EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.14.17

The Attacks of Patent Trolls as Outlined in the Media This Past Week

Posted in America, Asia, Europe, Patents at 2:13 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When a fossil of an ‘industry’ demands ‘protection’ money…

Organisms

Summary: An outline of some of the latest troll cases to be aware of and their consequences too (e.g. software patents being used to literally shut down entire programs)

THERE is no lack of stories about patent trolls. I spoke to one likely victim on the phone today for almost an hour. Patent trolls are not a US-only problem, but they often exploit patents granted by the USPTO because a lot of businesses operate in (if not based in) the US.

Today’s outline will be split for easier digestion. We probably won’t be covering EPO issues for a few days to come due to travel, but some time in the near future we are going to show that EPs too facilitate patent trolls, more so over time. Patent trolls are a growing problem in Germany, for instance, and definitely (in a very big way) in China.

Cloudflare

I often protest against Cloudflare, which I unfortunately have to depend on at work (many clients use it). Cloudflare and I are no friends, but now that Cloudflare is a victim of patent trolls it’s difficult to not have some sympathy or empathy. Yes, Cloudflare too — like many companies of its size — has become a victim of patent trolls with software patents of the “Internet” variant (like old ideas “over the Internet”). Found via this tweet was an article about it, showing that Blackbird is once again trying to destroy legitimate companies (we wrote about Blackbird before):

Cloudflare says it will go above and beyond to destroy what it claims is a uniquely dangerous patent troll.

The troll in question is Blackbird Technologies LLC, a law firm based in Boston, US. It has accused Cloudflare of ripping off a patent it owns on internet communications.

Crucially, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said the battle between his company and Blackbird is over more than just one infringement claim: Blackbird’s approach to poses a serious threat to other tech companies, and, we’re told, it must be stopped.

“They are a very dangerous new breed of patent troll different from what we have seen before,” Prince, himself a former lawyer, told The Register. “This is a perfect innovation killing machine.”

The original from Cloudflare says that “[o]n March 20th, Cloudflare received our first patent infringement claim: Blackbird Tech LLC v. Cloudflare, Inc. Today we’re filing our Answer to that claim in a federal court in Delaware. We have very strong arguments we will present in the litigation, mostly because the patent asserted against us does not have anything to do with our technology.”

We’ve long written about Blackbird; it’s a nasty, horrible patent troll. It needs to be purged. “Worse still,” Cloudflare explains, “Blackbird is a new, especially dangerous breed of patent troll. Like the dinosaur in the latest Jurassic Park movie, a synthetic combination of Tyrannosaurs and Velociraptor, Blackbird combines both a law firm and intellectual property {sic} rights holder into a single entity. In doing so, they remove legal fees from their cost structure and can bring lawsuits of potentially dubious merit without having to bear any meaningful cost. In other words, Blackbird’s new breed of entity is specifically designed to add leverage and amplify the already widely maligned problem of patent trolling.”

Good luck to Cloudflare and let’s hope that they invalidate this patent, which would otherwise be used against other innocent victims. Cloudflare might need to spend some money on this (it already fights against various sorts of censorship in court) and if it wins the case, the PR karma can help offset the losses (legal bills).

GoDaddy

GoDaddy has become a rather large Internet company and like most Internet companies GoDaddy is an attractive target for trolls. Yes, GoDaddy too is coming under software patent attacks from patent trolls. It was covered by The Register (same as above), which said:

Domain registrar and host GoDaddy has won its battle with a patent-holding company that had accused it of violating a handful of claims related to basic email functions.

Let’s hope GoDaddy fights back against this, even if this requires going to higher courts (more expensive).

Netflix

Netflix, like GoDaddy and Cloudflare, is a company that I strongly dislike for several different reasons, but now that it’s attacked by patent trolls I feel compelled to take its side. With software patents disguised as “cloud”, as is commonly the case these days, Netflix is vulnerable to such a lawsuit.

As this article put it, “using cloud computing to do business may get you sued by patent trolls in the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.” [via]

Notice the pattern. All the above are software patents. That’s just what patent trolls so habitually use.

Moom

Leaving aside those large companies that have reasonably deep pockets, watch what happens to the Moom developers. They don’t have deep pockets, so a lawsuit (or threat thereof) immediately kills the software. We have covered many such examples in the past, ranging from plugins and code samples to complete applications. Software patents can often doom an entire application. Sometimes the developers are not even allowed to speak about what happened (for fear of being sued for breaking the silence).

“We just had to remove Moom from sale due to a broad software patent,” wrote the developer. “Pissed doesn’t begin to describe my mood.”

The number of comments has increased considerably since we first saw it. “Software patents,” one person emphasised, are the culprit here. “Moneymakers for non creating people. Good luck! Hope it will be fixed soon!”

Here is the corresponding blog post about it:

Tonight we received notice that Moom is in violation of US patent number 8434019, Apparatus and method for positioning windows on a display. Yes, someone has patented positioning windows on a screen via a grid. Given we’ve been notified of a patent violation, we have no choice but to remove Moom from sale, effective immediately.

Honestly, we have no idea how to proceed here—the notice arrived at 8pm on a Friday evening, meaning it will be a few days until we can even speak to an attorney about our options, if any. We’re not a big company by any stretch, and certainly don’t have the resources for a patent fight.

Facebook

Facebook is a very malicious company, including on the patent front. But that does not mean that we should celebrate when patent trolls want to enrich themselves using Facebook, having already enriched themselves because Apple and Microsoft paid. As Reuters have just put it, “Patent firm Mirror Worlds targets Facebook in latest lawsuit” and here is a key part:

Patent licensing firm Mirror Worlds Technologies LLC on Tuesday sued Facebook Inc for infringing software patents Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp have already paid a combined $30 million to license.

The more money they receive, the hungrier they get.

Microsoft

Microsoft, in the mean time, patents creepy stuff [1, 2
3, 4] which reveals plans to spy on one’s meal, not just people. Incredible! Incredibly spooky. Maybe such patents will one day be passed to trolls; Microsoft loves passing patents to trolls.

Statistics

Numbers associated with trolls continue to be alarming. As this tweet put it the other day: “Of the 29 patent suits filed yesterday, 25 were filed by patent trolls — that’s 86%. It’s time to #FixPatents”

This is pretty normal. The proportion of patent lawsuits that are filed by trolls is very high.

What will it take to weed out the trolls? There is no secret formula.

When patent law firms dump patent trolls (which happens) there is this interesting situation which Patently-O remarked on a few days ago. It said: “I’ve discussed a few times this fight over whether a patent assertion entity should be required to pay full hourly fees, or anything, to a firm that dumped it after losing the case on summary judgment, when the client hired another firm, got the case reversed on appeal by paying hourly rates to the new firm, and later settled the case for significant money.”

The problem is, each time a law firm rejects such business (it does happen) the troll will turn to less ethical and potentially nastier firms.

See this new article from Mobile Mag. “Eighty percent of patents litigated by PAE’s are acquired from operating companies through bankruptcies,” it says. Here are some of the interesting figures:

The PAE or patent assertion entity problem is big and growing, posing a threat to startups and established companies alike, costing companies millions in defensive litigation fees and diverting money that would be better spent on innovation. However, unlike big companies with money to spend on litigation, PAE’s or “patent trolls” greatly affects startups and small entrepreneurs due to patents with supposedly questionable quality. More than 10,000 companies have been sued at least once by a patent trolls, and these PAE trolls file 84 percent of high-tech patent lawsuits a year. Over the past decade, there has been a 500% growth in patent troll lawsuits, and research from the Boston University School of Law found that PAE litigation results in $80 billion in lost wealth annually.

[...]

It’s also a reactive course of action. It protects the defendant company, but it is not the only way to combat the patent troll problem as a whole. Eighty percent of patents litigated by PAE’s are acquired from operating companies through bankruptcies, special funds, or even through a direct sale if a company is looking to boost its revenue. Companies, because of financial pressure or to recoup expenses upon folding, might sell off their patents or license the assertion rights to a PAE for a percentage of any money extracted. Cutting off this supply is one way to go about fighting PAE’s.

How can one defend oneself? It certainly has become rather hard.

“More than 10,000 companies” have experienced lawsuits from patent troll/s, according to another new report which says: [via]

More than 10,000 companies have been sued at least once by a patent troll, and patent trolls file 84 percent of high-tech patent lawsuits a year. Over the past decade, there has been a 500 percent growth in patent troll lawsuits, and research from the Boston University School of Law found that PAE litigation results in $80 billion in lost wealth annually.

See where the money goes and comes from? What is the use of that?

China Replaces US as Trolls’ Hub

We have recently been writing many articles about SIPO’s misguided policies, which are guaranteed to tax the whole Chinese industry for the sake of trolls and law firms. Yes, patent maximalism in China is now killing startups and companies in China, just as we predicted last year. Even IAM, which promotes this, cares to admit that by stating that “YouOn was a relatively late entrant to China’s billion dollar bike sharing market, but it hoped to be the first such company to go public. Now, the Jiangsu-based firm’s share float is on hold after an individual inventor’s patent suit and complaint to regulators caused a minor media storm. Bringing patent suits against companies about to go public is certainly not a new strategy, but the environment in China could make it a particularly effective one there.”

Thankfully, the political momentum in the US right now (and media framing) seems to be curbing or at least slowing down trolls. See this new article from lobbyists’ press. [via]

For a change, it gives a platform not to some lobbyists (it often spews out patent propaganda from patent politicians) but to “Austin Meyer is the owner and developer of X-Plane, a flight simulator based in South Carolina. Michael Skelps is the General Manager of Capstone Photography based in Connecticut. Eric Rosebrock is the developer of iDrumTech and other apps, and is based in Florida.”

To quote some portions:

As three entrepreneurs from South Carolina, Connecticut and Florida working in different lines of business, we have encountered a variety of stumbling blocks in starting our own companies. But one barrier in particular has challenged our abilities to thrive: abusive litigation from patent trolls.

We have seen firsthand how our broken patent system incentivizes patent trolls to target small businesses with frivolous and onerous litigation. Unlike entrepreneurs who strive to bring their innovations to better consumers’ lives – bringing jobs and other benefits to their local communities in the process – patent trolls do not contribute anything of value to society. Instead, they simply buy up vague, low-quality patents – many of which never should have been granted in the first place – and use them to launch patent infringement litigation against innovative businesses.

[...]

It’s time for Congress to once and for all close the loopholes that patent trolls exploit to target American businesses and to preserve our ability to challenge the low-quality patents wielded against us. By supporting the important gains that the courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office have started to make in cleaning up our broken system, as well as legislative reform efforts, members of Congress can have a real impact on the strength and vitality of the small businesses in their districts, states and around the country. Patent trolls impose a tax on innovation; remove this burden, and watch Main Street businesses thrive.

We predict that in the coming years the overall number as well as proportion of patent troll lawsuits in the US will decline, whereas in China everything will go up. Up litigation-wise! That’s not a desirable thing, unless one works in the patent ‘industry’ (a predator).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The EPO is Dying and Those Who Have Killed It Are Becoming Very Rich in the Process

    Following the footsteps of Ron Hovsepian at Novell, Battistelli at the EPO (along with Team Battistelli) may mean the end of the EPO as we know it (or the end altogether); one manager and a cabal of confidants make themselves obscenely rich by basically sacrificing the very organisation they were entrusted to serve



  2. Short: Just Keep Repeating the Lie (“Quality”) Until People Might Believe It

    Battistelli’s patent-printing bureau (EPO without quality control) keeps lying about the quality of patents by repeating the word “quality” a lot of times, including no less than twice in the summary alone



  3. Shelston IP Keeps Pressuring IP Australia to Allow Software Patents and Harm Software Development

    Shelston IP wants exactly the opposite of what's good for Australia; it just wants what's good for itself, yet it habitually pretends to speak for a productive industry (nothing could be further from the truth)



  4. Is Andy Ramer's Departure the End of Cantor Fitzgerald's Patent Trolls-Feeding Operations and Ambitions?

    The managing director of the 'IP' group at Cantor Fitzgerald is leaving, but it does not yet mean that patent trolls will be starved/deprived access to patents



  5. EPO Hoards Billions of Euros (Taken From the Public), Decreases Quality to Get More Money, Reduces Payments to Staff

    The EPO continues to collect money from everyone, distributes bogus/dubious patents that usher patent trolls into Europe (to cost European businesses billions in the long run), and staff of the EPO faces more cuts while EPO management swims in cash and perks



  6. Short: Calling Battistelli's Town (Where He Works) “Force for Innovation” to Justify the Funneling of EPO Funds to It

    How the EPO‘s management ‘explained’ (or sought to rationalise) to staff its opaque decision to send a multi-million, one-day ceremony to Battistelli’s own theatre only weeks before he leaves



  7. Short: EPO Bribes the Media and Then Brags About the Paid-for Outcome to Staff

    The EPO‘s systematic corruption of the media at the expense of EPO stakeholders — not to mention hiring of lawyers to bully media which exposes EPO corruption — in the EPO’s own words (amended by us)



  8. Short: EPO's “Working Party for Quality” is to Quality What the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea” is to Democracy

    To maintain the perception (illusion) that the EPO still cares about patent quality — and in order to disseminate this lie to EPO staff — a puff piece with the above heading/photograph was distributed to thousands of examiners in glossy paper form



  9. Short: This Spring's Message From the EPO's President (Corrected)

    A corrected preface from the Liar in Chief, the EPO's notoriously crooked and dishonest President



  10. Short: Highly Misleading and Unscientific Graphics From the EPO for an Illusion of Growth

    A look at the brainwash that EPO management is distributing to staff and what's wrong with it



  11. Short: EPO Explains to Examiners Why They Should and Apparently Can Grant Software Patents (in Spite of EPC)

    Whether it calls it "CII" or "ICT" or "Industry 4.0" or "4IR", the EPO's management continues to grant software patents and attempts to justify this to itself (and to staff)



  12. Links 21/4/2018: Linux 4.9.95, FFmpeg 4.0, OpenBSD Foundation 2018 Fundraising Campaign

    Links for the day



  13. As USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu Gives Three Months for Public Comments on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Software Patenting Impacted)

    Weeks after starting his job as head of the US patent office, to our regret but not to our surprise, Iancu asks whether to limit examiners' ability to reject abstract patent applications citing 35 U.S.C. § 101 (relates to Alice and Mayo)



  14. In Keith Raniere v Microsoft Both Sides Are Evil But for Different Reasons

    Billing for patent lawyers reveals an abusive strategy from Microsoft, which responded to abusive patent litigation (something which Microsoft too has done for well over a decade)



  15. Links 20/4/2018: Atom 1.26, MySQL 8.0

    Links for the day



  16. Links 19/4/2018: Mesa 17.3.9 and 18.0.1, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Flidas, Elections for openSUSE Board

    Links for the day



  17. The Patent Microcosm, Patent Trolls and Their Pressure Groups Incite a USPTO Director Against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Section 101/Alice

    As one might expect, the patent extremists continue their witch-hunt and constant manipulation of USPTO officials, whom they hope to compel to become patent extremists themselves (otherwise those officials are defamed, typically until they're fired or decide to resign)



  18. Microsoft's Lobbying for FRAND Pays Off as Microsoft-Connected Patent Troll Conversant (Formerly MOSAID) Goes After Android OEMs in Europe

    The FRAND (or SEP) lobby seems to have caused a lot of monopolistic patent lawsuits; this mostly affects Linux-powered platforms such as Android, Tizen and webOS and there are new legal actions from Microsoft-connected patent trolls



  19. To Understand Why People Say That Lawyers are Liars Look No Further Than Misleading Promotion of Software Patents

    Some of the latest misleading claims from the patent microcosm, which is only interested in lots and lots of patents (its bread and butter is monopolies after all) irrespective of their merit, quality, and desirability



  20. When News About the EPO is Dominated by Sponsored 'Reports' and Press Releases Because Publishers Are Afraid of (or Bribed by) the EPO

    The lack of curiosity and genuine journalism in Europe may mean that serious abuses (if not corruption) will go unreported



  21. The Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Complain That They Are Understaffed, Not Just Lacking the Independence They Depend on

    The Boards of Appeal have released a report and once again they openly complain that they're unable to do their job properly, i.e. patent quality cannot be assured



  22. Links 18/4/2018: New Fedora 27 ISOs, Nextcloud Wins German Government Contract

    Links for the day



  23. Guest Post: Responding to Your Recent Posting “The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable”

    In France, where Battistelli does not enjoy diplomatic immunity, he can be held accountable like his "padrone" recently was



  24. The EPO in 2018: Partnering With Saudi Arabia and Cambodia (With Zero European Patents)

    The EPO's status in the world has declined to the point where former French colonies and countries with zero European Patents are hailed as "success stories" for Battistelli



  25. For Samsung and Apple the Biggest Threat Has Become Patent Trolls and Aggressors in China and the Eastern District of Texas, Not Each Other

    The latest stories about two of the world's largest phone OEMs, both of which find themselves subjected to a heavy barrage of patent lawsuits and even embargoes; Samsung has meanwhile obtained an antisuit injunction against Huawei



  26. The EPO Continues to Lie About Patent Quality Whilst Openly Promoting Software Patents, Even Outside Europe

    EPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it and software patents are openly being promoted/advocatedEPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it (the article above is new) and software patents are openly being promoted/advocated



  27. SCOTUS on WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Almost Done; Will Oil States Decision Affirm the PTAB's Quality Assurance (IPRs) Soon?

    Ahead of WesternGeco and Oil States, following oral proceedings, it's expected that the highest court in the United States will deliver more blows to patent maximalism



  28. Links 17/4/2018: Linux 5.x Plans and Microsoft's 'Embrace'

    Links for the day



  29. The European Patent Office (EPO) Grants Patents in Error, Insiders Are Complaining That It's the Management's Fault

    The EPO has languished to the point where patents are granted in error, examiners aren't happy, and the resultant chaos benefits no-one but lawyers and patent trolls



  30. The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable

    With only one in seven EPO stakeholders believing that Battistelli's pick (António Campinos) will turn things around for the better, it certainly does not seem like people are happy and there's no real hope that Battistelli will ever be held accountable for his abuses after his immunity expires


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts