EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.09.17

Ousting of Benoît Battistelli Next Week Seems Feasible, But Jesper Kongstad Protects Rather Than Supervises Battistelli

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:03 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Another fine demonstration of the farcical state of affairs at the EPO, where Battistelli is 'overseen' by his lapdog

Battistelli and Kongstad

Summary: The latest developments that are going on behind the scenes and may soon culminate in removal of the EPO’s immunity, if not the ousting of Battistelli and the “swamp” he brought with him as well

OUR original article about Bert Koenders (his strong words for the EPO) has received a lot of attention, including some from the Dutch media. Koenders is not just some ordinary Dutch politician — many of whom complain about the EPO too, notably John Kerstens — as Koenders is the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs. Other top officials have already lashed out at the EPO and who can forget Battistelli evacuating a meeting with one of them?

We have just caught up with this comment that says: “Here is a copy in english of the Letter from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Minister Bert Koenders, dated 23 February 2017 to the Chair of the House of Representatives. about the conversation with the Vice President of the EPO.”

This links to SUEPO, which earlier today wrote:

Letter from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Minister Bert Koenders, dated 23 February 2017 to the Chair of the House of Representatives.

The original letter is in Dutch. Translations in English, German and French are available.

Here is SUEPO’s English translation:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

To the Chair of the
House of Representatives
Binnenhof 4
The Hague

Bezuidenhoutseweg 67
2594 AC Den Haag
Postbus 20061
The Netherlands
www.rijksoverheid.nl

Our Reference
4ZKWPA3M5U6C-3-15307
Your reference
14-12-2016 DPG1
Appendix/Appendices
0

Date 23 February 2017
Re. Conversation with Vice President of European Patent Office

Dear Chair,

I hereby inform your House, in accordance with my commitment in the general meeting of the standing committee on Foreign Affairs regarding diplomatic immunity on 14 December 2016, of my conversation with Mr Minnoye, Vice President of the European Patent Office (EPO), which took place on 30 January 2017.

Part of this conversation was about the ruling of the Supreme Court on 20 January 2017, in which the immunity of the organisation was confirmed. The Netherlands respects the immunity of the EPO, along with the other intergovernmental organisations that are based here. This immunity does not prevent the host country from entering into conversation with the management of the EPO regarding the continuing unrest between the management and staff at the EPO. Particularly now that this unrest has become part of public and political debate.

In this context, I informed Mr Minnoye that the internal unrest has been going on for too long and that the situation now needs to improve quickly. In order to make a rapid start to restoring trust between the management and staff, the proposal is to resume constructive social dialogue and to introduce a number of trust-building measures in the very short term, based among other things on the Social Study:

- Including external parties in the internal complaint procedure, so that this procedure is experienced as impartial and independent by the staff;

- Reconsideration of the disciplinary measures implemented with respect to certain trade-union members.

Finally, on the basis of my host-country responsibility, I indicated that the EPO can call on the host country when it comes to support for initiatives that contribute to ending the current situation of unrest.


Our Reference
STPS5HHCFWEY-7-88383

Mr Minnoye indicated that attempts are currently being made to commence a positive dialogue with the staff in various ways. As an example, he cited the townhall meetings that recently took place. Vice President Minnoye expressed the hope and expectation that the organisation will be entering calmer waters soon.

I stated that I share this hope, but added an important note: If there is no clear improvement in the industrial relations within the EPO in the short term, I see no other option but the discussion of the situation at a high political level with the member states of the European Patent Organisation.

I will continue to monitor this dossier closely in accordance with the host-country responsibility and will continue to urge Vice President Minnoye to improve the situation within the EPO.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs,

Bert Koenders

With just 5 or so days before the Administrative Council gathers things are heating up again. SUEPO has taken note of this morning’s article titled “Euro nations push for vote to axe Europe’s patent office president” (from The Register).

The Chinchilla Man of the Council, Jesper Kongstad, is trying to save his master, whom he was in theory supposed to master. Here are a couple of portions from the report:

European governments have finally had enough of the head of the European Patent Office, Benoit Battistelli, and are pushing for a vote that could turn him into a lame duck president.

The EPO’s Administrative Council is due to meet in Munich next week and on the agenda is a discussion over the appointment of a new president of the EPO.

In particular, the council is due to discuss publication of a vacancy notice for the job – something that would start the ball rolling on finding a successor to Battistelli in July 2018, and would immediately limit his ability to force through changes.

Although the agenda point is labeled “opn” rather than “dec,” meaning that only discussion will take place rather than a vote and a decision, chair of the council Jesper Kongstad has already leapt into action, insiders tells us, in an effort to undermine the effort to oust Battistelli.

[...]

That difference between 50 per cent and 66 per cent is the only thing that is keeping Battistelli in office. There have been repeated efforts by some European countries to pressure Battistelli to back down on his aggressive reforms at the EPO, and his intimidation and – critics argue – persecution of those who have stood up to him. But it has never been possible to get a majority of the council to vote him out.

Some people have blamed this on dirty tactics from Battistelli, who must feel rather God-like about it, as long as he is protected from the law and exempted from his own rules.

An interesting comment on the above says: “What if the council were to first propose a vacancy for the chairman ?”

Battistelli’s departure would certainly not be enough as the whole Organisation (especially at the top) has been thoroughly compromised. “Bring back Madame la Guillotine!” is the comment from one anonymous person, to which to reply was, “I’ve got a list.”

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The EPO's HR Roadmap Retrospective

    A look back at the terrible ‘accomplishments’ of the Jesper Kongstad-led Administrative Council, which still issues hogwash and face-saving lies, as one might expect from a protector of Battistelli that lies to national representatives and buries inconvenient topics



  2. Links 26/3/2017: Debian Project Leader Elections, SecureDrop and Alexandre Oliva FSF Winners

    Links for the day



  3. His Master's Voice, Jesper Kongstad, Blocks Discussion of Investigative and Disciplinary Procedures at the EPO

    The Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation is actively preventing not just the dismissal of Battistelli but also discussion of Battistelli's abuses



  4. Heiko Maas and the State of Germany Viewed as Increasingly Complicit in EPO Scandals and Toxic UPC Agenda

    It is becoming hard if not impossible to interpret silence and inaction from Maas as a form of endorsement for everything the EPO has been doing, with the German delegates displaying more of that apathy which in itself constitutes a form of complicity



  5. With IP Kat Coverage of EPO Scandals Coming to an End (Officially), Techrights and The Register Remain to Cover New Developments

    One final post about the end of Merpel’s EPO coverage, which is unfortunate but understandable given the EPO’s track record attacking the media, including blogs like IP Kat, sites of patent stakeholders, and even so-called media partners



  6. Everyone, Including Patent Law Firms, Will Suffer From the Demise of the EPO

    Concerns about quality of patents granted by the EPO (EPs) are publicly raised by industry/EPO insiders, albeit in an anonymous fashion



  7. Yes, Battistelli's Ban on EPO Strikes (or Severe Limitation Thereof) is a Violation of Human Rights

    Battistelli has curtailed even the right to strike, yet anonymous cowards attempt to blame the staff (as in patent examiners) for not going out of their way to engage in 'unauthorised' strikes (entailing dismissal)



  8. Even the EPO's Administrative Council No Longer Trusts Its Chairman, Battistelli's 'Chinchilla' Jesper Kongstad

    Kongstad's protection of Battistelli, whom he is supposed to oversee, stretches to the point where national representatives (delegates) are being misinformed



  9. Thanks to Merpel, the World Knows EPO Scandals a Lot Better, But It's a Shame That IP Kat Helped UPC

    A look back at Merpel's final post about EPO scandals and the looming threat of the UPC, which UPC opportunists such as Bristows LLP still try hard to make a reality, exploiting bogus (hastily-granted) patents for endless litigation all around Europe



  10. EPO Critics Threatened by Self-Censorship, Comment Censorship, and a Growing Threat to Anonymity

    Putting in perspective the campaign for justice at the EPO, which to a large degree relies on whistleblowers and thus depends a great deal on freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and anonymity



  11. Links 25/3/2017: Maru OS 0.4, C++17 Complete

    Links for the day



  12. Judge and Justice Bashing in the United States, EPC Bashing at the EPO

    Enforcement of the law based on constitutional grounds and based on the European Patent Convention (EPC) in an age of retribution and insults -- sometimes even libel -- against judges



  13. Looking for EPO Nepotism? Forget About Jouve and Look Closely at Europatis Instead.

    Debates about the contract of Jouve with the EPO overlook the elephants in the room, which include companies that are established and run by former EPO chiefs and enjoy a relationship with the EPO



  14. Depressing EPO News: Attacks on Staff, Attacks on Life, Brain Drain, Patents on Life, Patent Trolls Come to Germany, and Spain Being Misled

    A roundup of the latest developments at the EPO combined with feedback from insiders, who are not tolerating their misguided and increasingly abusive management



  15. It Certainly Looks Like Microsoft is Already Siccing Its Patent Trolls, Including Intellectual Ventures, on Companies That Use Linux (Until They Pay 'Protection' Money)

    News about Intellectual Ventures and Finjan Holdings (Microsoft-funded patent trolls) reinforces our allegations -- not mere suspicions anymore -- that Microsoft would 'punish' companies that are not paying subscription fees (hosting) or royalties (patent tax) to Microsoft and are thus in some sense 'indebted' to Microsoft



  16. Links 24/3/2017: Microsoft Aggression, Eudyptula Challenge Status Report

    Links for the day



  17. Bernhard Rapkay, Former MEP and Rapporteur on Unitary Patent, Shoots Down UPC Hopes While UPC Hopefuls Recognise That Spain Isn't Interested Either

    Germany, the UK and Spain remain massive barriers to the UPC -- all this in spite of misleading reports and fake news which attempted to make politicians believe otherwise (for political leverage, by means of dirty lobbying contingent upon misinformation)



  18. Links 23/3/2017: Qt 5.9 Beta, Gluster Storage 3.2

    Links for the day



  19. The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Has Just Buried an Innocent Judge That Battistelli Does Not Like

    An innocent judge (never proven guilty of anything, only publicly defamed with help from Team Battistelli and dubious 'intelligence' gathering) is one of the forgotten casualties of the latest meeting of the Administrative Council (AC), which has become growingly complicit rather than a mere bystander at a 'crime' scene



  20. Nepotism at the European Patent Office and Suspicious Absence of Tenders for Big Projects

    Carte blanche is a French term which now perfectly describes the symptoms encountered in the European Patent Office, more so once led by a lot of French people (Battistelli and his friends)



  21. “Terror” Patent Office Bemoans Terror, Spreads Lies

    Response to some of the latest utterances from the European Patent Office, where patently untruthful claims have rapidly become the norm



  22. China Seems to be Using Patents to Push Foreign Companies Out of China, in the Same Way It Infamously Uses Censorship

    Chinese patent policies are harming competition from abroad, e.g. Japan and the US, and US patent policy is being shaped by its higher courts, albeit not yet effectively combating the element that's destroying productive companies (besieged by patent trolls)



  23. 22,000 Blog Posts

    A special number is reached again, marking another milestone for the site



  24. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  25. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  26. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  27. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  28. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  29. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  30. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts