EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.15.17

European Commission Betrays the Public by Promoting Software Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Software patents named

Summary: Software patents named by the European Commission as a given rather than challenged in line with everything that the Parliament, EPC, and European public generally insist on

THE EPO has gone way too far with patent scope. It threatens Europe as a whole, for reasons we’ll show in the coming days (in relation to the US where patent scope is belatedly being narrowed).

“Sadly, however, the European Commission has become part of the problem.”The EPO recently dropped the guillotine on a lot of patents pertaining to plants and seeds, but it ought to go further with a drop of software patents too, as per the directive, the rules and so on. There are many articles these days about the EPO’s decision to eliminate patents in bulk, notably patents on life. Publications are writing about it not just in English but also in French, in German and so on. (via [1, 2]).

Why stop there? As we put it a few days ago, "The EPO Should Throw Away All Software Patents in the Same Way It Threw Away Patents on Plants and Animals" (as per input/instructions from politicians).

“…Elżbieta Bieńkowska from the Commission cares more about the UPC (Trojan horse for software patents) than about justice…”Sadly, however, the European Commission has become part of the problem. As we showed earlier this month, Elżbieta Bieńkowska from the Commission cares more about the UPC (Trojan horse for software patents) than about justice, and the FFII’s founder wrote yesterday that the “European Commission [is] promoting “Responsible Innovation” via software patents” (via the FFII’s president).

To quote what he wrote:

The pattern of promoting software patentability is similar to that of asylum law (e.g. the principle of non-refoulement). There is an agenda that must be followed, beyond discussion, backed by top level judges. Studies must somehow legitimate it, at least in their introductory part or in the executive summary. Discussion about the fundamental issues is systematically evaded. Instead you do have pointless discussions about how to identify the real invention or the real refugee. If you dig down deeper, however, you find that the studies do provide answers to the fundamental question of effects of the touted policy vs the unthinkable alternative, and even ones that are quite devastating to the touted solution. Since it is difficult to completely suppress the truth, those who order the study are satisfied with an executive summary that can be served to fool the public with help of willing journalists who just copy and paste from press releases.

“Responsible Innovation” is the latest catchphrase apparently.

As someone put it: “Innovation killer! This is where a phrase or line of code can be copyrighted and making logical programming within a language, a minefield.”

“Furthermore,” it says in a new report, “we also consider patents on computer-implemented inventions (CII)…”

“What on Earth are they doing and what hope is there that the Commission will not stab software developers in their backs?”Then there’s this: “When the open source and open are applied to the patent system” (FOSS is not compatible with software patents because of its distribution paradigm).

Note at the bottom: “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 731940…”

What on Earth are they doing and what hope is there that the Commission will not stab software developers in their backs? They have done this for ages (e.g. with FRAND, discrimination in procurement and so on). We’ve already given many examples where European software developers — including Free software developers — directly suffered from such patents. Does the Commission listen to anyone but huge corporations that are often multinationals rather than European corporations?

As Patently-O incidentally put it yesterday, in some areas “time-to-market has become shorter, and, likewise, product life cycles have become shorter.”

“Why is the Commission — like the EPO — besieging the software industry?”This is one of the many reasons software patents are unsuitable. Patently-O adds: “Competent practitioners should consider several things. One is to recognize that diligent prosecution is becoming more important for clients. Another is that examining whether to discuss with clients the use of Track One, PPH, or the pilot program (or the program — forget its name — that allows for accelerated examination when there’s an older inventor named).”

It doesn’t matter how quickly patents are granted (infringement penalties aren’t calculated since the time of grant); the very concept of patents on algorithms is obscene. Even the US is moving away from that grave mistake. Why is the Commission — like the EPO — besieging the software industry?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Free as in Free Speech (Restrictions May Apply)

    When limits of speech are not safety-related rules but political correctness or conformism



  2. There Won't be Patent Justice Until Patent Trolling Becomes Completely and Totally Extinct

    SLAPP-like behaviour and extortion/blackmail tactics using patent monopolies are a stain on the patent system; it's time to adopt measures to stop these things once and for all, bearing in mind they're inherently antithetical to the goal/s of the patent system and therefore discourage public support for this whole system



  3. EPO Staff Union and Staff Representatives Ought to Demand EPO Stops Bullying Publishers and Censoring Their Sites

    An often neglected if not forgotten aspect of EPO tyranny is the war on information itself; EPO management continues to show hostility towards journalism and disdain for true information



  4. Bribes, Lies, Fundamental Violations of the Law and Cover-Up: This is Today's European Patent Office

    It has gotten extremely difficult to hold the conspirators accountable for turning Europe’s patent office into a ‘printing machine’ of the litigation industry and amassing vast amounts of money (to be passed to private, for-profit companies)



  5. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Lost Almost Half (3 Out of 8) Board Members in Only One Month

    As the old saying goes, a picture (or screenshot) is worth a thousand words



  6. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 16, 2019



  7. Startpage and System1 Abuse Your Privacy Under the Guise of 'Privacy One Group'

    Startpage has sold out and may have also sold data it retained about its users to a privacy-hostile company whose entire business model is surveillance



  8. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  9. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  10. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  11. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  12. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  13. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  14. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  15. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  16. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  17. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  18. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  19. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  20. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  21. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  22. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything



  23. As Expected, the Bill Gates Propaganda Machine is Trying to Throw/Put Everyone off the Scent of Jeffery Epstein's 'Incestuous' Ties With Gates

    Media ownership up on display; it's amplifying false claims for a whole month, whereas truth/correct information gets buried before a weekend is over



  24. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 14, 2019



  25. [ES] El Kernel de Linux está introduciendo Open Source Privative Software

    Linux, el kernel, continúa su trayectoria o el camino hacia convertirse en software propietario de código abierto (OSPS).



  26. Linux Foundation Board Meeting

    More sponsored keynotes and tweets — like more sponsored articles (or “media partners”) — aren’t what the Linux Foundation really needs



  27. Links 14/10/2019: Linux 5.4 RC3, POCL 1.4, Python 3.8.0

    Links for the day



  28. This Week Techrights Crosses 26,000 Posts Milestone, 3 Weeks Before Turning 13 (2,000+ Posts/Year)

    A self-congratulatory post about another year that's passed (without breaks from publishing) and another milestone associated with posting volume



  29. No Calls to "Remove Gates" From the Board (Over a Real Scandal/Crime), Only to "Remove Stallman" (Over Phony Distraction From the Former)

    Jeffrey Epstein's connections to Bill Gates extend well beyond Gates himself; other people inside Microsoft are closely involved as well, so Microsoft might want to cut ties with its co-founder before it becomes a very major mess



  30. “The Stupidest [Patent/Tax] Policy Ever”

    It’s pretty clear that today’s European patent system has been tilted grossly in favour of super-rich monopolists and their facilitators (overzealous law firms and ‘creative’ accountants) as opposed to scientists


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts