EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.15.17

European Commission Betrays the Public by Promoting Software Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Software patents named

Summary: Software patents named by the European Commission as a given rather than challenged in line with everything that the Parliament, EPC, and European public generally insist on

THE EPO has gone way too far with patent scope. It threatens Europe as a whole, for reasons we’ll show in the coming days (in relation to the US where patent scope is belatedly being narrowed).

“Sadly, however, the European Commission has become part of the problem.”The EPO recently dropped the guillotine on a lot of patents pertaining to plants and seeds, but it ought to go further with a drop of software patents too, as per the directive, the rules and so on. There are many articles these days about the EPO’s decision to eliminate patents in bulk, notably patents on life. Publications are writing about it not just in English but also in French, in German and so on. (via [1, 2]).

Why stop there? As we put it a few days ago, "The EPO Should Throw Away All Software Patents in the Same Way It Threw Away Patents on Plants and Animals" (as per input/instructions from politicians).

“…Elżbieta Bieńkowska from the Commission cares more about the UPC (Trojan horse for software patents) than about justice…”Sadly, however, the European Commission has become part of the problem. As we showed earlier this month, Elżbieta Bieńkowska from the Commission cares more about the UPC (Trojan horse for software patents) than about justice, and the FFII’s founder wrote yesterday that the “European Commission [is] promoting “Responsible Innovation” via software patents” (via the FFII’s president).

To quote what he wrote:

The pattern of promoting software patentability is similar to that of asylum law (e.g. the principle of non-refoulement). There is an agenda that must be followed, beyond discussion, backed by top level judges. Studies must somehow legitimate it, at least in their introductory part or in the executive summary. Discussion about the fundamental issues is systematically evaded. Instead you do have pointless discussions about how to identify the real invention or the real refugee. If you dig down deeper, however, you find that the studies do provide answers to the fundamental question of effects of the touted policy vs the unthinkable alternative, and even ones that are quite devastating to the touted solution. Since it is difficult to completely suppress the truth, those who order the study are satisfied with an executive summary that can be served to fool the public with help of willing journalists who just copy and paste from press releases.

“Responsible Innovation” is the latest catchphrase apparently.

As someone put it: “Innovation killer! This is where a phrase or line of code can be copyrighted and making logical programming within a language, a minefield.”

“Furthermore,” it says in a new report, “we also consider patents on computer-implemented inventions (CII)…”

“What on Earth are they doing and what hope is there that the Commission will not stab software developers in their backs?”Then there’s this: “When the open source and open are applied to the patent system” (FOSS is not compatible with software patents because of its distribution paradigm).

Note at the bottom: “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 731940…”

What on Earth are they doing and what hope is there that the Commission will not stab software developers in their backs? They have done this for ages (e.g. with FRAND, discrimination in procurement and so on). We’ve already given many examples where European software developers — including Free software developers — directly suffered from such patents. Does the Commission listen to anyone but huge corporations that are often multinationals rather than European corporations?

As Patently-O incidentally put it yesterday, in some areas “time-to-market has become shorter, and, likewise, product life cycles have become shorter.”

“Why is the Commission — like the EPO — besieging the software industry?”This is one of the many reasons software patents are unsuitable. Patently-O adds: “Competent practitioners should consider several things. One is to recognize that diligent prosecution is becoming more important for clients. Another is that examining whether to discuss with clients the use of Track One, PPH, or the pilot program (or the program — forget its name — that allows for accelerated examination when there’s an older inventor named).”

It doesn’t matter how quickly patents are granted (infringement penalties aren’t calculated since the time of grant); the very concept of patents on algorithms is obscene. Even the US is moving away from that grave mistake. Why is the Commission — like the EPO — besieging the software industry?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Free Software Tackles Political Issues. Political Tactics Are Also Being Weaponised Against Free Software.

    Divide-and-rule tactics seem to have been exploited to weaken collaborative work on Free/libre software; the response to these tactics needs to start with realisation that this is going on (even if it's done in a somewhat clandestine nature)



  2. Offence and Racism

    o those in positions of power and privilege (financial) you are controllable by guilt; dividing us and causing us to feel guilt and fear (over potential offence) is a powerful social control mechanism and pretext for dismissal, censorship, humiliation



  3. Links 3/7/2020: TrueNAS 12 Beta 1, Librem 13 Product Line

    Links for the day



  4. [Humour] European Patents Only Useful Outside the Legal Framework?

    Patents that aren't valid in the eyes of courts would best serve patent trolls that settle out of courts, en masse



  5. Microsoft's Share in Web Servers Rapidly Falls to Just 4.5% (Falling More Than 5% in a Single Month)

    Microsoft's share as measured at Netcraft (de facto authority in this area) is rapidly declining; expect IIS to go the way of the dodo some time in the coming years



  6. The Lock-downs Are Over and Still Zero Media Coverage About EPO Scandals and Corruption

    The appalling state of journalism in Europe (and to some extent in the world at large) means that the EPO's management can get away with all sorts of horrible crimes and fraud; the silencing of the media is, in its own right, quite scandalous



  7. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, July 02, 2020



  8. “Microsoft's Deadly Love” by Alessandro Ebersol (Agent Smith)

    Full credit goes to PCLOS Magazine for publishing this good piece, which we’re reproducing



  9. Links 2/7/2020: Microsoft Partner Says GNU/Linux Share in Desktops/Laptops at 4% Even After Lock-downs, OpenSUSE Leap 15.2 and Mageia 8 Alpha 1 Released

    Links for the day



  10. Why People Should Never Ever Use DuckDuckGo

    DuckDuckGo is another privacy abuser in disguise; the above forum thread enumerates key reasons



  11. After 2 Years and 2 Days António Campinos is a Perfect Leader, Fostering EPO Abuses While Smiling

    EPO corruption persists, but this time the corruption enjoys better marketing/PR and complicit (or at best silent) media



  12. [Humour] As If Monopolies for Life Will Save People's Lives...

    The mentality of monopoly or the mindset of patent maximalism has been quick to exploit the deaths of half a million



  13. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, July 01, 2020



  14. IBM-Funded FSF Censors Itself on Software Patents

    Donald Robertson’s article bemoaning and openly condemning the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) over software patents, which it illegally grants in some cases, was modified a week later; and why? One can only guess… (but remember that the FSF’s foremost sponsor is lobbying against 35 U.S.C. § 101 and for software patents)



  15. [Humour/Meme] Remember That As Recently as Last Year Microsoft Was Still Shaking Down and Even Suing Companies Over 'Linux Patent Infringement'

    There's no 'new Microsoft' except a (better at) lying Microsoft; its covert actions tell us a lot about its ongoing hatred of GNU/Linux, which it is assaulting in new and more sophisticated ways



  16. Contrary to Common Misconceptions, Free Software is More 'Corporate' or More 'Enterprise-Grade' Than Proprietary Abandonware (All Proprietary Software Will Die)

    Free software can leverage the superficial and bland boardroom lingo/slang to promote itself; it would definitely harm or dilute/weaken the terms which proprietary software giants like to leverage against us



  17. Social Control Media Will Not Exist One Day

    Digital obsolescence and Internet bitrot — that’s what Social Control Media is really good for; as many Google+ ‘users’ (useds) found out, they’re just being ‘farmed’ for their ‘content’, which is neither valuable nor resilient (definitely of no value to Google)



  18. What Freedom of Software Actually Means to Us

    Liberty or libre (freedom) is about more than brands or personalities, as names or institutions or individuals can change or completely perish; but concepts outlast superficialities



  19. [Humour] Thinking Beyond Just the Linux Brand

    We're supposed to believe that because "Linux" is dominant we finally have freedom; but almost all the very big companies that are using GNU/Linux leverage it for freedom-hostile purposes and keep about 99% of their code secret from us, so the fight for software freedom must go on



  20. Corporate Media Blames 'China' and 'Open Source' for Back Doors in Microsoft's Intentionally Flawed Proprietary Software That's Causing Chaos

    'Red Scare' tactics are being used to divert attention away from Microsoft's incompetence and conspiracy with the NSA (to put back doors in everything, essentially making all software inherently vulnerable, by design)



  21. Microsoft Has Infiltrated Authorities and/or Their Consultation Processes

    In the European Union, the United States and just about everywhere else in the world one can find Microsoft officials replacing public officials, as if the decision-making too has been outsourced to the "Good Folks" from Microsoft



  22. Links 1/7/2020: Tails 4.8, Serpent OS

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 30, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, June 30, 2020



  24. EPO Management Celebrates the Lowering of Patent Quality While Granting Invalid Patents (IPs) Instead of European Patents (EPs)

    Europe's most autocratic institution continues to cheat and lie to everybody; even twice in one day, together with... the Communist Party of China (through CNIPA)



  25. Links 30/6/2020: OpenSUSE Leap 15.2, 4MLinux 34.0 Beta and IPFire 2.25 - Core Update 146

    Links for the day



  26. [Humour] There's Always a Way... (to Grant Patents on Almost Anything)

    The referral from European Patent Office (EPO) President António Campinos leaves the door open to patents on life, provided one paints those as uniquely clever, e.g. GMO (same tricks for software patents in Europe with “Hey Hi” — an overblown buzz wave)



  27. Crocodiles Can Only Ever Fake Empathy

    Greenwashing, pinkwashing, openwashing and abduction of various authentic civil rights movements (centered around gender, race, and sometimes economic issues) is very easy and cheap relative to the depths of corporate pockets; the problem is, those things help distract the 'masses' from objectively immoral and universally unacceptable acts



  28. [Humour/Meme] History in the Making or History Being Rewritten?

    he idea that history can just totally eliminate particular people and particular views overlooks the very nature of historical studies; banning words impedes the telling of history itself and society cannot tackle the underlying issues without talking about them



  29. A Lot of Things Are Offensive to Someone and Appeasing the Easily Offended is an Endless Adventure That Can Offend Free Speech Ideals

    Free speech may be the main casualty of the recent flamewars, which were initially rationalised as ethics-driven and nowadays boil down to speech police



  30. Feeling Vindicated About the Harms of Social Control Media Being Widely Recognised

    The cleansing of social control media sites reinforces our long-held views about social control media in general


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts