More Details Revealed About How the NSA Infiltrates Windows and Other Proprietary Software, Governments Should Now Ban Microsoft
Summary: RSA is the latest (known) entity to have received bribes from the NSA in exchange for back doors; Germany may move towards banning software from companies that share data with the NSA
A COUPLE of nights ago Reuters published an explosive report about RSA, basically showing that Windows does not have back doors, it is a back door and so is a lot of the software that’s proprietary. Free/libre software does not suffer from the trap . This is a serious wakeup call to any government that still relies on proprietary software and US companies that collect data.
Munich moved to GNU/Linux owing to political determination to do so , but what about other cities? Their politicians are in serious trouble and a constant threat of espionage.
“This is a serious wakeup call to any government that still relies on proprietary software and US companies that collect data.”As the Reuters report revealed  (and there was a lot of journalism linking to it [4,5]), “RSA Weakened Encryption For $10M From NSA,” to quote Slashdot, which consequently also published the item “Microsoft Security Essentials Misses 39% of Malware” (especially NSA malware that enables system compromise). Remember that Windows XP will soon receive no patches, so not just the NSA will get easy access through back doors. IDG’s advice on this matter is misguided as it basically offers continued use of Windows XP rather than runaway to a secure platform like GNU/Linux. As the author put it, “Microsoft’s support for Windows XP ends in less than four months, and the company has warned users repeatedly that it’s time to move on. But a lot of them are sticking with the aged OS. And for Microsoft, that’s a problem.”
Security is not really a problem here because there was never really any security to begin with. As we showed in our articles about the NSA, Windows is just a Trojan horse. It is obviously not secure and the only variable is, how many people can seize control of it?
The latest news makes almost all proprietary software suspect, even fake ‘open source’ like TrueCrypt (it is proprietary). As one tweet put it, “Check all on this list who use Dual_EC_DRBG as possible recipients of NSA bribes [...] Note Blackberry, Cisco, Juniper [...] Blast from the past: Call tracking Dual_EC_DRBG “Bribe Finder”: Any use by default post 2007 required either an implicit or explicit bribe.”
This is another good reason to avoid all proprietary software, including widely-used GNU/Linux programs like Skype. One tweet said that “Dual EC_DRBG was suspiciously absent from Wednesday’s report by President Obama’s NSA advisory panel.”
Going back to Microsoft’s flawed detection of malware, MinceR wrote that “their alleged “anti-malware” efforts started with stopping detecting claria as malware just as they were about to buy it, so i don’t know why anyone trusts them with such … [it] manages to out-sleaze even the other “antivirus” companies.”
” With Microsoft, NSA gets video/audio surveillance, not just through Skype but also through people’s webcams on computers that have Windows installed (and are idle).”Sosumi said that “they don’t detect NSA backdoors as malware, so why trust them?”
Nobody can trust Microsoft. The above report says that “latest tests from Dennis Publishing’s security labs saw Microsoft Security Essentials fail to detect 39% of the real-world malware thrown at it.”
“In recent news,” says the post, “it was revealed the FBI has a “virus” that will record a suspect through the webcam secretly, without turning on the LED light. Some researchers showed this working on an older Macbook. In this post, we do it on Windows.”
“The more you know about how the NSA gets along with RSA & Microsoft,” writes one Twitter user, “the more perspective you have on their handling of Lavabit.” With Microsoft, NSA gets video/audio surveillance, not just through Skype but also through people’s webcams on computers that have Windows installed (and are idle). This is a good enough reason to immediately abandon Microsoft and some politicians in Germany already think about moving in this direction. See [6,7] below for details of the latest news and pay attention to the explosive new article “Snowden ally Appelbaum claims his Berlin apartment was invaded” ; clearly it’s not about terrorism but about cracking down on activists .
Following the revelations above there is some new effort  — including from GNU/Linux developers  — to sack with prejudice potential NSA moles. █
Related/contextual items from the news:
As fears grow that US and UK spies have deliberately hamstrung key components in today’s encryption systems, users of OpenSSL can certainly relax about one thing.
It has been revealed that the cryptography toolkit – used by reams of software from web browsers for HTTPS to SSH for secure terminals – is not using the discredited random number generator Dual EC DRBG.
And that’s due to a bug that’s now firmly a WONTFIX.
A coding flaw uncovered in the library prevents “all use” of the dual elliptic curve (Dual EC) deterministic random bit generator (DRBG) algorithm, a cryptographically weak algorithm championed by none other than the NSA.
No other DRBGs used by OpenSSL are affected, we’re told.
This year saw the completion of the city of Munich’s switch to Linux, a move that began about ten years ago. “One of the biggest lessons learned was that you can’t do such a project without continued political backing,” said Peter Hofmann, the leader of the LiMux project, summing up the experience.
The Munich city authority migrated around 14,800 of the 15,000 or so PCs on its network to LiMux, its own Linux distribution based on Ubuntu, exceeding its initial goal of migrating 12,000 desktops.
As a key part of a campaign to embed encryption software that it could crack into widely used computer products, the U.S. National Security Agency arranged a secret $10 million contract with RSA, one of the most influential firms in the computer security industry, Reuters has learned.
Earlier this year, the Snowden leaks revealed how the NSA was effectively infiltrating crypto standards efforts to take control of them and make sure that backdoors or other weaknesses were installed. Many in the crypto community reacted angrily to this, and began to rethink how they interact with the feds. However, Reuters has just dropped a bombshell into all of this, as it has revealed that not only did the NSA purposefully weaken crypto, it then paid famed crypto provider RSA $10 million to push the weakened crypto, making it a de facto standard.
Latest Snowden claims: Flawed encryption tech switched on by default in exchange for cash
U.S. contracting companies such as Cisco, which manages much of the German armed forces’ data, should be contractually barred from passing sensitive information to the U.S. security services, a spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives was quoted saying.
Humanitarian organisations and German government buildings are among the targets of UK and US surveillance agencies, documents leaked by Edward Snowden are said to show.
The latest disclosures from the Snowden archive also highlight the key role in national security played by the small Cornish holiday resort town of Bude.
A government listening facility on the Cornish coast had a unit that was used to analyse samples of electronic date to assess whether surveillance targets were worth the effort of listening in on their communications more frequently.
A significant amount of the Bude listening post’s funding comes from the National Security Agency (NSA), the US surveillance body, because of shared operational projects.
Jacob Appelbaum, a US Internet activist and one of the people with access to Edward Snowden’s documents, has told a Berlin paper that his apartment was broken into, saying he suspected US involvement.
City leaders have argued that Oakland needs a massive surveillance system to combat violent crime, but internal documents reveal that city staffers are also focused on tracking political protesters.
Security experts are calling for the removal of a National Security Agency employee who co-chairs an influential cryptography panel, which advises a host of groups that forge widely used standards for the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Kevin Igoe, who in a 2011 e-mail announcing his appointment was listed as a senior cryptographer with the NSA’s Commercial Solutions Center, is one of two co-chairs of the IETF’s Crypto Forum Research Group (CFRG). The CFRG provides cryptographic guidance to IETF working groups that develop standards for a variety of crucial technologies that run and help secure the Internet. The transport layer security (TLS) protocol that underpins Web encryption and standards for secure shell connections used to securely access servers are two examples. Igoe has been CFRG co-chair for about two years, along with David A. McGrew of Cisco Systems.
I’ve said recently that pervasive surveillance is wrong. I don’t think anyone from the NSA should have a leadership position in the development or deployment of Internet communications, because their interests are at odds with the interest of the rest of the Internet. But someone at the NSA is in exactly such a position. They ought to step down.