09.28.10

Gemini version available ♊︎

USPTO Receives Overwhelming Opposition to Software Patents

Posted in FSF, Law, Microsoft, Patents, Red Hat at 7:57 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Flipping pages

Summary: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) successfully encourages many people to voice their opinion on software patents and the USPTO comes under pressure from other directions while unregistered lobbyists heckle those who drive progress

THE FSF’S Brett Smith, along with other people who support the FSF’s cause, has been calling for requests to be sent to the USPTO (first mentioned here), asking politely for elimination of software patents until over 450 submissions were sent:

Last week, we put out an action item asking people to write to the USPTO, and explain to them why software should not be eligible for patents under their forthcoming post-Bilski guidance. To answer the call, you all sent in more than 450 letters, offering the USPTO all kinds of legal and practical reasons why they should stop issuing software patents. This is a tremendous response, and we’re very grateful to you all for participating. Thank you very much!

Of course, we also submitted our own letter written by the director of the End Software Patents campaign, Ciarán O’Riordan. You can read it on the ESP site. We used this opportunity to point out three specific points in the Bilski decision that we believe seriously undermine any legal case for software patents. If the USPTO incorporates even one of these points into its guidance, it will be a big win for opponents of software patents.

The FSF must be doing something right because the hypocrite lobbyist Microsoft Florian, who is spamming journalists in the sense that without consent he sends a huge number of them identical E-mails (personalised for deception), called the FSF “spammer” for recommending that readers independently submit suggestion to the USPTO, which is run with/by their own government. The FSF — unlike the company Florian lobbies in favour — does not send fake letters with slight variations and fake names of dead people. But anyway, let’s digress and not pay too much attention to aggressive lobbyists whose mask has fallen and goals exposed a long time ago.

Here is Red Hat announcing its contribution to this:

Yesterday Red Hat has submitted comments to the U.S Patent and Trademark Office regarding interpretation of the Supreme Court’s Bilski decision.

The submission was made in response to the PTO’s request for public comments to assist it in determining how to apply the Supreme Court’s decision in that case. Although the Bilski decision did not expressly address the standards for refusing to allow software patents, interpretation of the decision will determine whether certain patents are granted. Thus the PTO’s approach to examining patent applications will have a substantial effect on the patent landscape.

Needless to say, the tireless lobbyist is already bombarding Twitter with smears against Red Hat (for working towards removal of software patents).

Over at Groklaw, where the lobbyist is banned, there is publication of another detailed submission to the USPTO [via].

This is more than enough evidence that physical devices and computations have the ability to represent abstract ideas. Their use is essential for human beings to even be able to conceive, let alone use, these ideas. In particular the computations described by algorithms must be carried out physically in order to be used at all. If you patent the physical means to carry out the computation then you may end up patenting the computation itself if you are not careful. This is the mathematical basis for the non-patentability of algorithms as per Benson, Flook and Diehr.

Remarking on a story we covered last week, TechDirt publishes “Patent Office Says Another ‘Worst Patent’ Should Be Rejected As Obvious”

“Groklaw notes that Trend Micro is now at risk of losing the patent monopoly it has been using to attack competitors”While not wasting its time in Twitter arguing with lobbyists for software patents, the FFII drew attention to this good old article about “How two lines of code can infringe on a software patent”

One Twitter user wrote: “Any of your patent practitioners noticing a high level of COURTESY at the USPTO? The “business method” /software examiners impress me!”

Groklaw notes that Trend Micro is now at risk of losing the patent monopoly it has been using to attack competitors [1, 2, 3]. This happened at the USPTO’s order, which sounds like an encouraging improvement.

The USPTO on September 16 issued an order granting Fortinet’s petition to reexamine the validity of the Trend Micro patent on antivirus functionality, the 5,623,600 patent, on the grounds that a “substantial new question of patentability” exists based on prior art now being considered. Fortinet publicly acknowledges the help of the open source community, specifically mentioning the prior art searching you guys did here on Groklaw in June. The ultimate outcome is yet to be determined, of course, and that’s in the hands of the lawyers now, but you guys did your part. It’s a great partnership, techies and lawyers, and I thank you for working hard on this, and I hope it leads to a just resolution.

Lastly, just for laughs, see the new article “Larry King bagel company sued over ‘patented water’” (it’s not a satire).

A new lawsuit answers three great questions:

1. What is TV and radio personality Larry King up to now that he’s bowing to Piers Morgan as host of a nightly CNN talk show?
2. Why can’t we get a good bagel outside of Brooklyn?
3. Can you patent a process for making water?

Obviously, the answers are connected.

In July, King signed on with the Original Brooklyn Water Bagel Co. as a franchisee and brand promoter. The company specializes in selling bagels prepared in water adapted to replicate the H2O of Brooklyn, N.Y. King would promote the brand and help develop the budding chain’s stores throughout the world, including, for those crying “dough” over the lack of tasty bagels in La-La Land, a store opening in Beverly Hills.

Unless the USPTO changes course, it is at risk of losing a lot of the legitimacy it has left. Reviewing the patentability of software patents would be a good start. “Success” is not to be measured in terms of the number of monopolies granted and only ever broadening their scope is a recipe for Water Bagel disaster.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

3 Comments

  1. kozmcrae said,

    September 29, 2010 at 8:44 am

    Gravatar

    Software patents must be about ideas and not software code. If software patents were about software code then there would be no need to “impound” an entire application, just the offending code. I’ve never heard of that happening so I must presume that software patents are misnamed. They must be Idea Patents, or IP for short ;-).

  2. twitter said,

    September 30, 2010 at 4:45 pm

    Gravatar

    Astroturfers can’t pretend to represent free software when so many free software advocates write in like they did. It is also good that the FSF got coppies, so they can verify that the public record is complete. I wrote on, short letter. I wonder how many fake opinions the Microsoft people shoveled into the pile.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    They usually have the likes of SAP/GE adding to the pile. Speaking of which, bad news:

    http://www.webosroundup.com/2010/09/hp-chooses-leo-apotheker-as-ceo-and-president/
    http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/SAP

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] Fluffy Staff

    EPO President António Campinos is failing to ‘contain’ the media after less than 4 years at the Office, just like Benoît Battistelli around 2014



  2. Kluwer Patent Blog Belatedly Gives EPO Staff a Voice

    There are at least 2 bloggers — if not 3 people — at Kluwer Patent Blog who air grievances of EPO staff; in addition, many of the comments there blast EPO management and Team UPC and it helps change the perceptions long shaped by bribes and blackmail from EPO management



  3. [Meme] Fluffy President

    Prepare for more puff pieces and fluff from President Fluffinos, who has commandeered the EPO‘s official Web site for self-serving whitewash and promotion of illegal agenda like European software patents and a kangaroo court to approve those (UPC)



  4. Blaming Patent Examiners Who Respect the Law

    The latest comments here are quite revealing; the EPO not only breaks the law with impunity but it also challenges the very legal system (like courts) with total impunity; Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are, in that regard, no better than Putin, just more temperamental



  5. Our Priorities and Our Future: More Gemini and More Daily Links (a Lot More Frequently)

    An informal and unscripted video that explains where we are and where we’re going



  6. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 27, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 27, 2022



  7. Links 28/05/2022: Twitter Fined for Spying in '2FA' Clothing

    Links for the day



  8. Links 27/05/2022: Trisquel 10.0.1 LTS and Perl Appreciation

    Links for the day



  9. Links 27/05/2022: Fwupd 1.8.1 and GCC 9.5

    Links for the day



  10. Visual Proof That Twitter Very Likely Faked Its Magnitude the Moment Musk et al (KSA, Ellison and so on) Wanted to Buy

    There's a very compelling case for the allegation that Twitter is defrauding shareholders and participants in the platform; Twitter is a lot smaller than it used to be (fewer people are actively involved), it is losing money, and it is so desperate to be acquired that it's shamelessly faking traffic



  11. Links 27/05/2022: Wayland 1.21 Alpha, KDE Adds Flatpak and Snap Permissions to Discover

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 26, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 26, 2022



  13. Links 27/05/2022: Many More Microsoft Security Failures (and Spin/Lies)

    Links for the day



  14. Links 26/05/2022: KStars 3.5.9 and Chrome 103 Beta

    Links for the day



  15. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day



  16. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day



  17. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day



  18. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s



  19. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’



  20. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022



  21. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves



  22. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  23. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever



  24. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack



  25. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…



  26. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day



  27. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day



  28. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022



  29. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day



  30. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts