EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.02.09

Red Hat Replaces Tomboy with Gnote, Removes Mono Dependency

Posted in Debian, GNOME, GNU/Linux, Mono, Red Hat at 5:24 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Red hat

Summary: Fedora 12 will have Gnote, not Tomboy, thereby eliminating that monkey (mono) tail which falls off too

IT HAS finally happened. Red Hat had already removed Mono from the Live CD of Fedora 10 and recently it spoke about substituting Tomboy with Gnote. Red Hat, unlike Debian for example, minds the risk of patents. From talk comes fruition, so Gnote, which has already entered Fedora, will also be there by default in the near future.

I have now changed the default panel configuration in F12 to include gnote instead of tomboy, and changed comps to make gnote default and tomboy optional.

This won’t replace tomboy in existing installations, but new installations will get gnote instead of tomboy.

This also means that gnote should show up on the live cd (where we excluded tomboy previously, due to no space for mono).

Some things are still needed for a 100% smooth experience:
- pick up existing tomboy notes (less urgent now, since we do not replace tomboy…)
- don’t show the ‘start here’ note initially

This means that Fedora rids itself from the Mono dependant in its implementation of GNOME.

Gnote is installed by default in GNOME for this release replacing Tomboy. Gnote is a port of Tomboy from Mono to C++ and consumes less resources. Gnote is both an applet that can sit in your GNOME panel as well as a individual application you can run within other desktop environments. Fedora Desktop Live CD excluded Mono in the last releases due to lack of space. Gnote will be installed by default in the Live CD as well in this release. Tomboy is still available as a optional alternative. If you are upgrading from the previous release you will not be migrated to Gnote and will continue to have Tomboy. It is easy to migrate to Gnote however as it shares the file format. This migration is not automatic. You can copy the notes from Tomboy to Gnote using the following command in your home directory

The developer of Gnote, Hubert, has already moved to Fedora and there is prior coverage of this news right here (the information was shared in Twitter half a day ago).

Redhat/Fedora drops Mono

It will come as no surprise to regular readers that I am heartily encouraged by this small snippet of news I picked up via Twitter this afternoon (thanks Roy)

This is a major milestone in the ongoing eradication of Mono as a dependency in GNU/Linux distributions. To put it bluntly, Mono is trouble.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

14 Comments

  1. Victor Soliz said,

    June 2, 2009 at 9:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Finally good news.

    Yay.

    Heck, with ubuntu being way more Mono friendly lately instead of changing, I might make the move.

  2. woods said,

    June 10, 2009 at 1:21 am

    Gravatar

    This is indeed great news.

    Finally a mono-free (by default) mainstream distro.

    I’m definitely moving to Fedora (especially in light of Ubuntu’s continuing mono-friendliness)

    pcolon Reply:

    If you’re using ubuntu and are, because of mono, changing to another distro, ubuntu’s source, Debian, is mono-free by default.

    Fedora is a great distro. It was the one used to in place of windows. Nevertheless, I found that there is a lot of freedom and choice using Debian.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    We might hear something about Tomboy becoming default in Debian. It is not too late to stop it. We will know about the results pretty soon.

  3. Marcus Koze said,

    June 10, 2009 at 2:59 am

    Gravatar

    I wish to believe that this is NOT something micromoft intended with mono (I know, made by novell, but still related and backed by micro&soft)… as in particularly dreaming about Canonical getting comfortable with the mono stuff and _drive users away_ through micromoft association with the “framework” (is mono a framework or what ?) …

    OTOH, i had a thought, maybe crazy, but what if Canonical had some secret deal with them (micro&soft / novell) not to be sued, so dancing with the renegades now ? I’m not accusing anyone of anything, was just a thought of mine … but i keep reminding myself: Canonical is a company, sponsoring the Ubuntu project … they’ve done a phenomenal job ’till now, all respect to them for that … but sooner or later, companies get into compromising stuff for revenue… you know, money can corrupt even the brightest minds around … i keep hoping they wouldn’t fall into it, yet started to prospect several other distros for a possible switch (that is: away from Ubuntu)… still using it, but seriously prospecting nonetheless…

    As far as my concearn, the only app that I’ve used and dropped later was Gnome-Do (with the new Docky theme), but when i found out it’s written in mono, removed it in an instant… out of ideological reasons (mainly) but also because i didn’t want to become too fond of it, considering the risks behind the technology used to create it. Some may keep saying there’s no risk, or that there’s a risk in everything, but this one (mono) is just too serious (for me at least) and obvious, watching micro&soft’s desperate actions around the world…

    If Canonical starts showing further signs that it does what about every business does (compromises the path it started for the sake of more, and then even more, revenue), guess what follows …

  4. eet said,

    June 10, 2009 at 7:44 am

    Gravatar

    If you are afraid of patent risks, better don’t use the Kernel either, as M$ claims it violates some of their patents. :p

    To put it blunt: If you don’t even care to use what M$ threatened to sue about one day, why should you care to use what M$ expressly promises NOT to sue about?

    pcolon Reply:

    MSFT promised not to sue on FAT.

    Marcus Koze Reply:

    Oh no, I’m not afraid to use the kernel, i don’t even consider micro&soft’s claims about that, actually I’m much more convinced that M$’s code is a rip-off of FLOSS code… but that’d be self-nullifying, as what micro&soft offers is crap packed in a not-so-appealing box, valued only by marketing over-hype.

    No, i won’t stop using the Linux kernel as long as it or i exist. Yet the mono thingie seems a *real* risk, *no matter what micro&soft says about not suing or using it to favour themselves / keep themselves afloat*. At least in my very own opinion.

    eet Reply:

    There is no logic in your argument, Sir!

    Marcus Koze Reply:

    Probably because my english isn’t the best thing i’m capable of. Please tell me what’s not clear to you and i’ll try to rephrase more concisely

  5. eet said,

    June 10, 2009 at 8:36 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not a matter of re-phrasing, you are simply being illogical. You know; logic – fact, cause, effect, and so-on; you learn that stuff at university.

  6. Marcus Koze said,

    June 10, 2009 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    alright, to sum what i’ve meant there:

    - i personaly have no issues about the Linux kernel and use it without a single sweat about what you say regarding m$ claims that the linux kernel infringes xyz patents

    - again, i personaly find the use of mono a lot more probable of being used by m$ agains the FOSS community

    - a correction about my claim about m$’s code being a rip-off of FLOSS code: that should read “i think some m$ code is more likely to be a rip-off of FLOSS code, than vice-versa”. my apologies, i see now that it sounds a bit too radical as i’ve previously written it.

  7. saulgoode said,

    June 10, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Gravatar

    If you are afraid of patent risks, better don’t use the Kernel either, as M$ claims it violates some of their patents.

    The kernel development project doesn’t rely upon Microsoft patent licensing for justification of implementing potentially infringing code.

    eet Reply:

    Nor does Mono. The Novell-M$ agreement was pure marketing that even Icaza was only informed about afterwards.

What Else is New


  1. Microsoft Paid the Open Source Initiative. Now (a Year Later) Microsoft is in the Board of the Open Source Initiative.

    The progression of Microsoft entryism in FOSS-centric institutions (while buying key "assets" such as GitHub) isn't indicative of FOSS "winning" but of FOSS being infiltrated (to be undermined)



  2. Jim Zemlin's Linux Foundation Still Does Not Care About Linux Desktops

    We are saddened to see that the largest body associated with Linux (the kernel and more) is not really eager to see GNU/Linux success; it's mostly concerned about its bottom line (about $100,000,000 per annum)



  3. Links 23/3/2019: Falkon 3.1.0 and Tails 3.13.1

    Links for the day



  4. The Unified Patent Court is Dead, But Doubts Remain Over the EPO's Appeal Boards' Ability to Rule Independently Against Patents on Nature and Code

    Patents used to cover physical inventions (such as engines); nowadays this just isn't the case anymore and judges who can clarify these questions lack the freedom to think outside the box (and disobey patent maximalists' dogma)



  5. Patent Law Firms Still Desperate to Find New Ways to Resurrect Dead Software Patents in the United States

    There's no rebound and no profound changes that favour software patents; in fact, judging by caselaw, there's nothing even remotely like that



  6. Links 22/3/2019: Libinput 1.13 RC2 and Facebook's Latest Security Scandal

    Links for the day



  7. Why the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) Cannot Ignore Judges, Whereas the EPO Can (and Does)

    The European Patent Convention (EPC) ceased to matter, judges' interpretation of it no longer matters either; the EPO exploits this to grant hundreds of thousands of dodgy software patents, then trumpet "growth"



  8. The European Patent Office Needs to Put Lives Before Profits

    Patents that pertain to health have always posed an ethical dilemma; the EPO apparently tackled this dilemma by altogether ignoring the rights and needs of patients (in favour of large corporations that benefit financially from poor people's mortality)



  9. “Criminal Organisation”

    Brazil's ex-President, Temer, is arrested (like other former presidents of Brazil); will the EPO's ex-President Battistelli ever be arrested (now that he lacks diplomatic immunity and hides at CEIPI)?



  10. Links 21/3/2019: Wayland 1.17.0, Samba 4.10.0, OpenShot 2.4.4 and Zorin Beta

    Links for the day



  11. Team UPC (Unitary Patent) is a Headless Chicken

    Team UPC's propaganda about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has become so ridiculous that the pertinent firms do not wish to be identified



  12. António Campinos Makes Up Claims About Patent Quality, Only to be Rebutted by Examiners, Union (Anyone But the 'Puff Pieces' Industry)

    Battistelli's propagandistic style and self-serving 'studies' carry on; the notion of patent quality has been totally discarded and is nowadays lied about as facts get 'manufactured', then disseminated internally and externally



  13. Links 20/3/2019: Google Announces ‘Stadia’, Tails 3.13

    Links for the day



  14. CEN and CENELEC Agreement With the EPO Shows That It's Definitely the European Commission's 'Department'

    With headlines such as “EPO to collaborate on raising SEP awareness” it is clear to see that the Office lacks impartiality and the European Commission cannot pretend that the EPO is “dafür bin ich nicht zuständig” or “da kenne ich mich nicht aus”



  15. Decisions Made Inside the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Lack Credibility Because Examiners and Judges Lack Independence

    The lawless, merciless, Mafia-like culture left by Battistelli continues to haunt judges and examiners; how can one ever trust the Office (or the Organisation at large) to deliver true justice in adherence or compliance with the EPC?



  16. Team UPC Buries Its Credibility Deeper in the Grave

    The three Frenchmen at the top do not mention the UPC anymore; but those who promote it for a living (because they gambled on leveraging it for litigation galore) aren't giving up and in the process they perpetuate falsehoods



  17. The EPO Has Sadly Taken a Side and It's the Patent Trolls' Side

    Abandoning the whole rationale behind patents, the Office now led for almost a year by António Campinos prioritises neither science nor technology; it's all about granting as many patents (European monopolies) as possible for legal activity (applications, litigation and so on)



  18. Where the USPTO Stands on the Subject of Abstract Software Patents

    Not much is changing as we approach Easter and software patents are still fool's gold in the United States, no matter if they get granted or not



  19. Links 19/3/2019: Jetson/JetBot, Linux 5.0.3, Kodi Foundation Joins The Linux Foundation, and Firefox 66

    Links for the day



  20. Links 18/3/2019: Solus 4, Linux 5.1 RC1, Mesa 18.3.5, OSI Individual Member Election Won by Microsoft

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  22. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  23. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day



  24. To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

    The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany



  25. Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

    Links for the day



  26. Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

    Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)



  27. The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

    Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised



  28. Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

    Links for the day



  29. The EPO and the USPTO Are Granting Fake Patents on Software, Knowing That Courts Would Reject These

    Office management encourages applicants to send over patent applications that are laughable while depriving examiners the freedom and the time they need to reject these; it means that loads of bogus patents are being granted, enshrined as weapons that trolls can use to extort small companies outside the courtroom



  30. CommunityBridge is a Cynical Microsoft-Funded Effort to Show Zemlin Works for 'Community', Not Microsoft

    After disbanding community participation in the Board (but there are Microsoft staff on the Board now) the "Linux Foundation" (or Zemlin PAC) continues to take Microsoft money and polishes or launders that as "community"


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts