EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.05.07

SUSE Community Moderators Escape GPLv3 Issues, Warn Those Who Defend GNU

Posted in GPL, OpenSUSE at 6:41 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

OpenSUSE a reflection of Novell’s own stance?

An online friend of mine, who is not hostile towards Novell, let me know that SUSE apparently escapes the GNU GPLv3. I believe he sought some help in the forums simply because he uses SUSE.

Yesterday, just a day or two after the initial discussion, a warning was sent to him for no justified reason, which seems to indicate that GPLv3 truly hit some nerve. Parts of the E-mail exchange are quoted below (spanning a couple of days).

Here is the thread in question

Are all these forums packed with corporate shills. I post URLs to developers moving to GPL 3 and the response is abuse and get accused of baiting.

Later came this:

I got beat up on an earlier thread by ‘elsewhere’ and some other admins. I suggested going private, but got no response. It’s a classic case of trolling from them, post abuse and when the OP responds accuse him of trolling.

And this:

…Wilson Phillips just came back with a comment after i said I wasn’t going to respond, classic baiting ..

[quote name='Wilson Phillips' date='Aug 4 2007, 01:06 PM' post='191344']
This means you won’t be posting here anymore???? :D
[/quote]

Finally, action was taken for no apparent reason.

Got this msg from an admin ..

- cut -
“I’ve put you in a moderated state indefinitely. Behave, and I’ll remove the moderation. Any other rants like the one posted today will get you banned” kastorff
- paste -

Do you see any reason for getting banned from my posts in this thread. Me = ‘emacsuser’.

So, what is OpenSUSE’s take on GPLv3 and why is it such a sensitive subject?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. GNU/Linux said,

    August 5, 2007 at 7:05 pm

    Gravatar

    You should read this thread first, Roy. “Emacsuser” simply exaggerated. Calling someone “idiot” and asking him to “shut up” is not the best way to express your thoughts. As a moderator I would close this thread too. I don’t think this should be ever mentioned on your site. And by the way you shouldn’t take moderator/administrator point of view as “official” openSUSE stuff statement. Someone, somewhere said something. It really doesn’t matter at all.

  2. DP said,

    August 5, 2007 at 11:56 pm

    Gravatar

    Sorry, but I’m going to have to disagree with that assessment. I skimmed the topic, and I don’t see emacsuser calling anyone an idiot or telling people to shut up. I see quite a bit of that from the other side, who don’t seem to want to know if any projects are adopting GPL3. I don’t see any crime in posting about GPL3 changeovers in a thread about GPL3 and projects that are/aren’t adopting it.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 6, 2007 at 12:02 am

    Gravatar

    …One ought to emphasise that emacsuser was not there to aggravate. He does not care much about GPLv3 either.

    I was not implying that an “official” statement was made in this thread. I was only wishing to show that Novell has presence in such forums and that OpenSUSE users do not back the FSF on this one.

  4. Simon said,

    August 6, 2007 at 4:26 am

    Gravatar

    I think

    http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtopic=36502&st=20&p=190522&#entry190522

    alone justfies Emacsuser getting banned (so he’s lucky only to have got himself moderated). Up to that point he’d done nothing wrong, but from there it’s all downhill, such as:

    http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?s=eca097ec160fba0d14fd64e5ecbddc6c&showtopic=36502&view=findpost&p=190619

    Then, attacking a moderator on a forum anywhere is likely to be abd move. You’d better be very sure of your ground before you do that.

  5. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 7:34 am

    Gravatar

    “alone justfies Emacsuser getting banned .. Up to that point he’d done nothing wrong, but from there it’s all downhill”

    See what i was responding to, my only mistake was in responding to the baiting from the administrators of that forum.

    Take a look at the time line, notice I said ‘ I hereby declare this thread closed’ on Aug 2 2007, 10:13 AM. That was me agreeing to stop posting on that particular thread. Immediately following were responses’ from two admins yet again distorting what i said. Wilson Phillips accuses me of baiting and kastorff takes the opportunity to accuse the FSF of a quasi-religious approach.

    On Aug 04 elsewhere decides to jump in. Remember I wanted to stop posting on Aug 02. Now when I respond to three separate messages directed to me – I GET moderated and THREATENED with permanent banning.

    Remember they could have posted me private and not on a public discussion board. Now who exactly is doing the baiting. It’s patently obvious that free speech don’t apply on OpenSUSE forum, especially in regards to the GPL 3. It would be intersting to find out who exactly is setting the agenda there, and what topics exactly are verboten.
    ——-

    Seeing as I am being censored over there I’ll lay out my position here. The MS/Novell deal is good for Novell as it get acknowledgment from MS that Novell Linux is a serious contender in corporate IT space and not just a hobbiest system made by some geeks in they bedroom, as fester and CO are given to describe it.

    What was bad about the deal was it was made in secret and the terms of the covenant are essentially meaningless. It isn’t as if MS was ever going to sue the end users. What were the lawyers thinking of in signing away their rights to their own code. Remember the covenant don’t say that MS can’t ever sue Novell, and as usual there is a get-out-clause that says MS can cancel/revise the deal at any time. Not much of a covenant then is it. Where the lawyers asleep or on drugs when they signed this.

    Lastly we come to how this affects OpenSUSE, well MS has so kindly introduced a new paragraph for the OpenSUSE license. You can work on YOUR own code as long as, you agree that it gets folded back to Novell, you don’t own your own code, YOU can’t make any money out of it and you cannot work on it in company time. Not much of a covenant then is it.

    The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots. Something it will recover from, unless it does something else as stupid, like letting MS buy them outright .. :)

  6. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:08 am

    Gravatar

    Your are wrong Emacsuser, Novell has no “Open Source roots.”. Novell was always proprietary software based company.

  7. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:12 am

    Gravatar

    Now by attempting to dialog privately I get accused of bothering the staff ..

    - quote -
    from: kastorff
    Re:Moderated Indefinitely, Yesterday, 05:56 PM

    You simply don’t see reality as it is, do you?

    First, there aren’t any “self appointed moderators” on the board. Every staff member is specially selected by existing staff, and has my complete support.

    Second, you got where we are by your behavior, no one else’s. Stop blaming others and take a good look at yourself. You’re alone in your estimation of the situation…no one else believes you’re getting anything other than what you deserve. You misquote, ridicule, and post poorly supported (by the facts) rhetoric and then pretend you are mistreated when others hold you accountable for that. No one baits you; they’re just sick and tired of your posts.

    So back off, let things rest for a bit, behave with some good, non-provocative posts, and we’ll happily restore your community rights. Or don’t, and keep bothering me about staff decisions, and get yourself banned. Your call.
    - unquote -

    Not allowed to post on a public forum, not allowed to msg privately. You know something, I think they are scared that Novell employees are reading this and might pick up unsound opinion.

  8. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:14 am

    Gravatar

    “Your are wrong Emacsuser, Novell has no “Open Source roots.”. Novell was always proprietary software based company” , GNU/Linux said, August 6, 2007 at 8:08 am

    ‘SUSE (pronounced IPA: [suzə], properly (in German), “ZOO-za”, loosely “SOO-sa” [1] in English) is a major retail Linux distribution, produced in Germany and owned by Novell, Inc. SUSE is also a founding member of the Desktop Linux Consortium’

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suse

  9. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    @Emacsuser, they moderated you because you were misbehaving, and even here you are giving pointless arguments :

    “The company began in Provo, Utah as Novell Data Systems Inc. in 1979″
    (…)
    “In August 2003, Novell acquired Ximian”
    “In November 2003, Novell acquired SUSE”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell

    So as you can see, Novell has been “open” just for few years. It has _no_ open source roots.
    And I will say it again, IMHO kastorff has right, and you were behaving really bad, hence bad behave makes all your arguments pointless (when you play like child/troll they will treat you like child/troll).

  10. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    “So as you can see, Novell has been “open” just for few years. It has _no_ open source roots”, GNU/Linux said

    Right, they made a collective decision to move from Netware to Linux but are not an Open Source company. Rest of troll bait ignored.

    “Novell has joined the Open Source Development Labs (OSDL)”

    http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5014211806.html

    “In August 2003, Novell acquired Ximian, a developer of open source Linux applications (Evolution, Red Carpet and Mono). This acquisition signaled Novell’s plans to move its collective product set onto a Linux kernel”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#Linux_for_Business

  11. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    I did not write that they are not moving toward open source _now_. I know about SUSE and Ximian, I just quoted that before for you. You are quoting Wikipedia against your own words. Think a bit. They changed its business just few years ago. And it was not full change, just partial (mixed source business = open and close source software). You wrote about Novell and its open source “roots”. And thats a totally BS for me. Novell has _not_ open source “roots”. Now please, stop fooling me, you were wrong and you should be honest enough to admit that.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:04 am

    Gravatar

    Emacsuser:

    The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots. Something it will recover from, unless it does something else as stupid, like letting MS buy them outright ..

    By “root” he did not mean “since establishment”. Novell described itself as a company with open source ambitions for 3 years (watch the bottom part of their press releases). When it shook hands with Microsoft it introduced the “mixed source” phrase, which it has repeated again and again since then.

    Also see: http://boycottnovell.com/2006/11/23/novell-mark-kent/ (on proprietary roots)

  13. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    This is what I call root http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root. He said exactly “The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots.” . Novell is not a one man business, you know that companies don’t change during one day, they need time. Novell was never, what I would call, “open source company” so I can’t agree that they had any “roots” in this “open” business. Ever.

  14. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Gravatar

    - quote -
    Sorry, an error occurred. If you are unsure on how to use a feature, or don’t know why you got this error message, try looking through the help files for more information.

    The error returned was:
    Sorry, you are not permitted to use this board
    - unquote -

    http://suseforums.net/

  15. Simon said,

    August 6, 2007 at 11:11 am

    Gravatar

    Emacsuser, I was a bit blunt above (sorry for that, as someone who still kinda follows things over at suseforums I’ve been quite irritated by that thread – not only by your part in it – but decided there was nothing to be gained from getting involved with people, on both sides, who seemed to have completely entrenched views). Still I think what you posted (in reply to a moderator ;-) you were bound to get kicked out.

    Having said that, there are a few issues with that thread and the background:

    - The title sahnne used was from the linux-watch (or was it eweek, if forget) story. I think sahnne used it because he thought it would grab attention and wasn’t necessarily his point of view – of course people care about gplv3 – we’ve seen already that MS do. You could see the title as (unintentional?) flame bait that unfortunately you seem to have gone for, although your early responses were not unreasonable

    - SUSE has never really been a FSF type distro (afterall, yast was proprietary before the Novell takeover). However, I and many other SUSE users – actually I’m a former SUSE user – don’t have anything against proprietary software and find RMS’s attitudes to that a little difficult to take. Of course, breaking the spirit of the licence under which you are permitted to distribute softwaer is another issue. There’s also the old FSF/KDE issues that a lot of SUSE users remember and so RMS and the FSF are not that well loved (validly or invalidly).

    - After the Novell-MS deal happened there was a lot of trolling (from the point of view of many existing suse forum users) on the suse forums about the deal, therefore people there are very sensitive to this issue and it’s one you need to handle with tact (Roy has a point on this attitude, see the opensuse wiki at http://en.opensuse.org/FAQ:Novell-MS#I_won.27t_use_openSUSE_since_I_don.27t_want_to_support_Novell for some breathtaking doublethink).

    For the MS deal, and the incompetence of Novell in handling suse, I’m now on debian and fedora.

What Else is New


  1. Backup: KIRO Report About Arrest of Rick Allen Jones

    We're making a mirror of this report as the media never touches the topic anymore



  2. Promoting False Perspectives and Narratives About GNU/Linux to Let Microsoft Dominate/Control Everything (Sometimes Quite Cynically in the Name of 'Security' or 'Responsibility')

    Microsoft's "perception management" games are progressing and are finding their way into official blogs of supposed 'competitors' like Canonical and SUSE



  3. Links 13/8/2020: New LibreOffice 6.4.x, Linspire 9.0, Endless OS 3.8.5

    Links for the day



  4. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Identified Some of the Children in the Pornographic 'Stash' of Bill Gates' Engineer

    Today we carefully and responsibly disclose just 9 pages (out of about 2700 pages) with slightly redacted samples and a handful of exemptions to show what Bill Gates' engineer was amassing, including identified kids (known to NCMEC)



  5. A Red Hat Response to Factual Information About Red Hat

    So far we've seen only Red Hat employees blasting our articles about Red Hat/IBM and the responses lack any substance, just name-calling (so we must be on the right track; there's no refutation so far)



  6. Always Look for Stories the Media is Suppressing and Hiding

    Based upon closer scrutiny of the Jones case (engineer of Bill Gates arrested for pedophilia at the Gates mansion), the sentence he received is incredibly negligible or close to nothing (for possession and sharing/dissemination of massive troves of child pornography, typically leading to many years in prison), so we’re closely examining if he’s still working and whether he still works for Bill and Melinda (more FOIA requests may be necessary)



  7. On Web Servers, Microsoft's Collapse Continues More Rapidly Under COVID (a Million Domains Lost in the Past Month)

    Even though the Microsoft-sponsored media repeatedly refuses (or strangely enough just 'fails') to report on it, the days of Microsoft's IIS are likely numbered; it won't be long before less than a million computers run it



  8. Canonical is Boosting Microsoft's Proprietary Software With Extensive Surveillance

    Canonical’s commitment to Free software barely exists; with so-called “Apps” and “Snaps” and “Stores” we’re seeing a gradual transition to — and acceptance of — blobs and DRM, including Microsoft lock-in inside Ubuntu



  9. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, August 12, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, August 12, 2020



  10. Harfbuzz Joins LibFFI, Zlib1g in Dragging GNOME, All Free Software Towards Microsoft

    "...I don’t want to help them help Microsoft control my computing by proxy — by controlling the development platform itself"



  11. Links 12/8/2020: Go 1.15, LibreOffice 7.0 Downloaded About Half a Million Times, LibreELEC (Leia) 9.2.4

    Links for the day



  12. Mega Setup, Mini Budget

    For a sum total of under £800 (eight hundred British pounds are about USD/$1043) one can piece together a versatile working environment (my latest additions, as of 5 days ago, are the 4 plastic plants)



  13. Twitter Appears to Have Taken Vendor/Platform Lock-in up Another Notch, Having Become Almost as Malicious as Facebook

    Twitter jumped the shark



  14. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 11, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, August 11, 2020



  15. Infographic by Marcia Wilbur: Where's My Refund?!

    Tweet by Marcia Wilbur:



  16. Links 12/8/2020: New GNU Emacs, GXml-0.20, WordPress 5.5, and Mozilla is Laying off 250 Staff

    Links for the day



  17. You Just Know Somebody is in a State of Retreat When the Strategy Becomes to Discredit One's Critics (or Collectively Paint Them All as Wrong/Crazy)

    A goulash of bullcrap from Bill Gates doesn't add up; it seems like his media strategy has warped (or fallen back) onto discrediting his critics as though they don't exist, don't know anything, or are simply jealous



  18. United States v IBM Archives/Resources

    As the massive case against IBM monopoly (United States v IBM; 104,400 pages of trial transcripts and 17,000 exhibits) predates the World Wide Web it's difficult to find comprehensive literature about it any longer (Wikipedia and more modern sites are instruments of revisionism and reputation laundering)



  19. History Goes in Cycles

    Just like antiwar activism was 'quelled' or 'pacified' half a century ago nowadays we're led to think that software freedom is just fine and there's nothing left to argue about (except words and other petty nonsense)



  20. Looking Back at the Real Story of Microsoft

    Let's take a moment to examine what Microsoft was all along (since its formation in 1975)



  21. Europe Deserves Better Than Today's EPO

    Overly restrictive society with countless monopolies (even on seeds!) will neither serve people nor will it breed general acceptance



  22. European Patent Office Management Swims With Sharks and Liars

    It has become increasingly if not abundantly evident that European Patent Office President Campinos is no better than Battistelli as he’s still a ‘darling’ of patent litigation trolls and their front groups/lawyers



  23. Linked In to Pedophilia

    As the above articles show (one published a couple of days ago), the 'Web of Lies' and the incredible deceit/cover-up run deep and we still lack answers from those who enabled what Salon has just said involved "trafficking five or six girls a day."



  24. Whistleblower Aid Already Showed Cover-up of Bill Gates 'Contributions' to MIT

    The Goodwin Procter report which failed to actually investigate whether Gates and Epstein jointly directed payments to MIT (the latter was already dead) can be understood differently in light of the above leak, which was published earlier this year



  25. IRC Proceedings: Monday, August 10, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, August 10, 2020



  26. Proof (Archived Original Letter): Bill Gates Lied to the New Yorker, BBC and Others About Connection of MIT Money to Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and Their Close Relationship

    As the article (“The anatomy of Bill Gates’ Jeffrey Epstein-facilitated MIT donations”) put it at the time (just 2 days before Dr. Stallman received all the heat at MIT), “Secrecy in the funding of academic programs is highly problematic, as University of Virginia professor Siva Vaidhyanathan explains in a long Twitter thread. “Companies and the billionaires who run them are always bending research agendas (and sometimes even results) to their interests,” he writes. “Anonymity would prevent any examination or accountability.”” But there are more high-level Microsoft links to Mr. Epstein; “Hoffman invited both former MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito and Epstein to an August 2015 dinner in Palo Alto with Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Peter Thiel. He tells Axios that he invited Epstein at Ito’s behest, and only because Ito vouched for the convicted criminal, saying that he had successfully cleared MIT’s vetting process.” In 2016 the article “Bill Gates talked to Reid Hoffman about being on Microsoft’s board of directors” was published. “Furthermore,” it notes, “Gates and Hoffman have a lot in common: They both hold board seats and advisory roles, and no other formal status or day-to-day obligations, at the tech companies they founded.”



  27. All This Happened While Bill Gates' Engineer Was on Trial for Amassing Child Pornography

    While MIT relies on the word of someone who repeatedly lied about his relationship with Mr. Epstein (refuted even by MIT itself), the record shows what happened just when Bill Gates’ own engineer faced conviction for pedophilia (the media diverted attention to Dr. Stallman just days after the above E-mails came to light)



  28. Links 10/8/2020: Popcorn Computers Pocket PC, Finnix 121, GhostBSD 20.08.04, EasyOS 2.3.8

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 09, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, August 09, 2020



  30. Release: Bill Gates' Engineer Busted for More Child Pornography Than Reported in the Media

    Based on our analysis, which was repeated carefully twice, the sum of recognised hashes turns out to be about 7,500 (7,430 objects), which is more than was reported in the media after the arrest of Rick Allen Jones at Bill Gates' mansion


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts