EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.08.15

The EPO’s Investigative Unit Exposed: Part VI

Posted in Europe, Patents at 9:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Investigating the investigators

Sebastian Bauer in an EPO protest
Sebastian Bauer watches those brave people who ‘dare’ to exercise their right to protest; other people’s faces are pixellated so as to obscure and thus better protect their identity

Summary: Research into the harsh methods used by the infamous Investigative Unit (I.U.) of the EPO and its Chief Investigator (shown above)

IN previous parts of this multi-part investigation, namely [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we rather politely talked about the people who turned the EPO into the gestEPO. "Gestapo" is what some people call the Investigative Unit internally, equating it with Geheime Staatspolizei, or the Secret State Police. “The Investigative Unit of the European Patent Office,” one source told us, “was created by Mr Battistelli in 2012. Officially, this unit was designed to protect the organisation from fraud and corruption. It was also presented as a “service to EPO colleagues” in order to protect the weak against the strong. However, when the I.U. reported that all allegations of corruption against Željko Topić were unfounded it became clear that this unit was just a political police in the hands of Mr Battistelli.” It should be noted that Željko Topić lost his case, so the allegations are quite likely true, at least on the balance of probabilities, and more criminal charges remain. In light of this, Topić seemed to be an apt addition to the gestEPO. Today we continue providing some background information about various individual members of the Investigative Unit. We focus on high-level people and we strongly adhere to the principle that we should only use information which is already publicly accessible. It’s not an attack on people’s privacy but a criticism of their track record at the EPO, where many overly stressed people commit suicide.

“It’s not an attack on people’s privacy but a criticism of their track record at the EPO, where many overly stressed people commit suicide.”This article focuses on Sebastian Bauer, who is the Chief Investigator at the I.U.

“One of the key players in Zanghi’s team,” told us a source, “is a “gentleman” by the name of Sebastian Bauer who is noted for his sartorial elegance.

“It is not clear where exactly he acquired his taste for expensive suits but this may have been during his post-graduate studies at Cambridge where he acquired an LL.M master’s degree in International Law.”

His full resumé can be found on LinkedIn (don’t click if/whilst logged in, as that may accidentally reveal one’s identity to him; here is a local copy [PDF]).

As the resumé makes quite evident, Mr. Bauer started off his career as a humble trainee law clerk in the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Munich in 2004, but it soon became clear that he was destined for greater things.

By 2009 he was working as an “Ethics Officer” for the World Bank in Washington, according to his profile on XING that says “Employee in Washington, D.C.”

“It is not clear where exactly he acquired his taste for expensive suits but this may have been during his post-graduate studies at Cambridge where he acquired an LL.M master’s degree in International Law.”
      –Anonymous source
We wish to kindly remind (or inform) readers of a long history of World Bank whistleblowers, some better known than others (whistleblower.org has a partial list).

By 2011, Mr. Bauer had advanced to the role of “Investigator” at the World Bank where his duties included “Investigation of staff misconduct”, “Resolution of workplace grievances” and “Outreach and communication to staff members on internal grievance procedures”.

He joined the EPO in March 2012, where he was initially attached to the Legal Services Department. It is rumoured, based on our sources, that he played a key role in drafting the “Guidelines for Investigations”, the notorious “Circular No. 342″ which we covered in parts I and II.

After the entry into force of “Circular No. 342″, Bauer joined the newly-formed Investigative Unit in January 2013. In the mean time he had made quite a name for himself with his reputedly aggressive interrogation techniques which are said to include the skillful application of the “Reid Technique”.

“It is rumoured, based on our sources, that he played a key role in drafting the “Guidelines for Investigations”, the notorious “Circular No. 342″ which we covered in parts I and II.”Wikipedia defines it as “a method of questioning subjects to try to assess their credibility through a non-accusatory interview process, and then if the investigative information indicates the subject’s probable involvement in the commission of the crime, an accusatory interrogation is initiated to develop the truth. Supporters argue the Reid technique is useful in extracting information from otherwise unwilling suspects, while critics have charged the technique can elicit false confessions from innocent persons, especially children. Reid’s breakthrough case resulted in an overturned conviction decades later.”

This seems to be similar to the method used on Quinn Norton to overzealously manufacture a case against Aaron Swartz, who later committed suicide. Watch the interview with a weeping Norton in the film “The Internet’s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz” (free to watch), a timely film by Brian Knappenberger because yesterday was Aaron Swartz Day. Mr. Bauer should be made aware of the dire consequence of the Reid technique.

“Mr. Bauer is also regularly spotted as an “observer” at EPO Staff demonstrations.”
      –Anonymous source
“When dealing with ordinary staff members,” told us another source, “the I.U. becomes an accusation unit. Their goal is to put the head of the accused on a silver plate and bring it to the President.”

Their “interrogation technique is criticized in European democratic countries because it is suspected to bring false confessions. No staff member can be prepared for such an experience. It was even reported that some attempted to commit suicide afterwards.”

Again, Mr. Bauer should be made aware of the potential consequences of continuing these practices.

“There are also many rumours in circulation,” said our source, “which suggest that he is quite adept at “constructing” allegations and misrepresenting facts to the detriment of those under investigation.

“Mr. Bauer is also regularly spotted as an “observer” at EPO Staff demonstrations.”

The photo above is a photo of a demonstration in front of the EPO’s main building in Munich, where he could be seen keeping a watchful eye on the protesters.

““Legal experts that [this source] talked to have been of the opinion that some of the actions of the Investigative Unit violate national laws and could provide a basis for criminal charges if national courts were to decide to lift immunity.””
      –Anonymous source
We asked one of the sources we trust about this situation, only to be told what we knew all along. To quote: “Legal experts that [this source] talked to have been of the opinion that some of the actions of the Investigative Unit violate national laws and could provide a basis for criminal charges if national courts were to decide to lift immunity.”

As one former EPO staff member (apparently that’s his/her background) put it last month (with slight edits): “The investigations against EPO staff and union representatives continue with the help of Control Risks, the company that allegedly spied on journalists on behalf of Deutsche Telekom in order to identify contact persons inside the company who were involved in leaking information to external parties. For sure, Control Risks people are operating within the EPO in many situations immoral and illegal. All EPO co-workers should collect evidences and facts from Control Risks activities, that possibly infringe national German and/or Dutch laws. These evidences [sic] and facts can help in eventual legal actions against Control Risks in Germany and The Netherlands.”

To date, the Investigative Unit has relied on the EPO’s immunity to protect itself from such unpleasant legal consequences.

“Some people inside the EPO’s management seem to believe that as public servants they have a right to remain invisible and never be criticised for their actions.”However, with the recent motion passed by the Dutch Parliament which called on the Dutch Government to take action to ensure that the EPO complies with international legal norms and which also called for limits to be imposed on the immunity of international organisations in cases involving breaches of national rules, the legal landscape may be slowly changing in this regard. See this new comment from the same person.

I myself have already considered (and was pressing to take) legal action against EPO individuals, for reasons that shall become apparent later this month. There is a lot more to come. Some people inside the EPO’s management seem to believe that as public servants they have a right to remain invisible and never be criticised for their actions. We don’t actually infringe the privacy of anyone; this stuff is already in the public domain. The close-up photo of Sebastian Bauer, for example (in the resumé extracted from his public profile), actually comes from a LinkedIn profile, which is publicly accessible.

What else has the I.U. been up to? How do they work? Stay tuned for the next part.

“Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we’re doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.”

Bruce Schneier

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  2. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  3. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  4. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  5. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  6. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  7. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  8. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  9. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  10. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  11. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  12. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  13. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  14. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  15. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  16. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  17. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  18. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  19. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  21. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  22. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  23. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  25. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  26. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  27. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  28. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  29. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  30. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts