EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.24.09

Mono Roundup: Suppression of Speech, Extension, and Deception

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FSF, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 4:26 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Playing with clay

Summary: Bits of minor news about Mono

AS our later post will show, Microsoft delivered not 20,000 lines of code but 20,000 lines of GPL compliance. Despite the illusion or bubble of PR bursting, some pro-Microsoft blogs are using this forced compliance (and Mono) to describe Microsoft’s self-serving actions as a “love-fest over open source” for which Microsoft deserves special credit. This spin is also pushed by the business press. At the same time we are seeing personal attacks on those daring to criticise some things like Mono, disdain of Stallman, and trust in Microsoft. Trust needs to be earned (c/f TomTom lawsuit in 2009)

Glyn Moody is able to see the disagreements at play and he has published a post that tells apart “Purists” and “Pragmatists”. It’s an old story and nothing particularly out of the ordinary; tension has always existed at some level.

Now we have a similar situation regarding Mono. The purists are concerned that there may be issues to do with software patents in jurisdictions that recognise them. To them, it seems folly to create what may be tainted code because of the digital sword of Damocles hanging over them through such intellectual monopolies. For the pragmatists, by contrast, Mono is simply a good way of programming that can serve the useful purpose of allowing people to run .Net-based programs on free software. All in all, then, they believe it is to be welcomed as a way of increasing the use of open source.

There is a particular irony in this situation, because this time it is the GNOME project’s use of Mono that is proving unacceptable to the purists, whereas ten years ago, GNOME was the purist solution to the problems with KDE’s pragmatism. If nothing else, this shows how foolish it would be to judge projects on their past alignments rather than present actions.

Despite warnings from the FSF, Novell is replicating Microsoft and it shows no signs of abatement. Taking Banshee for example, it is being further extended into territories which beg for trouble [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Tomboy has many users, but unlike Banshee, Microsoft’s Community Promise covers it for the time being. One of the biggest issues happens to be Moonlight, which was covered in ZDNet UK a few days ago.

Silverlight is based on .NET — the open source implementation of .NET is Mono. Microsoft has assisted Mono development. The open source version of Silverlight is called Moonlight, which is based on Mono, and sponsored by Novell. Moonlight enables Silverlight content to run on Linux.

Microsoft never appeased the concerns raised by the SFLC regarding Moonlight.

What also ought to be added is that David Worthington seems to have been promoting “everything Microsoft” recently (ever since they bought him lunch, but he was in touch with Microsoft for longer than that). Anyway, one of the latest posts from him is once again promoting Mono by deception, even spin and borderline lies. Pascal from the OpenSUSE Board is annoyed by it. He wrote:

This piece of… “art” has to be one of the most factually wrong and ridiculous pseudo-technical articles ever. Because its utterly unqualified author has 3 or 4 desktop applications running on Mono on his desktop, he states that Mono has overtaken Java (and, unlike the title of that article, he actually writes that it’s not only on the desktop).

And even later, Worthington carries on promoting Mono. It must be good for Microsoft, but we already knew that and wrote about it yesterday.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. zatoichi said,

    July 24, 2009 at 5:13 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, I’ve just reported your site to littleart.ru for violating its terms of use on artwork. I’d heard that you’d been smacked around for using stock are without permission, and here you are doing precisely that.

    This photo comes from this page on littleart.ru; note that at the bottom of the page, there’s the line

    Copyright ©2008-2009, Littleart.ru. Использование материалов сайта возможно только при наличии прямой ссылки на Littleart.ru

    If you read Russian, you’d be aware that this says, “Copyright © 2008-2009, Littleart.ru. Use of the site’s materials is only possible when there are direct links to Littleart.ru.” I’m not seein’ no direct links, Roy.

    So, the Big Defender of Free Software for the Evil Corporation is a violator of copyright. A thief of the creativity of others . Nice.

    Or maybe you’re just exercising your “freedom” and seeing to it that your neighbor shares his things with you. Whether he wants to or not. Without your asking first.

    For shame, Roy. I’m going to be going through the rest of the artwork on the site, I expect I’ll find more examples, and I’ll report those, too, as I find them, both to their owners and here.

    Those stories were true, weren’t they? Once a thief, always a thief.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The photo is from here:

    http://www.sxc.hu/photo/994612

    Usage
    Royalty free, see usage options”

    Your only purpose in this site in to silence and intimidate (see the subject of this post). If you carry on, your account will be banned for breaking the commenting policy.

    Dylan McCall Reply:

    Okay…

    “Standard restrictions apply and flaivoloka must be notified and credited when using the photo for any public work.”

    Maybe it’s lost somewhere, but I don’t see the latter end of that being upheld.

  2. zatoichi said,

    July 24, 2009 at 5:32 am

    Gravatar

    Don’t blame me, Roy, there had been stories, and the very first photo I check takes me to littlearts.ru; I not the one snagging free photos from dodgy web sites; I either get permission or get my stock from iStockphoto.com…

    That only talks about the royalty you have to pay when you’ve executed a license with the owner of the image. From the sxc.hu “Site Info” (my emphasis):

    “6. Are these images really free?

    Yes, they are free as long as you stick to the rules in the Image license Agreement. Also, in some cases you may need to notify the artists about using the images and sometimes you need to give credit to them. You can see these restrictions under the image previews, right next to the Download button.”

    Also, in section 7, “Legal Information”, they note

    “SXC cannot be held responsible for any copyright violations, and cannot guarantee the legality of the Images stored in its system. If you want to make sure, always contact the photographers. You use the site and the photos at your own risk! ”

    And, as I said, the image in question, as nearly as I can tell, belongs to littleart.ru and is only available under the specified terms. I’ll track down others as I have time, but I won’t bother telling you about it, since it seems to upset you.

    Speaking of “being banned”, I was wondering if you’d had a chance to either collect some links to where I was cursing so much that you had no recourse but to remove me from the site, as well as that list of “what is and what is not a ‘curse’”…? I mean, is “bas**rd” okay? I guess “as***le” is probably over the line, but what about just “a**”?

    Seen verofakto’s time line? Really nice job there, huh?

    zatoichi Reply:

    Oh, and verofakto did that on his or her own: I just offered one additional “incident”–the “tomboy replacement” thread in early 2008–and one clarification, to the work that had already been done. I can pass along any comments you have on this, if you’d like, Roy.

    nachokb Reply:

    And, as I said, the image in question, as nearly as I can tell, belongs to littleart.ru

    zatoichi, I don’t know why you are so sure about that, perhaps you have more information.

    Still, I can’t help but look at the dates, and it just so happens that sxc’s predates the Russian site’s image by more than a year. At least, that’s what it says.

    Anyway, it is ultimately irrelevant: it should be reported (to both of them, without prejudice) and then left aside (if, the real rights holder turns out to be the Russian guy, all that Roy would have to do is remove the image or ask permission).

    You seem to keep insisting that it is somehow Roy’s fault. That’s what makes you look like a zealot.

    Regards,

    nachokb

  3. zatoichi said,

    July 24, 2009 at 5:38 am

    Gravatar

    I’m not trying to silence you, Roy. I’m just trying to get you to stop misrepresenting things, and leading this incessant chorus of hatred. I’m afraid you’ll die young if you keep up this sort of thing, it’s not at all healthy for you.

    Of course, to the extent that a lot of stuff on the site is out-and-out misrepresentation, I guess there’d be a lot less stuff, but that’s not the same thing at all.

  4. Needs Sunlight said,

    July 24, 2009 at 6:27 am

    Gravatar

    More! This must be spot on if it gets the MSFT boosters so wound up and skipping right to the personal attacks. Fact is, if they have only the attacks that shows there is no basis for the claims that Mono / BOTNet are technically or legally suitable for any given task. Usually MSFT boosters do the attacks when there is some very bad showing in the quarterly figures, some competitors (read: the rest of industry) are getting good press, or

    Fact is the “protections” for Mono are not passed downstream. Only hobby developers are covered. End-users and commercial developers are at risk from racketeering. Building on Mono instead of the original Java or C++ can leave your customers in for a *nasty* surprise later — black hats and lawyers.

    eet Reply:

    Apparently you haven’t been following what’s been going on lately, otherwise you would know who zatoichi is. This here is about far more than your boring Mono-conspiracies; it is about what we want our community to be: A playground for self-indulgent paranoiacs who go around defaming others or a place for people who want to make constructive contributions to a shared vision.

    Needs Sunlight Reply:

    @EET: it seems you are one who has splinters from the troll-mirror in his eyes or that you seem to think it is opposite day. Anyway, keep up the yammering, but do it elsewhere.

    Mono, aside from performance and security hits, is about locking software into M$ outdated stack.

    Don’t use it in place of Java:
    http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono

    zatoichi Reply:

    The FSF has their opinion, and the UTB has theirs.

    Why does everyone need to subscribe to the one you say?

  5. Will said,

    July 24, 2009 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    Unless I missed something:

    “We hereby grant to You a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the Image on the terms and conditions explained in this Agreement and on the Image preview page FREE OF CHARGE.

    You may use the Image

    * In digital format on websites, multimedia presentations, broadcast film and video, cell phones.”

    That is from the terms of use for that photo.

    zatoichi Reply:

    You did indeed miss something. The paragraph where they allow that they don’t check a single solitary thing that’s uploaded for copyright violations, and that it’s on the user to check and make sure that the rights are what the upload says they are.

    This photo is clearly posted at scx.hu illegitimately, as my link to its original location shows. The site that has the rights–littleart.ru–says, as I pointed out, that you can only use it if you link back to their site from it. So, unless Roy makes that photo a link to littleart.ru, he’s in violation of their copyright.

    All he needs to do is make it link appropriately. Is that so hard? It’s a nice photo, why do you and Roy want to deny its creators the credit they deserve?

    But I’ve posted all of this already, right here. Don’t you read before you comment?

    Dylan McCall Reply:

    The truth is, they just want to pretend you don’t exist because you don’t subscribe to their “freedom or die” mentality. If Roy had his way, you would already be an unperson.

    zatoichi Reply:

    I was an unperson, a few times, at least until Roy ran short of reasons, and the energy, to ban me again.

    I though I was dead once. Turned out, I was just in Nebraska.

    —Gene Hackman as “‘Little’ Bill Daggett” in Unforgiven

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/4/2015: New KaOS (2015.04), Manjaro Linux 0.8.13 Pre1

    Links for the day



  2. Links 18/4/2015: ExTiX 15.2, RaspArch

    Links for the day



  3. Microsoft Tired of Pretending to be Nice to Free/Open Source Software (FOSS), Microsoft 'Open' Technologies Dumped

    Microsoft dumps its proxy (misleadingly named 'Open Tech') and other attacks on Free software persist from the inside, often through so-called 'experts' whose agenda is to sell proprietary software



  4. More Translations of French Article About the EPO

    German and Dutch translations of the Le Monde article are now available



  5. Links 17/4/2015: Wipro and the Netherlands Want FOSS

    Links for the day



  6. Microsoft's Multi-Dimensional Assault on Android/Linux: Extortion, Lobbying of Regulators, and Bribes

    Microsoft's vicious war on Linux (and Android in its current incarnation) takes more sophisticated -- albeit illegal (as per the RICO Act) -- forms



  7. Microsoft's Plot to Associate Windows with 'Open Source' is Proving Effective, Despite Being Just a Big Lie

    A look at the latest headlines which can lead to a false perception that Microsoft is now in bed with 'Open Source'



  8. Microsoft Windows Remotely Crashed, Remotely Hijacked, But Still No Logo and No Branding for the Bugs

    Windows maintains its reputation as a back doors haven, but the media is still not highlighting the severity of this issue, instead focusing on accidental bugs in Free software, even very old (and already fixed) bugs



  9. Black Duck's Latest Self-Promotional Propaganda (for Proprietary Software) Still Fools Journalists

    Under the traditionally misleading title "Future of Open Source" Black Duck expresses its desire for proprietary software sales, salivating over fearful managers who may get bamboozled into buying the patents-'protected' Black Duck 'product'



  10. Links 16/4/2015: Opera for 32-bit GNU/Linux, New Chromebook Site

    Links for the day



  11. Links 15/4/2015: Plasma 5.3 Beta, Docker's New Funding

    Links for the day



  12. Microsoft is Still Googlebombing the Term Open Source and Fooling Politicians Who Now Think Microsoft is Open Source

    Microsoft's attempt to assimilate (to confuse) bears some fruit and the Microsoft-linked media plays a considerable role in it



  13. Back Doors/Bug Doors in All Versions of Microsoft Windows Need a Name, a Logo, and Branding Too

    All versions of Microsoft Windows are found to have been insecure since 1997, but the bug responsible for this is not named as candidate for back door access, let alone named (with logo and marketing) like far less severe bugs in Free/libre software such as OpenSSL



  14. OnePlus (or OnePlus Customers) Should Wipe CyanogenMod From Existing Devices and Install Something Else

    A call for OnePlus to reconsider any future updates from Microsoft's Trojan horse, Cyanogen



  15. Links 14/4/2015: 3DR Dronecode, Z1/Z2 Tizen

    Links for the day



  16. Links 13/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Released; A Look at Antergos 2015.04.12

    Links for the day



  17. EFF Uses Alice v. CLS Bank Case to Pressure USPTO to Halt Software Patenting

    A look at recent patent policies and actions from the EFF, as well as increasing secrecy at the USPTO



  18. No, Panasonic Did Not Open-Source Anything (Another Example of Openwashing for PR)

    A dissection of media deception (or media being bamboozled) regarding the act of promising not to sue using patents, which in no way relates to Free/Open Source software



  19. Yes, Software Patents Are Dying, But Media Continues to Be Dominated by Those Denying it For a Salary

    The debate about software patents in this post-Alice era parallels the Net neutrality debate, where voices of people with vested interests contribute to confusion and meddle with largely-accepted views/consensus



  20. Links 12/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Imminent, Semplice 7 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  21. GNU/Linux is Crushing Windows, So Microsoft Leaps Ahead to X+2 Vapourware (Two Versions Ahead Into the Future)

    Microsoft continues to pile up bogus claims and empty promises in an effort to stall migrations to GNU/Linux



  22. The ITC's and US Media's Surprisingly Soft Treatment of Patent Bully Apple

    Despite Apple's history of initiating patent aggression against its competition (mostly Android-backing companies), the US corporate media treats Apple like a victim



  23. Microsoft Continues to Attack (and Tax) Linux Using Software Patents

    Microsoft stabs Linux in the back while it continues to insist that it 'loves' Linux



  24. European Unitary Patent Decision Due 5th of May

    The meta-industry of patent protectionism is debating and pushing forth the Unitary Patent Court, with or without endorsement from the European public



  25. Microsoft is Still Googlebombing 'Open Source'

    Microsoft's massive campaign of deception, obfuscation and misuse of the "Open Source" brand is still on, even a week after it was cleverly started by Condé Nast



  26. Links 11/4/2015: elementary OS Freya, Mageia 5 on the Way

    Links for the day



  27. Links 10/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Imminent, ZFS On Linux Improved

    Links for the day



  28. New Article Chronicles Suicides and Nervous Breakdowns at the EPO Due to the Management's Abuses

    Article from Le Monde translated into English



  29. Links 9/4/2015: SalentOS, Semplice Releases

    Links for the day



  30. The EPO is Becoming More Like the USPTO Under Benoît Battistelli's Greed-Driven Reign

    Recent articles about the EPO and the Unitary Patent are bundled together to highlight truly disturbing developments whereby those in power beget power through instruments of state-sanctioned power, such as the EPO (stateless entity within a continent-wide 'island')


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts