightly critical of European corruption), but this one seemed to haveApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> some merits for fighting monopoly infrastructure such as MS/Google inApr 23 22:04
schestowitz> schools etc.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitzNot so much "European corruption" as much as EPO corruption or patent abuse. Today we start a 14-part series about EPO-Belarus-Russia.Apr 23 22:04
schestowitzI don't know who promotes the above law (if Breton, be suspicious; we wrote tons about him), but I know someone who might know a lot more about it. Apr 23 22:04
schestowitzWhen I try to speak to politicians it goes almost nowhere at the end, e.g.: http://techrights.org/2021/10/02/merkel-epo-legacy/Apr 23 22:04
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Angela Merkel’s Coalition Has Not Helped EPO Staff and Not Even Bloggers Blackmailed by EPO Management | TechrightsApr 23 22:04
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Apr 23 22:17
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 22:18
*u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed)Apr 23 22:38
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Apr 23 23:20
*Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 23 23:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.