05.16.07

Steve Ballmer Accused of Bending Report on Patents, Gets Perfect Punishement

Posted in Boycott Novell at 6:23 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Imagine how surprised we would be if half-truths, inconsistencies, or inaccuracies were involved. But no. It turns out that, in order for Microsoft to defend its anti-Linux case, it turned a report upside-down.

The author of a report used by Microsoft as evidence of open source patent infringement has said that his report means the opposite of what Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer said it means.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is having some of its own patent ‘fun’. $1,500 million of Microsoft’s money is apparently not enough for Alcatel-Lucent. Let us wish them luck.

Alcatel-Lucent said in a court filing that $1.5 billion is not enough to properly compensate it for Microsoft Corp.’s infringement of two digital audio patents.

It has become clear that a patent system which is too lenient has fallen apart.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. David Mohring (NZheretic) said,

    May 16, 2007 at 6:59 am

    Gravatar

    http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=336#comment-18834
    ( if it survives moderation )

    Dear Bruce Lowry

    By definition, a “license” is a “covenant not to sue”.

    If the licensee abides by the stated terms then the licensor promises not to take legal action.

    That the licensor Microsoft promises not to sue the licensee Novell’s customers instead of Novell itself does not change the obvious fact that Microsoft stated terms represent a license for Novell.

    Let put it in the context of another case.

    Microsoft licensed patented data base technology from a company called Timeline Inc and put it in Microsoft SQL Server 7, Office 2000 other Microsoft products.

    Timeline Inc license to Microsoft was a “covenant not to sue” Microsoft’s customers for *using* code developed by Microsoft that infringed on Timeline’s patents.

    Note : “covenant not to sue” customers — that what a license is. How is the Microsoft/Novell agreement not to sue Novell’s customers any different?

    However Microsoft chose a cheaper license option that granted Microsoft the right to develop infringing software but did not confer full use rights for the patented technology to downstream customers. ( The Washington Court of Appeal agreed with Timeline Inc
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/02/20/sql_server_developers_face_huge/ ). Timeline then threatened several of Microsoft’s customers who were developing on top of Microsoft SQL Server and received very large payouts.

    Since those infringing customers had already agreed to Microsoft’s EULA, which included an effective agreement to recognise any patented technology that Microsoft had sub-licensed, it was a lot more difficult, if not impossible, for those Microsoft customers to challenge Timeline’s patents in court. Such agreements can limit defensive options.

    Microsoft is suppling “coupons” for Novel products. What terms do those customers have to abide by to accept the deal? What about making that license/terms public?

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 16, 2007 at 7:37 am

    Gravatar

    David, your message was in the moderation queue only becauseit contained a number of URLs. We neither have a deletion policy nor do we censor comments. Traffic on the site has gone up significally, so let us hope Bruce gets your message. I am aware of journalists and Novell staff who keep track of our writings.

  3. shane said,

    May 16, 2007 at 10:10 am

    Gravatar

    In my experience, Novell PR is pretty fair about their moderating (more than 75% of my comments are allowed, even with links to this site refuting their statements.)

    My newest:

    # Bruce Lowry Says:
    May 15th, 2007 at 5:24 pm

    A quick point of correction on an issue raised in several of these comments. The Novell-Microsoft patent agreement frequently gets reported in the press as a cross-license, but it isn’t. Novell did not cross-license any patents with Microsoft. Novell and Microsoft made an agreement not to sue one another’s customers over patent issues. So we don’t have the rights to use Microsoft patents in Novell technologies, nor does Microsoft have the rights to our patents. So when I say we did this deal to take the patent issue off the table for customers, that’s all it does. It doesn’t entitle Novell to any patent protection vis-a-vis Microsoft, nor Microsoft any patent protection vis-a-vis Novell. Nor does it change any of the commitments we’ve made previously on patents, including our commitment to use our patents against anyone attacking our open source products, or our involvement in the Open Invention Network, which is designed to leverage patents to promote open source innovation. Thanks.

    # shane Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    May 16th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    So we don’t have the rights to use Microsoft patents in Novell technologies…

    Justin Steinman recently indicated otherwise, care to explain?

    This foundation falls into two primary categories: 1) the “covenant not to sue,” which provides customers with peace of mind when they deploy SUSE Linux Enterprise; and 2) the IP access necessary for the technical collaboration to deliver interoperability between Windows and Linux.

  4. gpl1 said,

    May 16, 2007 at 10:27 pm

    Gravatar

    “2) the IP access necessary for the technical collaboration to deliver interoperability between Windows and Linux.”

    Interesting, the same IP which EC Commissioner Neelie Kroes viewed as obvious and non-innovative…yes, I think MS is trying to outmaneuver the EC’s decision on their antitrust non-compliance.

    “Microsoft has said it would charge for interoperability information because it was based on the company’s own innovative work and protected by patents.

    But the Commission charged in March this year that competitors gave away such software whether or not it was patented.

    “The Commission’s current view is that there is no significant innovation in these protocols,” European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement that month.

    “I am therefore again obliged to take formal measures to ensure that Microsoft complies with its obligations,” she said.

    http://www.crn.com/software/199200601

    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/05/04/novell-spin-deal/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/01/19/microsoft-corrupts-term/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2006/11/24/what-about-the-ec-ruling/

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 17, 2021



  2. The Oligarchs' Parties Will Never Choose the Side of Software Freedom Because Free Software Cannot Bribe Officials

    The tough reality is that next week's (or this coming week's, depending on what Sunday counts as) inauguration ceremony is partly symbolic as all the same and important issues remain largely untouched, for corporations control almost everything of significance



  3. COVID-19 Has Actually Helped Software Freedom Due to Financial and 'Spare Time' Factors

    Developers and users are increasingly exploring what the Free software world has to offer; this is actually measurable and it contradicts claims to the contrary



  4. Future Plans and Using Videos to Complement Text

    Remarks on recent and impending site changes; We are not replacing text with video, we're just trying to enhance the presentation a bit, especially where visuals help make a point or where browsing through Web sites (or leaks) is more suitable than static, linear presentation



  5. InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation

    There appears to be a severe crisis at Intel; they cannot recruit scientists (or those whom they recruited are walking away) and as a result the company produces bad products with poor documentation (or highly defective chipsets that top-notch marketing cannot compensate for); in this video we walk through some examples of how studies are being conducted (as already noted in Part XVII)



  6. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part III: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seems More Like a Victim of Destabilisation Campaigns

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), which turns 36 later this year, is looking to raise money that helps support the GNU Project, soon 38 years old and likely the most important Free software project to exist (ever)



  7. Links 17/1/2021: EasyOS on Raspberry Pi and GNU libsigsegv 2.13

    Links for the day



  8. InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams

    A look inside Intel explains what holds back the technical team, which bemoans the lesser technical people getting in the way and not even using the product that they are writing about



  9. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 16, 2021



  10. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part II: Why Bradley Kuhn Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    The founder of the FSF is still at the FSF (albeit not publicly) and the person who lobbied to oust him has basically been 'banished' by the founder



  11. Links 16/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 Release Candidate, Zeroshell 3.9.5, FreeBSD Report, and GhostBSD 21.01.15

    Links for the day



  12. Free Speech on the Web Not Respected by Companies That Used to Support Software Freedom

    Mozilla does not have to make its Web browser about politics; it can just make an excellent piece of software that is neutral about the Web pages that it renders, based on the user's personal preferences



  13. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part I: We Are Under Attack by Corporations and Their Salaried Facilitators

    The corporate takeover (taking over the Commons, produced by volunteers who are motivated by altruism) is a subject we must speak about and somehow tackle; this series will highlight uncomfortable or difficult truths



  14. InteLeaks – Part XVI: Intel Cannot Do Command Line, Even When It's Vastly Simpler and More Suitable for Development

    The Developer eXperience (DX) team at Intel seems to be full of Microsoft drones instead of developers and/or mildly technical people; this has not only harmed the quality of documentation but also upset staff, alienating people who actually understand what developers need (more than buzzwords like "DX")



  15. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 15, 2021



  16. Links 15/1/2021: KaOS 2021.01, Whisker Menu 2.5.2, Istio 1.8.2

    Links for the day



  17. InteLeaks – Part XV: Intel is Blind to Blind and Colour-Blind People

    Intel does not seem to grasp very basic concepts associated with accessibility; nevertheless, Intel shamelessly tries painting itself as "woke" and a "justice warrior" (policing speech while overlooking much-needed practical work)



  18. Links 15/1/2021: GStreamer 1.18.3 and Proton 5.13-5

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 14, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 14, 2021



  20. Links 14/1/2021: Wine 6.0, Debian 11 Freeze, and Alpine Linux 3.13

    Links for the day



  21. Patent Propaganda and UPC Jingoism Instead of Actual News

    Today's so-called 'news' about the EPO (Europe's second-largest institution) and the failed UPC is nothing short of shameless propaganda



  22. Links 14/1/2021: Season of KDE 2021 Selection, Mesa 21.0.0-RC1, Tor Browser 10.0.8

    Links for the day



  23. InteLeaks – Part XIV: Technical Incompetence and Incoherence Leading to Alienation and Brain Drain

    The idea that Intel "loves Linux" or "supports Linux" is somewhat of a sham; one needs only to consider what Intel insiders are saying about that, having witnessed it firsthand



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 13, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 13, 2021



  25. Links 13/1/2021: $150 RISC-V Computer With GNU/Linux, Intel Replaces CEO Again, and New Fedora 34 Plans

    Links for the day



  26. Unitary Patent is Dead and Lies About the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Aren't Ending

    Not "Russian agents" but concerned European citizens are beginning to see the truth behind the Unified Patent Court, which the 'media' has wrongly called "Unitary Patent Court" three times in 2 days



  27. InteLeaks – Part XIII: GNU/Linux Documentation From People Who Never Even Use GNU/Linux

    Inside Intel there's a whole bunch of embarrassing secrets about the Developer/Development eXperience ("DX") team; no wonder documentation efforts have been lacking and far too much time wasted putting such documentation together



  28. Links 13/1/2021: Mozilla VPN, NeoChat 1.0.1 and Sci-Hub Under Attack

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 12, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 12, 2021



  30. GNOME Foundation is Still Participating in the Attack on Richard Stallman

    GNOME's supposed 'representatives' (close-knit friends with Microsoft connections) continue to attack RMS (Richard Stallman), the founder of GNU (the G in GNOME) and the Free Software Movement


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts