The Paradox of GAFAM: Saying You Protect Women, Appointing Abusers of Women to Run the Company
IBM likes to pretend that it's all about "manners" (like telling people to avoid the word "master" even if IBM uses the word all the time).
It says it's offering safety, but instead it offers death.
Consider the following older articles:
- Real Feminism is Grassroots, Not a Corporate Ploy (to Improve Image and Sales)
- Faked Diversity in ‘Men-Only Clubs’ (and Corporations)
- IBM Likes to Speak About Diversity in Order to Distract or Confuse People About IBM’s Past and Present
- Video: Removing Our Leaders Because of Diversity is Disingenuous and Hypocritical
- Journey Back in History: Misconduct or Disorderly Conduct (Stuffing Money Down the Fronts of Stewardesses’ Blouses, According to Witness Account) by Arthur Watson of IBM (Founder’s Son and Former IBM Chief), Followed by Watson’s Admission and Resignation
- The ‘Access Watson Tapes’: Rare Richard Nixon Tape on Former IBM President and Son of IBM’s Founder Engaging in Sexual Abuse of Women
- Meet the IBM Watsons: Sponsors of Richard Nixon and Abusers of Women
- IBM (Red Hat) Lectured FSF That It Needed More Diversity, But Was It Looking at the Mirror? IBM and Red Hat Are Even Less Diverse.
- Diversity Comes in Many Forms
It is a paradox when those who harm women the most pay reckless people for PR campaigns which somehow paint them as champions of feminism. Don't be easily conned. █