08.05.07

SUSE Community Moderators Escape GPLv3 Issues, Warn Those Who Defend GNU

Posted in GPL, OpenSUSE at 6:41 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

OpenSUSE a reflection of Novell’s own stance?

An online friend of mine, who is not hostile towards Novell, let me know that SUSE apparently escapes the GNU GPLv3. I believe he sought some help in the forums simply because he uses SUSE.

Yesterday, just a day or two after the initial discussion, a warning was sent to him for no justified reason, which seems to indicate that GPLv3 truly hit some nerve. Parts of the E-mail exchange are quoted below (spanning a couple of days).

Here is the thread in question

Are all these forums packed with corporate shills. I post URLs to developers moving to GPL 3 and the response is abuse and get accused of baiting.

Later came this:

I got beat up on an earlier thread by ‘elsewhere’ and some other admins. I suggested going private, but got no response. It’s a classic case of trolling from them, post abuse and when the OP responds accuse him of trolling.

And this:

…Wilson Phillips just came back with a comment after i said I wasn’t going to respond, classic baiting ..

[quote name='Wilson Phillips' date='Aug 4 2007, 01:06 PM' post='191344']
This means you won’t be posting here anymore???? :D
[/quote]

Finally, action was taken for no apparent reason.

Got this msg from an admin ..

- cut -
“I’ve put you in a moderated state indefinitely. Behave, and I’ll remove the moderation. Any other rants like the one posted today will get you banned” kastorff
- paste -

Do you see any reason for getting banned from my posts in this thread. Me = ‘emacsuser’.

So, what is OpenSUSE’s take on GPLv3 and why is it such a sensitive subject?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2007/08/05/gplv3-opensuse/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. GNU/Linux said,

    August 5, 2007 at 7:05 pm

    Gravatar

    You should read this thread first, Roy. “Emacsuser” simply exaggerated. Calling someone “idiot” and asking him to “shut up” is not the best way to express your thoughts. As a moderator I would close this thread too. I don’t think this should be ever mentioned on your site. And by the way you shouldn’t take moderator/administrator point of view as “official” openSUSE stuff statement. Someone, somewhere said something. It really doesn’t matter at all.

  2. DP said,

    August 5, 2007 at 11:56 pm

    Gravatar

    Sorry, but I’m going to have to disagree with that assessment. I skimmed the topic, and I don’t see emacsuser calling anyone an idiot or telling people to shut up. I see quite a bit of that from the other side, who don’t seem to want to know if any projects are adopting GPL3. I don’t see any crime in posting about GPL3 changeovers in a thread about GPL3 and projects that are/aren’t adopting it.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 6, 2007 at 12:02 am

    Gravatar

    …One ought to emphasise that emacsuser was not there to aggravate. He does not care much about GPLv3 either.

    I was not implying that an “official” statement was made in this thread. I was only wishing to show that Novell has presence in such forums and that OpenSUSE users do not back the FSF on this one.

  4. Simon said,

    August 6, 2007 at 4:26 am

    Gravatar

    I think

    http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtopic=36502&st=20&p=190522&#entry190522

    alone justfies Emacsuser getting banned (so he’s lucky only to have got himself moderated). Up to that point he’d done nothing wrong, but from there it’s all downhill, such as:

    http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?s=eca097ec160fba0d14fd64e5ecbddc6c&showtopic=36502&view=findpost&p=190619

    Then, attacking a moderator on a forum anywhere is likely to be abd move. You’d better be very sure of your ground before you do that.

  5. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 7:34 am

    Gravatar

    “alone justfies Emacsuser getting banned .. Up to that point he’d done nothing wrong, but from there it’s all downhill”

    See what i was responding to, my only mistake was in responding to the baiting from the administrators of that forum.

    Take a look at the time line, notice I said ‘ I hereby declare this thread closed’ on Aug 2 2007, 10:13 AM. That was me agreeing to stop posting on that particular thread. Immediately following were responses’ from two admins yet again distorting what i said. Wilson Phillips accuses me of baiting and kastorff takes the opportunity to accuse the FSF of a quasi-religious approach.

    On Aug 04 elsewhere decides to jump in. Remember I wanted to stop posting on Aug 02. Now when I respond to three separate messages directed to me – I GET moderated and THREATENED with permanent banning.

    Remember they could have posted me private and not on a public discussion board. Now who exactly is doing the baiting. It’s patently obvious that free speech don’t apply on OpenSUSE forum, especially in regards to the GPL 3. It would be intersting to find out who exactly is setting the agenda there, and what topics exactly are verboten.
    ——-

    Seeing as I am being censored over there I’ll lay out my position here. The MS/Novell deal is good for Novell as it get acknowledgment from MS that Novell Linux is a serious contender in corporate IT space and not just a hobbiest system made by some geeks in they bedroom, as fester and CO are given to describe it.

    What was bad about the deal was it was made in secret and the terms of the covenant are essentially meaningless. It isn’t as if MS was ever going to sue the end users. What were the lawyers thinking of in signing away their rights to their own code. Remember the covenant don’t say that MS can’t ever sue Novell, and as usual there is a get-out-clause that says MS can cancel/revise the deal at any time. Not much of a covenant then is it. Where the lawyers asleep or on drugs when they signed this.

    Lastly we come to how this affects OpenSUSE, well MS has so kindly introduced a new paragraph for the OpenSUSE license. You can work on YOUR own code as long as, you agree that it gets folded back to Novell, you don’t own your own code, YOU can’t make any money out of it and you cannot work on it in company time. Not much of a covenant then is it.

    The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots. Something it will recover from, unless it does something else as stupid, like letting MS buy them outright .. :)

  6. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:08 am

    Gravatar

    Your are wrong Emacsuser, Novell has no “Open Source roots.”. Novell was always proprietary software based company.

  7. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:12 am

    Gravatar

    Now by attempting to dialog privately I get accused of bothering the staff ..

    - quote -
    from: kastorff
    Re:Moderated Indefinitely, Yesterday, 05:56 PM

    You simply don’t see reality as it is, do you?

    First, there aren’t any “self appointed moderators” on the board. Every staff member is specially selected by existing staff, and has my complete support.

    Second, you got where we are by your behavior, no one else’s. Stop blaming others and take a good look at yourself. You’re alone in your estimation of the situation…no one else believes you’re getting anything other than what you deserve. You misquote, ridicule, and post poorly supported (by the facts) rhetoric and then pretend you are mistreated when others hold you accountable for that. No one baits you; they’re just sick and tired of your posts.

    So back off, let things rest for a bit, behave with some good, non-provocative posts, and we’ll happily restore your community rights. Or don’t, and keep bothering me about staff decisions, and get yourself banned. Your call.
    - unquote -

    Not allowed to post on a public forum, not allowed to msg privately. You know something, I think they are scared that Novell employees are reading this and might pick up unsound opinion.

  8. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:14 am

    Gravatar

    “Your are wrong Emacsuser, Novell has no “Open Source roots.”. Novell was always proprietary software based company” , GNU/Linux said, August 6, 2007 at 8:08 am

    ‘SUSE (pronounced IPA: [suzə], properly (in German), “ZOO-za”, loosely “SOO-sa” [1] in English) is a major retail Linux distribution, produced in Germany and owned by Novell, Inc. SUSE is also a founding member of the Desktop Linux Consortium’

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suse

  9. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    @Emacsuser, they moderated you because you were misbehaving, and even here you are giving pointless arguments :

    “The company began in Provo, Utah as Novell Data Systems Inc. in 1979″
    (…)
    “In August 2003, Novell acquired Ximian”
    “In November 2003, Novell acquired SUSE”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell

    So as you can see, Novell has been “open” just for few years. It has _no_ open source roots.
    And I will say it again, IMHO kastorff has right, and you were behaving really bad, hence bad behave makes all your arguments pointless (when you play like child/troll they will treat you like child/troll).

  10. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    “So as you can see, Novell has been “open” just for few years. It has _no_ open source roots”, GNU/Linux said

    Right, they made a collective decision to move from Netware to Linux but are not an Open Source company. Rest of troll bait ignored.

    “Novell has joined the Open Source Development Labs (OSDL)”

    http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5014211806.html

    “In August 2003, Novell acquired Ximian, a developer of open source Linux applications (Evolution, Red Carpet and Mono). This acquisition signaled Novell’s plans to move its collective product set onto a Linux kernel”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#Linux_for_Business

  11. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    I did not write that they are not moving toward open source _now_. I know about SUSE and Ximian, I just quoted that before for you. You are quoting Wikipedia against your own words. Think a bit. They changed its business just few years ago. And it was not full change, just partial (mixed source business = open and close source software). You wrote about Novell and its open source “roots”. And thats a totally BS for me. Novell has _not_ open source “roots”. Now please, stop fooling me, you were wrong and you should be honest enough to admit that.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:04 am

    Gravatar

    Emacsuser:

    The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots. Something it will recover from, unless it does something else as stupid, like letting MS buy them outright ..

    By “root” he did not mean “since establishment”. Novell described itself as a company with open source ambitions for 3 years (watch the bottom part of their press releases). When it shook hands with Microsoft it introduced the “mixed source” phrase, which it has repeated again and again since then.

    Also see: http://boycottnovell.com/2006/11/23/novell-mark-kent/ (on proprietary roots)

  13. GNU/Linux said,

    August 6, 2007 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    This is what I call root http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root. He said exactly “The deal was also a betrayal by Novell of its Open Source roots.” . Novell is not a one man business, you know that companies don’t change during one day, they need time. Novell was never, what I would call, “open source company” so I can’t agree that they had any “roots” in this “open” business. Ever.

  14. Emacsuser said,

    August 6, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Gravatar

    - quote -
    Sorry, an error occurred. If you are unsure on how to use a feature, or don’t know why you got this error message, try looking through the help files for more information.

    The error returned was:
    Sorry, you are not permitted to use this board
    - unquote -

    http://suseforums.net/

  15. Simon said,

    August 6, 2007 at 11:11 am

    Gravatar

    Emacsuser, I was a bit blunt above (sorry for that, as someone who still kinda follows things over at suseforums I’ve been quite irritated by that thread – not only by your part in it – but decided there was nothing to be gained from getting involved with people, on both sides, who seemed to have completely entrenched views). Still I think what you posted (in reply to a moderator ;-) you were bound to get kicked out.

    Having said that, there are a few issues with that thread and the background:

    - The title sahnne used was from the linux-watch (or was it eweek, if forget) story. I think sahnne used it because he thought it would grab attention and wasn’t necessarily his point of view – of course people care about gplv3 – we’ve seen already that MS do. You could see the title as (unintentional?) flame bait that unfortunately you seem to have gone for, although your early responses were not unreasonable

    - SUSE has never really been a FSF type distro (afterall, yast was proprietary before the Novell takeover). However, I and many other SUSE users – actually I’m a former SUSE user – don’t have anything against proprietary software and find RMS’s attitudes to that a little difficult to take. Of course, breaking the spirit of the licence under which you are permitted to distribute softwaer is another issue. There’s also the old FSF/KDE issues that a lot of SUSE users remember and so RMS and the FSF are not that well loved (validly or invalidly).

    - After the Novell-MS deal happened there was a lot of trolling (from the point of view of many existing suse forum users) on the suse forums about the deal, therefore people there are very sensitive to this issue and it’s one you need to handle with tact (Roy has a point on this attitude, see the opensuse wiki at http://en.opensuse.org/FAQ:Novell-MS#I_won.27t_use_openSUSE_since_I_don.27t_want_to_support_Novell for some breathtaking doublethink).

    For the MS deal, and the incompetence of Novell in handling suse, I’m now on debian and fedora.

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/4/2021: VirtualBox 6.1.20, GCC 11.1 Release Candidate, Nginx 1.20.0

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 20, 2021



  3. Some People Who Asked to Be Removed From the Slanderous Hate Letter Against the FSF Are Still Being Denied Removal (But Not All)

    I am aware of some people (evidence is in the public domain for all to see) who asked to be removed from the hate list; their requests have not yet been processed, or simply denied. Maybe they should ask again. There are silent and selective changes.



  4. Overt Abuse and Mischaracterisations by Bully de Blanc

    The campaign to ruin the FSF and silence its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), goes months prior to the hate letter set up by Bully de Blanc, her boss, and the Microsoft-sponsored OSI; they just attack the licence (GPL/copyleft) and they try to redefine things for the corporations which fund them



  5. According to StatCounter, This Month GNU/Linux Market Share on Desktops/Laptops Exceeded 2% (Based on Sites They Monitor)

    StatCounter does not monitor everything and not every machine connects to the Web, but in relative terms, based on the chart above, no doubt GNU/Linux continues growing relative to other operating systems (chart plotted based on the latest raw data, rendered in LibreOffice Calc)



  6. At the EPO, Lawlessness Has Become “a New Normal”

    Without as much as a real consultation with those who are impacted (by the EPO's gross infringements) the management of the EPO rushes ahead again, enjoying zero oversight, no legal review, and no accountability or scrutiny of any kind



  7. Links 20/4/2021: Tails 4.18 and Mark Surman in Mozilla's Board of Directors

    Links for the day



  8. Microsoft as a Censorship Machine Working to Undermine Free Software and Code Sharing (Also Sharing in General)

    Microsoft is, as usual, a tool of destruction rather than creation; it seems to be better at ruining things and censoring things, notably things that compete against Microsoft or pose a threat to Microsoft's business model (and close partners, such as RIAA)



  9. Phoronix Needs to Exercise Caution and Stay Vigilant/Careful of Microsoft

    Taking note or lessons from the blunder of Raspberry Pi (back in February), Phoronix should be careful of Microsoft 'freebies' as they're never free and there are strings attached, destined to alienate longtime supporters



  10. IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, April 19, 2021



  11. Links 20/4/2021: EasyOS Dunfell 2.7.1, Phoronix Takes Microsoft 'Freebies', Microsoft Trying to Steal Credit for Linux on Mars

    Links for the day



  12. Richard Stallman on How UPC is a Trojan Horse for Software Patents in Europe

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, offers his analysis of the Unitary Patent (or UPC) and what it means for software patents in Europe now that the EPO increases its influence over continental law



  13. Technology Can Make Life Worse, Even in the Public Sector, Not Just the Private Sector

    There are growing concerns — increasingly justified concerns as a matter of fact — that customer service is universally going away and “COVID” has become the impenetrable shield or a cover in the face of facts, laws, and basic rights



  14. Links 19/4/2021: LibreSSL 3.3.2, OpenSSH 8.6, Firefox 88

    Links for the day



  15. Time to Move to Gemini, Wherever/Whenever Possible, as the World Wide Web is a Burden on Everybody

    A 30-minute rant about what the Web has become and the promise of gemini:// (designed to simplify everything, enable self-hosting, preserve privacy, and empower communities rather than military-connected monopolies)



  16. The Number of Signatures in the Anti-FSF Petition is Decreasing, Not Increasing

    A reader has notified Techrights that belatedly, perhaps where people’s job is at risk (we’ve heard of stories and situations wherein the employer’s view and a worker’s view diverge), the GNOME Foundation/OSI did in fact remove some people from the hate letter they had set up for their monopolistic sponsors. We do, however, still see some names in there of people who asked to be removed, so it must be a very selective process. They don’t want to lose face, so they must have made it very difficult to revoke one’s name. Exceptional circumstances? We have checked to confirm, based on the available archives, and indeed that number decreased since 10 days ago, whereas 6,415 people have thus far signed the support letter (it's still growing), so we’ve just re-plotted the chart.



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 18, 2021



  18. How Many People Developed GNU (Maybe Hundreds) in the 1980s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains how code was managed and contributed in the early days of GNU



  19. Links 19/4/2021: Linux 5.12 RC8, GNU Poke 1.2, EndeavourOS 2021.04

    Links for the day



  20. Proprietary Software (BT Hub) Has Ruined My Whole Day

    While we did have some plans to publish long articles, those plans were curtailed or at least delayed due to the fact our sole device at home not to be controlled by us (a so-called 'Smart' Hub from BT) decided to break itself and by doing so bring productivity to a standstill (that firmware update, silently installed without notice or any form of consent, managed to screw with the local network)



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 17, 2021



  22. Tolerating the Intolerant and Lacking Tolerance for Opposing Views

    The person who shouted...



  23. Letter of Support for Richard Stallman - Doing Better in Community

    "How do you support someone you’ve known for years who is unfairly attacked and publicly maligned?"



  24. Richard Stallman on Rejecting Workplace Bureaucracy in the 1970s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains what inspired him to get involved in non-software matters



  25. Renata Avila: Trying to Understand the Lynching of Stallman

    Reproduced from the original



  26. Breaking News: EDPS Admits That It is Powerless to Investigate Claims of GDPR Non-compliance at the EPO

    Nobody is truly in charge at the EDPS (and in Europe at large); they say EPO is "company" and all one can do is kindly ask the EPO itself to obey the law and stop outsourcing European data to American military contractors



  27. Links 17/4/2021: Linux 5.13 in Sight, Holland Warming up to Free Software

    Links for the day



  28. Richard Stallman Vilified by Those Who Don't Know Him, Says Sylvia Paull

    Republished "In Support of Richard Stallman"



  29. [Meme] Linux Foundation Can't Use Linux

    Two examples from yesterday, highlighting what a bunch of hypocrites run the marketing operation now disguised as ‘research’; Jason Perlow from Microsoft signed/published this newsletter highlight from the failing “Linux” Foundation — a foundation that calls itself “Linux” while its newsletter is still hosted by Microsoft Windows+proprietary IIS and this latest report is made with proprietary software on a Mac



  30. [Meme] Haters Gonna Hate, Don't Apologise to a Libelling Mob

    As was already pointed out before, you cannot appease a mob by talking back to it, certainly not by issuing an apology (putting oneself in a position of weakness)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts