People Who Assault Women Are Not Victims of "Distress"
Recent: Asking People to Take Down Articles and Videos Only Makes These More Popular and "Viral"
The word "funny" does not best describe what unscrupulous losers attempted to do to my wife and I. Perhaps maddening is a better term, as they basically get paid to assert that a violent mobster from Microsoft, who actually attacked women, is somehow the victim. His reputation was a damaged by attacks on women, set aside what he did inside Microsoft.
It's neither amusing nor hilarious when national leaders not only assault women but then resort to attacking them some more for merely talking about these assaults. It seems like an American tradition. In a country with almost 50 presidents, not even one was a female. See more in:
- How Americans View 'Free Speech' in Practice
- Threats Against Techrights Always Come From Outside Britain
- When the Microsoft Aggressors Rely on Several Law Firms ('Attack Dogs', 'Guns for Hire'), Not Just One, Lawyering Up Against Techrights (Acting on Behalf of Americans Against UK Publishers)
Suffice to say, it's not going well for them. Bribing the system in the US may be trivial, but not everywhere.
The inversion of narratives is a common tactic, wherein the person who does horrible things claims that the critic or the reporter is "abusing" or "harassing" or "bullying". Sometimes this is known as DARVO. Louis (on the right) recently explained how this was done to him. █