EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.20.08

How Jim Allchin, Gartner and Enderle Lied to the Whole World

Posted in Deception, Security, Vista, Windows at 1:06 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

If you say it often enough, people will believe it

We have developed a habit of keeping track of analysts who are obviously paid or compensated for serving corporate agenda (e.g. [1, 2, 3]). This is very relevant in light of the recent OOXML propaganda that came from IDC and the Burton Group.

Here is another fine example from the news. We wish to debunk the said analysts using compelling evidence and fact. One of the predications which certain people made is this:

5. Windows Vista will be secure
Analysts were: Wrong

When Windows Vista was launched, Microsoft platforms group vice president, Jim Allchin, described a platform where its “safety and security” will be the “overriding features” for which most people will want Windows Vista.

Analysts from Gartner and the Enderle Group further touted Vista’s security features, highlighting in particular its spyware-fighting prowess.

Enderle and Gartner have been caught many times before. The former is a one-man, attention-seeking ‘consultancy’ whose major client is Microsoft. The latter, Gartner, is funded by Bill Gates and plenty of its revenue stream comes from work it does for Microsoft. Jim Allchin, by the way, escaped Microsoft as soon as Windows Vista was released. It truly make you wonder, does it not?

The people above claimed that Vista will be secure, but let us take a look at some headlines which cover separate incidents that occurred in the past year (sorted reverse chronologically for the most part).

The latest round of patches revealed that Vista could be hijacked by merely sending a packet to it.

Microsoft’s first set of security bulletins for 2008 may be slim, but will include a fix for a critical vulnerability in XP and Vista.

More information about this incident can be found here.

One of the updates is considered critical for Windows Vista and XP users because the flaw it fixes could be used by attackers to install unauthorized software on a victim’s computer.

As we showed before, especially when Microsoft’s Jeff Jones was lying to the public, Microsoft redefines and reinvents the science of security in attempt to show that Windows is more secure. Seconia was accused of playing similar games just days ago. Here is what needs to be pointed out:

1. Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Metrics

For Microsoft this makes sense because these fixes get the benefit of a full test pass which is much more robust for a service pack or major release than it is for a security update.

2. Skeletons in Microsoft’s Patch Day closet

This is the first time I’ve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins — a controversial practice that effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions.

3. Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches

Forget for a moment whether Microsoft is throwing off patch counts that Microsoft brass use to compare its security record with those of its competitors. What do you think of Redmond’s silent patching practice?

4. Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again

Sorry, but Microsoft’s self-evaluating security counting isn’t really a good accounting.

[...]

The point: Don’t count on security flaw counting. The real flaw is the counting.

Getting back to Vista, let us look at some of the flaws we have seen:

1. Microsoft fixes 11 flaws in 7 patches; 5 affect Windows Vista

Microsoft on Tuesday released its December 2007 security bulletin, which includes seven updates: three are designated as critical by the software giant and four are deemed important.

2. December 2007′s Patch Tuesday’s Going to Be Big – Really Big

A Trio of Critical Patches

First up is a remote code execution patch for DirectX versions 7.0 (Windows 2000) through 10.0 (Windows Vista).

3. Security hole in MS-Windows Vista on Thanksgiving

Microsoft, although late, but did acknowledge that it is a flaw even in the latest OS (Vista) which should have been fixed long back.

4. Thirty-Six Updates Later—and Counting

Over the Thanksgiving holiday, I refreshed one of my Windows Vista test machines. Oh my, there were so many Windows Updates.

5. Vista security threats to rise in 2008: McAfee

Microsoft’s Windows Vista operating system will face increasing security threats, according to McAfee Avert Labs predictions for top 10 security threats in 2008.

6. Microsoft issues 6 ‘critical’ patches

The updates affect many versions of Windows, Server and Office software — including Windows XP and Windows Vista — and are meant to prevent hackers from breaking into Web surfers’ computers using specially crafted Web pages.

7. Buffer the Overflow Slayer v. the ActiveX Files [Vista included]

The vulnerability was discovered by Krystian Kloskowski and is rated “highly critical” in this posting on Secunia. It’s also discussed here on the US-Cert website. Proof-of-concept code can be found on MilW0rm here.

8. Microsoft plans six critical patches

At least one of the critical vulnerabilities involves Internet Explorer 7 and Windows Vista, both of which were conceived under new and highly vaunted development rigors designed to produce more secure products.

9. Patch Tuesday: Critical IE, Vista patches on deck

Of the four criticals, two will include high-severity patches for Windows Vista. The bulletin rated ?moderate? only affects Vista.

10. June Patch Tuesday to deliver Vista fixes and more

Four of this month’s bulletins are labelled ‘critical’ and relate to vulnerabilities that may allow remote code execution.

11. Microsoft Plugs Critical Vista Hole

Microsoft has just patched another critical hole in Vista that it knew about as long ago as last Christmas. The delay was similar to its lag in patching the serious (and heavily targeted) animated-cursor flaw I told you about last month.

12. Microsoft Patches Not One, But Three Vista Holes

Microsoft today released an update for the recently popular ‘animated cursor’ vulnerability. The update was originally scheduled for April 10th, but due to recent exploits, was rushed out today. The update wasn’t just for this one vulnerability though, in Vista, it addressed two others, and in all covered seven vulnerabilities in Vista, XP and 2000.

13. Windows Vista’s Built-in Rootkit

This poor implementation of the permissions structure can be exploited by malware to make files that are undetectable to Anti-Virus products.

14. More Windows cursor patch trouble [Vista included again]

A new issue with the fix has also come up. Some customers have experienced trouble when printing from SQL Reporting Services to a Printer Command Language (PCL) printer, Microsoft said.

15. Windows cursor patch causing trouble

Installing Microsoft’s Tuesday patch for a “critical” Windows vulnerability is causing trouble for some users.

16. MS Patch Tuesday: Vista dinged again

For the second time this month, Microsoft has shipped a security bulletin with patches for a “critical” Vista vulnerability that puts millions of users at risk of code execution attacks.

17. Security Researchers Say Windows .ANI Problem Surfaced Two Years Ago

Security researchers say the Windows .ANI bug that has been plaguing users for the past week first surfaced — and was patched — in early 2005.

18. Week in review: Cursing Windows’ cursor flaw

The software giant broke with its monthly patch cycle to fix a bug that cybercrooks had been using since last week to attack Windows PCs, including those running Vista.

19. ANI takers for Asus website virus?

Asus.com.tw, the website of Taiwanese motherboard maker Asustek, has been spraying visitors with the .ANI virus, security software makers confirmed today.

20. Will Next Tuesday’s 3 Updates Effect Vista?

I would suspect that one will be a patch for the Windows MessageBox exploit, so Vista should get it. Might another be for the Vista ‘Timer/2099 Crack’? I wouldn’t consider it critical, but Microsoft probably does.

21. Windows Vista now has its first exploit spotted in the public

Security experts have confirmed that a proof of concept code for an unpatched vulnerability in Windows Vista has been released on the internet.

There were warning signs in advance. Windows Vista was not made to have a considerable impact, security-wise, but hype was a key driver. It happens to be the same case with DirectX 10, whose hype was generated by faking images which create a false perception that it is a big jump compared to DirectX 9 (that is another shocking story about deception, but it’s worth a separate post). Here are some more articles of interest:

1. Windows Vista: It’s More Secure, We Promise

Well, allow me to take a moment to remind everyone of something that you might not remember – XP was also touted as being ultra secure. Seriously, can anyone honestly look themselves in the mirror and say this is the gospel truth? You have got to be kidding me. Similar to XP, Microsoft promises to have the most secure Windows version to date yet again.

2. Cisco exec: Windows Vista is scary

“Parts of Vista scare me,” Gleichauf said at the Gartner Security Summit here on Monday. “Anything with that level of systems complexity will have new threats, as well as bringing new solutions. It’s always a struggle in security, trying to build for what you don’t know.”

3. Symantec Finds Flaws In Vista’s Network Stack

Researchers with Symantec’s advanced threat team poked through Vista’s new network stack in several recent builds of the still-under-construction operating system, and found several bugs — some of which have been fixed, including a few in Monday’s release — as well as broader evidence that the rewrite of the networking code could easily lead to problems.

[...]

Among Newsham’s and Hoagland’s conclusions: “The amount of new code present in Windows Vista provides many opportunities for new defects.”

“It’s true that some of the things we found were ‘low-hanging fruit,’ and that some are getting fixed in later builds,” said Friedrichs. “But that begs the question of what else is in there?”

With so many incidents out there, there remains this Big Lie that Vista is secure. Paid analysts do not help here.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

47 Comments

  1. DOUGman said,

    January 20, 2008 at 2:46 am

    Gravatar

    You know after running with Ubuntu linux for little over a year now, I can say that all this BS from M$ does not worry anymore.

    I often get asked about how I manage spyware, defragging, virus’s, adware, etc. i just say that your OS of choice requires special software to deal with all that. Linux doesn’t period.

    Vista is fools gold, to appease the DRM folks at the expense of the licensee, as by agreeing to EULA, you do not own the copy of Windows nor its associated software.

    D.

  2. Dave said,

    January 25, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Gravatar

    I just recently dumped Vista for Ubuntu, and curse Dell for shipping Vista on my notebook in the first place. The first thing I HAD to do was spend $200 on ‘upgraded’ system utility software because it broke everything, including both older versions of Visual Studio that I had been using and VMWare.

    It ran the hard drive constantly to ‘defrag’ or ‘index’ things while I tried to work, even when on battery power, and it put clicks and pops into every kind of audio, even after installing new drivers, and M$ shuffled the configuration interfaces to the point where Linux seemed comfortable and familiar by comparison. So I switched.

  3. Carl Das Goat said,

    January 26, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    Gravatar

    A year ago I decided to make the switch to Ubuntu. I have never regretted it. Quicken is the only application that can not be crossed over at this time, so I run an old copy of WinXP inside Virtual Box to do my banking. I keep a partition with XP on it so I can play video games that are only made for MS. But these things too shall pass.

    I am on a project now to convert my small ($2 million in sales) business over to Fedora 8. It seems that my custom application DB vendor will only compile for RPM. Small price to pay, Fedora is a good product as well, if not as easy to customize since it lacks Ubuntu’s Synaptic Package Manager to simply “search and get” applications. But I have found that WINE will run my custom 3rd party Windows interface to the DB application, so I am (hopefully) just a few tweeks away from converting my 15 workstations and two servers over to a fully Linux enviorment. Then I can banish MS to the dust bin it truly deserves.

    Long live Open Source, the way things should be.

    {You can’t patent the wheel, how long can you continue to try to patent code and free thought?}

  4. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 27, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Gravatar

    I’d say that the theoretical security across Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X is equal. But practical security is a different matter.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I beg to differ. Here you will find evidence that Windows was never built with the Internet or security in mind.

    http://www.boycottnovell.com/comes-vs-microsoft/addenda/demonstrate.NTServer%20as.THE.Internet.platform/

    It wasn’t designed for a networked environment and no lessons were taken from decades of UNIX evolution. Moreover, back in 1993 Bill Gates said that they (Microsoft) did not care about the Internet.

    For additional readings consider:

    Linux vs. Windows: Which is Most Secure?

    http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3665801

    Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows

    http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html

    The problems with Vista laid bare – What might have been

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38419

    Why Windows is less secure than Linux

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311

    Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows

    http://www.xomba.com/linux_more_secure_than_windows_national_survey_shows

    Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=printer

    If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092300510.html?nav=rss_technology

    Why Windows is a security nightmare.

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/21/1085120110704.html

  6. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:50 pm

    Gravatar

    To be honest, Windows NT’s security was designed for a LAN, not for the Internet. That is for example why the Messenger service was enabled by default. It was not a problem in the pre-Internet days, when LANs were common. But Unix’s security was also not built for the Internet either. It was designed for a time-sharing system with multiple terminals attached to a minicomputer. But they are still quite good, the problem lies in the practical security of NT. I mean, NT nowadays have more viruses than Unix. BTW, by “NT” I also mean to Windows 2000, XP, and later because 2000 is NT 5.0, but not to 95/98/Me which is Windows 4.0, nor 3.x. Unix was not completely free of viruses either, however. The Morris worm was a famous worm targeting Unix.

  7. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Back then, there was a Unix monoculture, like today’s Windows monoculture.

  8. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Gravatar

    By then I mean when the Morris worm spread.

  9. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:55 pm

    Gravatar

    So Unix is not fundamentally more secure than Windows.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 27, 2008 at 11:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, NT was inspired by UNIX by the way. Gates openly said so. As for viruses, the last time I checked (2 days ago) there were over 5,000,000 pieces of known malware for Windows, including variants I presume. AV software is becoming ineffective, based on many recently articles that I’ve read in the past few months.

    For Windows, security issues will get worse before they get any better. Most PCs (>50%) are now believed to be infected by malware and about 1 in 4, according to some estimates, are controlled remotely by a criminal. This leads to a surge in cybercrime (stolen passwords, ransoms, etc.) and also to SPAM and DDOS attacks. We are all paying the price because it’s spread collectively.

  11. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:00 am

    Gravatar

    I know that, that is why I said in theory. BTW, NT’s kernel is more inspired by VMS. I am sure there are parts of NT which were inspired by Unix however.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:04 am

    Gravatar

    Comparing Morris to a more chaotic state that you have nowadays is a tad iffy, in my humble opinion. Morris affected and targeted some mission-critical equipment, which even /today/ rarely runs Windows.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm

    The critical error that transformed the worm from a potentially harmless intellectual exercise into a virulent denial of service attack was in the spreading mechanism.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:05 am

    Gravatar

    I am sure there are parts of NT which were inspired by Unix however.

    It does make you wonder about all those patent claims that are brought against Linux, doesn’t it?

  14. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Gravatar

    Running with least privilege however will at least isolate malware, and that applies to Unix as well. No, it won’t prevent the Sasser, Blaster, Morris, or SQL slammer worm from spreading, but it will prevent email worms from installing itself inside the system beyond the user you are logged on to. And if the user can’t access a file, macro viruses can’t infect it.

  15. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:07 am

    Gravatar

    >Comparing Morris to a more chaotic state that you have nowadays is a tad iffy, in my humble opinion.
    I agree but don’t forget there were a Unix monoculture back in 1989.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:12 am

    Gravatar

    Unix has its variant and Linux — oh boy — does Linux have variants! Seemingly easy-to-exploit flaws like buffer overflows become very harder to exploit based on a monoculture hypothesis. There are also more dynamic (or random) allocations, which can be used to prevent this. Schneier wrote about it a couple of years ago when he praised Red Hat for security. He had something to say also about diversity (separately).

  17. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:13 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, I am mentioning the Morris worm just to show Unix was not completely free of worms.

  18. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:17 am

    Gravatar

    Yep, more common in Unix are attackers that target against one system in order to gain access to that system. That is why it is important to have a plan in case a system is compromised.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:27 am

    Gravatar

    I am mentioning the Morris worm just to show Unix was not completely free of worms.

    No system can ever be ‘bulletproof’, especially when handling complexity that’s measured at hundreds of millions of LOCs brought together. Heck, just making 100 lines of code as elegant, as efficient and as secure as possible would take ages. It’s a science. That’s why age (maturity) and exposure (visibility) have a lot to offer.

    Having 15 people hacking on some Windows kernel in isolation (with employees going in and out) is the route to code spaghetti.

  20. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:28 am

    Gravatar

    >Having 15 people hacking on some Windows kernel in isolation (with employees going in and out) is the route to code spaghetti.
    Not by itself. 15 people that designed something properly won’t.

  21. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:30 am

    Gravatar

    However, I do know that more common in Unix are attackers who target against one system in order to gain access to that system. That is why it is important to have a plan in case a system is compromised.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:41 am

    Gravatar

    Based on the recent Apache/Linux incidents, it seems natural to assume that compromise of Windows boxes is enough to permit a great deal of pain to ‘pass on’ to other systems. If 25% of the Windows PCs out there are essentially zombie PCs, then how can you ensure those PCs do not upload mischievous scripts to the GNU/Linux servers? That’s just what happens when there is poor password control (or endless leaks). The problem that we have at the moment is that very relatively few are actually the sole owners of their PCs. That’s why I referred to it as “chaos” earlier on.

  23. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 12:53 am

    Gravatar

    Fortunately in the case where the user that is not an admin runs an exe to install a zombie program, the zombie programs can only last while the user is logged on and only have the privilege of the user, thus running with least privilege helps here. In the case the zombie program exploit a vulnerability in a service to install itself, the zombie program only have the privilege of the service, thus least privilege helps here as well. These things I just said in fact all apply to Unix as well.

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:01 am

    Gravatar

    You brought up an interesting topic here because Windows Vista has had privilege escalation issues and it’s natural to expect the same from Longhorn (or WS08). Patches were slow in terms of delivery, so the assertion above stands.

  25. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:03 am

    Gravatar

    Yep MS have a Patch Tuesday and one of the disadvantages is that any patches would not be released until the next Patch Tuesday. To be fair there are advantages as well, such as when you should check for patches, but still…

  26. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:18 am

    Gravatar

    MS just did another count, BTW:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2008/01/23/windows-vista-security-one-year-later.aspx

  27. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:20 am

    Gravatar

    Interestingly one of these articles came from a person who you rated low credibility in your charts.

  28. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:23 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, Vista’s UAC is similar to sudo, only that it does not prompt for a password by default.

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:47 am

    Gravatar

    Jeff Jones is just doing his job, which is to redefine metrics in such a way so that Windows is seen as secure. Then, Microsoft pushes its ‘studies’ onto journalists (I am quite initimately familiar with the process), some of whom will neglect to say that those ‘facts’ are in fact coming from Microsoft. I could provide more examples which show that this behaviour has a long history and one particular antitrust exhibit, sometimes referred to as “Effective Evangelism”, reveals Microsoft’s plan to deceive in this fashion.

    About UAC — yes, it’s like sudo. What’s most amusing/obnoxious about it is that Microsoft recently patented this idea and even recommended that Apple and GNU/Linux should ‘copy’ the idea from Microsoft. We wrote about this at the time.

  30. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:58 am

    Gravatar

    “very relatively few are actually the sole owners of their PCs.” What do you mean?

  31. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 1:59 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, I am quite neutral in the Windows vs Linux vs Mac OS X war.

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 2:08 am

    Gravatar

    “very relatively few are actually the sole owners of their PCs.” What do you mean?

    Oops. I had a little typo there.

    From what i can gather (based on the writings of Geer, Cerf and others), over 100 million PCs (running Windows) are part of one botnet or another. The media does not give this proper coverage because it would incite panic.That’s the way I view this anyway.

    BTW, I am quite neutral in the Windows vs Linux vs Mac OS X war.

    Harmony is a wonderful thing and I’m all in favour of it. What bothers me personally are the attempts to rewrite the laws and set precedence (a la Novell deal) in order to destroy a long-time rival known as Free software, which is highly attractive to more and more businesses. Some parties just don’t play by the rules. In other cases, they simply change the rules.

    Have you read the Halloween Documents any time recently, Yuhong?

  33. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 2:12 am

    Gravatar

    But you mentioned one of the areas of the war, so I just want you to tell you that.

  34. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 2:48 am

    Gravatar

    Which part are you referring to here? I think you are trying to suggest that “Effective Evangelism” is a war of words…? I’m not sure I’m following…

    Either way, be aware that “Effective Evangelism” states that “evangelism (sophisticated word for astroturfing) is war” and it also uses words like Jihad (holy war). It’s a truly appalling leak from Microsoft. Here is a bunch of quotes of interest:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/08/05/honour-competition-not/

    Always remember that Microsoft is not an innocent party that comes under attacks. Despite the secrecy, it’s clearly attacking all of its rival as it ‘innovates’ new ways to undermine competition (again, I urge you to re-read the Halloween Document and see this for yourself).

  35. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Gravatar

    You know the Windows vs Mac OS X vs Linux war I am referring to? One of it’s points is security

  36. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Gravatar

    I rarely think of security as “war”.

  37. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 28, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    Gravatar

    No I don’t either. I am talking about OS advocacy.

  38. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 28, 2008 at 11:30 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t think about it as war, either. I advocate very passionately, but it’s a matter of freedom. As I stressed before (can’t recall where), there might be a “war” between Apple and Microsoft because both very similar, but with GNU/Linux or BSD you’re looking at escaping digital shackles. In other words, I think of Apple and Microsoft as a couple of ‘clans’ battling for vanity just as football teams compete. With Linux, it’s sometimes about trend-setting.

  39. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 29, 2008 at 12:00 am

    Gravatar

    Yep, the primary reason for using free software is freedom in my opinion. Freedom from a single vendor, in particular.

  40. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 29, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    Gravatar

    On the matter of the Morris worm, there was one part that executed only on 2 system, VAX and Sun.

  41. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 29, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t know much about Morris (it predates my time somewhat) but I hear about it occasionally because I’m aware of many misconceptions about. It is sometimes used by Microsoft to make false statements.

  42. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 29, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    Gravatar

    On the matter of Windows Vista, I am kind of neutral about the Vista upgrade.
    I am not saying that MS is innocent of crimes, in fact I do dislike the MS-Novell deal, because that deal can make Linux non-free software.

  43. Yuhong Bao said,

    January 29, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Many of the people who have low credibility in the Free Software Credibility List are simply the wrong person anyways for free software related matters. They are OK for Microsoft software related matters.

  44. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 30, 2008 at 12:16 am

    Gravatar

    Yes, but when a journalist published an article in a seemingly-neutral publication (no such thing), then the biases and business relationship must have no effect. Rob Enderle comes to mind as an example because people think of him as an analyst and journalists quote him. He is paid by Microsoft (fact) and he spreads lies about Linux adoption (last seen this yesterday).

  45. Felis silvestris said,

    February 19, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Hi, the “Effective Evangelism” document(s) are not available on Groklaw, or see the original document at:
    http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX3096.pdf

  46. Felis silvestris said,

    February 19, 2008 at 2:51 pm

    Gravatar

    s/not/now/, sorry. The Groklaw link is http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071023002351958

  47. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 19, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, I know. I sent some fragments of text to PJ a day before she published this. It was timely and it will hopefully generate a lot of discussion ahead of that corrupt (as in stacked) BRM.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  2. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  3. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  4. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  5. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  6. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  7. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  8. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  9. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  10. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  11. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  12. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  13. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  14. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  15. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  16. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  17. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  18. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  19. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  20. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  21. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  22. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  23. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  24. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide



  25. Unitary Patent (UPC) Promotion by Team Battistelli 'Metastasising' in Private Law Firms

    The EPO's Albert Keyack (Team Battistelli) is now in Team UPC as Vice President of Kilburn & Strode LLP; he already fills the media with lies about the UPC, as one can expect



  26. Microsoft Targets GNU/Linux Advocates With Phony Charm Offensives and Fake 'Love'

    The ways Microsoft depresses GNU/Linux advocacy and discourages enthusiasm for Software Freedom is not hard to see; it's worth considering and understanding some of these tactics (mostly assimilation-centric and love-themed), which can otherwise go unnoticed



  27. Proprietary Software Giants Tell Open Source 'Communities' That Proprietary Software Giants Are 'Friends'

    The openwashing services of the so-called 'Linux' Foundation are working; companies that are inherently against Open Source are being called "Open" and some people are willing to swallow this bait (so-called 'compromise' which is actually surrender to proprietary software regimes)



  28. Microsoft Pays the Linux Foundation for Academy Software Foundation, Which the Linux Foundation is Outsourcing to Microsoft

    Microsoft has just bought some more seats and more control over Free/Open Source software; all it had to do was shell out some 'slush funds'



  29. Links 14/9/2019: SUSE CaaS Platform, Huawei Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  30. Links 13/9/2019: Catfish 1.4.10, GNOME Firmware 3.34.0 Release

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts