"It probably reckoned it would be cheaper to start a witch-hunt than to do things properly."Just to be very clear on this matter, the company does not wish to issue compensation. It said that in letters. It thinks it can dodge its obligations and has constructed a chain of shell companies, which further complicate litigation. The company wanted to make it all seem legitimate; so it meticulously issued or manufactured some false pretexts, even bogus scenarios (months in the making already). It probably reckoned it would be cheaper to start a witch-hunt than to do things properly. We still have them saying on the record (audio/video) that compensation would be considered, but that was just what HR told them to say. There was probably no intention to ever consider that. We have those bits on record (compensation mentioned several times***).
"Speculations aren't as good as facts, but at Sirius speculating was often required due to a lack of transparency."To avoid repetition, the company has engaged in a lot of chronic lying and false promises in 2022****. There were contradictory statements (like claims of recruitment in the US, later refuted by what the managers told me upon asking). It's hard to even keep track of the lies. Many didn't try to keep track; they were too busy trying to cope with a sort of 'jet lag' -- an integral part of the job. We're talking about technical people who are idle a lot of the time because they work overnight, devoted to complex tasks of monitoring many things and responding accordingly -- all this while paid laughably little. Some cooks who work in daytime (9 to 5) get paid more. It's worth noting that they use us for marketing in their site. They use or even exploit our credentials, even more than a month after we left. The company wouldn't get away with it several years ago. To remind readers, there's also programming done, but that falls under "projects" and has another pay grade. For projects, the staff needs a proper daytime job (without distractions such as alerts; they're not sysadmins) and with decent pay.
Speculations aren't as good as facts, but at Sirius speculating was often required due to a lack of transparency. The footnotes below contain a mixture of facts and speculations. ⬆
____
* We've also shown PDFs with names and balances redacted; some demonstrate the nepotism, which we'll revisit later this week. Sirius is basically run like a family thing. Incorporation of the current shell is dated "16 Oct 2017" (with "Starting value 1 pound (minimum)"). We've long assumed this shell was meant to help dodge liability to the soon-divorced wife. The 'founder' has had two failed marriages with 2 daughters from each. The second wife was very much in control of the 'founder' (say former insiders who worked in the office and saw it firsthand). The 'founder' is (openly) a Donald Trump fan (there are Trump support tweets). Not a huge deal, but does help explain a thing or two at times. Jobs were advertised by him and the company's account in Twitter a few years ago; that said the company was also US-based and said laughable things like us being American leaders in the area (we have had almost no clients and staff there!); the salary is very low for the skills level required and is shown in USD (currency) as well as GBP. The official Sirius Twitter account used to say US/UK; this is no longer the case. No idea why (possibly aborted plans), but the plausible explanation is that the company was just inconsistently presenting itself to potential/prospective clients, depending on what they wanted to hear or believe.
** To give some more hypothetical scenarios, let's say we found a way to sue the company (it is hiding). The lawyers told us a legal case of this nature can take 12 months to conclude and if by that point the debt collectors decide which liabilities are paid first, then the news isn't good; a court case (legal bills and so on), even if a resounding loss for the company, would be at the bottom of the priorities, the bottom of the list (or liabilities to pay off). So it would be a pyrrhic victory for us, no financial and moral damages paid, not even our legal fees covered. This hopefully helps explain the decision to resign. The resignations gave us more freedom to speak out too (no agreement to keep silent). One notable issue is, the company can pretend to be broke in one shell while hiding some assets in another. There's this 'monkey business' modus operandi which is to separate companies into profitable and non-profitable, then pick one part with no liability and throw out the rest. Maybe this is applicable here. We've found no compelling evidence though.
*** We started making our own recordings because the management lied about providing recordings of particular meetings in 2019. It lied about such transparency, so I started making my own recordings of such meetings.
**** Last year we had this meeting for "re-infrastructuring", followed by several more meetings. They pretended things would be OK but were planning to dismantle the company and turn it into a kind of 'consultants' reseller, looking not to pay staff, seeking advice for back-stabbing (from external HR firm, months before spying on us).