EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.08.13

Guest Post: Windows RT – Jail Breaking!

Posted in Microsoft, Windows at 9:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pushing Windows the Microsoft Way – An Economy without a Conscience!

Recently, we all heard about how the Microsoft’s ARM-based version of Windows RT (Surface Tablet) is only intended to run Metro-style applications downloaded directly from the Microsoft “Windows Store”. You already knew this of course.

But did you know why as the reason for it?

The restriction of installing only Metro-style applications on Windows RT is enforced through a code integrity mechanism that checks the application’s signature before allowing it to be installed. This mechanism is hardcoded in the kernel itself and cannot be modified permanently in systems using UEFI “Secure Boot”. Due to the required cryptographic signature from Microsoft (as an UEFI signing key) stored in the firmware; that will authorize only approved boot loading software like the “Windows” OS kernel.

But a hacker (clrokr) has just shown, it can, however, be changed in virtual RAM memory!

Using some clever reverse-engineering, the hacker discovered the location of this setting in the virtual RAM memory, and then used Microsoft’s own remote debugger to execute some code and alter its value.

Of course, the setting isn’t permanent and it does require that the x86 (32 bit) desktop software applications to be ported (recompiled) for the ARM architecture.

However, this clearly shows, Windows RT was a decision to BAN ALL traditional desktop software applications on purpose, rather than as a technological limitation by design.

The same can be said for the artificial limitation of the licensed memory in 32-bit “Windows” too. See this.

Should Microsoft have the legal right of EXCLUDING out ALL other competition, by locking down the Windows RT (Surface Tablet) platform (ARM architecture) to which only Microsoft gets to ALLOW software that is only provide through them (Windows Store)?

How is this different than locking out ALL other operating systems on UEFI “secure boot” hardware, that requires an approved Microsoft digital signature loaded into the firmware for verification (protectionism) or rather just another instance of applying a code integrity mechanism?

Would kind of business behaviour would you label Microsoft as; when they can only compete when the customers cannot choose?

Let’s review some of the many ways Microsoft is pushing “Windows”;

  1. Get hardware manufactures to preload and preinstall $$$ “Windows” on just about every PC globally. Nobody would value a FREE OS like Linux, right?
  2. Have the customer BUY “Windows” without offering the terms for review! That is until AFTER the purchase, when the customer takes home the product to boot up the OS system for the first time.
  3. That’s the moment when the EULA demands your FULL submission and surrender to be like an ultimatum, as there is NO negotiation, what’s so ever! It’s ACCEPT or the cancel button. Note, with the defeat of war even our enemies and advisories doesn’t get this kind of abuse and exploitation. Japan got to keep their emperor despite the unconditional surrender.
  4. No REFUNDS (1 in a billion chance), are given out for rejecting the Microsoft forced License (tax) worldwide. Walk into most stores, ask the manufactures or Microsoft for a refund, just go ahead and try. LOL
  5. Demand software to be only obtainable from the “Microsoft Store” (regarding Windows RT Surface Tablets). Just 1 source only to obtain ALL your software needs from Microsoft, and that’s not a monopoly? LOL
  6. Bundling code like IE and Office, so competitor software developers will be at huge disadvantages due to the interoperability issues and the constant code changes that break their software applications.
  7. Shove proprietary censorship like DRM, HDCP and IRM upon “Windows” users. Not to mention the backing of political DMCA, ACTA, SOPA, PIPA, ITU legislation.
  8. Lock down Windows RT (Surface Tablets) by denying everyone else the right to port their Intel software programs to run on the ARM architecture.
  9. Netscape and Caldera would never had the privilege of having their software sabotaged by Microsoft, with fake error messages and hacks designed by Microsoft to make it crash.
  10. Embrace, extend and extinguish,” also known as “embrace, extend, and exterminate,” is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found was used internally by Microsoft.
  11. Microsoft builds in restrictions, then plans to charge big money to remove them. Is this the type of “Features” you want to purchase?

Example:

Windows 7 Starter “Cripple” Edition with so many built-in disabled Features!

-> 32bit Only (Must use slower PC)

-> 1 CPU Supported Only (Must use crappy PC)

-> Cannot Create a Home Group (Don’t Share)

-> Cannot Backup to Network (No network back)

-> No Multiple Monitor Support

-> No Fast user switching

-> No Changeable Desktop Wallpaper

-> No Desktop Window Manager

-> No Windows Mobility Center

-> No Windows Aero Glass Themes

-> No Multitouch

-> No Aero glass remoting

-> No Premium Games Included

-> No Windows Media Center

-> No Windows Media Player Remote Media Experience

-> No Encrypting File System

-> No Location Aware Printing

-> No Remote Desktop Host

-> No Presentation Mode

-> No Windows XP Mode

-> No Windows Server domain joining

-> No Direct Access

-> No AppLocker

-> No BitLocker Drive Encryption

-> No BranchCache Distributed Cache

-> No Multilingual User Interface Pack

-> No Virtual Hard Disk Booting

-> No Subsystem for Unix-based Applications

  • Windows file incompatibilities, major interface changes, etc… In fact, Microsoft even has their own special word for bugs, “Entomophobia”! But as interesting that is, when one considers how NONE of the third party vendors plan to ever FIX “Windows” like the antivirus providers, who obviously thrive on them bugs, who only exist to sell you their subscription services until the end of time, just lets us know what to expect come Windows 100. To be more of the same, just relabeled, rebranded, a 100 times! Isn’t this a lot like how the pharmaceutical industry has invested into controlling disease by focusing on “symptom suppression”, so they can make huge profits by hooking patients to become a lifelong users of their drug products? As curing the patient doesn’t earn them more profit, it’s better to prolong the disease insuring the addiction of being DEPENDENT, right?

Clearly the world needs Microsoft, because we need suppression of choice with a monopoly, enforced by dubious business practices tantamount to racketeering, resulting in buggy, insecure, bloated, overpriced software?

The absolute worst thing if there was no Microsoft, is there’d be this intolerable condition known as diversity, which might lead to the horrors of accelerated innovation. Then people would have even more choice, and we’d all be doomed?

Consumers would have to put up with that dreaded thing called “choice” when purchasing a PC, including the choice to buy one “naked“, which as everyone knows is disgusting and illegal. Some might even choose to preinstall that “Linux” operating thingie, which I hear is only used and endorsed by every other country.

Internet Standards would work in that horrid and annoying way that is interoperable across platforms, without requiring the bestest and mostest insecure Web browser in history to do your online banking.

Maybe, it’s NOT Microsoft’s own fault, we should blame, but rather the BROKEN economy system (momentary-market economy) that wasn’t design to be sustainable, moral and ethical?

After all, how can anyone be expected to participate in a money economy, if they don’t have sufficient amounts of money? Doesn’t that explain most of the crimes, which just happen to revolve around financial reasons, be the Mafia, theft, robbery, ransom, extortion, blackmail, political prostitution, even marriage as a method and means of acquiring the money?

Isn’t money really a system designed by the RICH, in favor of the wealthy, who use the instrument of money to TRANSFER the labor, time and effort given by and from the majority of people, into a concentration of wealth for the rich?

This system does NOT even insure the uplifting of poverty! It actually creates poverty, by means of producing inequality among society and psychopathic corporations (snakes in suits appointed by vulture capitalist, communist or socialist). Take your pick! It’s only propaganda hype, shills, trolls, worshiping pundits or evangelists looking out for their own interest.

The “monetary system” takes no responsibility for the well-being of ALL people. You cannot measure God and no amount of money will make the world a better place. It takes people doing that themselves by the day to day things they do for each other.

In fact, the most important investment in life are the people you make friends with and whose examples you follow. The people you invest in will generate the greatest impact on your life. Only people can provide other people with opportunities. As only people can help other people.

Everyone on this planet ALL want to experience a better quality of life. The question becomes what are “WE” doing to create that existence, by creating that environment, so that it can exist and happen? What do we care about that effort we give each day to see that it does happen?

If all the money in the world was suddenly removed, taken away, we would still have everything we need, the same amount of people to do the work as before, even the factories, the machines, everything. The only thing missing here is a better reason for us to cooperate together on doing it.

Realize, to be human means to care for each other and civilization means to work together to create a better life for everyone. The moment we stop fighting for each other that’s the moment that we lose our humanity. To save the human race we have an obligation to stick to this plan for all of civilization, right?

As nobody knows everything about everything; we are all more ignorant than we realize. As NONE of us is as smart as ALL of us. That’s why we need civilization, to draw upon each other’s strengths to overcome our individuals weakness.

Our purpose in life involves us acquiring a level of consciousness we’re NOT born with. If we look around us in the chaos of today, it is self-evident that the vast majority of us are unaware that such a possibility even exists.

Humanity only needs a better reason to dump the BROKEN momentary-market economy. Well, there is a known method to do just that, it’s been theorized as a “resource-based economy” by Jacque Fresco.

Watch “Paradise or Oblivion” (magnet) or (YouTube)

A free online documentary created by The Venus Project and see for yourself, right?

Also worth watching “Future by Design” (magnet) or (dotsub.com)

An Oscar-nominated filmmaker William Gazecki directed this thought-provoking documentary, chronicling the life and work of self-taught futurist Jacque Fresco, a Florida-based engineer, designer and inventor who’s built his life around forward thinking.

Isn’t it time to realize, there is more to life, than money?

Have you read “Free Culture” by Lawrence Lessig?

Perhaps your readers have already seen the video titled as “The Story of Stuff”, about the lifecycle of material goods, by Annie Leonard?

Here is a FREE film “Sita Sings the Blues” by Nina Paley! She even explicitly used a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License so that everyone can freely distribute, copy, share, archive, and even show “Sita Sings the Blues” in public. From the shared culture it came, and back into the shared culture it goes!

Download it here: www.archive.org/download/Sita_Sings_the_Blues/Sita_Sings_the_Blues_720p.mp4

(2.4GB) or just watch it on YouTube (HD Stream)

She wrote, “conventional wisdom urges me to demand payment for every use of the film, but then how would people without money get to see it?“.

This shows how humanity needs a better system to work for (thrive) than the current acquisition of wealth model. How about developing our “human potentials” to be of greater value for ALL of society?

Adter all if we make smarter technologies, why shouldn’t we adapt smarter economic models as well? The same goes for smart grids that allow society to share clean energy too.

Imagine how a superconductive clean and sustainable energy network gird would make it possible to power the entire whole world with FREE energy for all.

Scientists have confirmed that enough solar energy falls on the surface of the earth every 40 minutes to meet 100 percent of the entire world’s energy needs for a full year. Tapping just a small portion of this solar energy could provide all of the electricity America uses. – Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore

Two American companies, First Solar and Nanosolar, say they can now manufacture thin-film solar cells at a cost of around a dollar a watt. Source: National Geographic Society Sept. 2009

The sun radiates about a kilowatt of energy per square meter on the surface of Earth, according to B.J. Stanberry, CEO of HelioVolt. There are 2.6 million square meters in a square mile. Thus, every square mile gets about 2.6 gigawatts.

Arnulf Jaeger-Walden, one of Europe’s leading energy authorities, said that less than 0.4% percent of the solar energy that falls on the deserts of North Africa and the Middle East would satisfy all of Europe’s energy needs, while speaking at the Euroscience Open Forum in Barcelona, Spain.

Enough wind power blows through the Midwest corridor every day to also meet 100% percent of US electricity demand. – Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore

Yearly emissions eliminated by generating energy from a 1 MW wind turbine instead of 1 MW of conventional sources: over 1,500 tons of carbon dioxide, 6.5 tons of sulfur dioxide, 3.2 tons of nitrogen oxides, and 60 pounds of mercury in one year.

Eicke Weber, director of the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, in Freiburg, Germany, stated, “The total power needs of the humans on Earth is approximately 16 terawatts”. The sunshine on the exposed land mass of the Earth is about 120,000 terawatts.

Clearly, humanity could build the superconductivity clean energy network grid to power a sustainable global economy, that favours everyone on the planet and by reducing pollution. A win, win situation for everyone.

A superconductivity clean energy network grid will insure 50% of the surface of the planet has the means to transfer the energy at all times to everyone else, including the dark side. If we factor in all the additional methods of generating clean energy, there is an abundance so great we haven’t even begin to invent what to do with it all.

Right now our dependence upon using dirty polluting energy is choking our economy, accelerating climate change, due to global warming, making the dirty energy suppliers wealthier than kings, governments, maybe God (figure of speech). What good will all that money be when the climate mean average temperature reaches 150 Fahrenheit? When all the trees burn, and the plankton die off, leaving only depleting oxygen to be consumed as we all expire? Who will care about money then? Why should we let money decided out fate today, when we have every good reason instead to do BETTER?

Are we obliged to believe in that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use, right?

While I’m on this subject, here is another inspiring inspirational film: http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/lEV5AFFcZ-s It’s titled “Thrive” An eye opener documentary not to miss out on.

A final thought, just how many weapons of mass destruction will it take to make the world a safe place for all; 1, 1,000, 10,000, a million, what does it take?

The solution is not the destruction of humanity or the environment, for the problem is the thinking, the human ability to reason, because human beings are to blame for every war, every crime against humanity, when the people of this world are creating the very instruments of our demise rather than our ability to work out and resolve our indifferences without going to war.

Obviously, we not there yet, and that is why humanity needs a better REASON to work for our future ahead.

In the meantime, let us be grateful to the people who make us happy, for they are the charming gardeners who make our souls blossom!

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. mcinsand said,

    January 8, 2013 at 4:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Absent regulators and a customer base comprised of sheeple have allowed Applesoft to get away with illegal anticompetitive practices. Especially in the US, our government is obviously not as attentive as it was when IBM was prosecuted for tying punch cards to leased mainfraims or when Data General was found to have illegally tied the RDOS operating system to the Nova. Apple duplicates DG’s illegal behavior thousands of times per day, and, with Windows 8, MS is looking to do the same.

    The average consumer needs to wake up, in order for letters and calls to wake up our officials. We can make a difference. We did it with SOPA. I may be overly optimistic, but I do believe that, as more people see FOSS offerings, then they will realize how much Applesoft has done to exterminate freedom and choice.

    Furthermore, the topmost title really says it all, and in a very sad way. Excercising basic consumer rights, the basic principles of owning what we bought, is referred to as ‘jailbreaking.’ We have to break out of Applesoft’s prisons to have even the simplest of rights to our hardware.

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/2/2018: Qt Roadmap for 2018, Calculate Linux 17.12.2

    Links for the day



  2. As Expected, Bristows and Others Already Lying About UPC Status in Germany, But Doing This Anonymously (to Dodge Accountability for Lies)

    In their characteristic fashion, firms that created the UPC for their self-enrichment purposes, along with publishers/writers who deem it their role to promote the UPC and set up lobbying events for the UPC, look for ways to downplay if not intentionally distort what happened in Germany yesterday



  3. Further Attacks on EPO Staff and the Appeal Boards; Former EPO Boards of Appeal Member Speaks About EPO Scandals

    In the process of devaluing EPO workers and perhaps preparing them for a large round of layoffs information is also revealed about further repressions against the independence of the Boards of Appeal



  4. End of the UPC Lobby and Withdrawal of UPCA May Seem Imminent

    The Unitary Patent fantasy (of mass litigation firms) is coming to an end; in fact, the German government and courts (Bundesverfassungsgericht to be specific) now deem the complaint to be admissible and thus likely legitimate in spite of many attempts to shoot it down



  5. EPO's Board 28 Spikes Article 53 in CA/3/18, Apparently After Battistelli Withdrew It

    The latest plot twist, as odd as that may seem, is that the attack on the rights of thousands of workers (many of whom are rumoured to be on their way out) is curtailed somewhat, at least for the time being



  6. Links 21/2/2018: Apper 1.0, New Fedora ISOs

    Links for the day



  7. Rumour: European Patent Office to Lay Off a Significant Proportion of Its Workforce

    While the Administrative Council of the EPO praises Battistelli for his financial accomplishments (as laughable as it may seem) a lot of families stuck in a foreign country may soon see their breadwinner unemployed, according to rumours



  8. The Patent Trolls' Lobby, Bristows and IAM Among Others, Downplays Darts-IP/IP2Innovate Report About Rising If Not Soaring Troll Activity in Europe

    Exactly like last year, as soon as IP2Innovate opens its mouth Bristows and IAM go into "attack dog" mode and promote the UPC, deny the existence or seriousness of patent trolls, and promote their nefarious, trolls-funded agenda



  9. Links 20/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.5, Qt 5.11 Alpha, Absolute 15.0 Beta 4, Sailfish OS 2.1.4 E.A., SuiteCRM 7.10

    Links for the day



  10. Replacing Patent Sharks/Trolls and the Patent Mafia With 'Icons' Like Thomas Edison

    The popular perceptions of patents and the sobering reality of what patents (more so nowadays) mean to actual inventors who aren't associated with global behemoths such as IBM or Siemens



  11. The Patent Trolls' Lobby is Distorting the Record of CAFC on PTAB

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), which deals with appeals from PTAB, has been issuing many decisions in favour of § 101, but those aren't being talked about or emphasised by the patent 'industry'



  12. Japan Demonstrates Sanity on SEP Policy While US Patent Policy is Influenced by Lobbyists

    Japan's commendable response to a classic pattern of patent misuse; US patent policy is still being subjected to never-ending intervention and there is now a lobbyist in charge of antitrust matters and a lawyer in charge of the US patent office (both Trump appointees)



  13. The Patent Microcosm's Embrace of Buzzwords and False Marketing Strives to Make Patent Examiners Redundant and Patent Quality Extremely Low

    Patent maximalists, who are profiting from abundance of low-quality patents (and frivolous lawsuits/legal threats these can entail), are riding the hype wave and participating in the rush to put patent systems at the hands of machines



  14. Today, at 12:30 CET, Bavarian State Parliament Will Speak About EPO Abuses (Updated)

    The politicians of Bavaria are prepared to wrestle with some serious questions about the illegality of the EPO's actions and what that may mean to constitutional aspects of German law



  15. Another Loud Warning From EPO Workers About the Decline of Patent Quality

    Yet more patent quality warnings are being issued by EPO insiders (examiners) who are seeing their senior colleagues vanishing and wonder what will be left of their employer



  16. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  17. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  18. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  19. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  20. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  21. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  22. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  23. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  24. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  25. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  26. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  27. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  28. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  29. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  30. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts