EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.30.17

Deconstructing the Latest ‘Damage Control’ From Team UPC Amid Demise of Unitary Patent Pipe Dreams

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 11:19 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

UPC cartoon

Summary: A breakdown of responses to Britain’s exit from the EU (as per Article 50), with its mortal impact on the Unified Patent Court that was long envisioned and lobbied for by the patent microcosm

THIS WEEK was a dark week for EPO management. They spent a fortune promoting the UPC (even paying publishers!), which is now essentially dead. For those who don’t know why the UPC is a very terrible idea, a reader prepared the above cartoon to demonstrate what the UPC would accomplish if it ever became a reality (maybe reused graphics but source unknown/unspecified in this original tweet). It’s all about domination over European companies, not by European companies, certainly not the 99% of them that are not multinational giants (like Philips).

The response to the news was unsurprising. Will Team UPC acknowledge defeat and move on? Never! Their media, as well as their own blogs, will sing the same old tune, which is “real soon now!” (they have been saying this about the UPC for over half a decade now, even predating the buzzword “UPC”).

“It’s all about domination over European companies, not by European companies, certainly not the 99% of them that are not multinational giants (like Philips).”Here is one example of this. “UK’s ratification of UPC agreement delayed,” according to the headline. But no date is given. They mean called off. Until further notice at least. The word “delayed” is loaded as it implies that this will happen sooner or later. To quote this article (from the patent microcosm’s ‘news’ site): “On the eve of the UK government triggering Article 50 to kick off the Brexit negotiations, it is looking less likely that the country will ratify the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement before the start of EU talks.”

Or ever! Forget about it. The headline could easily be written to say something more honest, but the site has an agenda. It’s not Europe’s agenda but some law firms’ agenda.

As Benjamin Henrion put it, “the UPC camp will say UK still has 2 years to ratify.”

2 years. 22 years. What’s the difference anyway? It’s always “real soon now”. It’s always inevitable, unstoppable, just a matter of time or whatever. We have grown tired of these sick lobbying tactics.

“It’s not Europe’s agenda but some law firms’ agenda.”What does the mainstream British media say down in London? The Financial Times was already bribed by the EPO (another brilliant Battistelli policy) and then promoted the Unitary Patent (on numerous occasions even), so those within the patent microcosm who cite it must be desperate or simply ignorant about the financial strings. This one says “May ‘softens’ on role for the #CJEU post Brexit … a chink of light for the #UPC?”

No, nothing of that kind.

Dr. Glyn Moody quoted earlier today a tweet from the Financial Times that said “European Courts will have “no future role” in UK law after Brexit, insists David Davis…”

Moody continued by stating “so that means no flights between UK and EU, no? also, no #UPC…”

Here is another concerned voice saying “Certainty on UK’s #UPC ratification needed ASAP Wednesday briefing: Brexit – the next two years start now…”

“Dr. Glyn Moody quoted earlier today a tweet from the Financial Times that said “European Courts will have “no future role” in UK law after Brexit, insists David Davis…” “Needed for who? Team UPC? Uncertainty is needed. The UPC is not happening here and it's good for British firms. The last thing they would want is UPC certainty of any kind. The only such certainty is being given by Team UPC itself, as it continues to mislead the public about the situation. As the EPO paid a lot of money to all sorts of publications we must wonder if this new article too is some kind of ‘placement’. They’re just quoting Battistelli’s lies about the UPC (in the Canadian press). This is a fine example of poor journalism or perhaps PR money at work.

What does British press for lawyers say? Well, a prominent site went with “BREXIT: Triggering of article 50 makes UK’s ratification of new Unified Patent Court more uncertain, says expert” (more or less accurate). Here is the opening part:

Christopher Sharp of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said the triggering of article 50 of the Treaty on European Union by the UK government on Wednesday makes it less certain that the UK will formally ratify the UPC Agreement.

Sharp said many were surprised in November when the government announced that it intended to move forward with plans to ratify the UPC Agreement.

But that was Lucy, who has since then been fired or resigned. We wrote the following series about it at the time.

What does Battistelli's lapdog (IAM) say? Well, it links to the above article and says: “Think this is true, but government does seem to be pulling back on its previous no ECJ absolutism.”

“They are again spreading uncertainty and doubt about ECJ, probably as part of their longstanding lobbying endeavour.”No. See the above quote from/about David Davis himself. They are again spreading uncertainty and doubt about ECJ, probably as part of their longstanding lobbying endeavour.

“They won’t pull back,” an EPO insider told IAM, “in fact just the opposite will happen !”

Looking at Team UPC blogs and sites, it’s quite a parallel universe!

Marks & Clerk, for example, having repeatedly lied for UPC ratification purposes, is trying to sell services now. Well, only a fool would trust anything they say on the UPC given their track record. They now state that “[i]t is important to note that a unitary patent is not available if a European patent is granted before the Unitary Patent and UPC systems come into effect.”

“Looking at Team UPC blogs and sites, it’s quite a parallel universe!”What a loaded statement. We’re not even at the stage when the UPC even exists! They’ve already taken it one step ahead. How typical of them…

Here is another law firm trying to sell services around this news. “What is less certain is the fate of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC),” it says. “Both of these systems – currently predicted to come into force by the end of 2017 or start of 2018 – are currently only open to EU members. If the current timetable does not slip significantly, these are expected to come into force while the UK is still an EU member and therefore they will apply to the UK. What is less clear is whether the UK can remain a member of the Unitary Patent and UPC after leaving the EU. This is likely to be one of many issues on the table in the upcoming negotiations.”

Notice how they already shift the expected day to 2018. They just can’t stop changing their predictions all the time. Later this year they’ll say 2019, then 2020. So much for ‘legal advice’…

Moody spotted this passage from an article shared by Christopher Weber from Germany: “Kommt der Brexit, steht das gesamte neue europäische Patentsystem wieder auf der Kippe – noch bevor es überhaupt gestartet ist…”

A rough translation from German: “Comes the Brexit, is the whole new European patent system back on the brink – even before it is ever launched” (unedited, automated translation).

“Notice how they already shift the expected day to 2018. They just can’t stop changing their predictions all the time.”Yes, it’s a dead project.

Weber had said: “Maybe time again to point out what I said about the #UPC 2 days before the #brexit #Referendum [] We’ll what I said was more in the vein of: we could get up to 2 years delay + cost/benefit relation will change. [] I learned since then that at least big parts of the industry want to go ahead with UPC w/ or w/o UK.”

That’s a lie. Law firms (and big clients) are not “big parts of the industry”, though Weber insists that they are. A UPC-like regime would be good for patent trolls, but Weber just calls “trolls” people whom he does not agree with.

Henrion asked him, “big parts of the industry means large companies?”

Weber responded in a self-defeating fashion with “People from Bayer and Siemens said so at last year’s GRUR, so, yes. I have not heard to the contrary from any part of industry.”

“Law firms (and big clients) are not “big parts of the industry”, though Weber insists that they are.”Monsanto and Siemens is “big parts of the industry”? They’re more like patent bullies. Of course they would want the UPC! Easier litigation everywhere.

“Wake up and face reality,” the EPO insider then noted. “UPC is DEAD !”

Lies are abundant among Team UPC. In fact, they have become the norm. Consider what Withers & Rogers, for example, just published. It seems to be a law firm that patently lies. “Great for SMEs,” it said about the UPC. “Chance to leverage 25 country injunctions in a single action. Lower court fees.”

How many SMEs even operate in 25 countries? SMEs themselves have already refuted this lie and Henrion told the above firm, “trolls not SMEs.”

“Lies are abundant among Team UPC.”Maybe in the eyes of law firms, “small” companies that come to them make nothing at all excerpt lawsuits.

Anyway, the UPC certainly looks like history and it may take several years before any clear answers are available. Does this mean that the ‘Mafioso’ at the EPO will have an excuse to demand another extension of his term, going into his seventies in clear defiance (yet again) of the rules? It would not surprise us at all.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Patents Need to Exist Only to Pass Information Around and Keep Good Ideas Alive, Not to Feed Litigation Firms and Litigation 'Enthusiasts'

    The current situation or the status quo where legal professionals are advised not to even look at patents means that patents aren’t for “information” and “innovation” anymore; moreover, calling them “intellectual property rights” (or IPRs) is spreading a malicious lie



  2. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 21, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 21, 2019



  3. SUEPO Protest Tomorrow. All EPO Staff in Munich Ought to Attend and Prepare to Strike Too.

    Tomorrow’s planned protest should be a bridge towards a full strike, which takes more time to plan for and get authorisation for (because of increasingly strict restrictions)



  4. Looking for Explanations About Samsung's DeX and Other FOSS Initiatives Being Canned

    DeX was primarily a threat to the desktop/laptop monopoly of Microsoft, so its sudden abandonment — without even an explanation — continues to attract speculations



  5. EPO Will Need a Lot More Than Photo Ops and Hoax 'Studies' to Restore the Perception of Lawfulness

    Battistelli‘s illegal attacks on European Patent Office (EPO) judges have tarnished any impression that the EPO serves justice and the current regime torpedoes an assessment of these attacks; EPO workers understand that to follow guidelines from the management may be a breach of the EPC



  6. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  7. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  8. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  9. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  10. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  11. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  12. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  13. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  14. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  15. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  16. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  17. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  18. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  19. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  20. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  21. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  22. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  23. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  24. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  25. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  26. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  27. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  28. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  29. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  30. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts