EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.21.07

Europe Takes a Look at Microsoft’s .NET (/Mono) Web Hijack Attempts

Posted in Europe, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 4:36 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

In case you did not know, Microsoft plans to hijack the World Wide Web and Novell is helping. To avoid repeating old stories and arguments, consider these:

The good news is that Europe has just woken up, so to speak, and it is prepared to intervene.

…according to Vinje, most relevant to the Internet and work done at the IGF, was the problem of growing .NET-dependency for web applications. .NET is Microsoft’s platform for web applications software development. “It is a sort of an effort to ‘proprietise’ the Internet,” said Vinje..

We will be covering this in the future. The Linux deals, which include OOXML obligations, have plenty to do with Microsoft’s ambitions to lock in the user and lock out competitors.

Novell and Microsoft piss on GNU/Linux codebase

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. eet said,

    November 21, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Wow, the picture shows again that you are a man of real taste. If I was your prospective future employer and had just found this website your name would be off my list now.

    It might be prejudice but I have found that only Americans can be that bluntly in bad, primitive taste. Bah. Yuck.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 21, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    Gravatar

    http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9788233-16.html

    “Novell doesn’t need to urinate in the pool from which it hopes to build its future, but that is precisely what it is doing. It can and should do better.”

  3. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 3:50 am

    Gravatar

    “There really is factual basis for comment that SUSE Linux Enterprise works better with Microsoft Windows. ”
    Justin Steinmann’s comment, from the same site.

    Pamela is just a very difficult person, that’s all.

    I can only agree with this comment:
    “Novells employees will not be paid with feel-good-wishes from the FOSS community Novell is a business and is out to make money and SO is Redhat, why bomb-blast them because they market their product and play to their strengths, seriously wake up and realise that this is commercial company that gives a lot back into the FOSS community than most realise.”

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  4. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 3:55 am

    Gravatar

    ““It is a sort of an effort to ‘proprietise’ the Internet,”

    Unfortunately, .NET is based on an ECMA-standard, so I don’t give that claim much of a chance in court. As much as I like to see Microsoft clobbered.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  5. Victor Soliz said,

    November 22, 2007 at 8:59 am

    Gravatar

    eet, It is nice that you buy the whole ECMA-standard stuff. But it is quite foolish or misinformed.

    For one, System.Windows.Forms is not covered as part of the standard. For two silverlight is also dependant of a number of codecs that are ultra proprietary, want more examples?

    Novell uses FUD and false advertisement, you know? It is not true that SUSE enterprise works better with windows than Red Hat, but that’s Novell’s main selling point right now.

    Red Hat’s developers get paid totally well AND have the respect of the community, I am unsure why Novell had such need to make a pact with a company that even to date is an abusing monopoly that fights Linux with FUD and other anticompetitive tactics.

    Regarding your attempts to become political correctness police, I have no comment.

  6. eet said,

    November 22, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Gravatar

    “System.Windows.Forms is not covered as part of the standard.”
    That’s why these parts are kept strictly separate from the rest of Mono.

    “For two silverlight is also dependant of a number of codecs that are ultra proprietary.”
    Wrooong; you can use any video or audio codec that you want with; you can for example compile a version with only Ogg Vorbis and Theora. Codecs are not integral; you can use GStreamer, for example, or Xine.

    Get your facts straight before accusing others of being uninformed, son.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  7. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    Gravatar

    “.NET is based on an ECMA-standard”
    well “BEING BASED IN” DOES NOT EQUAL “BEING” a standard
    We all know all Microsoft formats are “BASED” in standards, only after being EEEd by MSFT.
    And for gods sake it is not a standard is a “ECMA-standard” (RTFLMAO!)

    ECMA-standards, despite its misleading name, are not necessarily standards. In some cases (as in the case of Microsoft’s throat-fed formats) are not standards AT ALL.
    ECMA is no less than a private company that helps other companies to push their proposals through TRUE standarization bodies (ANSI, ISO, IEC), for a fee, while trying to guarantee a faster approval process and that the format won´t be modified by the true standarisation process.

    ECMA defines itself as:
    “A proactive, problem solving experts’ group that ensures timely
    publication of international standards;
    Offers industry a “fast track”, to global standards bodies, through
    which standards are made available on time;
    Balances Technical Quality and Business Value:
    • Quality of a standard is pivotal, but the balance between timeliness and
    quality as well: Better a good standard today than a perfect one tomorrow!
    • Offers a path which will minimise risk of changes to input specs
    • Solid IPR policy and practice
    Ecma can be viewed as a reconfigurable hub of TCs”

    Anyway, independently of ECMA’s nature, no format supported by a single vendor (and its cronies) deserves be called “standard”.

  8. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm

    Gravatar

    “I am unsure why Novell had such need to make a pact with a company that even to date is an abusing monopoly that fights Linux with FUD and other anticompetitive tactics.”

    IMHO, Novell accepted the pact with the devil due to serious financial problems. The 348 million dollar deal allowed them some relief. Microsoft is very smart when they target struggling companies… the timing was perfect.
    Follow the money, ask yourself the right questions:

    http://www.itworld.com/Man/2698/060921novellnasdaq/

    JUST ONE MONTH before the pact Novell was about to be delisted from Nasdaq and was having problems with the Wells Fargo Bank. I think the re-animator injection of 348 million by Microsoft converted Novell in the perfect zombie to perform its masters at Redmond commands.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm

    Gravatar

    SubSonica, I can’t recall ever seeing this article. It’s worth a separate post. Mind if I do (post about it)?

    Bear in mind that Novell spoke to Microsoft since around May.

  10. SubSonica said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Sure you can. You should! I wonder if you ever thought about this. The first time I saw the 348 million figure linked to the pact, the former news of financial problems came to my mind like a flash. It is just a guess… but certainly a strikingly coherent one…
    When I first knew that Novell was in financial hardship, I regreted it since I was closely following all the fiaSCO case and also watching the maneovers of the big software corporations about pushinf the US software patents regime in the EU. and I thought Novell was a powerful ally to FOSS due to its big patent portfolio that could defensively prevent Microsoft and other giants’ (SAP, Oracle, Siemens) aggresive attitude towards FOSS.
    When they caved it to Microsoft IP infringement claims, lamely “agreeing to disagree” I knew that it was the price of Novell’s so-badly-needed 348 million dollars.

  11. Béranger said,

    November 22, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s not even about ECMA and what means to be a standard.

    It’s not even about patents.

    But I don’t need EXE and DLL files on my Linux box — and Mono clones .NET that much that you’ll have at least a few dozens of EXE and DLL files!

    Also, I don’t need a reimplementation of a Microsoft technology (note: it’s not like Samba, which is needed for real interoperability) that WAS NOT NEEDED, NOR REQUIRED.

    We already have Java.

    For small gizmos to use with GNOME, there is PyGtk, should it be that complicated to use C or C++ (Gtkmm) — although for crap like Tomboy or Beagle you could have used just about anything.

    There isn’t ANY SINGLE MAJOR MONO APPLICATION that would justify the existence of Mono.

    Mono is bloat, and a capitulation to a Microsoft “technology”.

What Else is New


  1. Sometimes Sounding 'Rude' Can Be Necessary

    We need to quit accepting this corporate-led ideology that says you cannot 'offend' people whose work is of offending quality (an offense against technical standards)



  2. Status Update: DDoS, Traffic, Interns

    Times are difficult for liberty/freedom; but we're trying to stay on top of it all in spite of attempts to derail us



  3. GNU/Linux Still Not Controlled Purely by Large Corporations

    Linus Torvalds was not fully canceled; nor was Richard Stallman, who's still heading the GNU Project (under conditions specified by those looking to oust him; people who code for Microsoft GitHub and many IBM employees)



  4. The Need for Purely Independent Media

    The media crisis, which has deepened greatly as more journalists are laid off amid pandemic, means that the PR/B2B industry takes over what's left of news sites; we need to counter this worrying trend



  5. Links 7/6/2020: Sparky 2020.06, Wine Staging 5.10, Vulkan SDK 1.2.141

    Links for the day



  6. GNU is Open Source

    "The GNU Project is no longer ethical. RMS may care, but he's outnumbered enough by liars and traitors."



  7. Chairman of the Board of Red Hat Explains He Was Introduced to GNU/Linux When It Helped His Regime Change in Haiti

    General Hugh Shelton, Chairman of the Board of Red Hat, explains (keynote in 2011 Red Hat Summit/JBoss World) that he was introduced to the system as part of a military campaign; it basically helped war, not antiwar



  8. The Faces of 'The Cloud' (Surveillance in Clown Computing/Clothing)

    Consolidation of the world's computers/servers and the stories told by photo ops; we're particularly interested in IBM's relationship with Condé Nast, which owns The New Yorker and Wired



  9. Microsoft is Now in the Technical Advisory Board of the Linux Foundation

    Techrights politely takes note of the growing role (or roles) of Microsoft employees inside the Linux Foundation; there are now at least half a dozen people



  10. Two Things IBM and Microsoft Have in Common: Layoffs and Fake Hype Like 'Clown Computing' and 'Hey Hi' (AI) as Perceived 'Opportunity' for 'Growth'

    The infamous pair of monopolists, Microsoft and IBM, are both suffering during the COVID-19 lock-downs (no matter how hard they try to spin it and/or distract from it)



  11. IBM (Red Hat) Lectured FSF That It Needed More Diversity, But Was It Looking at the Mirror? IBM and Red Hat Are Even Less Diverse.

    Techrights examines Red Hat’s (IBM’s) hypocritical claims about the Free Software Foundation, founded by Richard Stallman back when IBM was the “big scary monopolist”; IBM employees were prominent among those pushing to oust Stallman from the GNU Project, which he founded, as well



  12. IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, June 05, 2020



  13. Guix Petition Demographic Data, by Figosdev

    That old anti-RMS letter, which called for his removal (or resignation) from GNU (RMS is the founder of the GNU Project), as characterised by metadata of signatories



  14. When You Realise People Who Don't Support RMS Do Not Really Support GNU, Either

    The (in)famous letter against Richard Stallman (RMS), which was signed by many Red Hat employees with Microsoft (GitHub) accounts, doesn’t look particularly good in light of recent revelations/findings; it increasingly looks like IBM simply wants Microsoft-hosted and “permissively” licensed stuff, just like another project it announced yesterday and another that it promoted yesterday



  15. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part III: What Happens When You Tell the Truth About Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation

    One might not expect this from a so-called 'charity'; the Gates Foundation's critics are often met with unprecedented aggression, threats and retribution, which make one wonder if it's really a charity or a greedy cult of personalities (Bill and Melinda)



  16. Links 6/6/2020: Bifrost Meets GNOME, Wine 5.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  17. Links 5/6/2020: LibreELEC (Leia) 9.2.3, Rust 1.44.0, and Hamburg's Pivot to Free/Libre Software

    Links for the day



  18. This Article About GitHub Takeover Never Appeared (Likely Spiked by Microsoft and Its Friends Inside the Media)

    And later they wonder why people distrust so much of the media (where paying advertisers set the agenda/tone)



  19. Raw: How Microsoft and/or the EPO Killed an Important EPO Story About Their SLAPP Against Techrights and Others

    Spiking a story about spiked stories about corruption



  20. The Linux Foundation 'Bootcamp' -- Badly Timed and Badly Named in June 2020 -- Only Uses Linus Torvalds Like a 'Prop' (for Legitimacy) While Promoting Militarised Monopolies

    Sometimes a picture says a lot more than words, especially in light of political events in the US and a certain Chinese anniversary we cannot name (Microsoft censors mentions of it)



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 04, 2020



  22. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part II: When Media That You Bribe Calls All Your Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists' (to Keep Them Silenced, Marginalised)

    The assault on the media by Bill Gates is a subject not often explored by the media (maybe because a lot of it is already bribed by him); but we're beginning to gather new and important evidence that explains how critics are muzzled (even fired) and critical pieces spiked, never to see the light of day anywhere



  23. GitHub is Not Sharing But 'Theft' by Microsoft

    Microsoft buying GitHub does not demonstrate that Microsoft loves Open Source (GitHub is not Open Source and may never be) but that it loves monopoly and coercion (what GitHub is all about and why it must be rejected)



  24. The Huge Damage (Except for Patent Lawyers' Bottom Line) Caused by Fake European Patents

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps granting fake patents that cause a lot of real harm (examiners are pressured to play along and participate in this unlawful agenda); nobody is happy except those who profit from needless, frivolous lawsuits



  25. Red Hat/IBM Got 'Tired' of RMS. Is It Getting 'Tired' of GPL/Copyleft Too?

    After contributing to the cancellation of Richard Stallman (RMS) based on some falsehoods perpetuated in the media we're seeing the sort of thing one might expect from IBM (more so now that it totally controls Fedora and RHEL)



  26. Links 4/6/2020: Proton 5.0-8 Release Candidate, GNU Linux-libre 5.7

    Links for the day



  27. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 03, 2020



  28. Social Engineering of Free Software, Based on Corporate Criteria

    What "professional" nowadays means in the context of coding and honest assessment of technical work



  29. Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

    The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"



  30. Sword Group Violates Its Own Commitment by Working for the EPO

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps outsourcing its work to outside contractors (for-profit private entities) to the tune of hundreds of millions if not billions — all this without any oversight


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts