--Microsoft, internal document [PDF]
"If Win 8 only includes the superficial features that are predicted, then it's a tweak of Win 7, not a new OS, and we shouldn't have to pay for it," wrote John Dvorak last week. Microsoft is too busy trying to block Linux at OEM levels (Windows is dying in x86 land) and amid "Windows 8" hype our reader Ryan, who is a former Microsoft MVP, says that the "same could be said of Windows 7" as "it's just superficial tweaks of Vista" (see our pages about 7 and 8, the better marketed versions of Vista). The promise of a 'new' operating system merely shows that Microsoft is nervous. ⬆
Comments
twitter
2011-06-02 14:34:15
The first clue is that he thinks that the Vista family GUIs are comparable to OSX and does not mention gnu/linux. That's laughable because the Vista/Vista 7 GUIs are infamous for user frustration and both Windows and Apple GUIs are ultimately governed by ugly digital restrictions designed to prevent sharing. GNU/Linux has no such restrictions but also has had easy, beautiful and more powerful interfaces all along. My first girl mastered KDE 3.x when she was 4 and my whole family has been using gnu/linux exclusively for about a decade.
The one promised feature he thinks is interesting has also been around for for about a decade. Sun made "On the go" almost a decade ago and live CD makers incorporated the feature, which one ups Microsoft by not requiring any OS on the target PC. The feature made a home directory on USB stick and also allowed the installation of applications not normally found on the live CD. Live USB sticks do the same today when the target machine can boot them. They can be encrypted, so free software users can now carry around a full, custom OS on a USB stick without risking their privacy. Dvorak himself thinks the feature will be crippled on Vista 8 and only mentions it because he thinks Microsoft still has a desktop monopoly and might be able to bully other non free software makers into accepting change.
So why does Dvorak ignore gbu/linux? It might be his insistence on the specific, non free applications he mentions. This also explains his admiration of Microsoft bullying which everyone should reject. If he were honest with himself, he'd realize that he could get work done well without those applications and it would not be any harder to do. Thanks to software patents and constantly shifting goal posts, no one will ever be able to do things exactly the way the non free programs do it . As long as he's unreasonably attached to these specific programs he'll always be promoting Windows, even when he thinks he's criticizing it.
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2011-06-02 14:44:49
twitter
2011-06-03 00:56:14
To wish him the best, I hope he does not have a retirement account full of MSFT. Such are Microsoft wages.