EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.21.07

Europe Takes a Look at Microsoft’s .NET (/Mono) Web Hijack Attempts

Posted in Europe, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 4:36 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

In case you did not know, Microsoft plans to hijack the World Wide Web and Novell is helping. To avoid repeating old stories and arguments, consider these:

The good news is that Europe has just woken up, so to speak, and it is prepared to intervene.

…according to Vinje, most relevant to the Internet and work done at the IGF, was the problem of growing .NET-dependency for web applications. .NET is Microsoft’s platform for web applications software development. “It is a sort of an effort to ‘proprietise’ the Internet,” said Vinje..

We will be covering this in the future. The Linux deals, which include OOXML obligations, have plenty to do with Microsoft’s ambitions to lock in the user and lock out competitors.

Novell and Microsoft piss on GNU/Linux codebase

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. eet said,

    November 21, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Wow, the picture shows again that you are a man of real taste. If I was your prospective future employer and had just found this website your name would be off my list now.

    It might be prejudice but I have found that only Americans can be that bluntly in bad, primitive taste. Bah. Yuck.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 21, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    Gravatar

    http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9788233-16.html

    “Novell doesn’t need to urinate in the pool from which it hopes to build its future, but that is precisely what it is doing. It can and should do better.”

  3. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 3:50 am

    Gravatar

    “There really is factual basis for comment that SUSE Linux Enterprise works better with Microsoft Windows. ”
    Justin Steinmann’s comment, from the same site.

    Pamela is just a very difficult person, that’s all.

    I can only agree with this comment:
    “Novells employees will not be paid with feel-good-wishes from the FOSS community Novell is a business and is out to make money and SO is Redhat, why bomb-blast them because they market their product and play to their strengths, seriously wake up and realise that this is commercial company that gives a lot back into the FOSS community than most realise.”

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  4. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 3:55 am

    Gravatar

    ““It is a sort of an effort to ‘proprietise’ the Internet,”

    Unfortunately, .NET is based on an ECMA-standard, so I don’t give that claim much of a chance in court. As much as I like to see Microsoft clobbered.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  5. Victor Soliz said,

    November 22, 2007 at 8:59 am

    Gravatar

    eet, It is nice that you buy the whole ECMA-standard stuff. But it is quite foolish or misinformed.

    For one, System.Windows.Forms is not covered as part of the standard. For two silverlight is also dependant of a number of codecs that are ultra proprietary, want more examples?

    Novell uses FUD and false advertisement, you know? It is not true that SUSE enterprise works better with windows than Red Hat, but that’s Novell’s main selling point right now.

    Red Hat’s developers get paid totally well AND have the respect of the community, I am unsure why Novell had such need to make a pact with a company that even to date is an abusing monopoly that fights Linux with FUD and other anticompetitive tactics.

    Regarding your attempts to become political correctness police, I have no comment.

  6. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Gravatar

    “System.Windows.Forms is not covered as part of the standard.”
    That’s why these parts are kept strictly separate from the rest of Mono.

    “For two silverlight is also dependant of a number of codecs that are ultra proprietary.”
    Wrooong; you can use any video or audio codec that you want with; you can for example compile a version with only Ogg Vorbis and Theora. Codecs are not integral; you can use GStreamer, for example, or Xine.

    Get your facts straight before accusing others of being uninformed, son.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  7. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    Gravatar

    “.NET is based on an ECMA-standard”
    well “BEING BASED IN” DOES NOT EQUAL “BEING” a standard
    We all know all Microsoft formats are “BASED” in standards, only after being EEEd by MSFT.
    And for gods sake it is not a standard is a “ECMA-standard” (RTFLMAO!)

    ECMA-standards, despite its misleading name, are not necessarily standards. In some cases (as in the case of Microsoft’s throat-fed formats) are not standards AT ALL.
    ECMA is no less than a private company that helps other companies to push their proposals through TRUE standarization bodies (ANSI, ISO, IEC), for a fee, while trying to guarantee a faster approval process and that the format won´t be modified by the true standarisation process.

    ECMA defines itself as:
    “A proactive, problem solving experts’ group that ensures timely
    publication of international standards;
    Offers industry a “fast track”, to global standards bodies, through
    which standards are made available on time;
    Balances Technical Quality and Business Value:
    • Quality of a standard is pivotal, but the balance between timeliness and
    quality as well: Better a good standard today than a perfect one tomorrow!
    • Offers a path which will minimise risk of changes to input specs
    • Solid IPR policy and practice
    Ecma can be viewed as a reconfigurable hub of TCs”

    Anyway, independently of ECMA’s nature, no format supported by a single vendor (and its cronies) deserves be called “standard”.

  8. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm

    Gravatar

    “I am unsure why Novell had such need to make a pact with a company that even to date is an abusing monopoly that fights Linux with FUD and other anticompetitive tactics.”

    IMHO, Novell accepted the pact with the devil due to serious financial problems. The 348 million dollar deal allowed them some relief. Microsoft is very smart when they target struggling companies… the timing was perfect.
    Follow the money, ask yourself the right questions:

    http://www.itworld.com/Man/2698/060921novellnasdaq/

    JUST ONE MONTH before the pact Novell was about to be delisted from Nasdaq and was having problems with the Wells Fargo Bank. I think the re-animator injection of 348 million by Microsoft converted Novell in the perfect zombie to perform its masters at Redmond commands.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm

    Gravatar

    SubSonica, I can’t recall ever seeing this article. It’s worth a separate post. Mind if I do (post about it)?

    Bear in mind that Novell spoke to Microsoft since around May.

  10. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Sure you can. You should! I wonder if you ever thought about this. The first time I saw the 348 million figure linked to the pact, the former news of financial problems came to my mind like a flash. It is just a guess… but certainly a strikingly coherent one…
    When I first knew that Novell was in financial hardship, I regreted it since I was closely following all the fiaSCO case and also watching the maneovers of the big software corporations about pushinf the US software patents regime in the EU. and I thought Novell was a powerful ally to FOSS due to its big patent portfolio that could defensively prevent Microsoft and other giants’ (SAP, Oracle, Siemens) aggresive attitude towards FOSS.
    When they caved it to Microsoft IP infringement claims, lamely “agreeing to disagree” I knew that it was the price of Novell’s so-badly-needed 348 million dollars.

  11. Béranger said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s not even about ECMA and what means to be a standard.

    It’s not even about patents.

    But I don’t need EXE and DLL files on my Linux box — and Mono clones .NET that much that you’ll have at least a few dozens of EXE and DLL files!

    Also, I don’t need a reimplementation of a Microsoft technology (note: it’s not like Samba, which is needed for real interoperability) that WAS NOT NEEDED, NOR REQUIRED.

    We already have Java.

    For small gizmos to use with GNOME, there is PyGtk, should it be that complicated to use C or C++ (Gtkmm) — although for crap like Tomboy or Beagle you could have used just about anything.

    There isn’t ANY SINGLE MAJOR MONO APPLICATION that would justify the existence of Mono.

    Mono is bloat, and a capitulation to a Microsoft “technology”.

What Else is New


  1. GitHub is All About Control

    GitHub is not a platform for sharing and collaboration but social control and manipulation of the Free software community



  2. 2019 in Review: Worst Year Ever for Software Freedom

    A look back (and ahead) as the year's end fast approaches, marking the end of a mostly bad year



  3. Links 15/12/2019: Hacker-Friendly Hardware Success Stories and Mozilla Woes

    Links for the day



  4. European Patents Losing Their Appeal, Lustre and Glamour

    Years of assaults on EPO staff — including EPO judges — have taken their toll and the quality of patents is nothing like it used to be



  5. Software Freedom and The U.S. Constitution

    “We need to stand for the freedom to not use the software — we need to enjoy that freedom without giving up the rest of the existing Free software ecosystem.”



  6. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 14, 2019



  7. Links 15/12/2019: Wine 5.0 RC1 Released, KDE Frameworks 5.65.0, Qubes OS 4.0.2 RC3

    Links for the day



  8. It Matters a Lot What You Call the System

    Why the best name for the best operating system would be "GNU", not "Linux" (media has twisted the words so as to marginalise GNU and its politics/philosophy)



  9. Only the EPO Goes as Far as Bribing Publishers (the Media) to Promote Software Patents and Publish Fictional Stories

    The world’s patent offices are growing tired of granting software patents which courts later toss out (because these patents are not valid); not only does the EPO advocate such patents — typically using a bundle of buzzwords — it’s also bribing the media to help



  10. EU Needs to Show That It Cares About SMEs and Not 'European Champions' That Are Actually Foreign Monopolies

    Judging by the EU’s nearly blind and unconditional support for the management of the EPO — no matter how abusive and corrupt it has gotten — one has to wonder if the ex-EU official in charge of the EPO reveals a profound democracy deficit as well as growing dangers to Europe’s businesses — the productive firms to which patent maximalism often represents far more risk than opportunity



  11. Guest Article: The Free Software Movement Should Come Out From the Box

    "From now onwards we have to think from a user’s rights perspective and mobilise users of Free software. They should know what rights they ought to get."



  12. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 13, 2019



  13. Links 13/12/2019: QEMU 4.2.0, GNU Guile 2.9.7

    Links for the day



  14. Links 13/12/2019: Zorin OS 15.1, Vim 8.2

    Links for the day



  15. Linux Foundation Has Outsourced All the Licence Compliance Stuff to Microsoft, a Serial GPL Violator

    OpenChain Specification/OpenChain Project and Automated Compliance Tooling (ACT) are yet more examples -- the latest of many -- of the Linux Foundation being outsourced to Microsoft, not only for code but also documentation and hosting



  16. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 12, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 12, 2019



  17. Copyleft: Keeping Code Free

    Now that news about "Linux" is dominated by promotion of proprietary software we ought to remember what perpetrators of such a strategy seek to eliminate



  18. Plans That Worked, Plans That Failed

    "I am still looking for good news, but the more good I try to find, the more nastiness I uncover. This is by far, Free software's worst year ever. 2019 Sucks!"



  19. Links 12/12/2019: KDE Applications 19.12, Qt Creator 4.11, New VirtualBox

    Links for the day



  20. Brand Dilution in Action

    Microsoft's proprietary software which spies on people and businesses is getting a "free ride" on the "Linux" brand; and nobody seems to care, nobody seems to notice how perverse that it



  21. At the EPO Money -- Not Quality -- is King

    Financiers are ruining quality



  22. The EPO's Strategic Failure 2023

    Potemkin social dialogue



  23. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 11, 2019



  24. EPO Promoting Software Patents in Countries Where These Are Illegal

    The EPO's vision of 'unitary' software patents (patents on algorithms in countries that disallow such patents, as per their national laws) won't materialise, but in the meantime a lot of Invalid Patents (IPs) are granted in the form of European Patents (EPs) and this is wrong



  25. We Support GNU and the FSF But Remain Sceptical and Occasionally Worry About an RMS-less FSF

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is not in charge of the FSF anymore (it's Stallman who created the FSF) and there's risk the decisions will be made by people who don't share Stallman's ethics or the FSF's spirit



  26. Links 11/12/2019: Huawei Lobbied by Microsoft (Because of GNU/Linux) and Microsoft Still Googlebombs Linux to Promote 'Teams'

    Links for the day



  27. Links 11/12/2019: Edge Native Working Group, CrossOver 19.0 Released

    Links for the day



  28. Instead of Fixing Bug #1 Canonical/Ubuntu Contributes to Making the Bug Even More Severe (WSL/EEE)

    Following one seminal report about Canonical financially contributing to Microsoft's EEE efforts — celebrated openly by GNU/Linux opponentsclosing bug #1 Ubuntu basically decided not that it was fixed but that it would no longer attempt to fix it (“wontfix”)



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 10, 2019



  30. Today's Example of Microsoft's Faked 'Love'

    “On 7 September 2017, users began noticing a message that stated “Skype for Business is now Microsoft Teams”. This was confirmed on 25 September 2017, at Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference,” according to Wikipedia


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts